South Slavic Discourse Particles
Editors
Discourse particles, discourse markers and pragmatic markers refer to phenomena that linguists have begun to probe only since the mid-1980s. Long-ignored in traditional linguistics and textbook grammars, and still relegated to marginal status in South Slavic, these linguistic phenomena have emerged as invaluable devices for cutting-edge theories of the semantics/pragmatics interface. This book, which is a pioneering study in such linguistic phenomena in South Slavic languages, is also among the first of its kind for a related group of languages. It builds on the recent findings of some of the most influential linguistically-oriented theories, such as Relevance Theory, Argumentation Theory and coherence-based approaches to explain the meaning and use of certain discourse/pragmatic particles/markers in Bulgarian, Macedonian, Serbian, Bosnian, Croatian and Slovene. These particles/markers are part of the contemporary and historical lexicons of the South Slavic languages, varying across regions and time, but also differing in origin. This book, which draws from naturally occurring data, written media and constructed examples, aims at a wider audience including scholars working in semantics/pragmatics and Slavic languages, and applied specialists interested in this area of research. The authors hope that this book will be conceived as a starting point for a structured inquiry into the flourishing field of discourse particles in South Slavic.
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 197] 2010. ix, 166 pp.
Publishing status:
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
Preface | pp. vii–viii
-
Acknowledgement and dedication | p. ix
-
1. South Slavic discourse particles: IntroductionMirjana Mišković-Luković and Mirjana N. Dedaić | pp. 1–22
-
2. Ama, a Bulgarian adversative connectiveGrace E. Fielder | pp. 23–44
-
3. Kamo, an attitudinal pragmatic marker of MacedonianAlexandre Sévigny | pp. 45–63
-
4. Markers of conceptual adjustment: Serbian baš and kaoMirjana Mišković-Luković | pp. 65–89
-
5. The Bosnian discourse particle onoAida Premilovac | pp. 91–108
-
6. Reformulating and concluding: The pragmatics of the Croatian discourse marker dakleMirjana N. Dedaić | pp. 109–131
-
7. Pa, a modifier of connectives: An argumentative analysisIgor Ž. Žagar | pp. 133–162
-
Note on contributors | pp. 163–164
-
Index | pp. 165–166
“A most interesting volume which – by offering in-depth analyses of discourse particles from a group of languages that so far have hardly been studied from this point of view – constitutes a very welcome contribution to current knowledge of the role that such particles play in communication.”
Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen, Professor of French Language and Linguistics, The University of Manchester
“The book is a valuable contribution to the phenomenon of particles in the South Slavic languages and a good starting point to further definitions of the phenomena in this field. All the articles are backed with sufficient material analysed for the purpose. Once again the value of the particle as a contextually bound word is pointed out. Besides the good study within the theoretic frame the authors are adopting, on one hand the relevance theoretic approach, on the other argumentative within the Ducrot's principle of polyphony, the impact is seen beyond the theory in question. [...] Hopefully the book will yield to encourage further particle research within the scope of pragmatics of those languages.”
Mocja Schlamberger Brezar, University of Ljubljana, in Pragmatics Vol. 21:1 (2011)
“The volume is a valuable reference for anyone studying discourse markers, especially those in South Slavic languages.”
Magdalena Nigoevic, University of Split, Croatia, on Linguist List Vol. 22-1413 (2011)
“The collection of studies in South Slavic discourse particles based on authoritative data is not only a very valuable contribution to Slavic Linguistics but also to the field of particle analysis and pragmatics as a whole. If it is true that discourse particles are procedural in nature guiding the interpretation process then it can be expected that markers with similar procedural functions will be found in diverse languages of the world.
Moreover, by choosing mainly two pragmatic models, the Relevance Theory of Sperber and Wilson and Ducrot and Anscrombre’s Theory of Argumentation and Topoi, the authors pay attention to various aspects of particle analysis (cognitive, communicative and argumentative) in a very successful way. It becomes more and more apparent that a single aspect for the analysis of particles and a single scope of application only covers part of the communicator’s intention of the communicator. In fact the authors have shown that not only the scope of utterance but also the level of discourse is indeed important to recognise in particle analysis. This collection provides also insight into the historical development of the particles from conceptual phenomena to procedural particles in a remarkable way. Moreover, every paper pays attention to clarity, detail and richness of data display. This is a work no linguist interested in discourse particles and pragmatics should ignore.”
Moreover, by choosing mainly two pragmatic models, the Relevance Theory of Sperber and Wilson and Ducrot and Anscrombre’s Theory of Argumentation and Topoi, the authors pay attention to various aspects of particle analysis (cognitive, communicative and argumentative) in a very successful way. It becomes more and more apparent that a single aspect for the analysis of particles and a single scope of application only covers part of the communicator’s intention of the communicator. In fact the authors have shown that not only the scope of utterance but also the level of discourse is indeed important to recognise in particle analysis. This collection provides also insight into the historical development of the particles from conceptual phenomena to procedural particles in a remarkable way. Moreover, every paper pays attention to clarity, detail and richness of data display. This is a work no linguist interested in discourse particles and pragmatics should ignore.”
Regina Blass, Professor of Linguistics and Translation Studies, Africa International University (AIU)
“This well-conceived and highly informative volume should be of particular interest to specialists in both discourse analysis and Slavic linguistics. Many readers will also benefit from the short survey of the sociolinguistic situation of the South Slavic languages which the book includes.”
Ranko Bugarski, Professor of English and General Linguistics, University of Belgrade
“The book South Slavic Discourse Particles, as a pioneering collection of studies on discourse particles in South Slavic languages, represents a significant contribution in terms of centering the attention to a topic which seems to be marginal in the traditional study of South Slavic philology. [...] There are many reasons why the book South Slavic Discourse Particles represents a significant contribution to studying discourse markers. Not only does it include a detailed introductory chapter which tackles the burning issues regarding terminology, as well as other disputable issues related to this relatively new linguistic area, but it also presents articles which deal with particular discourse markers in respective languages and clearly indicate that the South Slavic languages abound these means of communication. [...] The book South Slavic Discourse Particles highlights the importance and the potential of the area it deals with, and lays a firm foundation for further research in the field of South Slavic philology.”
Virna Karlić, in Prikazi ocjene, SL 71 (2011)
“The studies in this volume provide fruitful extensions to our knowledge on the numerous functions of discourse particles with respect to text, discourse, argumentation and cognitive context. The volume thus contributes to our understanding of the challenges for theory development in the field.”
Kerstin Fischer, Associate Professor, University of Southern Denmark
“The volume is a valuable reference for anyone studying discourse markers, especially those in South Slavic languages. Some contributors approached their essay through a systematic theory-supported analysis, while others are more theoretical and argumentative, hence presupposing that the reader has some theoretical knowledge. Therefore, the target audience is graduate students and researchers who may use the book as a tool to identify possible implications for further research and challenges for carrying out new studies.”
Magdalena Nigoevic, University of Split, Croatia, on Linguist List 22.1413
“This much needed book in the field of discourse analysis comprises the results of research on discourse particles, which has been increasingly interesting for linguists in the past few decades. The reason for choosing South Slavic languages as the sources of material and field of investigation rests in their abundance of discourse particles. [...] This book, whose contributions follow the dialectal continuum of South Slavic languages from South to North, thus covering an impressive number of languages, is an extremely valuable resource for everyone interested in discourse particles as it provides authoritative data on the semantic and pragmatic aspects of a number of discourse particles.”
Biljana Radić Bojanić, University of Novi Sad, on elanguage.net, June 2011
“The South Slavic languages haven't always commanded the attention from linguists in general that they deserve. Moreover, discourse elements constitute a neglected topic within these languages. This well-conceived collection of interesting studies therefore enriches at once these two important areas of scholarly concern.”
Brian D. Joseph, Distinguished University Professor of Linguistics, and The Kenneth E. Naylor Professor of South Slavic Linguistics, The Ohio State University
“This is a fascinating collection of studies about current spoken usage in each of the modern South Slavic languages. The level of theoretical discussion is sophisticated, yet all of the articles are accessible to anyone interested in language. Non-specialists will be particularly intrigued to see the ways in which these small but ubiquitous particles form a systematic part of the speech code of Bulgarians, Macedonians, Bosnians, Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes.”
Professor Ronelle Alexander, Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures, University of California, Berkeley
“The articles in this collection represent path-breaking studies in Slavic linguistics and in pragmatics. South Slavic discourse particles are arguably the most intractable elements for both analysis and translation, and the studies in this volume greatly advance our understanding of these vital phenomena.”
Victor Friedman,
Andrew W. Mellon Professor, Slavic Languages and Literatures, University of Chicago
“
South Slavic Discourse Particles offers an impressive empirical coverage of South Slavic discourse markers, and lays down the foundations for future work in this area. The book is a great resource for Slavists, for linguists working within the relevance theory framework, and for cognitive linguists more generally.”
Anastasia Smirnova, Tufts University, in Slavic and East European Journal, Vol. 57.3.2013
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Halupka-Rešetar, Sabina & Biljana Radic-Bojanic
2022. The discourse marker znači in Serbian. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 785 ff.
Endresen, Anna, Laura A. Janda, Robert Reynolds & Francis M. Tyers
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Main BIC Subject
CFG: Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis
Main BISAC Subject
LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General