Telecinematic Discourse
Approaches to the language of films and television series
Editors
Roberta Piazza | University of Sussex
Monika Bednarek | University of SydneyFabio Rossi | University of Messina
This cutting-edge collection of articles provides the first organised reflection on the language of films and television series across British, American and Italian cultures. The volume suggests new directions for research and applications, and offers a variety of methodologies and perspectives on the complexities of "telecinematic" discourse – a hitherto virtually unexplored area of investigation in linguistics.
The papers share a common vision of the big and small screen: the belief that the discourses of film and television offer a re-presentation of our world. As such, telecinematic texts reorganise and recreate language (together with time and space) in their own way and with respect to specific socio-cultural conventions and media logic. The volume provides a multifaceted, yet coherent insight into the diegetic – as it revolves around narrative – as opposed to mimetic – as referring to other non-narrative and non-fictional genres – discourses of fictional media. The collection will be of interest to researchers, tutors and students in pragmatics, stylistics, discourse analysis, corpus linguistics, communication studies and related fields.
The papers share a common vision of the big and small screen: the belief that the discourses of film and television offer a re-presentation of our world. As such, telecinematic texts reorganise and recreate language (together with time and space) in their own way and with respect to specific socio-cultural conventions and media logic. The volume provides a multifaceted, yet coherent insight into the diegetic – as it revolves around narrative – as opposed to mimetic – as referring to other non-narrative and non-fictional genres – discourses of fictional media. The collection will be of interest to researchers, tutors and students in pragmatics, stylistics, discourse analysis, corpus linguistics, communication studies and related fields.
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 211] 2011. xi, 315 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
Contributors | pp. ix–xi
-
Chapter 1. Introduction: Analysing telecinematic discourseRoberta Piazza, Monika Bednarek and Fabio Rossi | pp. 1–17
-
Part I. Cinematic discourse
-
Chapter 2. Discourse analysis of film dialogues: Italian comedy between linguistic realism and pragmatic non-realismFabio Rossi | pp. 21–46
-
Chapter 3. Using film as linguistic specimen: Theoretical and practical issuesMichael Alvarez-Pereyre | pp. 47–67
-
Chapter 4. Multimodal realisations of mind style in Enduring LoveRocío Montoro | pp. 69–83
-
Chapter 5. Pragmatic deviance in realist horror films: A look at films by Argento and FincherRoberta Piazza | pp. 85–104
-
Chapter 6. Emotion and empathy in Martin Scorsese’s Goodfellas: A case study of the “funny guy” sceneDerek Bousfield and Dan McIntyre | pp. 105–123
-
Chapter 7. Quantifying the emotional tone of James Bond films: An application of the Dictionary of Affect in LanguageRose Ann Kozinski | pp. 125–139
-
Chapter 8. Structure and function in the generic staging of film trailers: A multimodal analysisCarmen Daniela Maier | pp. 141–158
-
Part II. Televisual discourse
-
Chapter 9. “I don’t know what they’re saying half the time, but I’m hooked on the series”: Incomprehensible dialogue and integrated multimodal characterisation in The WireMichael Toolan | pp. 161–183
-
Chapter 10. The stability of the televisual character: A corpus stylistic case studyMonika Bednarek | pp. 185–204
-
Chapter 11. Star Trek: Voyager’s Seven of Nine: A case study of language and character in a televisual textSusan Mandala | pp. 205–223
-
Chapter 12. Relationship impression formation: How viewers know people on the screen are friendsClaudia Bubel | pp. 225–247
-
Chapter 13. Genre, performance and Sex and the CityBrian Paltridge, Angela Thomas and Jianxin Liu | pp. 249–262
-
Chapter 14. Bumcivilian: Systemic aspects of humorous communication in comediesAlexander Brock | pp. 263–280
-
-
List of tables | p. 303
-
List of figures | p. 305
-
Index of films and TV series | pp. 307–309
-
Index
“The articles in this collection consist mainly of in-depth case studies of particular movies or television series, which offer valuable insights in the budding study of telecinematic discourse. The contents are based on several different perspectives and methodologies (e.g. pragmatics, discourse analysis, corpus linguistics, and stylistics) and most authors not only base their analysis on purely linguistic aspects but also use a multimodal approach to interpreting their data. Overall, this collection is a first step in the systematic analysis of telecinematic discourse and illustrates the need for further research in this field.”
Sofia Rüdiger, University of Bayreuth, on E-Language, dated 20/07/12
“This volume presents a well-thought out and balanced selection of interrelated articles showing the endless possibilities for further research in this field. Indeed, one of the strengths of this volume is that its contributions feature many approaches which do not exclusively focus on the verbal channel (i.e. by taking a multimodal stance, examining the types of frames, gestures, sounds) and which stimulate cross-disciplinary analyses. [...] I would recommend this volume to scholars interested in disciplines such as Pragmatics, Corpus Linguistics, Stylistics, Film Studies and Cultural Studies.”
Simon Labate, University of Namur & FNRS, in English Text Construction Vol. 5:2 (2012)
“
Telecinematic Discourse, on the whole, is groundbreaking for contemporary multimodal discourse analysis, especially in its various methodological approaches and analytical perspectives on languages of films and television series. The collection of articles explores new areas and directions for discourse analysis. [...] One noteworthy aspect is that previously most MDA research has used a systemic functional approach, while studies in this book cover disciplines of linguistics, pedagogy, psychology, semiotics and sociology. In short, this book would be an asset to students and researchers interested in pragmatics, discourse analysis, corpus linguistics, communication and cultural studies.”
Haipeng Hu, Zhejiang University, in Discourse Studies, Volume 15:4 (2013), pages 491-493.
“This is a genuinely innovative collection of texts, examining aspects of media discourse from a variety of different linguistics-based approaches. I can imagine that a number of the chapters will be much cited as they lead to promising directions of further investigation. [...] This is a thought-provoking book, appropriate for those who wish to experiment with diverse approaches to media discourse from linguistic perspectives that take account of other modalities. The editors and publishers have done an excellent job of presentation; the texts are enhanced by careful figures and tables, and the composite index is admirable.”
Julia Gillen, Lancaster University, on Linguist List 24.2939 (July 2013).
Cited by
Cited by 54 other publications
No author info given
2014.
In A Corpus Linguistic Approach to Literary Language and Characterization [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 18],
No author info given
2014.
In A Corpus Linguistic Approach to Literary Language and Characterization [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 18],
No author info given
2020.
In Playing with Mental Models [Topics in Humor Research, 9],
No author info given
2021.
In The Mysterious Address Term anata 'you' in Japanese [Topics in Address Research, 4],
Bednarek, Monika
2011. Expressivity and televisual characterization.
Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 20:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Bednarek, Monika
2014. ‘And they all look just the same’? A quantitative survey of television title sequences.
Visual Communication 13:2 ► pp. 125 ff.
Bednarek, Monika
2018.
In Language and Television Series,
Bednarek, Monika
2020. Keyword analysis and the indexing of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander identity.
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 25:4 ► pp. 369 ff.
Bednarek, Monika
2020. The Sydney Corpus of Television Dialogue: designing and building a corpus of dialogue from US TV series.
Corpora 15:1 ► pp. 107 ff.
Bednarek, Monika & Liza-Mare Syron
2022. Functions of dialogue in (television) drama – A case study of Indigenous-authored television narratives.
Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics ► pp. 096394702210966 ff.
Bednarek, Monika, Marcia Veirano Pinto & Valentin Werner
2021. Corpus approaches to telecinematic language.
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 26:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Bell, Alice, Sam Browse, Alison Gibbons & David Peplow
2021.
In Style and Reader Response [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 36],
► pp. 1 ff.
Berber Sardinha, Tony & Marcia Veirano Pinto
2021. A linguistic typology of American television.
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 26:1 ► pp. 127 ff.
Boberg, Charles
2021.
In Accent in North American Film and Television,
Brock, Alexander
2015.
In Participation in Public and Social Media Interactions [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 256],
► pp. 27 ff.
Bączkowska, Anna
2022.
In Language Use, Education, and Professional Contexts [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ],
► pp. 71 ff.
Changsong, Wang & Lucyann Kerry
2022. Filmic Depiction of Malay Subjectivity in the Late Yasmin Ahmad’s Films.
SAGE Open 12:2 ► pp. 215824402210964 ff.
Chepinchikj, Neda
2022.
In Interactional Approach to Cinematic Discourse,
► pp. 7 ff.
Chepinchikj, Neda
2022.
In Interactional Approach to Cinematic Discourse,
► pp. 57 ff.
Chepinchikj, Neda
2022.
In Interactional Approach to Cinematic Discourse,
► pp. 95 ff.
Chepinchikj, Neda
2022.
In Interactional Approach to Cinematic Discourse,
► pp. 213 ff.
Chierichetti, Luisa
2022. Recursos (des)corteses en el diálogo telecinemático: la ironía y el sarcasmo en la serie "Vis a Vis".
Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas 17 ► pp. 29 ff.
Chovanec, Jan & Marta Dynel
2015.
In Participation in Public and Social Media Interactions [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 256],
► pp. 1 ff.
Crespo-Fernández, Eliecer
2021.
In Discourse Studies in Public Communication [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 92],
► pp. 2 ff.
Davies, Mark
2021. The TV and Movies corpora.
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 26:1 ► pp. 10 ff.
de Pablos-Ortega, Carlos
2020. Directive Speech Acts in English and Spanish Filmspeak.
Pragmática Sociocultural / Sociocultural Pragmatics 8:1 ► pp. 105 ff.
Dynel, Marta
2021.
In Inquiries in Philosophical Pragmatics [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 28],
► pp. 205 ff.
Díaz-Sierra, Sara
2022. Produced and perceived authenticity in the Northern Irish TV show Derry Girls
.
English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 43:2 ► pp. 167 ff.
Elyamany, Nashwa
2022. Postcyberpunk dystopian cityscape and emotion artificial intelligence: A spatio-cognitive analysis of posthuman representation in Blade Runner 2049 (2017).
Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies ► pp. 135485652211229 ff.
Formentelli, Maicol
2014. Vocatives galore in audiovisual dialogue.
English Text Construction 7:1 ► pp. 53 ff.
Fägersten, Kristy Beers & Monika Bednarek
2022. The evolution of swearing in television catchphrases.
Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 31:2 ► pp. 196 ff.
Gibbons, Alison & Sara Whiteley
2021. Do worlds have (fourth) walls? A Text World Theory approach to direct address in Fleabag.
Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 30:2 ► pp. 105 ff.
Harrison, Chloe
2020. ‘The truth is we’re watching each other’: Voiceover narration as ‘split self’ presentation inThe Handmaid’s Tale TV series.
Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 29:1 ► pp. 22 ff.
Jaspers, Jürgen & Sarah Van Hoof
2015. Ceci n'est pas une Tussentaal: Evoking Standard and Vernacular Language Through Mixed Dutch in Flemish Telecinematic Discourse.
Journal of Germanic Linguistics 27:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Kirner-Ludwig, Monika & Aleksandra Soboleva
2022. An intercultural pragmatic approach to English-Russian and English-German renditions of the formulaic "That’s what she said"-punchline in telecinematic discourse.
The European Journal of Humour Research 10:3 ► pp. 113 ff.
Lee, Kelvin K. H.
2018. “Watashi-tachi wa ningen da!”: A Corpus-Assisted Analysis of a Non-Human Character in the Anime Series ‘From the New World’.
New Voices in Japanese Studies 10 ► pp. 52 ff.
McIntyre, Dan
2012. The year’s work in stylistics 2011.
Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 21:4 ► pp. 402 ff.
Okazawa, Ryo
2022. Membership categorization, humor, and moral order in sitcom interactions.
Discourse, Context & Media 46 ► pp. 100593 ff.
Pavesi, Maria
2014. This and That in the Language of Film Dubbing: A Corpus-Based Analysis.
Meta 58:1 ► pp. 103 ff.
Prodanović Stankić, Diana
2017.
In Advances in Cultural Linguistics [Cultural Linguistics, ],
► pp. 29 ff.
Reichelt, Susan
2021. Innovation on screen.
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 26:1 ► pp. 95 ff.
Richardson, Kay P.
2017.
In Dialogue across Media [Dialogue Studies, 28],
► pp. 37 ff.
Rodríguez-Abruñeiras, Paula
2022. “Me likey!” A new (old) argument structure or a partially fixed expression with the verb like?.
Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 90 ► pp. 237 ff.
Schubert, Christoph
2017. Constructing the antihero: Linguistic characterisation in current American television series
.
Journal of Literary Semantics 46:1 ► pp. 25 ff.
Statham, Simon
2015. ‘A guy in my position is a government target … You got to be extra, extra careful’: Participation and strategies in crime talk in The Sopranos.
Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 24:4 ► pp. 322 ff.
Statham, Simon & Rocío Montoro
2019. The year’s work in stylistics 2018.
Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 28:4 ► pp. 354 ff.
Stratton, James
2018. The Use of the Adjective Intensifierwellin British English: A Case Study ofThe Inbetweeners.
English Studies 99:8 ► pp. 793 ff.
Sánchez Ruiz, Raquel
2021.
In Discourse Studies in Public Communication [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 92],
► pp. 220 ff.
Thomas, Bronwen
2017.
In Dialogue across Media [Dialogue Studies, 28],
► pp. 77 ff.
Tsakona, Villy, Rania Karachaliou & Argiris Archakis
2020. Liquid racism in the Greek anti-racist campaign #StopMindBorders
.
Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 8:2 ► pp. 232 ff.
Veirano Pinto, Marcia
2014.
In Multi-Dimensional Analysis, 25 years on [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 60],
► pp. 109 ff.
Wieczorek, Magdalena
2018. Relevance in Sitcom Discourse: The Viewer’s Perspective.
Anglica. An International Journal of English Studies :27/2 ► pp. 127 ff.
Yonezawa, Yoko
2019. Constructing fluid relationships through language: A study of address terms in a Japanese drama and its pedagogical implications.
Journal of Japanese Linguistics 35:2 ► pp. 189 ff.
Zago, Raffaele
2015.
In Participation in Public and Social Media Interactions [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 256],
► pp. 183 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 november 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects & Metadata
BIC Subject: CFG – Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General