By Word of Mouth
Metaphor, metonymy and linguistic action in a cognitive perspective
This volume contains seven synchronic and diachronic empirical investigations into the expression and conceptualization of linguistic action in English, focusing on figurative extensions. The following issues are explored:
- Source domains, and their relation to the complexities of linguistic action as a target domain.
- The role of axiological parameter, the experiential grounding of metaphors expressing value judgements and the part played by image-schemata, how value judgements come about and their socio-cultural embedding.
- The graded character of metaphoricity and its correlation with degrees of recoverability/salience.
- The interaction of metonymy and metaphor, e.g. the question what factors motivate the conventionalization of metonymies, which includes the perspective that conventionalized metaphors frequently have a metonymic origin.
- The role of image-schemata in the organization and development of a lexical subfield, which raises new questions on the nature of metaphor, the identification of source and target domains and the Invariance Hypothesis.
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 33] 1995. xii, 254 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
Introduction | p. vii
-
A survey of Metalinguistic MetaphorsJohan Vanparys | p. 1
-
Body Parts in Linguistic Action: Underlying Schemata and Value JudgementsPaul Pauwels and Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen | p. 35
-
Assessing Linguistic Behaviour: A Study of Value JudgementsAnne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen | p. 71
-
Levels of Metaphorization: The Case of PutPaul Pauwels | p. 125
-
Metaphonymy: The Interaction of Metaphor and Metonymy in Figurative Expressions for Linguistic ActionLouis Goossens | p. 159
-
From Three Respectable Horses’ Mouths: Metonymy and Conventionalization in a Diachronically Differentiated Data BaseLouis Goossens | p. 175
-
Metaphor, Schema, Invariance: The Case of Verbs of AnsweringBrygida Rudzka-Ostyn | p. 205
-
-
Subject Index | p. 251
“The empirical depth to which this volume examines one coherent area of metaphorization in English, including theoretical and historical discussion, is a true benefit to the maturation of Cognitive Linguistics.”
James Fife, Word 49:2 (98)
Cited by
Cited by 27 other publications
Abbott, Christine & Philip Eubanks
2005. How Academics and Practitioners Evaluate Technical Texts. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 19:2 ► pp. 171 ff. 
Ananieva, Nika
2023. The DIVIDED SELF metaphor and conceptualizations of the internal conflict in suicide notes. Cognition, Communication, Discourse :26 ► pp. 9 ff.
Ansah, Gladys Nyarko
2014. Culture in Embodied Cognition: Metaphorical/Metonymic Conceptualizations ofFEARin Akan and English. Metaphor and Symbol 29:1 ► pp. 44 ff.
Barcelona, Antonio, Olga Blanco Carrión & Rossella Pannain
Danesi, Marcel
2001. METAFORA E SENSO: UN'INTERPRETAZIONE VICHIANA DELLE RICERCHE RECENTI SULLA METAFORA. Forum Italicum: A Journal of Italian Studies 35:1 ► pp. 23 ff.
Deignan, Alice
2008. Corpus linguistics and metaphor. In The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, ► pp. 280 ff.
Ferrerós-Pagès, Carla
2022. Verbs That Express Passive Hearing in Catalan and French: Semantic Change of the Forms sentir (Catalan) and entendre (French). Languages 7:4 ► pp. 301 ff.
Gibbs Jr., Raymond W.
2005. Embodiment in Metaphorical Imagination. In Grounding Cognition, ► pp. 65 ff.
Gibbs, Jr, Raymond W.
2005. Embodiment and Cognitive Science,
Glynn, Dylan
2014. Polysemy and synonymy. In Corpus Methods for Semantics [Human Cognitive Processing, 43], ► pp. 7 ff.
Glynn, Dylan
2014. Techniques and tools. In Corpus Methods for Semantics [Human Cognitive Processing, 43], ► pp. 307 ff.
Golubkova, E. E. & E. B. Kivileva
2021. Seacraft Names in Military Discourse. Professional Discourse & Communication 3:1 ► pp. 10 ff.
Hernández-Guerra, Concepción
2012. Outstanding Rhetorical Devices and Textuality in Obama’s Speech in Ghana, Africa. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics 02:03 ► pp. 97 ff.
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide & Brigitte Nerlich
2000. Metáfora y Conocimiento. Metaphor and Symbol 15:1 ► pp. 109 ff.
Liu, Feifei
2018. Lexical metaphor as affiliative bond in newspaper editorials: a systemic functional linguistics perspective. Functional Linguistics 5:1
MICHL, DIANA
2019. Metonymies are more literal than metaphors: evidence from ratings of German idioms. Language and Cognition 11:1 ► pp. 98 ff.
Pannain, Rossella
2018. Chapter 9. The mouth of the speaker. In Conceptual Metonymy [Human Cognitive Processing, 60], ► pp. 237 ff.
Patton, Laurie L.
2000. Viniyogavijñāna: The uses of poetry in Vedic ritual. International Journal of Hindu Studies 4:3 ► pp. 237 ff.
Roldán-Riejos, Ana & Paloma Úbeda-Mansilla
2013. Análisis del uso de la metáfora en el contexto de la ingeniería . EDU REVIEW. International Education and Learning Review / Revista Internacional de Educación y Aprendizaje 1:1
Semino, Elena
2005. The Metaphorical Construction of Complex Domains: The Case of Speech Activity in English. Metaphor and Symbol 20:1 ► pp. 35 ff.
Sepideh, Hozhabrossadat
2018. Sacrificing the bull: Conceptualisations of fanā (spiritual death) in Rumis Mathnavi. International Journal of English and Literature 9:2 ► pp. 10 ff.
Soto Nieto, Almudena & Antonio Barcelona Sánchez
1970. Principales patrones metonímicos en las extensiones semánticas de los términos cromáticos en español. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 75 ► pp. 287 ff.
Steen, Gerard
2004. Introduction: Metaphor across languages. Journal of Pragmatics 36:7 ► pp. 1183 ff.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Richard B. Dasher
2001. Regularity in Semantic Change,
Vanparys, Johan
Wang, Wei
2013. Review of Xiufang (2011): 词汇化：汉语双音词的衍生 和发展. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 4:1 ► pp. 149 ff.
Zhang, Cun & Charles Forceville
2020. Metaphor and metonymy in Chinese and American political cartoons (2018–2019) about the Sino-US trade conflict. Pragmatics & Cognition 27:2 ► pp. 474 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Main BIC Subject
CF: Linguistics
Main BISAC Subject
LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General