Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics
Vol. 10:2 (2000) ► pp.215–231

Interaction in the oral proficiency interview

Problems of validity

This article reports on the findings of a discourse analysis study whose purpose was to provide answers to the following research question: What kind of speech event is the OPI? Is it more like an everyday, friendly conversation, an interview, or something else?

Keywords: Speech event, Conversation, Oral proficiency interview
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 1 June 2000
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.10.2.03joh
References
Bachman, L.
(1988) Problems in examining the validity of the ACTFL oral proficiency interview. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 101: 149–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1990) Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Bachman, L., & S. Savignon
(1986) The evaluation of communicative language proficiency: A critique of the ACTFL oral interview. Modern Language Journal 70.4: 380–390. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, G., & G. Yule
(1983) Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Clark, J.L.D.
(1972) Foreign language testing: Theory and practice. Philadelphia, PA: Center for Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
Clark, J.L.D., & R. Clifford
(1988) The FSI/ILR/ACTFL proficiency scales and testing techniques: Development, current status, and needed research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 101: 129–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Educational Testing Service
(1989) Oral proficiency testing manual. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
Hughes, A.
(1989) Testing for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, M.
(1997) What kind of speech event is the Oral Proficiency Interview: Problems of construct validity. Unpublished Georgetown University Dissertation.
(1997) Interaction in the Oral Proficiency Interview. Paper presented at the American Association for Applied Linguistics, Annual Conference, Orlando 1997.
Johnson, M., & A. Tyler
(1998) Re-analyzing the OPI: How much does it look like natural conversation? In R. Young & A.W. He (eds), Taking and Testing: Discourse Approaches to the Assessment of Oral Proficiency. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tyler, A., & M. Johnson
(1998) Natural context?: Collaboration, conversational involvement and the OPI . Paper presented at the American Association for Applied Linguistics, Seattle 1998.
Jones, E.E., & H.B. Gerard
(1967) Foundation of social psychology. New York: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J., & W. Frawley
(1985) Oral-proficiency testing: A critical analysis. Modern Language Journal 69.40: 337–345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1988) Proficiency: Understanding the construct. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 101: 181–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lazaraton, A.
(1992) The structural organization of a language interview: A conversation analytic perspective. System 201: 373–386. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S.
(1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liskin-Gasparro, J.
(1984) The ACTFL proficiency guidelines: Gateway to testing and curriculum. Foreign Language Annals 171: 475–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lowe, P.
(1983) The ILR interview: Origins, applications, pitfalls, and implications. Die Unterrichts Praxis 21: 230–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1986) Proficiency: Panacea, framework, process? A reply to Kramsh, Schultz, and in particular, to Bachman and Savignon. Modern Language Journal 70.4: 391–396. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1988) ILR handbook on oral interview testing. Washington, DC: DLI/LS Oral Interview. Google Scholar
McNamara, T.
(1996) Measuring second language performance. London: Addisson Wesley Longman.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1996) Interaction in second language performance assessment. Plenary address. American Association for Applied Linguistics Annual Conference. Chicago IL, 26 March 1996.
Messick, S.
(1989) Validity. In R.L. Linn (ed.), Educational measurement. New York: Macmillan, pp. 13–104.Google Scholar
Mishler, E.
(1986) Research interviewing: Context and narrative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, S.
(1992) Accommodative questions in oral proficiency interview. Language Testing 91: 173–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, S., & R. Berwick
(1992) The discourse of accommodation in oral proficiency examinations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 141: 159–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H., E. Schegloff, & G. Jefferson
(1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn taking in conversation. Language 50.4: 696–735. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Savignon, S.
(1985) Evaluation of communicative competence: The ACTFL provisional proficiency guidelines. Modern Language Journal 691: 129–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E., & H. Sacks
(1973) Opening up closings. Semiotics 81: 287–327. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E., G. Jefferson, & H. Sacks
(1977) The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 531: 361–82. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, D.
(1987) Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1990) Conversational analysis. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 111: 3–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1994) Approaches to discourse. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Shohamy, E.
(1982) Affective considerations in language testing. Modern Language Journal 661: 13–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1983) The stability of oral proficiency assessment on the oral interview testing procedures. Language Learning 331: 527–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1988) A proposed framework for testing the oral language of second/foreign language learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 101: 165–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Valdman, A.
(1988) Introduction to the assessment of foreign language oral proficiency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 10.2: 121–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Lier, L.
(1989) Reeling, writhing, drawling, stretching, and fainting in coils: Oral proficiency interviews as conversation. TESOL Quarterly 231: 489–508. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1988) The classroom and the language learner. London: Longman.Google Scholar
(1996) Interaction in the language curriculum: Awareness, autonomy, and authenticity. London: Longman. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Young, R., & Milanovic
(1992) Discourse variation in Oral Proficiency Interviews. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. DOI logo
Young, R.
(1995a) Conversational styles in language proficiency interviews. Language Learning 45.1: 3–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1995b) Discontinuous interlanguage development and its implications for oral proficiency rating scales. Applied Language Learning 61: 13–26.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 15 other publications

Angelelli, Claudia V.
2007. Assessing Medical Interpreters. The Translator 13:1 ► pp. 63 ff. DOI logo
Brown, Annie, Noriko Iwashita & Tim McNamara
2005. AN EXAMINATION OF RATER ORIENTATIONS AND TEST-TAKER PERFORMANCE ON ENGLISH-FOR-ACADEMIC-PURPOSES SPEAKING TASKS. ETS Research Report Series 2005:1 ► pp. i ff. DOI logo
Chaudron, Craig
2003. Data Collection in SLA Research. In The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, ► pp. 762 ff. DOI logo
Fahim, Mansoor & Ali Seidi
2013. Interaction and Interactive English Teaching in the High School Level. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 3:6 DOI logo
Gan, Z., C. Davison & L. Hamp-Lyons
2009. Topic Negotiation in Peer Group Oral Assessment Situations: A Conversation Analytic Approach. Applied Linguistics 30:3 ► pp. 315 ff. DOI logo
Gerson, Marysia Johnson
2006. Local and Dialogic Language Ability and its Implication for Language Teaching and Testing. In Spoken English, Tesol and Applied Linguistics, ► pp. 271 ff. DOI logo
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine & Véronique Traverso
2004. Types d'interactions et genres de l'oral. Langages n° 153:1 ► pp. 41 ff. DOI logo
Kitajima, Ryu
2009. Negotiation of meaning as a tool for evaluating conversational skills in the OPI. Linguistics and Education 20:2 ► pp. 145 ff. DOI logo
Leons, Eve, Christie Herbert & Ken Gobbo
2009. Students With Learning Disabilities and AD/HD in the Foreign Language Classroom: Supporting Students and Instructors. Foreign Language Annals 42:1 ► pp. 42 ff. DOI logo
Malone, Margaret E.
2003. Research on the Oral Proficiency Interview: Analysis, Synthesis, and Future Directions. Foreign Language Annals 36:4 ► pp. 491 ff. DOI logo
Mikhailova, Julia
2007. Rethinking Description in the Russian SOPI: Shortcomings of the Simulated Oral Proficiency Interview. Foreign Language Annals 40:4 ► pp. 584 ff. DOI logo
Pennington, Martha C. & Pamela Rogerson-Revell
2019. Assessing Pronunciation. In English Pronunciation Teaching and Research [Research and Practice in Applied Linguistics, ], ► pp. 287 ff. DOI logo
Ross, Steven
2018. Listener response as a facet of interactional competence. Language Testing 35:3 ► pp. 357 ff. DOI logo
Sandlund, Erica, Pia Sundqvist & Lina Nyroos
2016. Testing L2 Talk: A Review of Empirical Studies on Second‐Language Oral Proficiency Testing. Language and Linguistics Compass 10:1 ► pp. 14 ff. DOI logo
ShinDongil & 김종국
2009. Exploring the relationship between predicted and actual test task functions in English speaking test. English Teaching 64:2 ► pp. 103 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.