Communicated and non-communicated acts in relevance theory
According to relevance theory (Sperber and Wilson 1986; Blakemore 1991) some cases of communication depend on the hearer recognising that a particular speech act, for example admitting, betting or promising, is being performed. These are ‘communicated’ acts. Other cases of communication do not depend on the hearer recognising that a particular speech act, for example predicting, warning or permitting, is being performed. These are ‘non-communicated’ acts. In the case of non-communicated acts communication is successful so long as the hearer recovers adequate contextual effects without having to recognise the speaker’s intentions. Against this view, I will argue that each of the speech acts considered to be non-communicated in the relevance theory literature fall into one of two categories. The speech acts in one category contribute to the strength of associated assumptions, and those in the other convey socially relevant information. I will argue that according to relevance theory both types of speech act must be recognised and that they are in fact communicated. If relevance theory is to be internally consistent, therefore, the distinction between communicated and non-communicated speech acts must be abandoned.
References (24)
Blakemore, D. (1991) Performatives and parentheticals. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 911: 197–213. 

Cosmides, L., and J. Tooby (1992) Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. In J. Barkow, L. Cosmides and J. Tooby (eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dominicy, M., and N. Franken (forthcoming) Speech acts and relevance theory. To appear in D. Vanderveken and S. Kubo (eds.), Essays in speech act theory. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 
Escandell-Vidal, V. (1996) Towards a cognitive approach to politeness. In K. Jaszczolt and K. Turner (eds.), Contrastive semantics and pragmatics. Oxford: Pergamon Press, pp. 629–650.
Franken, N. (1997) Les performatifs dans la théorie de la pertinence. Paper presented at the 3ème Rencontre des Jeunes Linguistes, Université du Littoral, Dunkerque, 16–17 May 1997.
Jary, M. (1998a) Relevance theory and the communication of politeness. Journal of Pragmatics 301: 1–19.
BoP
Jary, M. (1998b) Is relevance theory asocial? Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 111: 157–169. 

Humphrey, N. (1976) The social function of the intellect. In P.P.G. Bateson and R.A. Hinde (eds.), Growing points in ethology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Myers-Scotton, C. (1993) Common and uncommon ground: Social and structural factors in codeswitching. Language in Society 221: 475–503.
BoP
Myers-Scotton, C. (1995) What do speakers want? Codeswitching as evidence of intentionality in linguistic choices. In P. Silberman and J. Loftin (eds.), SALSA 2 (Papers from the Symposium about Language and Society at Austin). Austin: University of Texas, Department of Linguistics.
Nicolle, S. (1999) On the translation of implicit information: Experimental evidence and further considerations. Notes on Translation 13.3: 1–12.
O’Neill, J. (1988-89) Relevance and pragmatic inference. Theoretical Linguistics 151: 241–261. 

Recanati, F. (1987) Meaning and force. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sperber, D. (1994) The modularity of thought and the epidemiology of representations. In L.A. Hirschfeld and S.A. Gelman (eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 39–67. 

Sperber, D., and D. Wilson (1986) Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. BoP
Tooby, J. and L. Cosmides (1992) The psychological foundations of culture. In J. Barkow, L. Cosmides and J. Tooby (eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wilson, D. and D. Sperber (1993) Linguistic form and relevance. Lingua 901: 1–25. 

Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Linde-Usiekniewicz, Jadwiga
Yus, F.
2006.
Relevance Theory. In
Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics,
► pp. 512 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.