Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics
Vol. 11:2 (2001) ► pp.105–126

Language and cognition in development

Old questions, new directions

The relation between language and cognition in child development is one of the oldest and most debated questions, which has recently come back to the forefront of several disciplines in the social sciences. The overview below examines several universalistic vs. relativistic approaches to this question, stemming both from traditional developmental theories and from more recent proposals in psycholinguistics that are illustrated by some findings concerning space in child language. Two main questions are raised for future research. First, substantial evidence is necessary concerning the potential impact of linguistic variation on cognitive development, including evidence that can provide ways of articulating precocious capacities in the pre-linguistic period and subsequent developments across a variety of child languages. Second, relating language and cognition also requires that we take into account both structural and functional determinants of child language within a model that can explain development at different levels of linguistic organization in the face of cross-linguistic diversity.

Keywords: Linguistic relativity, Child development, Function, Structure, Space
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 1 June 2001
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.11.2.01hic
References
Berman, R.A., & D.I. Slobin
(1994) Different ways of relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bloom, P
(1996) Recent controversies in the study of language acquisition. In Morton Ann Gernsbacher (ed.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics. San Diego, Calif.: Academic Press, pp. 741-779.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M
(1989) Learning a semantic system: What role do cognitive pre-dispositions play?. In M.L. Rice, & R.L. Schiefelbusch (eds.), The teachability of language. Baltimore: Paul H. Brooks, pp. 133-69.Google Scholar
(1996) The origins of children's spatial semantic categories: Cognitive vs. linguistic determinants. In J.J. Gumperz, & S.C. Levinson (eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 145-176.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M., S. Choi
& (2001) Shaping meanings for language: Universal and language-specific in the acquisition of spatial semantic categories. In M. Bowerman, & S.C. Levinson (eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 475-511. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Brown, R
(1994) The Ins and Ons of Tzeltal locative expressions: The semantics of static descriptions of location. Linguistics 321: 743-790. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Choi, S., & M. Bowerman
(1991) Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: The influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns. Cognition 411: 83-121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N
(1981) Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Clark, H.H
(1973) Space, time, semantics and the child. In T.E. Moore (ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. New york: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ehrich, V
(1982) Discourse organization and sentence form in child language: How children describe rooms. Papers and reports on child language development 211: 55-62.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, A.R., E.T. Kako, M. Highter, & N. McGraw
(1998) Speaking of motion: Verb use in English and Spanish. Language and Cognitive Processes 13.51: 521-549. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Fodor, F.J
(1983) The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, J.J., & S.C. Levinson
(eds.) (1996) Rethinking linguistic relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hirsh-Pasek, K., & R.M. Golinkoff
(1996) The origins of grammar: Evidence from early language comprehension. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Hendriks, H
(1993) Motion and location in narrative discourse: A crosslinguistic and developmental perspective. Doctoral dissertation, University of Leiden.
Hickmann, M
(1995) Discourse organization and the development of reference to person, space, and time. In P. Fletcher, & B. McWhinney (eds.), Handbook of child language. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 194-218.Google Scholar
(1998a) On null subjects and other pronouns: Syntactic and pragmatic approaches. In N. Dittmar, & Z. Penner (eds.), Issues in the theory of language acquisition. Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 143-175.Google Scholar
(1998b) Person, space, and information status in children's narratives: A crosslinguistic analysis. Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teorica e Applicata XXVII.1: 49-66.Google Scholar
forthcoming) Person, time, and space in children's narratives: A crosslinguistic functional perspective to language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hickmann, M., H. Hendriks, & F. Roland
(1998) Référence spatiale dans les récits d'enfants. Langue Française 1181: 104-126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnston, J.R., & D.I. Slobin
(1979) The development of locative expressions in English, Italian, Serbo-Croatian and Turkish. Journal of Child Language 61: 529-45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A
(1987) Function and process in comparing language and cognition. In M. Hickmann (ed.), Social and functional approaches to language and thought. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, pp. 185-202.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1992) Beyond modularity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Landau, B., & D.S. Jackendoff
(1990) Objects and places : Geometric and syntactic representations in early lexical learning. Cognitive Development 51: 287-312. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lécuyer, R., A. Streri, & M-G. PLcheux
(1996) Le développement cognitif du nourrisson. Paris: Nathan.Google Scholar
Levinson, S.C
(1994) Vision, shape, and linguistic description: Tzeltal body-part terminology and object description. Linguistics 321: 791-855. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1996) Relativity in spatial conception and desciption. In J.J. Gumperz & S.C. Levinson (eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 177-202.Google Scholar
(1997) From outer to inner space: Linguistic categories and non-linguistic thinking. In J. Nuyts, & E. Pederson (eds.), Language and conceptualization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 13-45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, P
(1991) Strategies in children’s route directions. Journal of Child Language 181: 171-189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lucy, J., & J. Werstch
(1987) Vygotsky and Whorf: A comparative analysis. In M. Hickmann (ed.), Social and functional approaches to language and thought. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, pp. 67-86.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B., & E. Bates
(eds.) (1989) The cross-linguistic study of sentence processing. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Piaget, J
(1923) Le langage et la pensée chez l’enfant. Neuchâtel: Delachaux & Niestlé.Google Scholar
Piaget, J., & B. Inhelder
(1947) La représentation de l'espace chez l'enfant. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Slobin, D.I
(1985) Cross-linguistic evidence for the language-making capacity. In D.I. Slobin (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 1157-1257.Google Scholar
(1996) Thinking for speaking. In J.J. Gumperz, & S.C. Levinson (eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 70-96.Google Scholar
Talmy, L
(2000) Towards a cognitive semantics. Harvard, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Van Geert, P
(1985) In, on, under: An essay on the modularity of infant spatial competence. First Language 6.16: 7-28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L.S
(1962) Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wertsch, J
(1981) The concept of activity in Soviet Psychology. Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
(1985) Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Weissenborn, J
(1986) Learning how to become an interlocutor: The verbal negotiation of common frames of reference and actions in dyads of 7-14 year-old children. In J. Cook-Gumperz, W. Corsaro & J. Streek (eds.), Children's world and children's language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whorf, B.L
(1956) Language, thought and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 8 other publications

Aguert, Marc, Virginie Laval & Josie Bernicot
2010. Comprendre l’intention communicative du locuteur : une étude du rôle de l’intonation et du contexte chez des enfants de 5 à 9 ans. L’Année psychologique Vol. 110:1 ► pp. 49 ff. DOI logo
Aguert, Marc, Virginie Laval & Josie Bernicot
2010. Comprendre l'intention communicative du locuteur : une étude du rôle de l'intonation et du contexte chez des enfants de 5 à 9 ans. L’Année psychologique 110:01 ► pp. 49 ff. DOI logo
Bernicot, Josie, Virginie Laval & Stéphanie Chaminaud
2007. Nonliteral language forms in children: In what order are they acquired in pragmatics and metapragmatics?. Journal of Pragmatics 39:12 ► pp. 2115 ff. DOI logo
Chaminaud, Stéphanie, Virginie Laval & Josie Bernicot
2006. Pragmatique et compréhension du langage chez l’enfant : une étude des formes non littérales avec un paradigme informatisé. L’Année psychologique 106:04 ► pp. 491 ff. DOI logo
Kuo, Sheng-Huang, Shi-Jer Lou, Tien-Hsin Hsin & Wei-Yuan Dzan
2011. The Application of Digital Game-Based Learning to Idioms Education Acceptance. In Edutainment Technologies. Educational Games and Virtual Reality/Augmented Reality Applications [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6872], ► pp. 435 ff. DOI logo
Laval, V., C. Ryckebusch, A. Bert-Erboul, E. Eme, D. Chesnet & J. Bernicot
2009. Le LECPC version 1.1 : un logiciel d’étude de la compréhension du langage non littéral chez l’enfant. European Review of Applied Psychology 59:3 ► pp. 229 ff. DOI logo
Laval, Virginie & Josie Bernicot
2022.  “Tu es dans la lune” . Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 399 ff. DOI logo
Smogorzewska, Joanna
2019. “Storyline” or “Associations Pyramid”? A Relationship Between the Difficulty of Educational Methods and Their Effectiveness in Developing Language Creativity Among Pre-School Children. Psychology of Language and Communication 23:1 ► pp. 27 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.