“Tu es dans la lune”
Understanding idioms in French-speaking children and adults
From a psychological point of view, this study looks at children’s and adult’s comprehension of idiomatic expressions, and most particularly at the underlying cognitive processes needed for comprehension. Idiomatic expressions are expressions where there is a considerable difference between what is said (literal interpretation) and what is meant (idiomatic interpretation). In other words, the meaning of an idiomatic expression depends largely on a convention that relates a given linguistic form to a given meaning. Conducted in this framework, the present study was aimed at determining the role of contextual characteristics and the linguistic convention in the comprehension of idiomatic expressions by 6- and 9-year-old children, and by adults. The subject’s task was to complete stories. Twelve stories were presented in comic strip format by the experimenter, who told the story in the first three frames and then instructed the subject to choose one of the two possible endings. Two features of the stories were varied : The utterance production context (idiomatic vs. literal) and the idiom familiarity level (familiar vs. unfamiliar). Regardless of age, the context had a substantial impact on idiom comprehension: This reinforces the idea of the necessity of taking the context and the extra-linguistic conventions into account in order to explain language functioning, not only in children but also in adults. The role of the linguistic convention began at the age of 9 and was particularly strong in adults: They appear to reconstruct the communication situation solely on the basis of the linguistic convention. The role of familiarity also appeared in the 9-year-olds and continued on into adulthood. These results suggest that the period of adolescence is crucial for the development of certain pragmatic aspects of language.
Keywords: French Language, Children, Understanding, Idioms, Pragmatics
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 01 December 2002
Abkarian, G.G., Alison Jones, and Gretchen West
Ackerman, Brian P.
Bernicot, Josie, and Virginie Laval
(1996) Promises in French children: Comprehension and metapragmatic knowledge. Journal of Pragmatics 25: 101-122. BoP
Cacciari, Cristina, and Maria C. Levorato
(1989) How children understand idioms in discourse. Journal of Child Language 16: 387-405. BoP
Colston, Herbert L., and Jennifer O'Brien
(2000) Contrast and pragmatics in figurative language: Anything understatement can do, irony can do better. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1557-1583. BoP
Cowie, Antony P.
Cronk, Brian C., and Wendy A. Schweigert
(1992) The comprehension of idioms: The effects of familiarity, literalness, and usage. Applied Psycholinguistics 13: 131-146. BoP
Cronk, Brian C., Susan D. Lima, and Wendy A. Schweigert
(1994) Register and the redemption of relevance theory: The case of metaphor. Pragmatics 4.2: 139-182. BoP
Gibbs, Raymond. W.
Gibbs, Raymond W.
Gibbs, Raymond W., and Gayle P. Gonzales
Gibbs, Raymond W., Nandini P. Nayak, John L. Bolton, and Melissa E. Keppel
Gibbs, Raymond W., and Nandini P. Nayak
(1989) Psycholinguistic studies on the syntactic behavior of idioms. Cognitive Psychology 21: 100-138. MetBib
Gibbs, Raymond W., and Jessica F. Moise
Giora, Rachel, and Ofer Fein
(1999) On understanding familiar and less-familiar figurative language. Journal of Pragmatics 31: 1601-1618. BoP
(2001) Understanding figurative language: From metaphors to idioms. London: Oxford University Press. BoP
(2001) Language and cognition in development: Old questions, new directions. Pragmatics 11.2: 105-126. BoP
Keysar, Boaz, and Bridget Martin Bly
(1999) Swimming against the current: Do idioms reflect conceptual structure? Journal of Pragmatics 31: 1559-1578. BoP
Laval, Virginie, and Josie Bernicot
Levorato, Maria C., and Cristina Cacciari
(1999) Idiom comprehension in children: Are the effects of semantic analyzability and context separable? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 60: 261-283. MetBib
Mueller, R., and Raymond W. Gibbs
(1987) Processing idioms with multiple meanings. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 16: 63-81. BoP
Ninio, Anat, and Catherine E. Snow
(1996) Pragmatic development. Colorado: Westview Press. BoP
Nippold, Marilyn A., and Stephanie T. Martin
Nippold, Marylin A., and Mishelle Rudzinski
(1993) Familiarity and transparency in idiom explanation: A developmental study with children and adolescents. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 36: 728-737. MetBib
Nippold, Marylin A., and Catherine L. Taylor
Nippold, Marylin A., Catherine L. Taylor, and Jennifer M. Baker
Nippold, Marylin A., Catherine Moran, and Ilsa E. Schwartz
Spector, Cecile C.
Steinhart, Eric, and Eva Feider, Kittay
Titone, Debra A., and Cynthia M. Connine
(1999) On the compositional and noncompositional nature of idiomatic expression. Journal of Pragmatics 31: 1655-1674. BoP
(2000) The social-pragmatic theory of word learning. Pragmatics 10.4: 401-414. BoP
Toplak, Maggie, and Albert N. Katz
(2000) On the uses of sarcastic irony. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1467-1488. BoP
Verschueren, Jef, Jan-Ola Östman, and Jan Blommaert
(eds) (1995) Handbook of Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. BoP
(1999) Understanding pragmatics. London: Arnold. BoP
(2000) Notes on the role of metapragmatic awareness in language use. Pragmatics 10.4: 439-456. BoP
Cited by 7 other publications
Bernicot, Josie, Virginie Laval & Stéphanie Chaminaud
Chaminaud, Stéphanie, Virginie Laval & Josie Bernicot
Hattouti, Jamila, Sandrine Gil & Virginie Laval
Kamanga, Mervis & Felix Banda
Laval, Virginie, Geneviève de Weck, Stéphanie Chaminaud & Agnès Lacroix
Vulchanova, Mila, Evelyn Milburn, Valentin Vulchanov & Giosuè Baggio
Vulchanova, Mila, David SaldaÃ±a, Sobh Chahboun & Valentin Vulchanov
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 09 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.