“The reading wars in situ”
Engaging Raymond Williams’ argument (1977: 112) that “[a] lived hegemony is always a process ... [that] can never be singular,” this paper examines contrary tendencies toward domination and autonomy in national debates about education, classroom-based reading practices, and students’ formation of literate identities. In particular, I explore the dynamics of inequality and reflexivity through an ethnographic-and-discursive analysis of a US urban middle school undergoing pedagogical reform. The school presents a balance, roughly 50/50, of students living in poverty and not living in poverty and from majority and non-majority ethnoracial backgrounds. Because of statewide pressures to “improve test scores,” the school has agreed to an ambitious English Language Arts curriculum initiative which encourages reflexive self-guidance among teachers and students. The paper presents analyses of public debates about literacy and of classroom interactional dynamics as well as case studies of ‘struggling readers,’ that is, young adolescent deemed unsuccessful at school literacy. The analysis of literacy debates focuses on the displacement of class and race “effects” in discussions of pedagogical reform. The classroom analyses focus on conditions of pedagogical inclusion and exclusion and the apparent role of class, race, and gender in such conditions. The case studies focus on the articulation of school and non-school literate identities and the role of class, race, and gender in those identities and their articulation.
References (42)
Adams, M
(
1993)
Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Allington, R
(ed.) (
2002)
Big Brother and the National Reading Curriculum. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Allington, R., and H. Woodside-Jiron
(
1999)
The politics of literacy research: How 'research' shaped educational policy.
Educational Researcher 281: 4-13.
Alverman, D
(
2001)
Reading adolescents' reading identities: Looking back to see ahead.
Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy 441: 676-691.
Angelis, J
(
2001)
Let us not abandon our older readers.
English Update: A Newsletter from the Center on English Learning and Achievement, pp. 1, 6.
Bauman, Z
(
1997)
Postmodernity and its discontents. New York: Routledge.
Berliner, D., and B. Biddle
(
1995)
The manufactured crisis: Myths, frauds, and the attack on public schools. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Bernstein, B
(
1996)
Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity. London: Taylor & Francis.
BoP
Brownstein, A
(
1999)
Low scores add up to big job ahead.
Times Union, pp. A1, A5.
Castells, M
(
1999)
Flows, networks, and identities: A critical theory of the information society. In
M. Castells,
R. Flecha,
P. Freire,
H. Giroux,
D. Macedo, &
P. Willis (eds.),
Critical Education in the information age. New York: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 37-64.
Cazden, C
(
1988)
Classroom discourse. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
BoP
Coles, G
(
1998)
Reading lessons: The debate over literacy. New York: Hill and Wang.
Coles, G
(
2000)
Misreading reading: The bad science that hurts children. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Collins, J
(
2002)
The Passions and perils of self-guidance: Learning, youth, and literacy. Paper presented at the American Anthropological Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans.
Collins, J., and C. Woodcock
(
2002)
Ecology, identity, and literacy. Paper presented at the National Reading Conference, Miami, FL.
Delpit, L
(
1995)
Other people's children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. New York: The New Press.
Donald, J
(
1983)
How illiteracy became a problem (and literacy stopped being one).
Journal of Education 165.1: 35-52.
Eckert, P
(
1989)
Jocks and burnouts. New York: Teachers College Press.
Edelsky, C
(
1996)
With literacy and justice for all: Rethinking the social in language and education. London: Taylor & Francis.
Fairclough, N
(
1995)
Critical discourse analysis. London: Longman.
BoP
Foorman, B., J. Francis, J. Fletcher, & C. Schatsneider
(
1998)
The role of instruction in learning to read: Preventing reading failure in at-risk children.
Journal of Educational Psychology 901: 37-55.
Freire, P
(
1970)
Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Seabury Press.
Frontline
(
2002)
Program on testing movement.
WMHT (Channel 13).
Gee, J
(
1996)
Social linguistics and literacies (2nd ed.). London: Taylor & Maxwell.
Giddens, A
(
1991)
Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the Late Modern age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Goodman, K
(
1986)
What's whole in Whole Language? Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Hoare, Q., and G. N. Smith
(eds.) (
1971)
Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
Jiron, H
(
2002)
The language of politics and the politics of language: A critical analysis of California reading policy. Dissertation, Department of Reading, University at Albany/SUNY, Albany.
Karlin, R
(
2000)
Latest report card eyes school spending.
Times Union, pp. A1, A11.
Kirsch, I., and A. Jungeblut
(
1986)
Literacy: Profiles of America's young adults: Final report. Princeton, NJ: National Assessment of Educational Progress, Educational Testing Service.
Kontopoulos, K
(
1993)
The logics of social structure. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Laclau, E., and C. Mouffe
(
1985)
Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. London: Verso.
Lemann, N
(
1997)
The reading wars.
The Atlantic Monthly 2821: 128-134.
Lemann, N
(
1998)
"Ready, read!".
Atlantic Monthly 2831: 92,96, 98-100, 102, 104.
Luttrell, W
(
1997)
Schoolsmart and motherwise: Working-class women's identity and schooling. New York: Routledge.
Males, M
(
1995)
The scapegoat generation: America's war on adolescents. Monroe, ME: Common Courage Press.
NCEE
(
1983)
A nation at risk. Washington, DC: The National Commission on Excellence in Education.
NRP
(
2000)
Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research on reading and its implications for reading Instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
Nystrand, M., A. Gamoran, R, Kachur, and C. Prendergast
(
1997)
Opening dialogue: Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the english classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
Routman, R
(
2000)
Conversations: Strategies for teaching, learning, and evaluating. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Shanker, A
(
1986)
Our profession, our schools: The case for fundamental reform.
American Educator 10. 10-17: 44-45.
Williams, R
(
1977)
Marxism and literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cited by (3)
Cited by 3 other publications
DeJulio, Samuel, Dixie D. Massey, Norman Stahl & James King
2024.
Terminologically Speaking, the Reading Wars.
Reading Psychology 45:4
► pp. 386 ff.
Blommaert, Jan, Lies Creve & Evita Willaert
2006.
On being declared illiterate: Language-ideological disqualification in Dutch classes for immigrants in Belgium.
Language & Communication 26:1
► pp. 34 ff.
Freeman, Melissa, Sandra Mathison & Kristen Campbell Wilcox
2006.
Performing Parent Dialogues on High-Stakes Testing: Consent and Resistance to the Hegemony of Accountability.
Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies 6:4
► pp. 460 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.