Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics
Vol. 14:1 (2004) ► pp.31–53

The functions of formulaic speech in the L2 class

This study deals with Formulaic Speech (FS) usage in the context of the partial L2 immersion class. It tries to define and classify FS according to its functions. The fact that learners resort to FS shows that second language production is not only based on the construction of sentences from scratch but also on the integration of formulaic sequences in discourse. But what is the use of FS? What are the possible functions it performs? We attempt to show that FS makes up for a lack of structural knowledge and might therefore be used as a learning strategy in the acquisition of structure. Then we consider the psycholinguistic function of FS and try to demonstrate that it might be a pre-planning strategy and a way for the learner to economize effort on processing and thus focus on his or her learning of the language. Finally, the paper analyzes the communicative function of FS and its role in the relation between speaker and hearer, and suggests that it might play a part in the development of pragmatic competence.
Keywords: Second language production, Second language acquisition, Formulaic Speech, Communicative competence, Partial immersion
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 1 March 2004
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.14.1.01gir
References (41)
Aijmer, K. (1998) Conversational Routines in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Altenberg, B. (1994) On the phraseology of spoken English: The evidence of recurrent word combinations. In Cowie (ed.), 1994.Google Scholar
Arends, J., P. Muysken, &. N. Smith (eds.) Pidgins and Creoles: An Introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logo
Baigent, M. (1996) Speaking in Chunks: An investigation into the use of multi-word phrases in spoken language by advanced learners of English. MSc Thesis in Teaching English, Aston University. [URL]
Bohn, O. (1986) Formulas, frame structures, and stereotypes in early syntactic development: Some new evidence from L2 acquisition. Linguistics 241: 185-202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. (1973) A First Language. Cambridge: Harvard Press DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, R. (1974) Performing without competence. Journal of Child Language 11: 1-10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cook, V. et al. (1993) Linguistics and Second Language acquisition. London: Macmillan.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cowie, A. (ed.) (1994) Phraseology: Theory, Analysis and Applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dechert, H., D. Möhle, and M. Raupach (eds.) (1984) Second Language Productions. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (1994) The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Girard, M., & C. Sionis (2003) Formulaic Speech in the L2 Class: An Attempt at identification and Classification. Pragmatics 13.2: 231-251.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, T. (1979) From Discourse to Syntax. Grammar as a processing strategy. In T. Givón (ed.), Discourse and syntax (Syntax and Semantics 12) New York: Academic Press, pp. 81-111.Google Scholar
Hakuta, K. (1974) Prefabricated patterns and the emergence of structure in second language acquisition. Language Learning 241: 287-97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hamers, J.F., and M. Blanc (1989) Bilinguality and Bilingualism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Hatch, E.M. (1972) Some Studies In Language Learning. UCLA Workpapers on Teaching English as a Second Language 61: 29-36.Google Scholar
. (1983) Psycholinguistics. A second language perspective. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Kecskes, I. (2000) A cognitive-pragmatic approach to situation-bound utterances. Journal of Pragmatics. 32.6: 605-625. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Klein, W. (1986) Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge Cambrige University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krashen, S , and R. Scarcella (1978) On routines and patterns in second language acquisition and performance. Language Learning 281: 283-300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krashen, S., M. Long, and R. Scarcella. (1979) Age, rate and eventual attainment in second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly 131: 573-82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D., and M.H. Long (1991) An introduction to second language acquisition research. London: Longman.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Lehtonen, J.(1985) Foreign Language Acquisition and the Development of Automaticity. In H. Dechert (ed.), 1990. Current Trends in European Second Language Acquisition Research. Clevendon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Manuel, J. (1990) Ecole Active Bilingue: Teacher’s guide. Paris R.E.M.I. Nathan.
Nattinger, J., and J. De Carrico (1992) Lexical Phrases and Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Peters, A.M. (1976) Language learning strategies: Does the whole equal the sum of the parts? Language 531: 560-73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1983) The units of Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pierce, A. (1992) A comparative analysis of French and English Child Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Porto, M. (1998) Lexical phrases and language teaching. Forum 36.3: 22. [URL]
Radford, A. (1997) Syntactic theory & the structure of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
.(1998) Syntactic Theory and the Acquisition of English Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Raupach, M. (1984) Formulae in second language production. In H. Dechert et al.. (eds.), Second Language Productions. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Rescorla, L., and S. Okuda (1987) Modular patterns in second language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics 81: 281-308. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R.W. (1983) Interaction, acculturation, and the acquisition of communicative competence: A case study of an adult. In N. Wolfson and E. Judd (eds.), Sociolinguistics and Language Acquisition. Rowley, MA.: Newbury House, pp. 137-74.Google Scholar
Singh, I. (2000) Pidgins and Creoles, an Introduction. London: Arnold.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P. (1998) A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, J.R. (1989) Lexical Categorization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wagner-Gough, J. (1975) Comparative Studies in second language learning. CAL ERIC/CLL Series on Languages and Linguistics 26.
Wong-Fillmore, L. (1976) The second time around: Cognitive and social strategies in SLA. Language Learning 321: 53-68.Google Scholar
Wray, A. (2000) Formulaic sequences in second language teaching: Principle and practice. Applied Linguistics 21.4: 463-489. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2002) Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Cited by (10)

Cited by ten other publications

Alrwais, Saleh
2024. Game-Based Learning and L2 Grammar Acquisition. In TESOL Teacher Research [English Language Education, 35], ► pp. 163 ff. DOI logo
Aline, David & Yuri Hosoda
2021. Deployment of the formulaic utterance “how about∼” in task-based second language classroom discussions. Intercultural Pragmatics 18:4 ► pp. 425 ff. DOI logo
Safont, Pilar
2018. Are Classroom Requests Similar in All EFL Settings? Focusing on a Young Multilingual Learning Environment. In Current Research in Bilingualism and Bilingual Education [Multilingual Education, 26], ► pp. 123 ff. DOI logo
Song, Sooho
2018. Second Language Learning as Mode-Switching. In Second Language Acquisition as a Mode-Switching Process, ► pp. 75 ff. DOI logo
Safont Jordà, María-Pilar & Laura Portolés Falomir
2016. Pragmatic functions of formulaic speech in three different languages. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 4:2 ► pp. 225 ff. DOI logo
Stephen, Christine, Joanna McPake, Irene Pollock & Wilson McLeod
2016. Early years immersion. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 4:1 ► pp. 59 ff. DOI logo
Yeh, Shu-Han
2016. The use of situation-bound utterances in Chinese foreign language textbooks. Chinese as a Second Language Research 5:2 ► pp. 187 ff. DOI logo
Tang, Jingwei
2012. An Empirical Study on the Effectiveness of the Lexical Approach to Improving Writing in SLA. Journal of Language Teaching and Research 3:3 DOI logo
JIANG, NAN & TATIANA M. NEKRASOVA
2007. The Processing of Formulaic Sequences by Second Language Speakers. The Modern Language Journal 91:3 ► pp. 433 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2012. References. In Language Teaching Research and Language Pedagogy, ► pp. 349 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.