Article published in:
Vol. 17:2 (2007) ► pp. 203230
Anderson, A.H., M. Bader, E.G. Bard, E. Boyle, G.M. Doherty, S. Garrod, S.D. Isard, J.C. Kowtko, J. McAllister, J. Miller, C.F. Sotillo, H.S. Thompson, and R. Weinart
(1991a) The HCRC Map Task Corpus. Language and Speech 34.4: 351-366. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, A.H., and E.A. Boyle
(1994) Forms of introduction in dialogues: Their discourse contexts and communicative consequences. Language and Cognitive Processes 91: 101-122. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, A.H., A. Clark, and J. Mullin
(1991b) Introducing information in dialogues: Forms of introduction chosen by young speakers and the responses elicited from young listeners. Journal of Child Language 181: 663-687. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1994) Interactive communication skills in children: Learning how to make language work in dialogue. Journal of Child Language 211: 439-463. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bargiela-Chiappini, F., and S. Harris
(1997) Managing Language: The discourse of corporate meetings. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Beebe, L.M., and M.C. Cummings
(1996) Natural speech act data versus written questionnaire data: How data collection method affects speech act performance. In S.M Gass & J. Neu (eds.), Speech acts across cultures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Brennan, S.E., and H.H. Clark
(1996) Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 22.6: 1482-1493. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carletta, J
(1992) Risk-taking and recovery in task-oriented dialogue. University of Edinburgh: Ph.D. thesis.Google Scholar
(1996) Assessing agreement on classification tasks: The kappa statistic. Computational Linguistics 22.2: 249-254.Google Scholar
Carletta, J., and C. Mellish
(1996) Risk-taking and recovery in task-oriented dialogue. Journal of Pragmatics 261: 71-107. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Carletta, J., S. Isard, G. Doherty-Sneddon, A. Isard, J.C. Kowtko, and A.H. Anderson
(1997) The reliability of a dialogue structure coding scheme. Computational Linguistics 23.1: 13-31.Google Scholar
Clark, H.H
(1992) Arenas of language use. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1996) Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H.H., and S.E. Brennan
(1991) Grounding in communication. In L. Resnick, J. Levine & S. Teasley (eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H.H., and M.A. Krych
(2004) Speaking while monitoring addressees for understanding. Journal of Memory and Language 501: 62-81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H.H., and E.F. Schaefer
(1987a) Collaborating on contributions to conversations. Language and Cognitive Processes 21: 19-41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1987b) Concealing one’s meaning from overhearers. Journal of Memory and Language 261: 209-225. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H.H., and D. Wilkes-Gibbs
(1986) Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition 221: 1-39. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Connor, U., and T.A. Upton
(eds.) (2004) Discourse in the professions: Perspectives from corpus linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Coupland, N., H. Giles, and J.M. Wiemann
(eds.) (1991) ‘Miscommunication’ and problematic talk. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Davies, B.L
(1998) An empirical examination of cooperation, effort and risk in task-oriented dialogue. University of Edinburgh: Ph.D. thesis.Google Scholar
(2006) Testing dialogue principles in task-oriented dialogues: An exploration of cooperation, collaboration, effort and risk. Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics, No.11. University of Leeds, UK: Department of Linguistics & Phonetics, pp. 30-64.Google Scholar
(in prep) Least collaborative effort or least individual effort: Examining the evidence.
Eckert, P
(1999) Linguistic variation as social practice. Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fawcett, R.P., and B.L. Davies
(1992) Monologue as a turn in dialogue: Towards an integration of Exchange Structure and Rhetorical Structure Theory. In R. Dale, E. Hovy, D. Rösner & O. Stock (eds.), Aspects of automated natural language generation. Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 151-166. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H.P
(1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J.L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics, vol 3: Speech acts.New York: Academic Press, pp. 41-58.Google Scholar
Grosz, B., and C. Sidner
(1986) Attention, intention, and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics 121: 175-206.Google Scholar
Houghton, G., and S.D. Isard
(1987) Why to speak, what to say and how to say it: Modelling language production in discourse. In P. Morris (ed.), Modelling cognition. Chichester: Wiley, pp. 249-267.Google Scholar
Isard, A., and J. Carletta
(1995) Transaction and action coding in the Map Task corpus. Tech. Rep. HCRC/RP-65. Edinburgh, Scotland: Human Communication Research Centre, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Kowtko, J.C., S.D. Isard, and G.M. Doherty
(1992) Conversational games within dialogue. Tech. Rep. HCRC/RP-31. Edinburgh, Scotland: Human Communication Research Centre, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Lave, J., and E. Wenger
(1991) Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leech, G
(1983) Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Lin, Y.Q., R.P. Fawcett, and B.L. Davies
(1993) Genedis: The discourse generator in COMMUNAL. In A. Sloman, D. Hogg, G. Humphreys, A. Ramsay & D. Partridge (eds.), Prospects for Artificial Intelligence. Amsterdam: IOS Press, pp. 148-157.Google Scholar
Power, R
(1979) The organization of purposeful dialogues. Linguistics 171: 107-152.  BoP CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E.A
(1968) Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist 701: 1075-95.  BoP CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schober, M.F
(1995) Speakers, addressees, and frames of reference: Whose effort is minimised in conversations about locations? Discourse Processes 201: 219-247. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schober, M.F., and H.H. Clark
(1989) Understanding by addressees and overhearers. Cognitive Psychology 211: 211-232. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shadbolt, R.N
(1984) Constituting reference in natural language dialogue: The problem of referential opacity. University of Edinburgh: Ph.D. thesis.Google Scholar
Siegel, S., and N.J. Castellan
(1988) Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. London: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. McH, and M. Coulthard
(1975) Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. London: Oxford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Traum, D.R
(1994) A computational theory of grounding in natural language conversation. University of Rochester: Ph.D. thesis.Google Scholar
Wilkes-Gibbs, D
(1986) Collaborative processes of language use in conversation. Stanford University: Ph.D. thesis.Google Scholar
(1997) Studying language use as collaboration. In G. Kasper & E. Kellerman (eds.), Communication Strategies: Psycholinguistic and Sociolinguistic Perspectives. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Wilkes-Gibbs, D., and H.H. Clark
(1992) Coordinating beliefs in conversation. Journal of Memory and Language 311: 183 - 194. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Principles we talk by