In this paper, various interactional features of turn-constructional unit (TCU) continuation as realized in Korean conversation through post-predicate elements are analyzed from a conversation-analytic perspective. Formulated as increments, post-predicate elements serve as re-completers by expanding the host TCU after it has reached a possible point of completion, which is explicitly marked by the utterance-final verb predicate. In many contexts of TCU continuation, the host TCU tends to be allusively constructed (e.g., in the form of a verb predicate with unexpressed arguments) and saliently indexical of the speaker’s affective stance, and post-predicate elements, mostly taking the form of ‘insertables’, elaborate the host TCU. TCU continuation is often realized when the action of the allusive host TCU is ‘disjunctively’ executed, with the interactional import of being potentially interruptive of the current talk-in-progress. Such an intrusive deployment of the host TCU, which is implicated in the practice of foregrounding the speaker’s collusively motivated responsive stance (e.g., in a confirmation request), is demonstrably oriented to by the speaker, who produces a post-predicate element as a methodic way of mitigating the disjunctive initiation of the prior action. The recipient also orients himself/herself to the potentially topic-derailing import associated with such a disjunctive initiation of action by way of initiating repair and/or promptly resuming his/her talk. As such, the production of a post-predicate element itself, mostly as an insertable that is grammatically and semantically related to the host, may not be directly attributed to interactional contingencies per se; it is often sequentially occasioned by practices geared towards enlivening the sequence being wrapped up, initiating or continuing an assessment sequence by way of highlighting the speaker’s evaluative stance turn-initially, or building the current turn on the prior turn through turn-tying operations. The interactional feature of post-predicate elements ‘re-doing the completion point as a transition-relevance place’ is partially manifested in the way the prosodic contour of the final or whole component of the host TCU is repeated and matched by that of the post-predicate elements.
(1984) Generating topic: The use of topic initial elicitors. In J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 167-190. BoP
(2002) Constituency and the grammar of turn increments. In C.E. Ford, B.A. Fox, and S.A. Thompson (eds.), The Language of turn and sequence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 14-38.
Ford, C.E., and S.A. Thompson
(1996) Interactional units in conversation: Syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns. In E. Ochs, E.A. Schegloff and S.A. Thompson (eds.), Interaction and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 134-184.
(1992) Lectures on conversation, Volume I1. Oxford/Cambridge: Blackwell. BoP
Sacks, H., E.A. Schegloff, and G. Jefferson
(1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 501: 696-735. BoP
(1987) Recycled turn beginnings: A precise repair mechanism in conversation’s turn-taking organization. In G. Button and J.R.E. Lee (eds.), Talk and social organization. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters, pp. 54-69.
(1996) Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In E. Ochs, E.A. Schegloff, and S.A. Thompson (eds.), Interaction and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 70-85. BoP
(2001) Conversation analysis: A project in process – “Increments”. Forum Lecture in the 2001 LSA Summer Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara.
Schegloff, E.A., G. Jefferson, and H. Sacks
(1977) The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 531: 361-382. BoP
(1999) Turn-taking in Japanese conversation: A study in grammar and interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. BoP
(2003) Turn continuations: Towards a cross-linguistic classification. InLiSt [Interaction and Linguistic Structures], No. 39, URL: [URL]
Cited by 7 other publications
Bolden, Galina B. & Estefania Guimaraes
2012. Grammatical Flexibility as a Resource in Explicating Referents. Research on Language & Social Interaction 45:2 ► pp. 156 ff.
2019. Conveying the Point of Telling a Story in First-Person Narratives. The Korean Language in America 23:2 ► pp. 119 ff.
2021. “Topic Marker” Nun in Conversation: Interactional Practices and Pedagogical Implications. The Korean Language in America 24:1 ► pp. 51 ff.
2022. Syllabically matched resonance in sound and category. East Asian Pragmatics 7:3 ► pp. 459 ff.
Kim, Stephanie Hyeri & Kyu-hyun Kim
2015. Conversation Analysis. In The Handbook of Korean Linguistics, ► pp. 269 ff.
Luke, Kang-kwong, Sandra A. Thompson & Tsuyoshi Ono
2012. Turns and Increments: A Comparative Perspective. Discourse Processes 49:3-4 ► pp. 155 ff.
2016. Turn-taking in Korean conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 99 ► pp. 62 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.