Article published in:
Turn continuation in cross-linguistic perspective
Edited by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen and Tsuyoshi Ono
[Pragmatics 17:4] 2007
► pp. 553572

Full-text

Complement clauses as turn continuations
References
Chafe, Wallace
(1994) Discourse, consciousness and time. The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
(1986) Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Englebretson, Robert
(2003) Searching for structure. The problem of complementation in colloquial Indonesian conversation. Studies in Discourse and Grammar 13. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E., Barbara A. Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson
(2002) Constituency and the grammar of turn increments. In Cecilia E. Ford, Barbara A. Fox and Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), The language of turn and sequence. Oxford Studies in Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 14-38.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
(1981) Forms of talk. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles
(1979) The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In George Psathas (ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology.New York: Irvington Publishers, pp. 97–121.Google Scholar
Hakulinen, Auli, and Fred Karlsson
(1979) Nykysuomen lauseoppia. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar
Hakulinen, Auli
(1989) Partikkelit ja muut kiteymät vuoroissa. In Auli Hakulinen (ed.), Suomalaisen keskustelun keinoja 1. Kieli 4.Helsinki: Helsingin yliopiston suomen kielen laitos.Google Scholar
Hakulinen, Auli, and Eeva-Leena Seppänen
(1992) Finnish kato: From verb to particle. Journal of Pragmatics 18: 527-549. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Hakulinen, Auli, Maria Vilkuna, Riita Korhonen, Vesa, Koivisto, Tarja Riita Heinonen, and Irja Alho
(2004) Iso suomen kielioppi [The big grammar of Finnish]. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar
Hakulinen, Lauri
(1979) Suomen kielen rakenne ja kehitys. Helsinki: Otava.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
(1977) X’ Syntax: A study of phrase structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kangasniemi, Heikki
(1997) Sana, merkitys, maailma. Katsaus leksikaalisen semantiikan perusteisiin. Helsinki: Finn Lectura.Google Scholar
Keevallik, Leelo
(2000) Keelendid et ja nii et vestluses. Keel ja Kirjandus 5: 344-358.Google Scholar
Kuiri, Kaija
(1984) Referointi Kainuun ja Pohjois-Karjalan murteissa. Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seuran toimituksia 405. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar
Laitinen, Lea
(2002) From logophoric pronoun to discourse particle. A case study of Finnish and Saami. In Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laury, Ritva
(2006) On subordination, Finnish style. Questioning the category of finite clausal complementation in Finnish. In Mickael Suominen, Antti Arppe, Anu Airola, Orvokki Heinämäki, Matti Miestamo, Urho Määttä, Jussi Niemi, Kari K. Pitkänen & Kaius Sinnemäki (eds.), A man of measure. Festschrift in honor of Fred Karlsson on his 60th birthday.Turku: The Linguistic Association of Finland, pp. 310-321.Google Scholar
Laury, Ritva, and Eeva-Leena Seppänen
to appear.) Clause combining. Interaction, evidentiality, participation structure and the conjunction-particle continuum: The Finnish että . Ritva Laury (ed.) Crosslinguistic studies of Clause Combining Crossref
Lindström, Jan
(2003) Syntaksia suomenruotsalaisittain [Syntax Finland Swedish style]. Virittäjä 4/2003: 545-567.Google Scholar
Mayes, Patricia
(1990) Quotation in spoken English. Studies in Language 14: 325-63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Munro, Pamela
(1982) On the transitivity of ’say’ verbs. In Paul J. Hopper and Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Studies in transitivity. New York, N.Y.: Academic Press, pp. 301-318.Google Scholar
Raussi, Anne
(1992)  Et(tä)-partikkelilla alkavat lausumat keskustelussa. Unpublished thesis, Department of Finnish, University of Helsinki.
Routarinne, Sara
(2003) Tytöt äänessä. Parenteesit ja nouseva sävelkulku kertojan vuorovaikutuskeinoina. [Girls Speaking. Parentheses and rising intonation as interactive tools of the teller.] Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden SeuraGoogle Scholar
Sorjonen, Marja-Leena
(2001) Responding in conversation. A study of response particles in Finnish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A.
(2002) ‘Object complements’ and conversation: Towards a realistic account. Studies in Language 26.1: 1125-164. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vilkuna, Maria
(1996) Suomen lauseopin perusteet. [Fundamentals of Finnish Syntax]. Kotimaisten kielten tutkimuskeskuksen julkaisuja 90. Helsinki: Edita.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 11 other publications

D’Hertefelt, Sarah & Jean-Christophe Verstraete
2014. Independent complement constructions in Swedish and Danish: Insubordination or dependency shift?. Journal of Pragmatics 60  pp. 89 ff. Crossref logo
Koivisto, Aino
2012. Discourse patterns for turn-final conjunctions. Journal of Pragmatics 44:10  pp. 1254 ff. Crossref logo
Koivisto, Aino
2014.  In Contexts of Subordination [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 249],  pp. 223 ff. Crossref logo
Koivisto, Aino
2016. Receipting information as newsworthy vs. responding to redirection: Finnish news particles aijaa and aha(a). Journal of Pragmatics 104  pp. 163 ff. Crossref logo
Koivisto, Aino & Liisa Voutilainen
2016. Responding to What Is Left Implicit: Psychotherapists’ Formulations and Understanding Checks After Clients’ Turn-FinalEttä(“That/So”). Research on Language and Social Interaction 49:3  pp. 238 ff. Crossref logo
Laury, Ritva
2012. Syntactically Non-Integrated FinnishJos‘If’-Conditional Clauses as Directives. Discourse Processes 49:3-4  pp. 213 ff. Crossref logo
Luke, Kang-kwong, Sandra A. Thompson & Tsuyoshi Ono
2012. Turns and Increments: A Comparative Perspective. Discourse Processes 49:3-4  pp. 155 ff. Crossref logo
Oloff, Florence & Martin Havlík
2018. An initial description of syntactic extensions in spoken Czech. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 28:3  pp. 361 ff. Crossref logo
Salminen, Jutta
2018. Paratactic negation revisited. Functions of Language 25:2  pp. 259 ff. Crossref logo
Thompson, Sandra A. & Tsuyoshi Ono
2020.  In The ‘Noun Phrase’ across Languages [Typological Studies in Language, 128],  pp. 2 ff. Crossref logo
Vilkuna, Maria
2014.  In Contexts of Subordination [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 249],  pp. 173 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 05 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.