Article published In:
Pragmatics
Vol. 18:3 (2008) ► pp.407424
References
Álvarez Martínez, and María Ángeles
(1989) El pronombre (I). Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Beard, Adrian
(2000) The language of politics. London: Routledge.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Blas-Arroyo, José L
(2000) Mire usted Sr. González…Personal deixis in Spanish political-electoral debate. Journal of Pragmatics 321: 1-27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003) ‘Perdóneme que se lo diga, pero vuelve usted a faltar a la verdad señor González’: Form and function of politic verbal behaviour in face-to-face Spanish political debates. Discourse and Society 14.4: 395- 423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, P., & A. Gilman
(1960) The pronouns of power and solidarity. In T.A. Sebeok (ed.), Style in language. New York: MIT, pp. 253-76.Google Scholar
Brown, P., & S. Levinson
(1987) Politeness: Some universals in language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bull, Peter
(2003) The microanalysis of political communication. Claptrap and ambiguity. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carter, R., & M. McCarthy
(2002) From conversation to corpus: A dual analysis of a broadcast political interview. In A. Sánchez Macarro (ed.), Windows of the world: Media discourse in English. Valencia: University of Valencia Press, pp. 15-39.Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul A
(2001) Analysing the language of politics: Xenophobic and racist discourse. In O. Panagl, H. Goebl and E. Brix, Der Mensch und seine Sprache(n). Vienna: Böhlau, pp. 157-190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004) Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. London: Routledge.  MetBib. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Fina, Anna
(1995) Pronominal choice, identity and solidarity in political discourse. Text 15.3: 379- 410.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DRAE (Diccionario de la Real Academia Española de la Lengua)
(2001) Madrid: Espasa Calpe.
Fairclough, Norman
(2000) New labour, new language? London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fernández Ramírez, Salvador
(1987) Gramática española 3.2. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Fortanet, Inmaculada
(2004) The use of ‘we’ in university lectures: Reference and function. English for Specific Purposes 231: 45-66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gamson, William A
(1992) Talking politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Geis, Michael L
(1987) The language of politics. New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gervasi, Kareen
(2007) The use of Spanish impersonal forms in monolingual and bilingual speech. Hispania 90.2: 342-353.Google Scholar
Gómez Torrego, Leonardo
(1992) La impersonalidad gramatical. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul
(1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole and J.L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics, vol 31: Speech acts. New York.Academic Press, pp. 41-58.Google Scholar
Harris, Sandra
(1991) Evasive action: How politicians respond to questions in political interviews. In P. Scannell (ed.), Broadcast talk. London: Sage, pp. 76-92.Google Scholar
Ilie, Cornelia
(2003) Discourse and metadiscourse in parliamentary debates. Journal of Language and Politics 2.1: 71-92.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Íñigo-Mora, Isabel
(2004) On the use of the personal pronoun we in communities. Journal of Language and Politics 3.1: 27-52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Juliver, P., & S. Stroschein
(1999) Missing boundaries of comparison: The political community. Political Science Quarterly 114.3: 435-453. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maitland, K., & J. Wilson
(1987) Pronominal selection and ideological conflict. Journal of Pragmatics 111: 495-512. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Martínez, José. A
(1989) El pronombre (vol.21). Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Mendikoetxea, Amaya
(1999) Construcciones con se: Medias, pasivas e impersonales. In I. Bosque and V. Demonte (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española 2. Madrid: Espasa Calpe, pp. 1635- 1722.Google Scholar
Morales, E., and G. Prego
(2002) Entrevistas electorales en las campañas políticas para la presidencia del gobierno de 1996 y 2000. Oralia5. 02: 203-45.Google Scholar
Obeng, Samuel G
(1997) Language and politics: Verbal indirection in political discourse. Discourse and Society 8.1: 49-83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Otaola, Concepción
(2000) Lexicometría y enunciación en el discurso político. In Bustos, Charaudeau, Girón, Iglesias and López (eds.), Lengua, Discurso, Texto (I Simposio Internacional de Análisis del Discurso) Madrid: Visor Libros, pp. 2405-2417.Google Scholar
Pennycook, Alastair
(1994) The politics of pronouns. ELTJ 48.2: 173-178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scott, Michael
(2004) Wordsmith tools. (computer software). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tolmach-Lakoff, Robin
(1990) The language war. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A
(2000) Parliamentary debates. In R. Wodak and T.A. Van Dijk (eds.), Racism at the top. Parliamentary discourses on ethic issues in six European States . Klagenfurt, Austria: Drava Verlag, pp. 45-78.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk. Teun A
Wilson, Joseph
(1990) Politically speaking. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Zupnik, Yael J
(1994) A pragmatic analysis or the use of person deixis in political discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 211: 339-383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 21 other publications

Chikara, Owen Tendai & Collen Sabao
2019. Rule Flouting as Argumentation Strategy. In Argumentation and Appraisal in Parliamentary Discourse [Advances in Linguistics and Communication Studies, ],  pp. 59 ff. DOI logo
De Cock, Barbara
Rasson, Marie
2016. Interpretación y tipología del pronombre indefinido uno a partir de tres géneros discursivos. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 67  pp. 227 ff. DOI logo
Schäfer, Sophie
2018. Manöver im politischen Diskurs. In Soziologie der Parlamente,  pp. 231 ff. DOI logo
Vukovic, Milica
2014. Strong epistemic modality in parliamentary discourse. Open Linguistics 1:1 DOI logo
Vuković, Milica
2012. Positioning in pre-prepared and spontaneous parliamentary discourse: Choice of person in the Parliament of Montenegro. Discourse & Society 23:2  pp. 184 ff. DOI logo
Vuković Stamatović, Milica
2017. Metaphors of parliamentary budget debates in times of crisis. Pragmatics and Society 8:2  pp. 281 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. List of figures. In Profiling Discourse Participants [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 246],  pp. ix ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. References. In Profiling Discourse Participants [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 246],  pp. 275 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter III. Discourse participant profiling beyond 
person deixis. In Profiling Discourse Participants [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 246],  pp. 153 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter I. General introduction. In Profiling Discourse Participants [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 246],  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. List of abbreviations. In Profiling Discourse Participants [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 246],  pp. xiii ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. List of tables. In Profiling Discourse Participants [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 246],  pp. xi ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. Index. In Profiling Discourse Participants [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 246],  pp. 303 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter VI. Conclusions and prospects for further research. In Profiling Discourse Participants [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 246],  pp. 267 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter V. Discourse participant profiling. In Profiling Discourse Participants [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 246],  pp. 229 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter IV. Indeterminate constructions. In Profiling Discourse Participants [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 246],  pp. 187 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter II. Person deixis. In Profiling Discourse Participants [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 246],  pp. 21 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. Acknowledgements. In Profiling Discourse Participants [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 246],  pp. xv ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.