This paper combines quantitative and qualitative analyses in a corpus-based study of how and for what purposes politicians, in the context of the Spanish Parliament, use the impersonal pronoun uno ‘one’. I begin by contrasting how uno is used in parliamentary debate versus non-political language. After reviewing traditional definitions of the semantic range and general behavior of this pronoun, I argue that a more accurate account that the one provided by standard grammars is needed for us to better understand how the peculiar characteristics of a parliament affect intentionality in the use of impersonal pronouns. In particular, it is argued that uno is utilized by politicians to serve principally two purposes: 1) avoidance of bluntness - a means of preserving professional etiquette, and 2) avoidance of self- praise - demonstrative of humility. Both purposes serve the larger objective of preserving professional face.
(2000) The language of politics. London: Routledge. BoP
Blas-Arroyo, José L
(2000) Mire usted Sr. González…Personal deixis in Spanish political-electoral debate. Journal of Pragmatics 321: 1-27.
Blas-Arroyo, José L
(2003) ‘Perdóneme que se lo diga, pero vuelve usted a faltar a la verdad señor González’: Form and function of politic verbal behaviour in face-to-face Spanish political debates. Discourse and Society 14.4: 395- 423.
Brown, P., & A. Gilman
(1960) The pronouns of power and solidarity. In T.A. Sebeok (ed.), Style in language. New York: MIT, pp. 253-76.
Brown, P., & S. Levinson
(1987) Politeness: Some universals in language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bull, Peter
(2003) The microanalysis of political communication. Claptrap and ambiguity. London: Routledge.
Carter, R., & M. McCarthy
(2002) From conversation to corpus: A dual analysis of a broadcast political interview. In A. Sánchez Macarro (ed.), Windows of the world: Media discourse in English. Valencia: University of Valencia Press, pp. 15-39.
Chilton, Paul A
(2001) Analysing the language of politics: Xenophobic and racist discourse. In O. Panagl, H. Goebl and E. Brix, Der Mensch und seine Sprache(n). Vienna: Böhlau, pp. 157-190.
Chilton, Paul A
(2004) Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. London: Routledge. MetBib.
De Fina, Anna
(1995) Pronominal choice, identity and solidarity in political discourse. Text 15.3: 379- 410. BoP
DRAE (Diccionario de la Real Academia Española de la Lengua)
(2001) Madrid: Espasa Calpe.
Fairclough, Norman
(2000) New labour, new language? London: Routledge.
Fernández Ramírez, Salvador
(1987) Gramática española 3.2. Madrid: Arco Libros.
Fortanet, Inmaculada
(2004) The use of ‘we’ in university lectures: Reference and function. English for Specific Purposes 231: 45-66.
Gamson, William A
(1992) Talking politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Geis, Michael L
(1987) The language of politics. New York: Springer.
Gervasi, Kareen
(2007) The use of Spanish impersonal forms in monolingual and bilingual speech. Hispania 90.2: 342-353.
Gómez Torrego, Leonardo
(1992) La impersonalidad gramatical. Madrid: Arco Libros.
Grice, H. Paul
(1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole and J.L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics, vol 31: Speech acts. New York.Academic Press, pp. 41-58.
Harris, Sandra
(1991) Evasive action: How politicians respond to questions in political interviews. In P. Scannell (ed.), Broadcast talk. London: Sage, pp. 76-92.
(1999) Missing boundaries of comparison: The political community. Political Science Quarterly 114.3: 435-453.
Maitland, K., & J. Wilson
(1987) Pronominal selection and ideological conflict. Journal of Pragmatics 111: 495-512. BoP
Martínez, José. A
(1989) El pronombre (vol.21). Madrid: Arco Libros.
Mendikoetxea, Amaya
(1999) Construcciones con se: Medias, pasivas e impersonales. In I. Bosque and V. Demonte (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española 2. Madrid: Espasa Calpe, pp. 1635- 1722.
Morales, E., and G. Prego
(2002) Entrevistas electorales en las campañas políticas para la presidencia del gobierno de 1996 y 2000. Oralia5. 02: 203-45.
Obeng, Samuel G
(1997) Language and politics: Verbal indirection in political discourse. Discourse and Society 8.1: 49-83.
Otaola, Concepción
(2000) Lexicometría y enunciación en el discurso político. In Bustos, Charaudeau, Girón, Iglesias and López (eds.), Lengua, Discurso, Texto (I Simposio Internacional de Análisis del Discurso) Madrid: Visor Libros, pp. 2405-2417.
Pennycook, Alastair
(1994) The politics of pronouns. ELTJ 48.2: 173-178.
Scott, Michael
(2004) Wordsmith tools. (computer software). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tolmach-Lakoff, Robin
(1990) The language war. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Van Dijk, Teun A
(2000) Parliamentary debates. In R. Wodak and T.A. Van Dijk (eds.), Racism at the top. Parliamentary discourses on ethic issues in six European States . Klagenfurt, Austria: Drava Verlag, pp. 45-78. BoP
(1994) A pragmatic analysis or the use of person deixis in political discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 211: 339-383.
Cited by
Cited by 21 other publications
Chikara, Owen Tendai & Collen Sabao
2019. Rule Flouting as Argumentation Strategy. In Argumentation and Appraisal in Parliamentary Discourse [Advances in Linguistics and Communication Studies, ], ► pp. 59 ff.
2016. Interpretación y tipología del pronombre indefinido uno a partir de tres géneros discursivos. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 67 ► pp. 227 ff.
Schäfer, Sophie
2018. Manöver im politischen Diskurs. In Soziologie der Parlamente, ► pp. 231 ff.
Vukovic, Milica
2014. Strong epistemic modality in parliamentary discourse. Open Linguistics 1:1
Vuković, Milica
2012. Positioning in pre-prepared and spontaneous parliamentary discourse: Choice of person in the Parliament of Montenegro. Discourse & Society 23:2 ► pp. 184 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.