Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics
Vol. 20:3 (2010) ► pp.401–423

Perspective and politeness in Finnish Requests

This study makes use of elicited request speech act data in Finnish to view variability of personal perspective and T/V forms across a variety of situations. The speakers exhibited a great deal of congruency when they were scripted as addressing someone familiar, being in a position of equal or higher status than the interlocutor, and when the request was considered a low imposition. In such situations, speakers tended to use a second person perspective, with informal T/V forms. The Finnish T-forms were found to be the default form, showing up in half of the request utterances. The Finnish V-forms showed up in only 10 percent of the requests. A variationist analysis using Varbrul complemented the main findings, but was found to not be a reliable tool for elicited pragmatic data, using sociopragmatic factors as independent variables.

Keywords: Perspective, Forms of address, Speech acts, Requests, Finnish, Pragmatic variation
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 1 September 2010
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.20.3.05pet
References
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana
(1982) Learning how to say what you mean in a second language: A study of speech act performance of learners of Hebrew as a second language. Applied Linguistics 31: 29-59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1990) You don’t touch lettuce with your fingers: Parental politeness in family discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 141: 259–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House, and Gabriele Kasper
(eds.) (1989) Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Brown, Roger, and Albert Gilman
(1960) The pronouns of power and solidarity. In Thomas Sebeok (ed.), Style in Language. New York: MIT, pp. 253-276.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson
(1978) Politeness: Some universals in language usage. In E.N. Goody (ed.), Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 56-310.Google Scholar
(1987) Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Byon, Andrew Sangpil
(2006) The role of linguistic indirectness and honorifics in achieving linguistic politeness in Korean requests. Journal of Politeness Research 21: 247–276.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cedergren, Henrietta, and David Sankoff
(1974) Variable rules: Performance as a statistical reflection of competence. Language 501: 333–355. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Churchill, E
(1999, September). Pragmatic development in L2 request strategies by lower level learners. Presented at Second Language Research Forum, University of Minnesota.
Clyne, Michael, Heinz-Leo Kretzenbacher, Catrin Norrby, and Doris Schüpbach
(2006) Perceptions of variation and change in German and Swedish address. Journal of Sociolinguistics 10/3: 287-319. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dines, Elizabeth R
(1980) Variation in discourse – “and stuff like that.” Language in Society 9.1: 13–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eelen, Gino
(2001) A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
(1967) Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. Garden City, New York: Doubleday, Anchor Books.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Harris, Sandra
(2003) Politeness and power: Making and responding to ’requests’ in institutional settings. Text 231: 27–52.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hartford, Beverly, and Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig
(1992) Experimental and observational data in the study of interlanguage pragmatics. Pragmatics and Language Learning. Volume 31. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, pp. 33-52.Google Scholar
Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa, and Lea Laitinen
(2006) Zero person in Finnish. A grammatical resource for constructing human reference. In Marja-Liisa Helasvuo and Lyle Campbell (eds.), Grammar from the human perspective: Case, space and person in Finnish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, Robin
(1973) The logic of politeness; or minding your p’s and q’s. In Papers from the ninth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society. University of Chicago, pp. 292-305.  BoP
(1975) Language and women’s place. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Lappalainen, Hanna
(2004) Variaatio ja sen funktiot. Erään sosiaalisen verkoston jäsenten kielellisen variaation ja vuorovaikutuksen tarkastelua [Variation and its functions]. Helsinki: Suomen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar
(2006a)  Mie vai mää, sinä vai te? Virkaoijoiden kielelliset valinnat itseen ja vastaanottajaan viitattaessa. In Marja-Leena Sorjonen and Liisa Raevaara (eds.), Arjen asiöntia. Keskustelija Kelan tiskin äärellä.Helsinki: Suomen Kirjallisuuden Seura, pp. 241–284.Google Scholar
(2006b) Pronominsubjektin käytöstä ja poisjätöstä Kelan asiointikeskusteluissa. In T. Nordlund, T. Onikki-Rantajääskö and T. Suutari (eds.), Kohtauspaikkana kieli. Näkökulmui persoonaan, muutoksiin ja valintoihin.Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura, pp. 37–64.Google Scholar
(2008) Kelan virkailijoiden henkilötunnuspyynnöt Tutkimus rutiininomaisista [Asking for clients’ identity number or identity card at Finnish Social Security offices: A study of routinized activities]. Virittäjä 41: 483–517.Google Scholar
Lavandera, Beatriz
(1978) Where does the sociolinguistic variable stop? Language in society 7.2: 171–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
(1983) Principles of pragmatics. London and New York: Longman.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Locher, Miriam
(2004) Power and Politeness in Action: Disagreemetns in Oral Communication. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Meier, A.J
(1995a) Defining politeness: Universality in appropriateness. Language Sciences 17.4: 345–356. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1995b) Passages of politeness. Journal of Pragmatics 41: 381–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milroy, Lesley
(1980) Language and social networks. Oxford, UK; New York: Blackwell.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Muikku-Werner, Pirkko
(1993) Impositiivus ja kielellinen variaatio. Julkisten keskustelujen käskyt ja kysymykset kelenopetuksen näkökulmasta. Joensuun yliopiston humanistisia julkaisuja 14. Joensuu.Google Scholar
Niendorf, Mariya
(2005) Investigating the future of Finnish congruency: Focus on possessive morphology. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University, Department of Central Eurasian Studies.
Nuolijärvi, Pirkko, and Liisa Tiittula
(2001)  Rakas Tarja ja hyvä ystävä. Puhuttelu minän ja sosiaalisten suhteiden esittämisen keinoina televisiokeskustelussa. Virittäjä 41: 580–601.Google Scholar
Paolillo, John
(2002) Analyzing linguistic variation: Statistical models and methods. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Paunonen, Heikki
(1995) Morphological changes in spoken Finnish possessive forms. Virittäjä 99.4: 501-531.Google Scholar
Peterson, Elizabeth
(2004) Social appropriateness and language variation: A study of Finnish requests. Unpublished doctoral dissertation,Department of General Linguistics, Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University.
Sankoff, David, Sali Tagliamonte, and Eric Smith
(2005) Goldvarb X: A variable rule application for Macintosh and Windows. New York: Department of Linguistics, University of York.Google Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian
(1974) A quantitative paradigm for the study of communicative competence. In R. Bauman and J. Sherzer (eds.), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking.Cambridge University Press, pp. 18-49.Google Scholar
Seppänen, Eeva-Leena
(1989) Henkilöön viittaaminen puhetilanteessa. In Auli Hakulinen (ed.), Suomalaisen keskustelun keinoja I. Kieli 4.Helsinki: The University of Helsinki, Department of Finnish, pp. 195–222.Google Scholar
Sorjonen, Marja-Leena
(2001) Responding in conversation: A study of response particles in Finnish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Statistics Finland
(2010)  Finland in figures . Retrieved March 15, 2010 from [URL].
Tagliamonte, Sally
(2006) Analysing Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Varghese, Manke, and Kristine Billmyer
(1996) Investigating the structure of discourse completion tests. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics 12.1: 39–58.Google Scholar
VISK = Auli Hakulinen, Maria Vilkuna, Riitta Korhonen, Vesa Koivisto, Tarja Riitta Heinonen ja Irja Alho
(2004) Iso suomen kielioppi, web version 2008. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura. Available at [URL] URN:ISBN:978-952-5446-35-7
Watts, Richard J., Sachiko Ide, and Konrad Ehlich
(eds.) (1992) Politeness in language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.  BoP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yli-Vakkuri, Valma
(2005) Politeness in Finland: Evasion at all costs. In Leo Hickey and Miranda Stewart (eds.), Politeness in Europe. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Holttinen, Tuuli, F. Neveu, G. Bergounioux, M.-H. Côté, J.-M. Fournier, L. Hriba & S. Prévost
2016. Stratégies de requête dans un bureau de tabac et dans son équivalent finlandaisR-kioski. SHS Web of Conferences 27 ► pp. 02007 ff. DOI logo
Isosävi, Johanna
2020. Cultural outsiders' reported adherence to Finnish and French politeness norms. Journal of Pragmatics 155 ► pp. 177 ff. DOI logo
Isosävi, Johanna & Hanna Lappalainen
2015. First Names in Starbucks: A Clash of Cultures?. In Address Practice As Social Action: European Perspectives, ► pp. 97 ff. DOI logo
Lappalainen, Hanna
2019. Imaginary customers and public figures. In It’s not all aboutyou [Topics in Address Research, 1], ► pp. 100 ff. DOI logo
Lappalainen, Hanna & Ildikó Vecsernyés
2023. Chapter 1. Comparing address practices in the Finnish and Hungarian “Got Talent” TV programmes. In It's different with you [Topics in Address Research, 5], ► pp. 13 ff. DOI logo
Pajusalu, Renate, Maret Kaska, Birute Klaas-Lang, Karl Pajusalu, Anu Treikelder & Virve-Anneli Vihman
2017. Characteristics of request formulation in Estonian, Finnish, French, Lithuanian and Russian. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 70:3 ► pp. 455 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.