Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics
Vol. 21:1 (2011) ► pp.69–83

Perceptions of national and regional standards of addressing in Germany and Austria

This article investigates the use of German forms of address in different national and regional varieties of German, as perceived by speakers of those varieties. For particular domains such as the workplace, informants report significant regional and national differences in use not only of pronominal address but also of nominal address and linguistic structures linked to addressing such as greetings. The data also confirm differences in information about and sensitivity for different national varieties between speakers of the dominant and of non-dominant varieties characteristic for asymmetrical pluricentricity.

Keywords: Greetings, Forms of address, Pluricentric languages, German, Language attitudes
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 1 March 2011
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.21.1.04kre
References
Becker, Hendrik
(1960) Herren oder Genossen? Sprachpflege 91: 43.Google Scholar
Besch, Werner
(1998) Duzen, Siezen, Titulieren: Zur Anrede im Deutschen heute und gestern, 2. erg. Aufl. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Carbaugh, Donal
(1996) Situating Selves: The Communication of Social Identities in American Scenes. Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Clyne, Michael
(1992) Epilogue. In Michael Clyne (ed.), Pluricentric Languages: Differing Norms in Different Nations. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 455-466.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Clyne, Michael, Heinz L. Kretzenbacher, Catrin Norrby, and Doris Schüpbach
(2006) Perceptions of variation and change in German and Swedish address. Journal of Sociolinguistics10.3: 287-319. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clyne, Michael, Catrin Norrby, and Jane Warren
(2009) Language and Human Relations: Styles of Address in Contemporary Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ehlers, Klaas-Hinrich
(2004) Zur Anrede mit Titeln in Deutschland, Österreich und Tschechien: Ergebnisse einer Fragebogenerhebung. Brücken. Germanistisches Jahrbuch Tschechien – Slowakei 121: 85-115.Google Scholar
Finkenstaedt, Thomas
(1963) You and Thou : Studien zur Anrede im Englischen (mit einem Exkurs über die Anrede im Deutschen). Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gruber, Reinhard P
(2006) Piefke-Wörterbuch. Graz/Wien: Droschl.Google Scholar
Howell, Richard, and Jack Klassen
(1971) Contrasting „Du/Sie“ patterns in a Mennonite community. Anthropological Linguistics 13.2: 68-74.Google Scholar
Johnston, William M
(2001) Österreichs kulturelle Identität am Ende des 20. Jahrhunderts. Neue Ansichten aus alten Begriffen. In Josef Marko and Klaus Poier (eds.), Politik, Staat und Recht im Zeitenbruch. Symposion aus Anlaß des 60. Geburtstags von Wolfgang Mantl. Wien/Köln/Weimar: Böhlau, pp. 15-33.Google Scholar
Kretzenbacher, Heinz L
(1991) Vom Sie zum Du – und retour? In Heinz L. Kretzenbacher and Wulf Segebrecht, Vom Sie zum Du — mehr als eine neue Konvention? Antworten auf die Preisfrage der Deutschen Akademie für Sprache und Dichtung vom Jahr 1989. Hamburg/Zürich: Luchterhand, pp. 9-77.Google Scholar
(2010) „Man ordnet ja bestimmte Leute irgendwo ein für sich...“: Anrede und soziale Deixis. Deutsche Sprache. Zeitschrift für Theorie, Praxis, Dokumentation 38.1: 1-18.Google Scholar
Kretzenbacher, Heinz L., Michael Clyne, and Doris Schüpbach
(2006) Pronominal address in German: Rules, anarchy and embarrassment potential. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics29.2: 17.1-17.18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuntzsch, Lutz
(2004) “Genosse Botschafter – Liebe Kollegin – Achtung, Gartenfreunde”: Anredeformen und Anredeverhalten in der DDR. In Ruth Reiher and Antje Baumann (eds.), Vorwärts und nichts vergessen. Sprache in der DDR: Was war, was ist, was bleibt. Berlin: Aufbau Taschenbuch Verlag, pp. 148-158.Google Scholar
Liebscher, Grit, Jennifer Daily-O’Cain, Mareike Müller, and Tetyana Reichert
(2010) Negotiating identities through pronouns of address in an immigrant community. Pragmatics20.3: 375-400.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maron, Monika
(1987) Warum zieht es euch nach Sachsen? Zeitmagazin no. 29, 10. July: 6.Google Scholar
Muhr, Rudolf
(2008) The pragmatics of a pluricentric language: A comparison between Austrian German and German German. In Klaus P. Schneider and Anne Barron (eds.), Variational Pragmatics: A Focus on Regional Varieties in Pluricentric Languages, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 211-244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norrby, Catrin
(2006) Variation in Swedish address practices. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics29.2: 18.1-18.15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Klaus P., and Anne Barron
(2008) Where pragmatics and dialectology meet: Introducing variational pragmatics. In Klaus P. Schneider and Anne Barron (eds.), Variational Pragmatics: A Focus on Regional Varieties in Pluricentric Languages. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 1-32. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Soukup. Barbara
(2009) Dialect Use as Interaction Strategy: A Sociolinguistic Study of Contextualization, Speech Perception, and Language Attitudes in Austria. Wien: Braumüller.Google Scholar
Sproß, Elfriede M
(2001) Das Du-Wort. Zur Anrede im Umgang mit anderen. Graz, University, Ph.D. Thesis.
Stoffel, Gertraut M
(1983a) Forms of address amongst German-English bilinguals in New Zealand. General Linguistics 23.2: 79-93.Google Scholar
(1983b) Veränderungen und semantische Konflikte im Anredeverhalten Deutschsprachiger in Neuseeland. Muttersprache 941: 185-193.Google Scholar
Svennevig, Jan
(1999) Getting Acquainted in Conversation: A Study of Initial Interactions. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tönnies, Ferdinand
(2010) Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft: Grundbegriffe der reinen Soziologie. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft (reprint of the 8th edition Leipzig: Buske 1935).Google Scholar
Warga, Muriel
(2008) Requesting in German as a pluricentric language. In Klaus P. Schneider and Anne Barron (eds.), Variational Pragmatics: A Focus on Regional Varieties in Pluricentric Languages. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 245-266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 8 other publications

Buyle, Anouk & Hendrik De Smet
2018. Meaning in a changing paradigm: the semantics of you and the pragmatics of thou. Language Sciences 68 ► pp. 42 ff. DOI logo
Dannerer, Monika, Marianne Franz & Heike Ortner
2017. „Da pendelt sich die Sprache automatisch so ein“: Sprachliche Identität, Akkommodation und Management von innerer und äußerer Mehrsprachigkeit bei Tiroler Privatvermietern. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Linguistik 2017:66 ► pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Kretzenbacher, Heinz L., John Hajek, Catrin Norrby & Doris Schüpbach
2020. Social deixis at international conferences: Austrian German speakers’ introduction and address behaviour in German and English. Journal of Pragmatics 169 ► pp. 100 ff. DOI logo
Norrby, Catrin & Jane Warren
2012. Address Practices and Social Relationships in European Languages. Language and Linguistics Compass 6:4 ► pp. 225 ff. DOI logo
Schüpbach, Doris, John Hajek, Heinz L. Kretzenbacher & Catrin Norrby
2021. Approaches to the study of address in pluricentric languages: methodological reflections . Sociolinguistica 35:1 ► pp. 165 ff. DOI logo
Schüpbach, Doris, John Hajek, Heinz L. Kretzenbacher & Catrin Norrby
2023. Chapter 10. Nominal address and introductions in three national varieties of German. In It's different with you [Topics in Address Research, 5], ► pp. 245 ff. DOI logo
Sild, Orsolya
2023. Address forms in Tatar spoken in Finland and Estonia. Open Linguistics 9:1 DOI logo
Vismans, Roel
2019. Address negotiations in Dutch emails. In It’s not all aboutyou [Topics in Address Research, 1], ► pp. 254 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.