Article published in:
Pragmatics
Vol. 21:3 (2011) ► pp. 411430

Full-text

Enticing a challengeable in arguments
References

References

Atkinson, Maxwell, and Paul Drew
(1979) Order in Court: The Organisation of Verbal Interaction in Judicial Settings. London: Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clayman, Steven, and John Heritage
(2002) The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Coulter, Jeff
(1990) Elementary properties of argument sequences. In George Psathas (ed.), Interaction Competence. Washington: University Press of America, pp. 181–203.Google Scholar
Dersley, Ian, and Anthony Wootton
(2000) Complaint sequences within antagonistic argument. Research on Language and Social Interaction 33: 375–406. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Derek, and Alessandra Fasulo
(2006) “To be honest”: Sequential uses of honesty phrases in talk-in-interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 39: 343–376. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles
(1996) Transparent vision. In Elinor Ochs, Emmanuel Schegloff, and Sandra Thompson (eds.), Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 370–404. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gruber, Helmut
(2001) Questions and strategic orientation in verbal conflict sequences. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 1851–1857. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles, and John Heritage
(1990) Conversation analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology 19: 283–307. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heinemann, Trine
(2008) Questions of accountability: Yes-no interrogatives that are unanswerable. Discourse Studies 10: 55–71. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John
(2002) The limits of questioning: Negative interrogatives and hostile question content. Journal of Pragmatics 34: 1427–1446. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John, and Geoffrey Raymond
(2005) The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in assessment sequences. Social Psychology Quarterly 68: 15–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John, and Steven Clayman
(2010) Talk in Action: Interactions, Identities, and Institutions. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hester, Stephen, and Peter Eglin
(1997) Culture in action: Studies in membership categorization analysis. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Housley, William, and Richard Fitzgerald
(2002) The reconsidered model of membership categorization analysis, Qualitative Research 2: 59–83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hutchby, Ian
(1996a) Confrontation talk: Argument, asymmetries and power on talk radio. Hilldale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(1996b) Power in discourse: The case of arguments on a British talk radio show. Discourse & Society 7: 481–97. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Jayyusi, Lena
(1984) Categorization and the moral order. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
(2004) Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In Gene Lerner (ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the first generation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp 13–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koshik, Irene
(2002) A conversation-analytic study of yes/no questions which convey reversed polarity assertions. Journal of Pragmatics 34: 1851–77. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) Wh-questions used as challenges. Discourse Studies 5: 51–77. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen
(1992) Activity types and language. In Paul Drew, and John Heritage (eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 66–100.Google Scholar
Maynard, Douglas
(1985) How children start arguments. Language in Society 14: 1–29. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Mehan, Hugh
(1979) Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Monzoni, Chiara
(2008) Introducing direct complaints through questions: The interactional achievement of “pre-sequences”. Discourse Studies 10: 73–87. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Muntigl, Peter, and William Turnbull
(1998) Conversational structure and facework in arguing. Journal of Pragmatics 29: 225–256. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Paoletti, Isabella
(1998) Handling "incoherence" according to speaker's on-sight categorization. In Charles Antaki, and Sue Widdicombe (eds.), Identities in Talk. London: Sage, pp. 171–190.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita
(1984) Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 57–101.Google Scholar
(1988) Offering a candidate answer: An information seeking strategy. Communication Monographs 55: 360–73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Raymond, Geoffrey
(2003) Grammar and social organization: Yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review 68: 939–67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey
(1992) Lectures on conversation. 2 vols. Jefferson, Gail (ed.) with introductions by Schegloff, Emmanuel. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emmanuel Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
(1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50: 696–735. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emmanuel
(1968) Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist 70: 1075–95. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1980) Preliminaries to preliminaries: "Can I ask you a question?". Sociological Inquiry 50: 104–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis, vol 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
(1984) Jewish argument as sociability. Language in Society 13: 311–335. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Sharrock, Wes
(1974) On owning knowledge. In Roy Turner (ed.), Ethnomethodology: Selected readings. Harmondsworth: Penguin, pp. 45–53.Google Scholar
Stokoe, Elizabeth, and Derek Edwards
(2008) "Did you have permission to smash your neighbour's door?" Silly questions and their answers in police–suspect interrogations. Discourse Studies 10: 89–111. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Asking ostensibly silly questions in police-suspect interrogations. In Alice Freed, and Susan Erlich (eds.), Why do you ask: The functions of questions in institutional discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 108–133.Google Scholar
Vuchinich, Samuel
(1990) The sequential organisation of closing in verbal family conflict. In Allen Grimshaw (ed.), Conflict Talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 118–139.Google Scholar
Watson, Rod
(1997) Some general reflections on 'Categorization' and 'Sequence' in the analysis of conversation. In Stephen Hester, and Peter Eglin (eds.), Culture in action: Studies in membership categorization analysis. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America, pp. 49–76.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 18 other publications

Brown, Barry & Eric Laurier
2017.  In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems,  pp. 416 ff. Crossref logo
Cerović, Marijana
2016. When suspects ask questions: Rhetorical questions as a challenging device. Journal of Pragmatics 105  pp. 18 ff. Crossref logo
Drake, Derek & Veronika Drake
2015. “Tags are easy,ne?”: How to Teach the Use of Tags in the German Language Classroom. Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German 48:1  pp. 146 ff. Crossref logo
Gruber, Helmut
2018. Debating or displaying political positions?. Pragmatics and Society 9:4  pp. 571 ff. Crossref logo
Hosoda, Yuri & David Aline
2013. Two preferences in question–answer sequences in language classroom context. Classroom Discourse 4:1  pp. 63 ff. Crossref logo
Humă, Bogdana, Elizabeth Stokoe & Rein Ove Sikveland
2019. Persuasive Conduct: Alignment and Resistance in Prospecting “Cold” Calls. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 38:1  pp. 33 ff. Crossref logo
Kent, Alexandra & Charles Antaki
2020. Police Call-takers' First Substantive Question Projects the Outcome of the Call. Applied Linguistics 41:5  pp. 640 ff. Crossref logo
Laurier, Eric
2016. YouTube: fragments of a video-tropic atlas. Area 48:4  pp. 488 ff. Crossref logo
Lee, Josephine
2019. Scaling as an argumentative resource in television talk shows. Journal of Pragmatics 150  pp. 133 ff. Crossref logo
Mayes, Patricia
2015. Becoming an ‘autonomous writer’: Epistemic stance displays and membership categorization in the writing conference. Discourse Studies 17:6  pp. 752 ff. Crossref logo
Reber, Elisabeth
2019.  In Embodied Activities in Face-to-face and Mediated Settings,  pp. 255 ff. Crossref logo
Reynolds, Edward
2015. How participants in arguments challenge the normative position of an opponent. Discourse Studies 17:3  pp. 299 ff. Crossref logo
Robles, Jessica S. & Theresa Castor
2019. Taking the moral high ground: Practices for being uncompromisingly principled. Journal of Pragmatics 141  pp. 116 ff. Crossref logo
Rosemeyer, Malte
2018. The pragmatics of Spanish postposed wh-interrogatives. Folia Linguistica 52:2  pp. 283 ff. Crossref logo
Theobald, Maryanne, Gillian Busch & Susan Danby
2018. Socializing children into pop culture: A visit to Santa. Global Studies of Childhood 8:3  pp. 252 ff. Crossref logo
Turowetz, Jason, Matthew M. Hollander & Douglas W. Maynard
2016.  In Handbook of Contemporary Sociological Theory [Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research, ],  pp. 387 ff. Crossref logo
Versteeg, Wytske & Hedwig te Molder
2018. ‘You must know what you mean when you say that’: the morality of knowledge claims about ADHD in radio phone-ins. Sociology of Health & Illness 40:4  pp. 718 ff. Crossref logo
Zhao, Yan & Jiangfeng Liu
2019.  In Literature, Spoken Language and Speaking Skills in Second Language Learning,  pp. 118 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.