Article published In:
PragmaticsVol. 21:3 (2011) ► pp.411–430
Enticing a challengeable in arguments
Sequence, epistemics and preference organisation
This article reports on an interactional practice found in one form of adversarial talk, arguments during protests, where participants work to ‘entice’ a particular answer from an opponent using an uncontroversial questions in order to challenge the opponent on the basis of their own answer. Based on a collection of arguments during protests posted to YouTube, this article uses conversation analysis (CA) in order to investigate the way in which participants employ these uncontroversial questions as ‘pre-challenges’, using speaker selection, recipient focused topics and a moral ordering of talk to work to obligate a particular answer from the recipient. The results of the analysis illustrate several ways in which participants manipulate epistemics, speaker selection, and recipient design as resources for enacting social conflict.
Keywords: Arguments, Questions, Conversation analysis, Epistemics, Conflict
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
References
Atkinson, Maxwell, and Paul Drew
(1979) Order in Court: The Organisation of Verbal Interaction in Judicial Settings. London: Macmillan. 
Clayman, Steven, and John Heritage
(2002) The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
BoPCoulter, Jeff
(1990) Elementary properties of argument sequences. In George Psathas (ed.), Interaction Competence. Washington: University Press of America, pp. 181–203.
Dersley, Ian, and Anthony Wootton
(2000) Complaint sequences within antagonistic argument. Research on Language and Social Interaction 331: 375–406. BoP
BoPEdwards, Derek, and Alessandra Fasulo
(2006) “To be honest”: Sequential uses of honesty phrases in talk-in-interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 391: 343–376.
Goodwin, Charles
(1996) Transparent vision. In Elinor Ochs, Emmanuel Schegloff, and Sandra Thompson (eds.), Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 370–404.
Gruber, Helmut
(2001) Questions and strategic orientation in verbal conflict sequences. Journal of Pragmatics 331: 1851–1857. BoP
BoPGoodwin, Charles, and John Heritage
(1990) Conversation analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology 191: 283–307.
Heinemann, Trine
(2008) Questions of accountability: Yes-no interrogatives that are unanswerable. Discourse Studies 101: 55–71. BoP
BoPHeritage, John
(2002) The limits of questioning: Negative interrogatives and hostile question content. Journal of Pragmatics 341: 1427–1446. BoP
BoPHeritage, John, and Geoffrey Raymond
(2005) The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in assessment sequences. Social Psychology Quarterly 681: 15–38.
Heritage, John, and Steven Clayman
(2010) Talk in Action: Interactions, Identities, and Institutions. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Hester, Stephen, and Peter Eglin
(1997) Culture in action: Studies in membership categorization analysis. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America. BoP
Housley, William, and Richard Fitzgerald
(2002) The reconsidered model of membership categorization analysis, Qualitative Research 21: 59–83.
Hutchby, Ian
(1996a) Confrontation talk: Argument, asymmetries and power on talk radio. Hilldale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
(1996b) Power in discourse: The case of arguments on a British talk radio show. Discourse & Society 71: 481–97. BoP
BoPJayyusi, Lena
(1984) Categorization and the moral order. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Jefferson, Gail
(2004) Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In Gene Lerner (ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the first generation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp 13–31.
Koshik, Irene
(2002) A conversation-analytic study of yes/no questions which convey reversed polarity assertions. Journal of Pragmatics 341: 1851–77.
Levinson, Stephen
(1992) Activity types and language. In Paul Drew, and John Heritage (eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 66–100.
Maynard, Douglas
Mehan, Hugh
(1979) Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Monzoni, Chiara
(2008) Introducing direct complaints through questions: The interactional achievement of “pre-sequences”. Discourse Studies 101: 73–87. BoP
BoPMuntigl, Peter, and William Turnbull
Paoletti, Isabella
(1998) Handling "incoherence" according to speaker's on-sight categorization. In Charles Antaki, and Sue Widdicombe (eds.), Identities in Talk. London: Sage, pp. 171–190.
Pomerantz, Anita
(1984) Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 57–101.
(1988) Offering a candidate answer: An information seeking strategy. Communication Monographs 551: 360–73.
Raymond, Geoffrey
(2003) Grammar and social organization: Yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review 681: 939–67.
Sacks, Harvey
(1992) Lectures on conversation. 2 vols1. Jefferson, Gail (ed.) with introductions by Schegloff, Emmanuel. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. BoP
Sacks, Harvey, Emmanuel Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
(1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 501: 696–735. BoP
BoPSchegloff, Emmanuel
(1968) Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist 701: 1075–95.
(1980) Preliminaries to preliminaries: "Can I ask you a question?". Sociological Inquiry 501: 104–52.
(2007) Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis, vol 11. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schiffrin, Deborah
Sharrock, Wes
(1974) On owning knowledge. In Roy Turner (ed.), Ethnomethodology: Selected readings. Harmondsworth: Penguin, pp. 45–53.
Stokoe, Elizabeth, and Derek Edwards
(2008) "Did you have permission to smash your neighbour's door?" Silly questions and their answers in police–suspect interrogations. Discourse Studies 101: 89–111.
(2010) Asking ostensibly silly questions in police-suspect interrogations. In Alice Freed, and Susan Erlich (eds.), Why do you ask: The functions of questions in institutional discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 108–133.
Vuchinich, Samuel
(1990) The sequential organisation of closing in verbal family conflict. In Allen Grimshaw (ed.), Conflict Talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 118–139.
Watson, Rod
(1997) Some general reflections on 'Categorization' and 'Sequence' in the analysis of conversation. In Stephen Hester, and Peter Eglin (eds.), Culture in action: Studies in membership categorization analysis. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America, pp. 49–76.
Cited by
Cited by 22 other publications
Brown, Barry & Eric Laurier
2017. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ► pp. 416 ff. 
Cerović, Marijana
2016. When suspects ask questions: Rhetorical questions as a challenging device. Journal of Pragmatics 105 ► pp. 18 ff.
Edmonds, David Matthew & Marco Pino
2023. Designedly intentional misgendering in social interaction: A conversation analytic account. Feminism & Psychology 33:4 ► pp. 668 ff.
Gruber, Helmut
Hansen, Susan
2021. Negative curation and contested claims over the public visual landscape. City 25:3-4 ► pp. 474 ff.
Hosoda, Yuri & David Aline
2013. Two preferences in question–answer sequences in language classroom context. Classroom Discourse 4:1 ► pp. 63 ff.
Humă, Bogdana, Elizabeth Stokoe & Rein Ove Sikveland
2019. Persuasive Conduct: Alignment and Resistance in Prospecting “Cold” Calls. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 38:1 ► pp. 33 ff.
Joyce, Jack B
2022. Resistance in public disputes: Third-turn blocking to suspend progressivity. Discourse Studies 24:2 ► pp. 231 ff.
Joyce, Jack B. & Linda Walz
2022. Picking fights with politicians. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 32:4 ► pp. 562 ff.
Kent, Alexandra & Charles Antaki
2020. Police Call-takers' First Substantive Question Projects the Outcome of the Call. Applied Linguistics 41:5 ► pp. 640 ff.
Laurier, Eric
2016. YouTube: fragments of a video‐tropic atlas. Area 48:4 ► pp. 488 ff.
Lee, Josephine
2019. Scaling as an argumentative resource in television talk shows. Journal of Pragmatics 150 ► pp. 133 ff.
Marrese, Olivia H., Chase Wesley Raymond, Barbara A. Fox, Cecilia E. Ford & Megan Pielke
2021. The Grammar of Obviousness: The Palm-Up Gesture in Argument Sequences. Frontiers in Communication 6
Mayes, Patricia
2015. Becoming an ‘autonomous writer’: Epistemic stance displays and membership categorization in the writing conference. Discourse Studies 17:6 ► pp. 752 ff.
Reber, Elisabeth
2019. ‘Punch and Judy’ Politics? Embodying Challenging Courses of Action in Parliament. In Embodied Activities in Face-to-face and Mediated Settings, ► pp. 255 ff.
Reynolds, Edward
2015. How participants in arguments challenge the normative position of an opponent. Discourse Studies 17:3 ► pp. 299 ff.
Robles, Jessica S. & Theresa Castor
2019. Taking the moral high ground: Practices for being uncompromisingly principled. Journal of Pragmatics 141 ► pp. 116 ff.
Rosemeyer, Malte
2018. The pragmatics of Spanish postposed wh-interrogatives. Folia Linguistica 52:2 ► pp. 283 ff.
Theobald, Maryanne, Gillian Busch & Susan Danby
2018. Socializing children into pop culture: A visit to Santa. Global Studies of Childhood 8:3 ► pp. 252 ff.
Turowetz, Jason, Matthew M. Hollander & Douglas W. Maynard
2016. Ethnomethodology and Social Phenomenology. In Handbook of Contemporary Sociological Theory [Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research, ], ► pp. 387 ff.
Versteeg, Wytske & Hedwig te Molder
2018. ‘You must know what you mean when you say that’: the morality of knowledge claims about ADHD in radio phone‐ins. Sociology of Health & Illness 40:4 ► pp. 718 ff.
Zhao, Yan & Jiangfeng Liu
2019. Screenplays as a Pedagogical Medium for Cultivating EFL Learners’ Metapragmatic Awareness of Speech Acts in Spoken English. In Literature, Spoken Language and Speaking Skills in Second Language Learning, ► pp. 118 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.