Article published in:
Pragmatics
Vol. 21:3 (2011) ► pp. 473490

Full-text

Use and abuse of the strategic function of in fact and frankly when qualifying a standpoint
References
Aijmer, K.
(2002) English Discourse Particles. Evidence From a Corpus. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aijmer, K., and A.-M. Simon-Vandenbergen
(2004) A model and a methodology for the study of pragmatic markers: The semantic field of expectation. Journal of Pragmatics 36: 1781-1805. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Bach, K., and R. Harnish
(1979) Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Bellert, I.
(1977) On semantic and distributional properties of sentential adverbs. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 337-351.Google Scholar
Biber, D., S. Johansson, G. Leech, S. Conrad, and E. Finegan
(1999) The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Brown, P., and S.C. Levinson
(1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Caffi, C.
(1999) On mitigation. Journal of Pragmatics 31: 881-909. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Edwards, D., and A. Fasulo
(2006) “To be honest”: Sequential uses of honesty phrases in talk-in- interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 39: 343-376. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eemeren, F.H. van
(2010) Strategic Maneuvering. Extending the Pragma-dialectical Theory of Argumentation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eemeren, F.H. van, and R. Grootendorst
(1984) Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions: A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussions Directed Towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion. Dordrecht: Foris Publications. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1992) Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies. A Pragma-dialectical Perspective. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(2004) A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. The Pragma- dialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eemeren, F.H. van, and P. Houtlosser
(2000) Rhetorical analysis within a pragma-dialectical framework. The case of R.J. Reynolds. Argumentation 14: 293-305. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002a) Strategic maneuvering: Maintaining a delicate balance. In F.H. van Eemeren and P. Houtlosser (eds.), Dialectic and Rhetoric: The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publications, pp. 131-159. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002b) Strategic maneuvering with the burden of proof. In F.H. van Eemeren (ed.), Advances in Pragma-Dialectics. Amsterdam/ Newport: SicSat/Vale Press, pp. 13-28.Google Scholar
(2004) Flexible facts: A pragma-dialectical analysis of a burden of proof manipulation. In T. Suzuku, Y. Yano and T. Kato (eds.), Argumentation and Cognition. Tokyo: Japan Debate Association, pp. 47-51.Google Scholar
Eemeren, F.H. van, P. Houtlosser, and A.F. Snoeck Henkemans
(2007) Argumentative Indicators in Discourse: A Pragma-dialectical Study. Argumentation Library, vol.12. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grice, P.
(1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole and J. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, vol. 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, pp. 41-58.Google Scholar
Houtlosser, P.
(2001) Points of view. In F.H. van Eemeren (ed.), Crucial Concepts in Argumentation Theory. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 27-50.Google Scholar
(2002) Indicators of a point of view. In F.H. van Eemeren (ed.), Advances in Pragma- Dialectics. Amsterdam/Newport News: Sic Sat/Vale Press, pp. 169-184.Google Scholar
Huddleston, R., and G. Pullum
(2002) The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hunston, S., and G. Thompson
(eds.) (2000) Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K.
(1998) Hedging in Scientific Research Articles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Ifantidou, E.
(2001) Evidentials and Relevance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Kauffeld, F.J.
(1998) Presumptions and the distribution of argumentative burdens in acts of proposing and accusing. Argumentation 12: 245-266. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oh, Sun-Young
(2000) Actually and in fact in American English: A data-based analysis. English Language and Linguistics 4: 243-268. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Simon-Vandenbergen, A.-M., and K. Aijmer
(2002-2003) The expectation marker of course in a cross- linguistic perspective. Languages in Contrast 4: 13-43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, S.W., and A.H. Jucker
(2000) Actually and other markers of an apparent discrepancy between propositional attitudes of conversational partners. In C. Andersen and T. Fretheim (eds.), Pragmatic Markers and Propositional Attitude. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 207-237. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Snoeck Henkemans, A.F.
(1992) Analysing Complex Argumentation: The Reconstruction of Multiple and Coordinatively Compound Argumentation in a Critical Discussion. Amsterdam: SicSat.Google Scholar
(2002) Clues for reconstructing symptomatic argumentation. In F.H. van Eemeren (ed.), Advances in Pragma-Dialectics. Amsterdam/Newport News: Sic Sat/Vale Press, pp. 185-195.Google Scholar
(2003a) Indicators of analogy argumentation. In F.H. van Eemeren, J.A. Blair, Ch.A. Willard and A.F. Snoeck Henkemans (eds.), Proceedings of the 5th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation. Amsterdam: SicSat, pp. 969-973.Google Scholar
(2003b) Indicators of argumentation structures. In J.A. Blair, D. Farr, H.V. Hansen, R.H. Johnson and C.W. Tindale (eds.), Informal Logic at 25: Proceedings of the Windsor Conference. CD Rom, Windsor, ON: OSSA, pp. 1-9.Google Scholar
Tseronis, A.
(2007) The management of the burden of proof and its implications for the analysis of qualified standpoints: The case of evaluative adverbials. In F.H. van Eemeren, J.A. Blair, Ch.A. Willard and A.F. Snoeck Henkemans (eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation. Amsterdam: SicSat, pp. 1387-1394.Google Scholar
(2009) Qualifying Standpoints. Stance Adverbs as a Presentational Device for Managing the Burden of Proof. Utrecht: LOT Dissertation Series.Google Scholar