Use and abuse of the strategic function of in fact and frankly when qualifying a standpoint
This paper seeks to specify the strategic function of adverbs like in fact and frankly when used to qualify the utterance that functions as a standpoint in an argumentative discussion. The aim is to provide a description of their strategic function that takes into consideration the role that the move of advancing a standpoint plays in argumentative discourse. To this direction, the choice of qualifying is explained as a choice that the arguer makes in his attempt to manage the burden of proof that is incurred when advancing a standpoint. By combining the insights from the pragma-linguistic treatment of these adverbs with the theoretical premises of a systematic approach to the analysis of argumentative discourse it becomes possible to specify their strategic function and to evaluate those cases in which this strategic function has been abused to the detriment of the quality of argumentative discourse.
Keywords: Argumentation, Standpoint qualification, Management of the burden of proof, Strategic manoeuvring, Expectation markers, Illocutionary adverbs, Stance adverbs, Pragma-dialectics
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 01 September 2011
Aijmer, K., and A.-M. Simon-Vandenbergen
(2004) A model and a methodology for the study of pragmatic markers: The semantic field of expectation. Journal of Pragmatics 36: 1781-1805. BoP
Bach, K., and R. Harnish
(1979) Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. BoP
Biber, D., S. Johansson, G. Leech, S. Conrad, and E. Finegan
Brown, P., and S.C. Levinson
(1999) On mitigation. Journal of Pragmatics 31: 881-909. BoP
Edwards, D., and A. Fasulo
Eemeren, F.H. van
Eemeren, F.H. van, and R. Grootendorst
(1984) Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions: A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussions Directed Towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion. Dordrecht: Foris Publications. BoP
Eemeren, F.H. van, and P. Houtlosser
Eemeren, F.H. van, P. Houtlosser, and A.F. Snoeck Henkemans
Huddleston, R., and G. Pullum
Hunston, S., and G. Thompson
(eds.) (2000) Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. BoP
(1998) Hedging in Scientific Research Articles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. BoP
(2001) Evidentials and Relevance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. BoP
Simon-Vandenbergen, A.-M., and K. Aijmer
Smith, S.W., and A.H. Jucker
Snoeck Henkemans, A.F.
(2007) The management of the burden of proof and its implications for the analysis of qualified standpoints: The case of evaluative adverbials. In F.H. van Eemeren, J.A. Blair, Ch.A. Willard and A.F. Snoeck Henkemans (eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation. Amsterdam: SicSat, pp. 1387-1394.