Gender and professional identity in three institutional settings in Brazil
The case of responses to assessment turns
The current study looks at the construction of professional identity and its relations with gender, by analyzing the discursive practices of a unique set of contrasting groups, i.e. three parallel institutions created to address violence against women in Brazil: An all female police station and two crisis intervention centers – one run by feminists professionals and the other run by lay women from a working class community. In particular, the study investigates how the professionals in each setting respond to self and other assessments made by the female victims of violence.
References
Atkinson, J. Maxwell
(
1992)
Displaying neutrality: Formal aspects of informal court proceedings. In
Paul Drew, and
John Heritage(eds.),
Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 199–211.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Azevedo, M.A.
(
1985)
Mulheres Espancadas, a Violência Denunciada. São Paulo: Cortez Editora.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baldock, John, and David Prior
(
1981)
Social workers talking to clients: A study of verbal behavior.
British Journal of Social Work 111: 19–38.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bayraktaroglu, Arin
(
1991)
Politeness and interactional imbalance.
International Journal of the Sociology of Language 921: 5–34.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
(
1987)
Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
(
1999)
Politeness: Some universals in language users. In
Adam Jaworski, and
Nikolas Coupland (eds.),
The discourse Reader. London: Routledge, pp. 320–335.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bucholtz, Mary
(
1999)
Bad examples: Transgression and progress in language and gender studies. In
Mary Bucholtz,
Anita C. Liang, and
Laurel A. Sutton (eds.),
Reinventing Identities: The Gendered Self in Discourse. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–24.
BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Butler, Judith
(
1990)
Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Button, Graham
(
1992)
Answers as interactional products: Two sequential practices used in job interviews. In
Paul Drew, and
John Heritage(eds.),
Talk at Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 212–231.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chauí, Marilena, Celia Paoli, and Ruth Cardoso
(
1984)
Perspectivas Antropológicas da Mulher. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar Editores.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clayman, Steven E.
(
1992)
Footing in the achievement of neutrality: The case of news-interview discourse. In
Paul Drew, and
John Heritage(eds.),
Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 163–198.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clayman, Steven E.
(
2002)
Sequence and Solidarity. In
J. Edward Lawler, and
Shane R. Thye (eds.),
Advances in Group Processes: Group Cohesion, Trust, and Solidarity. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science, pp. 229–253Liane V.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Correio da Gente
(
1995a,
November 11)
Delegacia da Mulher assume novo papel.
Correio da Gente.
Correio da Gente
(
1995b,
January 10)
Homem atende da Delegacia da Mulher.
Correio da Gente.
Davis, Liane V., Jan L. Hagen, and Theresa J. Early
(
1994)
Social services for battered women: Are they adequate, accessible, and appropriate? Social Work 39.6: 695–704.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Drew, Paul, and John Heritage
(
1992)
Analyzing talk at work: An introduction. In
Paul Drew, and
John Heritage(eds.),
Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–65.
BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Du Bois, J.W., S. Schuetze-Coburn, D. Paolino, and S. Cumming
(eds.) (
1992)
Discourse Transcription. Santa Barbara: University of Santa Barbara.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eckert, P., and S. McConnell-Ginet
(
1992)
Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as community-based practice.
Annual Review of Anthropology 211: 461–490.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Erickson, Frederick, and Jeffrey Shultz
(
1982)
The Counselor as Gatekeeper: Social Interaction in Interviews. New York: Academic Press.
BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gal, Susan
(
1995)
Language, gender, and power: An anthropological review. In
Kira Hall, and
Mary Bucholtz,
Gender Articulated: Language and the Socially Constructed Self. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 169–182.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goffman, Erving
(
1955)
On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction.
Psychiatry: Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Processes 181: 213–231.
BoP ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goodwin, Charles, and John Heritage
(
1990)
Conversation analysis.
Annual Review of Anthropology 191: 283–307.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Golato, Andrea, and Carmen Taleghani-Nikazm
(
2006)
The negotiation of face in chats.
Multilingual 251: 293–322.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Greatbatch, David
(
1992)
On the management of disagreement between news interviewers. In
Paul Drew, and
John Heritage(eds.),
Talk at work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 268–301.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hautzinger, S
(
1997)
“Calling a State a State”: Feminist politics and the policing of violence against women in Brazil.
Feminist Issues 15.1-2: 3–30.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hayashi, Takuo
(
1996)
Politeness in conflict management: A conversation analysis of dispreferred message from a cognitive perspective.
Journal of Pragmatics 25.2: 227–255.
BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jefferson, Gail, and John R.E. Lee
(
1992)
The rejection of advice: Managing the problematic convergence of a “Troubles-Telling” and a “Service Encounter”. In
Paul Drew, and
John Heritage(eds.),
Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 521–548.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kurz, Damie
(
1998)
Old problems and new directions in the study of violence against women. In
Raquel Kennedy Bergen (ed.),
Issue in Intimate Violence. Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 197–208.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leiman, Joan M.
(
1998)
Addressing Domestic Violence and Its Consequences: Policy Report of the Commonwealth Fund Commission on Women’s Health. New York: The Commission.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levinson, Stephen C.
(
1983)
Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
BoP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lerner, Gene H.
(
1996)
Finding ‘Face’ in the preference structures of talk-in-interaction.
Social Psychology Quarterly 59.4: 303–321.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McElhinny, Bonnie S.
(
1993a)
We all wear blue: Language, gender and police work. Unpublished Ph.D., Stanford University, Stanford.
McElhinny, Bonnie S.
(
1993b)
“You don’t smile a lot:” Gender, affect and discourse of Pittsburgh Police Officer. Paper presented at the Locating Power: Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Conference on Women and Language, Berkeley.
McElhinny, Bonnie S.
(
1994)
An economy of affect: Objectivity, masculinity and the gendering of police work. In
Andrea Cornwall, and
Nancy Lindisfarne(eds.),
Dislocating Masculinity: Comparative Ethnographies. New York, N.Y.: Routledge, pp. 159–171.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McElhinny, Bonnie S.
(
1995)
Challenging hegemonic masculinities: Female and male police officers handling domestic violence. In
Kira Hall, and
Mary Bucholtz(eds.),
Gender Articulated: Language and the Socially Constructed Self. New York: Routledge, pp. 217–243.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nabucco, Aray
(
1989,
April 30)
Aumentam os casos de estupro em um quadro geral de violência familiar.
Diário Popular, pp. 12–13.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nelson, Sarah Elizabeth
(
1996)
Constructing and negotiating gender in women’s police stations in Brazil.
Latin American Perspectives 23, no. 1.88: 131–148.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nelson, Sarah Elizabeth
(
1997)
Policing women: Race, class and power in the women’s police stations of Brazil. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Washington, Washington.
Ostermann, Ana. C.
(
2000)
Reifying and defying sisterhood: Communities of practice at work at an allfemale police station and a feminist crisis intervention center in Brazil. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Ostermann, Ana. C.
(
2003a)
Communities of practice at work: Gender, facework and the power of habitus at an all-female police station and a feminist crisis intervention center in Brazil.
Discourse & Society 14.4: 473–505.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ostermann, Ana C.
(
2003b)
Localizing power and solidarity: Pronoun alternation at an all-female police station and a feminist crisis intervention center in Brazil.
Language in Society 32.3: 351–381.
BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pillet-Shore, Danielle
(
2011)
Making way and making sense: Including newcomers in interaction.
Social Psychology Quarterly 73.2: 152–175.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pomerantz, Anita
(
1978)
Compliment responses: Notes on the co-operation of multiple constrains. In
Jim Schenkein (ed.),
Studies in the Organization of the Interaction. London: Academic Press, pp. 79–112.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pomerantz, Anita
(
1984)
Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some feature of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In
J. Maxwell Atkinson, and
John Heritage(eds.),
Structures of Social Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 57–101.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ptacek, James
(
1998)
Why do men batter their wives? In
Raquel Kennedy Bergen (ed.),
Issues in Intimate Violence. Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 181–195.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schegloff, Emmanuel, and Harvey Sacks
(
1973)
Opening up closings.
Semiotica VIII. 4: 289–327.
BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schuler, Margaret
(ed.) (
1992)
Freedom from Violence: Women’s Strategies from Around the World. New York: OEF International.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Scollon, Ron, and Suzanne Wong Scollon
(
1995)
Intercultural Communication: A Discourse Approach. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sorj, Bila, and Paula Montero
(
1984)
SOS-Mulher e a luta contra a violência. In
Marilena Chauí,
Maria Celia Paoli, and
Paula Montero SOS-Mulher (
Bila Sorj,
Lígia Rodrigues,
e Rita Andréa) (eds.),
Perspectivas Antropológicas da Mulher 4. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar Editores, pp. 101–108.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sorj, Bila, Paula Montero, Lígia Rodrigues, and Rita Andréa
(
1984)
SOS-Mulher do Rio de Janeiro. In
Marilena Chauí,
Maria Celia Paoli, and
Paula Montero SOS-Mulher (
Bila Sorj,
Lígia Rodrigues,
e Rita Andréa) (eds.),
Perspectivas Antropológicas da Mulher 4. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar Editores, pp. 109–137.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tannen, Deborah
(
1994)
Interpreting interruption in conversation. In
Deborah Tannen (ed.),
Gender and Discourse. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 53–83.
BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thomas, D., and M. Beasley
(
1993)
Domestic violence as a human rights issue.
Human Rights Quarterly 15.1: 36–62.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tracy, Karen
(
1990)
The many faces of facework. In
Giles Howard, and
W. Peter Robinson (eds.),
Handbook of Language and Social Psychology. Chichester, England, UK: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 209–226.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tracy, Karen, and Sarah Tracy
(
1998a)
Rudeness at 911: Reconceptualizing face and face attack.
Human Communication Research 25.2: 225–251.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tracy, Sarah J., and Karen Tracy
(
1998b)
Emotion labor at 911: A case study and theoretical critique.
Journal of Applied Communication Research 261: 390–411.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Whalen, Marilyn Regina, and Don H. Zimmerman
(
1990)
Describing trouble: Practical epistemology in citizen calls to the police.
Language in Society 191: 465–492.
BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zimmerman, Don H.
(
1992)
The interactional organization of calls for emergency. In
Paul Drew, and
John Heritage(eds.),
Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University, pp. 418–469.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Goldhill, Rachel
2017.
Videoing Supervision: Messages for Probation Practice.
Journal of Social Work Practice 31:3
► pp. 279 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.