Article published in:
Pragmatics
Vol. 22:3 (2012) ► pp. 391416

Full-text

“You don’t seem to know how to work”
Cited by

Cited by other publications

MCLELLAN, JAMES & GRACE V. S. CHIN
2016. A research bibliography for Brunei English. World Englishes 35:4  pp. 612 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 02 november 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References
Beebe, L.M., and M.C. Cummings
(1996) Natural speech act data versus written questionnaire data: How data collection method affects speech act performance. In S.M. Gass, and J. Neu (eds.), Speech acts across cultures. New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 65–86.Google Scholar
Billmyer, K., and M. Varghese
(2000) Investigating instrument-based pragmatic variability. Effects of enhancing discourse completion tests. Applied Linguistics 21: 517–552. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana
(1989) Playing it safe: The role of conventionality in indirectness. In S. Blum-Kulka, J. House, and G. Kasper (eds.), Cross-cultural pragmatics: requests and apologies. New Jersey: Ablex, pp. 37–70.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Brown, P., and S.C. Levinson
(1978) Universal in language usage: Politeness phenomenom. In E.N. Goody (ed.), Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 256–289.Google Scholar
Brown, P., and S. C. Levinson
(1987) Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In E.N. Grundy (ed.), Questions of politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 56–311.Google Scholar
Brown, P., and S.C. Levinson
(1989) Politeness. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, P., and S.C. Levinson
(1999) Politeness: Some universals in language usage. In A. Jaworski and N. Coupland (eds.), The discourse reader. London: Routledge, pp. 321–335.Google Scholar
Crookes, Graham
(1986) Towards a validated analysis of scientific text structure. Applied Linguistics 7: 57–70. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Edmonson, W., and J. House
(1981) Let’s talk and talk about it. Munchen: Urban and Schwarzenberg.Google Scholar
Elias, Nobert
(1977) Über den Prozß der. Zivilisation. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Eslami-Rasekh, Zohreh
(2004) Face-keeping strategies in reaction to complaints: English and Persian. Journal of Asia Pacific Communication 14: 181–197.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Gagne, N. Okura
(2010) Reexamining the notion of negative face in the Japanese sociolinguistics politeness of request. Language and Communication 30: 123–138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
(1967) Interaction ritual: Essays on face to face behaviour. New York: Doubleday Anchor.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Golato, Andrea
(2003) Studying complaint responses: A comparison of DCTs and recordings of naturally occurring talk. Applied Linguistics 24.1: 90–121. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, D., and R. Lakoff
(1975) Conversational postulates. In P. Cole, and J.L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts. New York: Academic Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Haji Hamdan Hassan, Haji Abdul Hakim bin Haji MohdYassin, Abdul Hamid bin Haji Jaluddin, Haji Harun Mat Piah, Hajah Isma NasrulKarim, Lufti Abas, A. Mani
, And Palaniappan Periannan (eds.) (1991) Forms of Courtesy in BruneiDarussalam. Department of Malay Literature, University of Brunei Darussalam.Google Scholar
Haverkate, Henk
(1984) Speech acts speakers and hearers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.  BoP CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1992) Deictic categories as mitigating devices. Pragmatics 2: 505–522.  BoP CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Henry, A., and D.G.E. Ho
(2010) The act of complaining in Brunei – then and now. Journal of Pragmatics 42.3: 840–855. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
House, Julianne
(1989) “On excuse me please…” apologising in a foreign language. In B. Kettleman, P. Bierbaumer, A. Fill, and A. Karpf (eds.), English a/s Zweitsprache. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
House, J., and G. Kasper
(1981) Politeness markers in English and German. In F. Coulmas (ed.), Converstional routine: Explorations in standardised communication situations and pre-patterened speech. The Hague: Mouton, pp.159-185.Google Scholar
Kasper, Gabrielle
(1989) Variation in interlanguage speech act realization. In S.M. Gass, C.G. Madden, D. Preston, and L. Selinker (eds.), Variation in second language acquisition: discourse and pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Kasper, G., and M. Dahl
(1991) Research methods in interlanguage pragmatics. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Kong, C.C. Kenneth
(1998) Politeness of service counters in Hong Kong. Pragmatics 8.4: 555–575. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laforest, Marty
(2002) Scenes of family life: complaining in everyday conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 34: 1595–1620. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
(1977) Language and tact. Trier: L.A.U.T. paper 46.Google Scholar
(1983) Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, Yoshiko
(1988) Reexamination of the universality of face: Politeness phenomena in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 12: 403–426. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Mulamba, Kashama
(2009) Social beliefs for the realization of the speech acts of apology and complaint as defined in Ciluba, French and English. Pragmatics 19.4: 543–564.  BoP CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nassaji, H., and A. Cumming
(2000) What’s in a ZPD? A case study of a young ESL student and teacher interacting through dialogue journals. Language Teaching Research 4.2: 95–121. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, B., and J. Neu
(1996) My grade’s too low: The speech act set of complaining. In S.M. Gass, and J. Neu (eds.), Speech acts across cultures. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter, pp.191-216.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Okamoto, Shigeko
(1999) Situated politeness: Manipulating honorific and non-honorifc expressions in Japanese conversations. Pragmatics 9.1: 51–74.  BoP CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Olshtain, E., and L. Weinbach
(1993) Interlangauge features of the speech act of complaining. In G. Kasper, and S. Blum-Kulka (eds.), Interlanguage pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 108–122.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Olshtain, E., and A.D. Cohen
(1983) Apology: A speech act set. In N. Wolfson, and E. Judd (eds.), Sociolinguistics and Language Acquisition. Rowley, M.A.: Newbury House, pp. 103–115.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Parvaresh, V., and M. Tavakoli
(2009) Discourse completion tasks as elicitation tools: How convergent are they? The Social Sciences 4.4: 366–373.Google Scholar
Pinto, D., and R. Raschio
(2007) A comparative study of requests in heritage speaker Spanish, L1 Spanish and L1 English. International Journal of Bilingualism 11.2: 135–155. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rintell, E.M., and C.J. Mitchell
(1989) Studying requests and apologies: an inquiry into method. In S. Blum-Kulka, J. House, and G. Kasper (eds.), Cross cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. New Jersey: Ablex, pp. 248–272.Google Scholar
Rose, R. Kenneth
(1994) On the validity of discourse completion tests in non- western contexts. Applied Linguistics 15: 1–14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scollon, R., and S.W. Scollon
(1995).Intercultural communication: A discourse approach. London: Blackwell.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Swales, John
(1981) Aspects of article introductions. Aston ESP Research report No. 1, Language Studies Unit, University of Aston in Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.Google Scholar
(1990) Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taguchi, Naoko
(2006) Analysis of appropriateness in a speech act of request in English. Pragmatics 16.4: 513–533  BoP CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tatsuki, Donna Hurst
(2000) If my complaints could passions move: An interlanguage study of aggression. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1003–1017. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Trosborg, Anna
(1995) Interlanguage pragmatics. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter& Co. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Turnbull, William
(1997) An appraisal of pragmatic elicitation techniques for the study of talk. Unpublished manuscript. Department of psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C. Canada.
Yuan, Li
(2001) An inquiry into empirical pragmatics data-gathering methods: Written DCTs, oral DCTs, field notes and natural conversations. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 271–292. CrossrefGoogle Scholar