Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics
Vol. 22:4 (2012) ► pp.591–614

Building connected discourse in non-native speech

Re-specifying non-native proficiency

The demand for proficient non-native speakers (NNSs) of English has increased across professional fields in recent years. While speaking skills involve a complex array of factors and constraints, previous studies resorted to unexamined perceptions or intuitive impressions drawn from surface linguistic features. Particularly missing is close analytic descriptions of non-native discourse that is produced in spontaneous contexts. The present study investigates the process by which NNSs of English produce connected discourse as it unfolds in real-time. The ability to produce connected discourse is considered a hallmark of advanced speaking proficiency and this study therefore focuses on tracing the sequential organization of multiple utterances that NNSs produce in spontaneous speech. Following the principles of conversation analysis (CA), the present paper analyzes three sets of excerpts demonstrating the contingent choices that NNSs make in building connected discourse. The findings offer empirical resources for non-native professionals to identify the practicality and generality of connected discourse in real-time speech contexts.

Keywords: Connected discourse, Non-native speaker, Speaking, Non-native discourse, Discourse, EFL, ESL, Conversation analysis
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 1 December 2012
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.22.4.03lee
References
ACTFL
(1999) ACTFL proficiency guidelines for speaking. New York: ACTFL.Google Scholar
Atkinson, J., and J. Heritage
(1984) Transcript notation. In M. Atkinson, and J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. New York: Cambridge, pp. ix-xvi.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Bachman, L.
(1990) Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Bowles, H.
(2006) Bridging the gap between conversation analysis and ESP: An applied study of the opening sequences of NS and NNS service telephone calls. English for Specific Purposes 251: 332–357. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowles, H., and P. Seedhouse
(2007) Interactional competence and the LSP classroom. In H. Bowles, and P. Seedhouse (eds.), Conversation analysis and language for specific purposes. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 305–329.Google Scholar
Burns, A.
(1998) Teaching speaking. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 181: 102–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bygate, M.
(1998) Theoretical perspectives on speaking. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 181: 20–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009) Teaching and testing speaking. In M. Long, and C. Doughty (eds.), The handbook of language teaching. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 412–440. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Byrnes, H.
(2002) Toward academic-level foreign language abilities: Reconsidering foundational assumptions, expanding pedagogical options. In B. Leaver, and B. Shekhtman (eds.), Developing professional-level language proficiency. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 34–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Canale, M., and M. Swain
(1980) Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics 11: 1–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Celce-Murcia, M., Z. Dornyei, and S. Thurrell
(1995) Communicative competence: A pedagogically motivated model with content specifications. Issues in Applied Linguistics 61: 5–35.Google Scholar
Celce-Murcia, M., and D. Larsen-Freeman
(1999) The grammar book: An ESL/EFL teacher’s course. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar
Chew, K.-S.
(2005) An investigation of the English language skills used by new entrants in banks in Hong Kong. English for Specific Purposes 241: 423–435. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cook, V.
(1999) Going beyond the native speaker in language teaching. TESOL Quarterly 331: 185–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe
(2001) Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Strasbourg: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crookes, G.
(1990) The utterances and other basic units for second language discourse analysis. Applied Linguistics 111: 183–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, A.
(2003) The native speaker: Myth and reality. Clevendon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.  BoP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Bot, K.
(1992) A bilingual production model: Levelt’s “speaking” model adapted. Applied Linguistics 131: 1–24. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R.
(2008) The study of second language acquisition. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Foster, P., and P. Skehan
(1996) The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 181: 299–323. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foster, P., A. Tonkyn, and G. Wiggleworth
(2000) Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics 211: 354–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glenda, C., and I. Ward
(2002) Oral communication: The workplace needs and uses of business graduate employees. English for Specific Purposes 211: 41–57. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
He, A., and R. Young
(1998) Language proficiency interviews: A discourse approach. In R. Young, and W. He (eds.), Talking and testing: Discourse approaches to the assessment of oral proficiency. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 1–24. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J.
(1984) Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hughes, R.
(2002) Teaching and researching speaking. New York: Pearson.Google Scholar
Hyland, K.
(2002) Specificity revisited: How far should we go now? English for Specific Purposes 211: 385–395. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iwashita, N., A. Brown, T. Mcnamara, and S. O’Hagan
(2008) Assessing levels of second language speaking proficiency: How distinct? Applied Linguistics 291: 24–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacoby, S., and T. McNamara
(1999) Locating competence. English for Specific Purposes 181: 213–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, G.
(1978) Sequential aspects of story telling in conversation. In J.N. Schenkein (ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction. New York: Academic Press, pp. 213–248.Google Scholar
(1985) An exercise in the transcription and analysis of laughter. In T. van Dijk (ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis: Discourse and dialogue. London: Academic Press, pp. 25–34.Google Scholar
(1990) List-construction as a task and resource. In G. Psathas (ed.), Interaction competence. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America, pp. 63–92.Google Scholar
Kasper, G.
(2009) Locating cognition in second language interaction and learning: Inside the skull or in public view? International Review of Applied Linguistics 471: 11–36. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Khanji, R.
(1996) Two perspectives in analyzing communication strategies. IRA 341: 144–154.Google Scholar
Kim, K.-J.
(2006) Writing apprehension and writing achievement of Korean EFL college students. English Teaching 611: 135–154.Google Scholar
Koike, D., and J. Liskin-Gasparro
(1999) What is a Near-Native speaker? Perspectives of job seekers and search committees in Spanish. ADFL Bulletin 301: 54–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kormos, J.
(2006) Speech production and second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Leaver, B., and B. Shekhtman
(2002) Principles and practices in teaching superior-level language skills: Not just more of the same. In B. Leaver, and B. Shekhtman (eds.), Developing professional-level language proficiency. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–33. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Lee, Y.
(2006a) Towards respecification of communicative competence: Condition of L2 instruction or its objective? Applied Linguistics 271: 349–376. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006b) Speaking proficiency of non-native English teachers. English Teaching 611: 189–212.Google Scholar
(2010) Using cultural categories in language classroom discourse. Discourse & Cognition 171: 69–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lerner, G.
(1992) Assisted storytelling: Deploying shared knowledge as a practical matter. Qualitative Sociology 151: 247–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1994) Responsive list construction: A conversational resource for accomplishing multifaceted social action. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 131: 20–33. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W.
(1989) Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Liu, D., G. Ahn, K. Baek, and N. Han
(2004) South Korean high school English teachers’ code switching: Questions and challenges in the drive for maximal use of English in teaching. TESOL Quarterly 381: 605–638. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lynch, M.
(2011) Commentary: On understanding understanding. Journal of Pragmatics 431: 553–555. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Makoni, S.B.
(1996) Variation in unplanned discourse. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 341: 167–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Markee, N., and J. Stansell
(2008) Using electronic publishing as a resource for increasing empirical and interpretive accountability in conversation analysis. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 271: 24–44.Google Scholar
McCarthy, M., and A. O’Keeffe
(2004) Research in the teaching of speaking. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 241: 26–43. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
McNamara, T., K. Hill, and M. Lynette
(2002) Discourse and assessment. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 221: 221–242. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Moerman, M., and H. Sacks
(1971/1988) On understanding in the analysis of natural conversation. In M. Moerman (ed.), Talking culture: Ethnography and conversation analysis. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 180–186.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Morell, T.
(2004) Interactive lecture discourse for university EFL students. English for Specific Purposes 231: 325–338. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nakatani, Y., and C. Goh
(2007) A review of oral communication strategies: Focus on interactionist and psycholinguistic perspectives. In A.. Cohen, and E. Macaro (eds.), Language learning strategies. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 207–227.Google Scholar
Nemtchinova, E.
(2005) Host teachers’ evaluation of non-native-English-speaking teacher trainees - A perspective from the classroom. TESOL Quarterly 391: 235–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nickerson, C.
(2005) English as a lingua franca in international business contexts. English for Specific Purposes 241: 367–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ochs, E.
(1979) Planned and unplanned discourse. In T. Givón (ed.), Discourse and syntax. New York: Academic Press, pp. 51–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortega, J.
(1999) Planning and focus on form in L2 oral performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 211: 109–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Planken, B.
(2005) Managing rapport in lingual franca sales negotiations: A comparison of professional and aspiring negotiators. English for Specific Purposes 241: 381–400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prodromou, L.
(2003) In search of the successful user of English. Modern English Teacher 121: 5–14.Google Scholar
Rendle-Short, J.
(2006) The academic presentation: Situated talk in action. New York: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Sacks, H.
(1972) On the analyzability of stories by children. In J. Gumperz, and D. Hymes (eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc, pp. 325–345.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1974) An analysis of the course of a joke’s telling in conversation. In R. Bauman, and J. Sherzer (eds.), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 337–353.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1978) Some technical considerations of a dirty joke. In J. Schenkein (ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction. New York: Academic Press, pp. 249–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1984) Notes on methodology. In M. Atkinson, and J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 21–27.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1992) Lectures on conversation. Cambridge: Blackwell.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H., E. Schegloff, and G. Jefferson
(1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 501: 693–735. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E.
(1979) The relevance of repair to syntax-for-conversation. In T. Givón (ed.), Syntax and semantics: Discourse and syntax (Vol. 12). New York: Academic Press, pp. 262–286.Google Scholar
(1982) Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of ‘Uh huh’ and other things that come between sentences. In D. Tannen (ed.), Georgetown university roundtable on language linguistics: Analyzing discourse - Text and talk. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, pp. 71–93.Google Scholar
(1986) The routine as achievement. Human Studies 91: 110–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1995) Discourse as an interactional achievement III: The omnirelevance of action. Research on Language and Social Interaction 281: 185–211. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1996) Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In E. Ochs, and S. Thompson (eds.), Interaction and grammar. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, pp.52-133. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1997) Practices and actions: Boundary cases of other-initiated repair. Discourse Processes 231: 499–545. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(2007) Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. New York: Cambridge. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E., and H. Sacks
(1973) Opening up closings. Semiotica 71: 289–327. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E., G. Jefferson, and H. Sacks
(1977) The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 531: 363–382. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E., I. Koshik, S. Jacoby, and D. Olsher
(2002) Conversation analysis and applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 221: 3–31. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Seedhouse, P.
(2004) The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A Conversation Analysis perspective. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Seedhouse, P., and K. Richards
(2007) Describing and analysing institutional varieties of interaction. In H. Bowles, and P. Seedhouse (eds.), Conversation analysis and language for specific purposes. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 17–36.Google Scholar
Seidlhofer, B.
(2001) Closing a conceptual gap: The case for a description of English as a lingua franca. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 111: 133–158. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Sharrock, W., and B. Anderson
(1982) Talking and teaching: Reflective comments on in-classroom activities. In G. Payne, and E.C. Cuff (eds.), Doing teaching: The practical management of classrooms. London: Batsford Academic and Educational, pp. 170–183.Google Scholar
Shimanoff, S., and J. Brunak
(1997) Repairs in planned and unplanned discourse. In E. Keenan, and T. Bennett (eds.), Discourse across time and space. Los Angeles: University of Southern California, pp. 123–167.Google Scholar
Skehan, P.
(1998) A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
So-Mui, F., and K. Mead
(2000) An analysis of English in the workplace: The communication needs of textile and clothing merchandisers. English for Specific Purposes 191: 351–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, H.
(2000) Rapport Management: A framework for analysis. In H. Spencer-Oatey (ed.), Culturally speaking: Managing rapport through talk across cultures. New York: Cassel Academic, pp. 11–46.  BoPGoogle Scholar
St. John, M.J.
(1996) Business is booming: Business English in the 1990s. English for Specific Purposes 151: 3–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Starks, D.
(1994) Planned vs. unplanned discourse: Oral narrative vs. conversation in Woods Cree. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 391: 297–320. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tesser, C.
(1999) The non-native speaker and literary studies: Instruction, scholarship, and translation. ADFL Bulletin 311: 20–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tyler, A.
(1992) Discourse structure and the perception of incoherence in international teaching assistants’ spoken discourse. TESOL Quarterly 261: 713–729. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wagner, J., and R. Gardner
(eds.) (2004) Second language conversations. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Wong, J.
(2000a) Repetition in conversation: A look at “First and second sayings.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 331: 407–424. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(2000b) The token “Yeah” in non-native speaker English conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 331: 39–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000c) Delayed next turn repair initiation in native/non-native speaker English conversation. Applied Linguistics 211: 244–267. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Wong, J., and H. Waring
(2010) Conversation analysis and second language pedagogy: A guide for ESL/EFL teachers. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yuan, F., and R. Ellis
(2003) The effects of pre-task planning and on-line planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production. Applied Linguistics 241: 1–27. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

HELLERMANN, JOHN & STEVEN L. THORNE
2022. Collaborative Mobilizations of Interbodied Communication for Cooperative Action. The Modern Language Journal 106:S1 ► pp. 89 ff. DOI logo
Lee, Yo-An & John Hellermann
2014. Tracing Developmental Changes Through Conversation Analysis: Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Analysis. TESOL Quarterly 48:4 ► pp. 763 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.