Cover not available
Article published In:
Approaches to grammar for interactional linguistics
[Pragmatics 23:3] 2013
► pp. 499–517

Teaching oral requests

An evaluation of five English as a second language coursebooks

Research in English language teaching has highlighted the importance of teaching communication skills in the language classroom. Against the backdrop of extensive research in everyday communication, the goal of this research was to explore whether current discourse analytic research is reflected in the lessons and communication examples of five English language teaching textbooks, by using spoken requests as the subject of investigation. The textbooks were evaluated on five criteria deriving from research on politeness, speech act theory and conversation analysis. These included whether and the extent to which the textbooks discussed the cultural appropriateness of requests, discussed the relationship of requests and other contextual factors, explained pre-sequences and re-requests and provided adequate practice activities. This study found that none of the coursebooks covered all of the criteria and that some coursebooks actually had very inadequate lessons. The results of the textbook analysis demonstrate that teachers using these five coursebooks and designers of future coursebooks must improve their lessons on requests by using pragmatics research and authentic examples as a guide.

Keywords: Requests, Pragmatic competence, Speech act theory, Pragmatics, ESL coursebooks, Politeness, Conversation analysis
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 1 September 2013
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.23.3.06pet
References
Bardovi-Harlig K
(2001) Evaluating the empirical evidence: Grounds for instruction in pragmatics? In Rose K., and G. Kasper (eds.), Pragmatics in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 13-32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
., and R. Mahan-Taylor (2003) Teaching Pragmatics. Washington DC: U.S. Department of State Office of English Language Programs.Google Scholar
Barker, H., S. Cunningham, and P. Moore
(2006) New Cutting Edge Intermediate Teacher’s Resource Book. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Bartels, C
(1999) The intonation of English statements and questions: A compositional interpretation. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bell, J., and R. Gower
(1991) Intermediate Matters: Students’ Book. Essex: Addison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
Bell, J., R. Gower, S. Scott-Malden, and J. Wilson
(1991) Intermediate Matters: Teacher’s Book. Essex: Addison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S
(1989) Playing it safe: The role of conventionality in indirectness. In S. Blum-Kulka, J. House, and G. Kasper (eds.), Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood NJ: Ablex.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S., and J. House
(1989) Cross-cultural and situational variation in requesting behaviour. In S. Blum-Kulka, J. House, and G. Kasper (eds.), Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood NJ: Ablex.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S., J. House, and G. Kasper
(1989) Investigating cross-cultural pragmatics: An introductory overview. In S. Blum-Kulka, J. House, and G. Kasper (eds.), Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood NJ: Ablex.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S., and E. Olshtain
(1984) Requests and apologies: A cross-cultural study of speech act realization patterns. Applied Linguistics 51: 196-213. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Boxer, D
(1993) Complaints as positive strategies: What learners need to know. TESOL Quarterly 27.2: 277-299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowles, H
(2006) Bridging the gap between conversation analysis and ESP — an applied study of the opening sequences of NS and NNS service telephone calls. English for Specific Purposes 25.3: 332-357. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, P., and S. Levinson
(1987) Politeness: Some universals in language usage. London: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Y., and G. Yule
(1983) Discourse Analysis. Cambidge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Cohen, A.D
(1998) Contrastive analysis of speech acts: What do we do with the research findings? Studia Anglica Posnaniensia: International review of English Studies 81-93.Google Scholar
Cunningham, S., and P. Moor
(2005) New Cutting Edge: Intermediate Students’ Book. Essex: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Doff, A., and C. Jones
(1994a) Language in Use: Intermediate Students’ Book. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1994b) Language in Use: Intermediate Teacher’s Book. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Economidou-Kogetsidis, M
(2005) “Yes, tell me please, what time is the midday flight from Athens arriving?”: Telephone service encounters and politeness. Intercultural Pragmatics 2.3: 253-73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Firmin, M., J. Helmick, B. Iezzi, and A. Vaughn
(2004) Say please: The effect of the word ‘please’ in compliance-seeking requests. Social Behavior and Personality 32.1: 67-72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldschmidt, M
(1998) Do me a favor: A descriptive analysis of favor asking sequences in American English. Journal of Pragmatics 29.2: 129-153. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, C., and J. Heritage
(1990) Conversation analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology 191: 283-307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graves, K
(2008) The language curriculum: A social contextual perspective. Language Teaching 41.2: 149-183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, J
(1997) Interethnic communication. In J. Coupland, and A. Jaworski (eds.), Sociolinguistics: A reader. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haines, S., and B. Stewart
(2000a) Landmark: Intermediate Students’ Book. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2000b) Landmark: Intermediate Teacher’s Book. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, S
(2003) Politeness and power: Making and responding to ‘requests’ in institutional settings. Text 23.1: 27-52.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
House, J
(1989) Politeness in English and German: The functions of please and bitte. In S. Blum-Kulka, J. House, and G. Kasper (eds.), Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood NJ: Ablex.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Kasper G
(1997) Can pragmatic competence be taught? Available at [URL]
Kim, M.-S., H.-C. Shin, and D. Cai
(1998) Cultural influences on the preferred forms of requesting and re-requesting. Communication Monographs 651: 47–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liddicoat, A
(2007) An introduction to conversation analysis. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Nguyen, M.T.T
(2011) Learning to communicate in a globalized world: To what extent do school textbooks facilitate the development of intercultural pragmatic competence? RELC Journal 421: 17-30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paulson, G., and M. Roloff
(1997) The effect of request form and context on constructing obstacles to compliance. Communication Research 24.3: 261-290. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Sato, S
(2008) Use of “please” in American and New Zealand English. Journal of Pragmatics 40.7: 1249-1278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, J.R
(1969) Speech Acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. London: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Soars, L., and J. Soars
(2009a) New Headway: Intermediate Student’s Book (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2009b) New Headway: Intermediate Teacher’s Book (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weizman, E
(1989) Requestive hints. In S. Blum-Kulka, J. House, and G. Kasper (eds.), Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood NJ: Ablex.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Wichmann, A
(2004) The intonation of please-requests: A corpus-based study. Journal of Pragmatics 36.9: 1521-1549. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Wong, J
(2002) “Applying” conversation analysis in applied linguistics: Evaluating dialogue in English as a second language textbooks. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 401: 37-60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yu, Kyong-Ae
(2011) Culture-specific concepts of politeness: Indirectness and politeness in English. Hebrew, and Korean requests. Intercultural Pragmatics 8.3: 385-409. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 9 other publications

Arita, Yuki & Akiko Imamura
2023. Japanese complaint responses in textbook dialogues and ordinary conversations: learning objects to expand interactional repertoires. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 0:0 DOI logo
Jakupčević, Eva & Mihajla Ćavar Portolan
2024. An analysis of pragmatic content in EFL textbooks for young learners in Croatia. Language Teaching Research 28:1 ► pp. 114 ff. DOI logo
KARATEPE, Çiğdem & Mustafa CİVELEK
2021. A case study on EFL teachers’ views on material adaptation for teaching pragmatics. RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi :23 ► pp. 894 ff. DOI logo
Li, Pei
2024. Research on Multiple Evaluation of English Teaching in Higher Vocational School-Enterprise Cooperation in the Era of Multimedia Informatization. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences 9:1 DOI logo
Limberg, Holger
2016. Teaching how to apologize: EFL textbooks and pragmatic input. Language Teaching Research 20:6 ► pp. 700 ff. DOI logo
Pérez-Hernández, Lorena
2019. From research to the textbook. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 32:1 ► pp. 248 ff. DOI logo
Tang, Xiaofei
2019. Learnability of Grammatical Sequencing: A Processability Perspective of Textbook Evaluation in EFL Settings. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics 42:2 ► pp. 236 ff. DOI logo
Woo-hyun Jung
2017. Textbook Analysis: Pragmatic Inappropriateness in the Realization of Speech Acts. Journal of the Korea English Education Society 16:3 ► pp. 49 ff. DOI logo
王, 昊
2023. Linguistic and Cultural Content in Foreign Language Textbooks: A Review Study. Modern Linguistics 11:06 ► pp. 2463 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.