Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics
Vol. 26:2 (2016) ► pp.221–245

Discourse marking in spoken intercultural communication between British and Taiwanese adolescent learners

This study investigates and compares the use of discourse markers (DMs) by native speakers and learners of English based on a corpus of adolescent intercultural exchange students. Thestudy employs a discourse analytical approach, in whichFung and Carter’s (2007)multi-category framework is appliedwith a view to examiningDMs used bya group of Taiwanese and British adolescentsin an intercultural setting.The analytical frameworkcontains four main functional categories: Interpersonal, referential, structural and cognitive DMs. Each DM was analysed qualitatively and quantitatively in order to identifythe functions it serves in its original contextandtofurther reveal the different uses of DMs between Taiwanese and British participants. The findings demonstrate that the DMs used by both groups of participants serve the fourcentral functions,andin particularTaiwanese participants display a significant use of interpersonal (e.g., yeah, oh) and structural DMs (e.g., so, okay), while British participants have a significantly higher usage of referential (e.g., coz/because, and) and cognitive DMs (e.g., like, well). The results of this study have direct pedagogical implications that can enhance the teaching of English as a Foreign Language (EFL)to better prepare learners for real life communication scenarios.

Keywords: Spoken communication, Discourse markers, Intercultural communication, EFL learners
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 1 June 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.26.2.03lin
References
Adolphs, S., S. Atkins, and K. Harvey
(2007) Caught between professional requirements and interpersonal needs: Vague language in health care contexts. In J. Cutting (ed.), Vague language explored. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 62-78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Adolphs, S
(2010) Using a corpus to study spoken language. In S. Hunston, and D. Oakey (eds.), Introducing Applied Linguistics: Concepts and Skills. Oxon: Routledge, pp. 180-187.Google Scholar
Aijmer, K
(2011)  Well I’m not sure I think… The use of well by non-native speakers. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 16.2: 231–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, G
(2000) Pragmatic markers and sociolinguistic variation. Amsterdam: John BenjaminsPublishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D
(1995) Dimensions of register variation: A cross-linguistic comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., S. Johansson, G. Leech, S. Conrad, and E. Finegan
(1999) Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow, England: Longman.Google Scholar
Bolden, G.B
(2009) Implementing incipient actions: The discourse marker ‘so’ in English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 411: 974–998. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carter, R., and M. McCarthy
(2006) Cambridge grammar of English: A comprehensive guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2015) Spoken grammar: Where are we and where are we going? Applied Linguistics 36.1:1-12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carter, R
(2008) Right, well, OK, so, it’s like, you know, isn’t it, I suppose: Spoken words, written words and why speaking is different. In C. Hudson (ed.), The sound and the silence: Key perspectives on speaking and listening and skills for life. Coventry: Quality Improvement Agency, pp. 11-23.Google Scholar
Carter, R., R. Hughes, and M. McCarthy
(2011) Telling tails: Grammar, the spoken language and materials development. In B. Tomlinson (ed.), Materials development in language teaching (2nd edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 78-100.Google Scholar
Cutting, J
(2011) Spoken discourse. In K. Hyland, and B. Paltridge (eds.), Continuum companion to discourse analysis. London and New York: Continuum, pp. 155-170.Google Scholar
Dunning, T
(1993) Accurate methods for the statistics of surprise and coincidence. Computational Linguistic 19.1:61-74.Google Scholar
Evison, J
(2008) Turn-openers in academic talk: An exploration of discourse responsibility (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Nottingham, UK.Google Scholar
Evison, J., M. McCarthy, and A. O’Keeffe
(2007) Looking out for love and all the rest of it: Vague category markers as shared social space. In J. Cutting (ed.), Vague Language Explored. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 138-157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fox Tree, J.E., and J.C. Schrock
(2002) Basic meanings of you know and I mean . Journal of Pragmatics 341: 727–747. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fraser, B
(1999) What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics 311: 931–952. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Fuller, J.M
(2003) Use of the discourse marker like in interviews. Journal of sociolinguistics 71: 365–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilmore, A
(2004) A comparison of textbook and authentic interactions. ELT Journal 58.4: 363-374. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hellermann, J., and A. Vergun
(2007) Language which is not taught: The discourse marker use of beginning adult learners of English. Journal of Pragmatics 391: 157–179. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
House, J
(2009) Subjectivity in English as Lingua Franca discourse: The case of you know . InterculturalPragmatics 21:171–193.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Koester, A
(2010) Building small specialised corpora. In M. McCarthy, and A. O’Keeffe (eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics. London: Routledge, pp. 66-79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lin, Y.L
(2013) Vague language and interpersonal communication: An analysis of adolescent intercultural conversation. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language 1.1.2: 69-81.Google Scholar
(2014) Exploring recurrent multi-word sequences in EFL textbook dialogues and authentic discourse. English Teaching & Learning 38.2: 133-158.Google Scholar
McCarthy, M
(2006) Explorations in Corpus Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McCarthy, M., C. Matthiessen, and D. Slade
(2010) What is discourse analysis? In N. Schmitt (ed.), An introduction to applied linguistics (2nd Edition). Oxon: Hodder & Stoughton Ltd, pp. 53-69.Google Scholar
McEnery, T., R. Xiao, and Y. Tono
(2006) Corpus-based language studies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Miskovic-Lukovic, M
(2009) Is there a chance that I might kinda sort of take you out to dinner?: The role of the pragmatic particles kind of and sort of in utterance interpretation. Journal of Pragmatics 411:602–625. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Norrick, N.N
(2009) Interjections as pragmatic markers. Journal of Pragmatics 411: 866–891. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Keeffe, A., and S. Adolphs
(2008) Using a corpus to look at variational pragmatics: Response tokens in British and Irish discourse. In K.P. Schneider, and A. Barron (eds.), Variational Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 69-98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Keeffe, A., M. McCarthy, and R. Carter
(2007) From Corpus to Classroom: Language use and language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Östman, J.O
(1981) You know: A discourse functional approach, Pragmatics and beyond II: 7. Amsterdam: John BenjaminsPublishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, D
(1987) Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, S
(2005) So who? Like how? Just what? Discourse markers in the conversations of youngCanadians. Journal of Pragmatics 371:1896–1915. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Timmis, I
(2012) Spoken language research and ELT: Where are we now?. ELT Journal 66.4: 514-522. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsui, A.B.M
(1994) English Conversation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Underhill, R
(1988) Like is, like, focus. American Speech 63.3: 234–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, A (1991) Cross-cultural pragmatics. The semantics of human interaction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.  BoP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Ament, Jennifer, Carmen Pérez Vidal & Júlia Barón Parés
2022. The effects of English-medium instruction on the use of textual and interpersonal pragmatic markers. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 517 ff. DOI logo
Huang, Lan-fen, Yen-liang Lin & Tomáš Gráf
2023. Development of the use of discourse markers across different fluency levels of CEFR. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 33:1 ► pp. 49 ff. DOI logo
Lin, Yen-Liang
2020. Pragmatic Nature of L2 Communication: Spoken Grammar in Native and EFL Speakers. In Speaking English as a Second Language, ► pp. 51 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.