Article published In:
Pragmatics
Vol. 3:4 (1993) ► pp.387409
References
Atkinson, J. M., & P. Drew
(1979) Order in court. London: Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bilmes, J.
(1985) “Why that now?”: Two kinds of conversational meaning. Discourse Processes 81: 319-355. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1986) Discourse and behavior. New York: Plenum. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1988) The concept of preference in conversation analysis. Language in Society 171: 161-181. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1993) Dividing the rice: A microanalysis of the mediator’s role in a Northern Thai negotiation. Language in Society 211: 569-602. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1994) Constituting silence: Life in the world of total meaning. Semiotica 981: 73-87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
in press) Negotiation and compromise: A microanalysis of a discussion in the Federal Trade Commission. In A. Firth (ed.) The discourse of negotiation: Studies of language in the workplace Oxford Pergamon DOI logo
Birdwhistell, R. L.
(1970) Kinesics and context: Essays on body motion communication. New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar
Button, G., P. Drew, & J. Heritage
(1986) Transcription notation. Human Studies 91: 109-10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C.J., P. Kay, & M.C. O’Connor
(1988) Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language 641: 501-538. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, H.
(1967) Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, H., & D.L. Wieder
(1992) Two incommensurable, asymmetrically alternative technologies of social analysis. In G. Watson & R. M. Seiler (eds.), Text in context: Contributions to ethnomethodology. Newbury Park, California: Sage, pp. 175-206.Google Scholar
Geoghegan, W.H.
(1973) Natural information processing rules: Formal theory and applications to ethnography. Monographs of the Language-Behavior Research Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Grice, H.P.
(1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J.L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic, pp. 41-58.Google Scholar
Horn, L.R.
(1984) Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature. In D. Schiffrin (ed.), Meaning form, and use in context: Linguistic applications. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, pp. 11-42.Google Scholar
Lee, J.R.E.
(1992) Language and culture: The linguistic analysis of culture. In G. Button (ed.), Ethnomethodology and the human sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 196-226.Google Scholar
Levinson, S.C.
(1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mehan, H.
(1991) The school’s work of sorting students. In D. Boden and D.H. Zimmerman (eds.), Talk and social structure: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 71-90.Google Scholar
Moerman, M.
(1988) Talking culture: Ethnography and conversation analysis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H.
(1972) On the analyzability of stories by children. In J.J. Gumperz & D.H. Hymes (eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, pp. 325-45.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1984) Notes on methodology. In J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 21-27.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H., E. Schegloff, & G. Jefferson
(1974) A simplest systematic« for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language 501: 696-735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E.A.
(1991) Reflections on talk and social structure. In D. Boden and D.H. Zimmerman (eds.), Talk and social structure: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 44-70.Google Scholar
(1984) On some questions and ambiguities in conversation. In J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 28-52.Google Scholar
(1968) Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist 701: 1075-95 DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, D.
(1987) Toward an empirical base in pragmatics (review article). Language in Society 161: 381-96. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Wilson, T.P.
(1991) Social structure and the sequential organization of interaction. In D. Boden and D.H. Zimmerman (eds.), Talk and social structure: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 22-43.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, D.H.
(1993) Acknowledgment tokens and speakership incipiency revisited. Research on Language and Social Interaction 261: 179-194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, D.H., & D.L. Wieder
(1970) Ethnomethodology and the problem of order: Comment on Denzin. In J.D. Douglas (ed.), Understanding everyday life: Toward the reconstruction of sociological knowledge. Chicago: Aldine, pp. 285-295.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 37 other publications

Auer, Peter
1996. Context and contextualization. In Handbook of Pragmatics,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Bilmes, Jack
2001. Tactics and Styles in the 1992 Vice Presidential Debate: Question Placement. Research on Language & Social Interaction 34:2  pp. 151 ff. DOI logo
Bilmes, Jack
2009. Taxonomies are for talking: Reanalyzing a Sacks classic. Journal of Pragmatics 41:8  pp. 1600 ff. DOI logo
Bilmes, Jack
2011. Occasioned Semantics: A Systematic Approach to Meaning in Talk. Human Studies 34:2  pp. 129 ff. DOI logo
Bilmes, Jack
2012. Truth and proof in a lawyer's story. Journal of Pragmatics 44:12  pp. 1626 ff. DOI logo
Bilmes, Jack
2014. Preference and the conversation analytic endeavor. Journal of Pragmatics 64  pp. 52 ff. DOI logo
Bilmes, Jack
2019. Regrading as a conversational practice. Journal of Pragmatics 150  pp. 80 ff. DOI logo
Bilmes, Jack
2020. The discussion of abortion in US political debates: A study in occasioned semantics. Discourse Studies 22:3  pp. 291 ff. DOI logo
Bilmes, Jack
2020. From ethnosemantics to occasioned semantics. In On Sacks,  pp. 47 ff. DOI logo
Bushnell, Cade
2022. On developing a systematic methodology for analyzing categories in talk-in-interaction: Sequential categorization analysis. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 735 ff. DOI logo
Choe, Ann Tai & Junichi Yagi
2023. Embodied remembering in coordinated performances. Multimodal Communication 12:2  pp. 99 ff. DOI logo
Deppermann, Arnulf
2011. The Study of Formulations as a Key to an Interactional Semantics. Human Studies 34:2  pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Deppermann, Arnulf
2018. Inferential Practices in Social Interaction: A Conversation-Analytic Account. Open Linguistics 4:1  pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Drew, Paul
2018. Inferences and Indirectness in Interaction. Open Linguistics 4:1  pp. 241 ff. DOI logo
Firth, Alan
1995. Ethnomethodology. In Handbook of Pragmatics,  pp. 269 ff. DOI logo
Firth, Alan
2022. Ethnomethodology. In Handbook of Pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics, ],  pp. 530 ff. DOI logo
Goatly, Andrew
2022. Register and the redemption of relevance theory. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 139 ff. DOI logo
Haugh, Michael
2007. The co-constitution of politeness implicature in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 39:1  pp. 84 ff. DOI logo
Haugh, Michael
2009. Intention(ality) and the Conceptualization of Communication in Pragmatics. Australian Journal of Linguistics 29:1  pp. 91 ff. DOI logo
Haugh, Michael
2011. Chapter 9. Practices and defaults in interpreting disjunction. In Salience and Defaults in Utterance Processing,  pp. 189 ff. DOI logo
Haugh, Michael
2012. Inference and Implicature. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, DOI logo
Haugh, Michael & Jonathan Culpeper
2018. Integrative pragmatics and (im)politeness theory. In Pragmatics and its Interfaces [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 294],  pp. 213 ff. DOI logo
Izumi, Hiroaki
2017. A technical analysis of scaling in rehabilitation team talk. Journal of Pragmatics 121  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Izumi, Hiroaki
2019. Regrading and implicature: Sequential structures of mobility scales in Japanese rehabilitation team interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 150  pp. 111 ff. DOI logo
Kasper, Gabriele & Steven J. Ross
2013. Assessing second language pragmatics: An overview and introductions. In Assessing Second Language Pragmatics,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Kasper, Gabriele & Soo Jung Youn
2018. Transforming instruction to activity: Roleplay in language assessment. Applied Linguistics Review 9:4  pp. 589 ff. DOI logo
Khodadady, Ebrahim & Jassem Alifathabadi
2012. Repairing Conversation and Foreign Language Proficiency. Journal of Language Teaching and Research 3:4 DOI logo
Kim, Sangki
2018. Development of discursive practices for the intelligibility of Thai English in interaction: Sequence and categories as contextual resources. System 72  pp. 164 ff. DOI logo
Kunitz, Silvia
2015. Scriptlines as emergent artifacts in collaborative group planning. Journal of Pragmatics 76  pp. 135 ff. DOI logo
Lee, Josephine
2019. Scaling as an argumentative resource in television talk shows. Journal of Pragmatics 150  pp. 133 ff. DOI logo
Prior, Matthew T.
2019. The interactional dynamics of scaling and contrast in accounts of interpersonal conflict. Journal of Pragmatics 150  pp. 92 ff. DOI logo
Robles, Jessica S.
2022. Misunderstanding as a resource in interaction. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 57 ff. DOI logo
Ross, Steven J.
2017. Interviewer Accommodation in Tasks and Transitional Talk. In Interviewing for Language Proficiency,  pp. 147 ff. DOI logo
Watson, Rod
2016. Harold Garfinkel and Pragmatics. In Handbook of Pragmatics, DOI logo
Yagi, Junichi
2021. Enacting burikko . Applied Pragmatics 3:2  pp. 195 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
1995. BIBLIOGRAPHY. In The Discourse of Negotiation,  pp. 399 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.