Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics
Vol. 5:4 (1995) ► pp.455–484

Argumentation and inhibition: Sexism in the discourse of Spanish executives

Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 1 December 1995
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.5.4.03mar
References
Alonso, L.E
(1994) El grupo de discusiân en su practica: Memoria social, intertextualidad y action comunicativa (in preparation).
Arkin, R.M
(1981) Self-presentation styles. In Impression management. Theory and social psychological research. New York: Academic Press, pp. 311-333. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arnold, V.l
(1987) Teoria de las catastrofes. Madrid: Alianza.Google Scholar
Beck, U
(1992) From industrial society to risk society. Theory, culture and society 91: 97-123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1991) La irresponsabilidad organizada. Débats March-June: 31-37.
Bion, W.R
(1974) Experiencias en grupos. Buenos Aires: Paidös.Google Scholar
Bodine, A
(1975) Androcentrism in prescriptive grammar: Singular they, sex indefinite he and he or she. Language m Society 41: 129-156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boudon, R
(1992) L ‘art de se persuader des idées douteuses, fragiles our fausses. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P
(1985) cQué significa hablar?. Economia de los intercambios lingùisticos. Madrid: Akal.Google Scholar
Calero Fernandez, M.A
(1990) La imagen de la mujer a través de la tradition paremiológica espahola (Lengua y cultura). PhD, Universidad de Lérida.
Ducrot, O
(1984) Le dire et le dit. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Duranti, A. and C. Goodwin
(1991) Rethinking context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ervin, S.M
(1962) The connotations of gender. Words 181: 249-261. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, N
(1992) Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Fernandez Lagunilla, M
(1991) Género y sexo: i, eon trovers ia cientifica o dialogo de sordos. In Bernis et al.. (eds.), Adas de las VU Jornadas de investigation interdisciplinaria. Los estudios sobre la niujer de la investigation a la docentia. Madrid: Institute) Universitäre de la mujer y Edieiones Universidad Autönoma.Google Scholar
Foueaull, M
(1967) Nietzsche, Freud, Marx. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Foueault, M
(1969) L’archéologie du savoir. Paris. Gallimard.Google Scholar
Foueault. M
(1971) L’ordre du discours. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Foueault, M
(1986) Por que hay que estudiar el poder: La cuestión del sujeto. In C. Wright Mills et al.., Materiales de sociologia critica. Madrid: La Piqueta.Google Scholar
(1994a) Subjectivité et venté. Dits et écrits, vol.IV. Pans: Gallimard, pp. 213-218.Google Scholar
(1994b) Le sujet et le pouvoir. Dits et écrits, vol.IV. Paris: Gallimard, pp. 222-242.Google Scholar
Freud, S
(1985) La interpretation de los suehos. Barcelona: Planeta.Google Scholar
Fuertes, P
(1989) El género cornu categoria social en la lengua inglesa. Memoria de licenciatura. Valladolid: Universidad de Valladolid.Google Scholar
Garcia Messeguer, A
(1991) Sexo, género y sexismo en espanol. In Bernis et al.. (eds.), Act as de las VU Jornadas de investigation interdisciplinaria. Los estudios sobre la mujer de la investigation a la docentia. Madrid: Instttuto Universitäre de la Mujer y Edieiones Universidad Auiónoma.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, H
(1984) Studies in ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, A
(1993) Consecuencias de la modernidad. Madrid: Alianza.Google Scholar
Goffman, E
(1961) Encounters: Two Studies in the sociology of interaction. Indianapolis: Bob-Merrill.Google Scholar
(1967) Interaction ritual: Essays in face to face behavior. Garden City, New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
(1986a) Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
(1986b) Strategic interaction. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Gome/., C
. et al. (1995) Imagenes de la mujer en situaciones de competitividad laboral. Madrid: Siglo XXI (in press)Google Scholar
Habermas. J
(1985) Conciencia moral y action comunicativa. Barcelona: Peninsula.Google Scholar
Habermas, J
(1987) Teori’a de la action comunicativa. Madrid: Taurus.Google Scholar
(1989) Teoria de la action comunicativa: Estudios y complementos. Madrid: Qitedra.Google Scholar
Ibânez, J
(1979) Mâs alla de la sociologia. El grupo de discusión: Teoria y critica. Madrid: Siglo XXI.Google Scholar
Ibähe/.. J
(1990) Cómo se realiza una investigación mediante grupos de discusión. In M. GarciaGoogle Scholar
Ferrando, J. Ibâfiezy F. AJvira
(eds.) El anâlisis de la realidad social. Métodos y técnicas de investigation social Madrid Alianza 2a.ed. pp. 489 501
Ibânez, J
(1994) El regreso del sujeto. La investigation social de segundo orden. Madrid: Siglo XXI.Google Scholar
Instituteo de la Mujcr
(1989) Propuestas para evitar el sexismo en el lenguaje. Madrid: Ministcrio de Asuntos Sociales.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G
(1987) Women, fire and dangerous things. Chicago: Chicago University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, R
(1982) Language and woman’s place. Language m Society 21: 45-80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luhmann, N
(1979) Trust and power. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Maneru. A
(1991) El género ¿accidente gramatical o discriminaciön no accidental?. In Bernis et al.. (eds.), Adas de las VII Jornadas de investigation interdisciplinaria. Los estudios sobre la mujer_de la investigation a la docencia. Madrid: Instituto Universitario de la Mujer y Ediciones Universida Autónoma.Google Scholar
Martin Rojo, L
(1995a) Division and rejection: From the personification of the Gulf conflict to the demonisation of Saddam Hussein. Discourse & Society 6.1: 49-80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1995b) Relaciones de poder y estrategias de resistencia: La aparieiön de una nueva subjetividad femenina. (in preparation).
Martin Santos, L
(1990) Teoria de las Catastrofes. Politica y Sociedad 51: 107-117.Google Scholar
McConncll-Ginet, S
(1988) Language and Gender. In F. Newmeyer Linguistics: The Cambridge sun>ey, vol.I: Language: The socio-cultural context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 75-99.Google Scholar
Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia
(1988) Gui’a didâctica para una orientation no sexista. El uso no sexista del lenguaje. Madrid: MEC, pp. 47-71.Google Scholar
Nissen, U
(1991) Si, primera ministro. 6lnfluye la feminization de los tîtulos de profesión en la interpretation del masculino en sentido extensivo?. In C. Bernis et al.. (eds.), Actas de las VII Jornadas de Investigation Interdisciplinaria. Los estudios sobre la mujer: De la investigation a la docencia. Madrid: Instituto Universitario de la Mujer & Ediciones Universidad Autónoma, pp. 343-362.Google Scholar
Ortí, A
(1986) La apertura y el enfoque cualitativo o estructural: La entrevista abierta y la discusión de grupo. In M. Garcia Ferrando, J. Ibánez y F. Alvira (eds.), El análisis de la realidad social. Métodos y técnicas de investigation social. Madrid: Alianza, pp. 153-185.Google Scholar
Peirce, CS
(1966) Collected papers of Charles Sanders Pence, vol.8, edited by A.W. Burks. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Perissinotto, G
(1982) Lingùîstica y sexismo. Dialogos 181: 30-34.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H
(1981) Human groups and social categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thorn, R
(1985) Parabolas y catastrofes. Barcelona: Tusquets.Google Scholar
(1983) Estabilidad estructural y morfogénesis. Barcelona: Gedisa.Google Scholar
Turner, J
(1985) Social categorisation and sell-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behaviour. In J. Lawler (ed.). Advances in group processes, vol.2. Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Turner, J., M. Hogg, P. Oakes, S. Reicher, y M. Wetherell
(1987) Rediscovering the social group: A self categorisation theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
van Dijk, T
(1987) Communicating racism: Ethnic prejudice in thought and talk. London: Sage.Google Scholar
van Dijk, T.A
(1988) News as discourse. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(1991) Elite discourse and racism. Newbury: Sage.Google Scholar
(1993) Analyzing racism through discourse analysis. Some methodological reflections. In J.H. Stanfield II & R.M. Dennis (eds.). Race and ethnicity m research methods. Newbury Park: SageGoogle Scholar
van Leeuwen, T
(1995a) Representing social action. Discourse & Society 6.1: 81-106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1995b) The representation of social actors. In CR. Gildas (ed.), Studies in critical discourse analysis. London: Routledge (in press)Google Scholar
Verschueren, J
(1987) Pragmatics as a theory of linguistic adaptation. IPrA Working Document 1.
Violi, P
(1987) Les origines du genre grammatical. Language 851: 15-34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Volosinov, V.N
(1973) Marxism and the philosophy of language. New York: Seminar Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Weber, M
(1979) Economia y sociedad. Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Wetherell, M. and J. Potter
(1992) Mapping the language of racism. Discourse and the legitimation of the exploitation. New York: Harvester, Wheatsheaf.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Wodak. R
(1995) Critical linguistics. In J. Blommaert, J-O. Ostman, y J. Verschueren (eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics. Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins (in press). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Woodcock, A. y M. Davis
(1986) Teona de las catastrofes. Barcelona: Citedra.Google Scholar
Zeeman, E.C
(1977) Catastrophe Theory. Mass.: Adleshon-Wesley.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Rojo, Luisa Martín & Concepción Gómez Esteban
2003. Discourse at Work: When Women Take On the Role of Manager. In Critical Discourse Analysis, ► pp. 241 ff. DOI logo
2003. Discourse at Work: When Women Take On the Role of Manager. In Critical Discourse Analysis, ► pp. 241 ff. DOI logo
van Eemeren, Frans H. & Rob Grootendorst
1995. Argumentation theory. In Handbook of Pragmatics, ► pp. 55 ff. DOI logo
2022. Argumentation theory. In Handbook of Pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics, ], ► pp. 82 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 february 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.