Article published In:
Interaction-based studies of languageEdited by Cecilia E. Ford and Johannes Wagner
[Pragmatics 6:3] 1996
► pp. 323–356
Edited by Cecilia E. Ford and Johannes Wagner
[Pragmatics 6:3] 1996
► pp. 323–356
From subordination to coordination? verb-second position in German causal and concessive constructions
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
References
Arndt, Erwin
(1956) Die begründenden Sätze im Neuhochdeutschen und ihre wichtigsten Konjunktionen. Dissertation. Humboldt Universität: Berlin.
Chafe, Wallace
(1984) How people use adverbial clauses. In C. Brugman and M. Macaulay (eds.), Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp. 437-449.
Eisenberg, Peter
(1989) Grundriß der Deutschen Grammatik. Stuttgart: Metzler. 
Foley, William A. & Robert D. Van Valin
Ford, Cecilia
(1993) Grammar in Interaction: Adverbial clauses in American English conversations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
BoP
(1994) Dialogic aspects of talk and writing: Because on the interactive-edited continuum. Text 14.4: 531-554. BoP
Ford, Cecilia & Junko Mori
(1994) Causal markers in Japanese and English conversations: A cross-linguistic study of interactional grammar. Pragmatics 4.1: 31-61. BoP
Gaumann, Ulrike
(1982) Weil die machen jetzt bald zu’. Dissertation, Universität Mainz.
Green, Georgia
Günthner, Susanne
(1993a) ‘… weil – man kann es ja wissenschaftlich untersuchen’ -Diskurspragmatische Aspekte der Wortstellung in WEIL-Sätzen. Linguistische Berichte 1431: 37-59.
(1993b) Diskursstrategien in der Interkulturellen Kommunikation. Analysen deutschchinesischer Gespräche. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
(1995) Exemplary stories: The cooperative construction of indignation. Versus 70/71: 147-175.
Halliday, M.A.K
Hopper, Paul J. & Sandra A Thompson
(1994) Introduction. Text 14.4: 461-463.
Hopper, Paul & Elizabeth C. Traugott
Keller, Rudi
(1993) Das epistemische WEIL. Bedeutungswandel einer Konjunktion. In HJ. Heringer & G. Stötzel (eds.), Sprachgeschichte und Sprachkritik. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter, pp. 219-247.
König, Ekkehard
(1985) On the history of concessive connectives in English. Qiachronic and synchronic evidence. Lingua 661: 363-381.
(1988) Concessive connectives and concessive sentences: Crosslinguistic regularities and pragmatic principles. In J.A Hawkins (eds.), Explaining Language Universals. New York: Basil Blackwell, pp. 145-166.
König, Ekkehard & Peter Eisenberg
(1984) Zur Pragmatik von Konzessivsätzen. In G. Stickel (ed.), Pragmatik in der Grammatik. Düsseldorf: Schwann, pp. 313-332.
König, Ekkehard & Johan van der Auwera
(1988) Clause integration in German and Dutch conditionals, concessive conditionals and concessives. In J. Haiman & S.A Thompson (eds.), Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 101-133.
Küper, Christoph
(1984) Zum sprechaktbezogenen Gebrauch der Kausalverknüpfer DENN und WEIL: Grammatisch-pragmatische Interrelationen. Linguistische Berichte 921: 15-30.
(1991) Geht die Nebensatzstellung im Deutschen verloren? Zur pragmatischen Funktion der Wortstellung in Haupt- und Nebensätzen. Deutsche Sprache 191: 133-158.
Lehmann, Christian
(1988) Towards a typology of clause linkage. In J. Haiman & S.A Thompson (eds.), Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 181-226.
(1991) Grammaticalization and related changes in contemporary German. In E.C. Traugott & B. Heine (eds.), Approaches to Grammaticalization. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 493-535.
Lerner, Gene
Ono, Tsuyoshi & Sandra A. Thompson
(1994) Interaction and Syntax in the Structure of Conversational Discourse. Manuscript. University of California.
Pawley, Andrew & Frances H. Syder
(1983) Natural selection in syntax: Notes on adaptive variation and change in vernacular and literary grammar. Journal of Pragmatics 71: 551-579. BoP
BoPQuirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik
Sacks, Harvey
(1987) On the preference for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In G. Button & J.R. Lee (eds.), Talk and social organisation. Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters, pp. 54-69.
Sandig, Barbara
(1973) Zur historischen Kontinuität normativ diskriminierender syntaktischer Muster in spontaner Sprechsprache. Deutsche Sprache 31: 37-57.
Selting, Margret
(1995) Prosodie im Gespräch. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Sweetser, Eve E
(1990) From Etymology to Pragmatics. Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
BoPThompson, Sandra A
(1987) ‘Concessive’ as a discourse relation in expository written English. In: B. Joseph & A.M. Zwickey (eds.), A Festschrift for Use Lehiste. Ohio State University, pp. 64-73.
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Ekkehard König
(1991) The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited. In Traugott & Heine (eds.), Approaches to Grammaticalization. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 189-218.
Wegener, Heide
(1994) weil – das hat schon seinen Grund. Zur Verbstellung in Kausalsätzen mit WEIL im gegenwärtigen Deutsch. Deutsche Sprache 41: 289-305.
Willems, Klaus
(1994) weil es hat mit Bedeutung nicht viel zu tun… Zum Sprachwandel einer Konjunktion. Deutsche Sprache 31: 261-279.
Cited by
Cited by 39 other publications
Abraham, Werner
2016. Zum grundsätzlichen Unterschied von Ereignissubjunktion (de re) und Prämissensubjunktion (de dicto) im Westgermanischen. Glottotheory 7:2 
Bendig, Ina, Emma Betz & Thorsten Huth
2016. “weil – das ist eben doch richtig so” Teaching variant types of weil‐ and obwohl‐structures in German. Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German 49:2 ► pp. 214 ff.
Catasso, Nicholas
2021. How large is the left periphery of Present-Day German? A unifying approach to multiply-filled-prefield configurations. Open Linguistics 7:1 ► pp. 760 ff.
Christensen, Tanya Karoli & Torben Juel Jensen
2022. When Variants Lack Semantic Equivalence: Adverbial Subclause Word Order. In Explanations in Sociosyntactic Variation, ► pp. 171 ff.
Daniels, Don
Detges, Ulrich & Thomas Weidhaas
2016. Coherence and interaction. The French causal connectors comme and car. Language Sciences 58 ► pp. 111 ff.
Diessel, Holger & Katja Hetterle
2011. Causal clauses: a cross-linguistic investigation of their structure, meaning, and use. In Linguistic Universals and Language Variation, ► pp. 23 ff.
D’Hertefelt, Sarah & Jean-Christophe Verstraete
2014. Independent complement constructions in Swedish and Danish: Insubordination or dependency shift?. Journal of Pragmatics 60 ► pp. 89 ff.
Eppler, Eva
2004. “…because dem Computer brauchst' es ja nicht zeigen.”*: because + German main clause word order. International Journal of Bilingualism 8:2 ► pp. 127 ff.
Evers-Vermeul, Jacqueline, Liesbeth Degand, Benjamin Fagard & Liesbeth Mortier
2011. Historical and comparative perspectives on subjectification: A corpus-based analysis of Dutch and French causal connectives. Linguistics 49:2
Glaznieks, Aivars
2022. Syntactic variation and interactional coherence in online communication: The German conjunction “weil” in written interactions. Psychology of Language and Communication 26:1 ► pp. 330 ff.
Golato, Peter & Andrea Golato
2018. The real-time processing of pragmatics: An experimental psychological-conversation analytic study of obwohl clauses in spoken German. Journal of Pragmatics 132 ► pp. 21 ff.
Günthner, Susanne
2000. Grammatik der gesprochenen Sprache – eine Herausforderung für Deutsch als Fremdsprache?. Informationen Deutsch als Fremdsprache 27:4 ► pp. 352 ff.
Günthner, Susanne
2008. „die Sache ist…“: eine Projektor-Konstruktion im gesprochenen Deutsch. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 27:1 ► pp. 39 ff.
Günthner, Susanne
2016. Concessive patterns in interaction: uses of zwar…aber (‘true…but’)-constructions in everyday spoken German. Language Sciences 58 ► pp. 144 ff.
He, Qingshun
2019. Introduction. In A Corpus-Based Approach to Clause Combining in English from the Systemic Functional Perspective [The M.A.K. Halliday Library Functional Linguistics Series, ], ► pp. 1 ff.
Higashiizumi, Yuko
2015. Periphery of utterances and (inter)subjectification in Modern Japanese. In New Directions in Grammaticalization Research [Studies in Language Companion Series, 166], ► pp. 135 ff.
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2003. Grammaticalization,
Huth, Thorsten & Carmen Taleghani-Nikazm
2006. How can insights from conversation analysis be directly applied to teaching L2 pragmatics?. Language Teaching Research 10:1 ► pp. 53 ff.
Kaltenböck, Gunther & Evelien Keizer
2022. Insubordinateif-clauses in FDG: Degrees of independence. Open Linguistics 8:1 ► pp. 675 ff.
Kim, Su Jeong & Dong-Ju Choi
2018. The Types of ‘-myeon’ Conditionals and Tense. Korean Journal of Linguistics 43:2 ► pp. 201 ff.
Lindström, Jan
2022. Interactional linguistics. In Handbook of Pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics, ], ► pp. 795 ff.
Lindström, Jan K.
Mushin, Ilana & Simona Pekarek Doehler
Raymond, Chase Wesley
Schäfer, Roland & Ulrike Sayatz
2016. Punctuation and syntactic structure inobwohlandweilclauses in nonstandard written German. Written Language & Literacy 19:2 ► pp. 212 ff.
Schönenberger, Manuela
2010. The surprisingly high proportion of Verb Second in causal adverbial clauses with wil ‘because’ in child Swiss German. Lingua 120:11 ► pp. 2589 ff.
Smet, Hendrik De & Jean-Christophe Verstraete
2006. Coming to terms with subjectivity. Cognitive Linguistics 17:3
Stoenica, Ioana-Maria & Simona Pekarek Doehler
2020. Chapter 11. Relative-clause increments and the management of reference. In Emergent Syntax for Conversation [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 32], ► pp. 303 ff.
Stukenbrock, Anja
2014. Take the words out of my mouth: Verbal instructions as embodied practices. Journal of Pragmatics 65 ► pp. 80 ff.
Suzuki, Ryoko & Sandra A. Thompson
2016. Beyond dichotomies and continua?: an interactional approach to the grammar of clause combining in Japanese. Language Sciences 58 ► pp. 35 ff.
Unternbäumen, Enrique Huelva
2005. Sprechaktbezogene kausale Satzverknüpfung mitporqueim gesprochenen Spanisch. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie (ZrP) 121:1 ► pp. 84 ff.
van Veen, Rosie, Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul, Ted Sanders & Huub van den Bergh
2014. “Why? Because I’m talking to you!” Parental input and cognitive complexity as determinants of children’s connective acquisition. In The Pragmatics of Discourse Coherence [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 254], ► pp. 209 ff.
Vandergriff, Ilona
2008. “weil der schmeckt so gut!” The Learner as Linguist. Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German 38:1 ► pp. 61 ff.
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
2005. Two types of coordination in clause combining. Lingua 115:4 ► pp. 611 ff.
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe & Sarah D'Hertefelt
2016. Chapter 3. Running in the family. In Insubordination [Typological Studies in Language, 115], ► pp. 65 ff.
Watzinger‐Tharp, Johanna
2006. German Weil‐Clauses: Current Research and Its Implications for the L2 Classroom. Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German 39:1-2 ► pp. 46 ff.
[no author supplied]
2005. Literaturverzeichnis. In Sprachgeschichte von unten, ► pp. 481 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.