Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics
Vol. 7:2 (1997) ► pp.147–162

The semantics of coming and going

Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 1 June 1997
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.7.2.02god
References
Fillmore, Charles J
(1966) D eictic categories in the semantics of come. Foundations of Language 21: 219-27.Google Scholar
(1975) Santa Cruz lectures on deixis 1971. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles
(1983) How to know whether you’re coming or going. In G. Rauh [Ed.], Essays on Deixis. Tubigen: Narr, pp. 219-227.Google Scholar
Gathercole, Virginia C
(1977) A study of the comings and goings of the speakers of four languages: Spanish, Japanese, English, and Turkish. Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics, vol 21: 61-94.Google Scholar
Goddard, Cliff
(1991) Testing the translatability of semantic primitives into an Australian Aboriginal language. Anthropological Linguistics 33.1: 31-56.Google Scholar
Goddard, Cliff and Anna Wierzbicka
(Eds.) (1994) Semantic and Lexical Universals: Theory and empirical findings. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Goddard, Cliff
(Ed.) (1997) Studies in the Syntax of Universal Semantic Primitives. Special Issue of Language Sciences 19(3). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(In Press 1998) Semantic Analysis: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goddard, Cliff and Anna Wierzbicka
(Eds.) (Forthcoming) The Universal Syntax of Semantic Primes Oxford Oxford University Press
Jackendoff, Ray
(1983) Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1990) Semantic Structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1996) Conceptual semantics and cognitive linguistics. Cognitive Linguistics 7.1: 93-129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm
(1981) [1765] New Essays Concerning Human Understanding. Translated by Peter Remnant and Jonathon Bennet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C
(1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Locke, John
(1976) [1690] An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Abridged and edited with an introduction by John W. Yolton. London: Everyman’s Library.Google Scholar
Lyons, John
(1977) Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Miller, George A. and Philip N. Johnson-Laird
(1976) Language and Perception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Russell, Bertrand
(1917) M ysticism and logic and other essays. 2nd Edition. London: G eorge Allen & Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar
Sorabji, Richard
(1988) Matter, Space and Motion. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Stanwood, Ryo E
(1993) The hitchhiker’s guide to SHAKE, WAVE, SWING, and WAG. Working Papers in Linguistics, University of Hawai’i 22.2: 141-147.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
(1985) Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen [Ed.], Language typology and syntactic description Vol III: Grammatical categories and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 57-149.Google Scholar
Tanz, Christine
(1980) Studies in the Acquisition of Deictic Terms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna
(1972) Semantic Primitives. Translated by Anna Wierzbicka and John Besemeres. Frankfurt: Athenäum.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1980) Lingua Mentalis: The Semantics of Natural Language. Sydney: Academic Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1988) The Semantics of Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1991) Cross-cultural Pragmatics: The semantics of human interaction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.  BoP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1992) Semantics, Culture, and Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1996) Semantics, Primes and Universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, David P. and Deborah Hill
(1995) When “go” means “come”: Questioning the basicness of basic motion verbs. Cognitive Linguistics 6.2/3: 209-259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 13 other publications

Abdulrahim, Dana
2019. go constructions in Modern Standard Arabic. Constructions and Frames 11:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Anderson, Carolyn Jane & Brian Dillon
2023. Grammatical Perspective-Taking in Comprehension and Production. Open Mind 7 ► pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
Antonopoulou, Eleni & Kiki Nikiforidou
2022. Deictic motion and the adoption of perspective in Greek. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 273 ff. DOI logo
Essegbey, James
2004. Auxiliaries in serialising languages: on COME and GO verbs in Sranan and Ewe. Lingua 114:4 ► pp. 473 ff. DOI logo
Feiz, Parastou
2019. Beyond motion: ‘Come’ and ‘go’ in Persian oral narratives. Linguistics 57:3 ► pp. 577 ff. DOI logo
Jerono, Prisca
2019. Typology of motion events in Tugen. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 15:2 ► pp. 123 ff. DOI logo
Ju, Bo Hyun & Ki-Seong Park
2011. A Study on the Aspects of Markedness in English Motion Verbs Come and Go. Linguistic Research 28:2 ► pp. 355 ff. DOI logo
Luraghi, Silvia
2020. From verb to New Event Marker. Studies in Language 44:4 ► pp. 788 ff. DOI logo
Mateo Mendaza, Raquel
2016. The Old English Exponent for the Semantic Prime MOVE*. Australian Journal of Linguistics 36:4 ► pp. 542 ff. DOI logo
Nakazawa, Tsuneko
2007. A Typology of the Ground of Deictic Motion Verbs As Path-Conflating Verbs: the Speaker, the Addressee, and Beyond. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 43:2 DOI logo
Nuti, Andrea
2016. A matter of perspective. In Embodiment in Latin Semantics [Studies in Language Companion Series, 174], ► pp. 15 ff. DOI logo
Pederson, Eric
2017. Approaches to Motion Event Typology. In The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Typology, ► pp. 574 ff. DOI logo
YAYLAGÜL ÜSTÜNEL, Özen
2021. Türkçe gel- ve git- Fiillerinin Anlamı. Dil Araştırmaları 15:29 ► pp. 31 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.