Article published In:
PragmaticsVol. 7:2 (1997) ► pp.147–162
The semantics of coming and going
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
References (29)
Fillmore, Charles J. (1966) D eictic categories in the semantics of come. Foundations of Language 21: 219-27.
. (1975) Santa Cruz lectures on deixis 1971. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club. BoP
Fillmore, Charles (1983) How to know whether you’re coming or going. In G. Rauh [Ed.], Essays on Deixis. Tubigen: Narr, pp. 219-227.
Gathercole, Virginia C. (1977) A study of the comings and goings of the speakers of four languages: Spanish, Japanese, English, and Turkish. Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics, vol 21: 61-94.
Goddard, Cliff (1991) Testing the translatability of semantic primitives into an Australian Aboriginal language. Anthropological Linguistics 33.1: 31-56.
Goddard, Cliff and Anna Wierzbicka (Eds.) (1994) Semantic and Lexical Universals: Theory and empirical findings. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 
BoP
BoPGoddard, Cliff (Ed.) (1997) Studies in the Syntax of Universal Semantic Primitives. Special Issue of Language Sciences 19(3).
(In Press, 1998) Semantic Analysis: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goddard, Cliff and Anna Wierzbicka (Eds.) (Forthcoming) The Universal Syntax of Semantic Primes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jackendoff, Ray (1983) Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
(1990) Semantic Structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
(1996) Conceptual semantics and cognitive linguistics. Cognitive Linguistics 7.1: 93-129.
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1981) [1765] New Essays Concerning Human Understanding. Translated by Peter Remnant and Jonathon Bennet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Levinson, Stephen C. (1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP.
Locke, John (1976) [1690] An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Abridged and edited with an introduction by John W. Yolton. London: Everyman’s Library.
Lyons, John (1977) Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
Miller, George A. and Philip N. Johnson-Laird (1976) Language and Perception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
BoPRussell, Bertrand (1917) M ysticism and logic and other essays. 2nd Edition. London: G eorge Allen & Unwin Ltd.
Sorabji, Richard (1988) Matter, Space and Motion. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Stanwood, Ryo E. (1993) The hitchhiker’s guide to SHAKE, WAVE, SWING, and WAG. Working Papers in Linguistics, University of Hawai’i 22.2: 141-147.
Talmy, Leonard (1985) Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen [Ed.], Language typology and syntactic description Vol III: Grammatical categories and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 57-149.
Tanz, Christine (1980) Studies in the Acquisition of Deictic Terms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wierzbicka, Anna (1972) Semantic Primitives. Translated by Anna Wierzbicka and John Besemeres. Frankfurt: Athenäum. BoP
(1980) Lingua Mentalis: The Semantics of Natural Language. Sydney: Academic Press. BoP
(1988) The Semantics of Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. BoP
BoP (1991) Cross-cultural Pragmatics: The semantics of human interaction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. BoP.
(1992) Semantics, Culture, and Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. BoP
(1996) Semantics, Primes and Universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press. BoP
Wilkins, David P. and Deborah Hill (1995) When “go” means “come”: Questioning the basicness of basic motion verbs. Cognitive Linguistics 6.2/3: 209-259.
Cited by (14)
Cited by 14 other publications
Subiyanto, Agus, Nurhayati Nurhayati, M. Suryadi & Peter Suwarno
2024. Motion verbs related to Javanese traditional fishing activities: a natural semantic metalanguage approach. Cogent Arts & Humanities 11:1 
Anderson, Carolyn Jane & Brian Dillon
2023. Grammatical Perspective-Taking in Comprehension and Production. Open Mind 7 ► pp. 31 ff.
Antonopoulou, Eleni & Kiki Nikiforidou
2022. Deictic motion and the adoption of perspective in Greek. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 273 ff.
YAYLAGÜL ÜSTÜNEL, Özen
2021. Türkçe gel- ve git- Fiillerinin Anlamı. Dil Araştırmaları 15:29 ► pp. 31 ff.
Luraghi, Silvia
Abdulrahim, Dana
Feiz, Parastou
2019. Beyond motion: ‘Come’ and ‘go’ in Persian oral narratives. Linguistics 57:3 ► pp. 577 ff.
Jerono, Prisca
2019. Typology of motion events in Tugen. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 15:2 ► pp. 123 ff.
Pederson, Eric
2017. Approaches to Motion Event Typology. In The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Typology, ► pp. 574 ff.
Mateo Mendaza, Raquel
2016. The Old English Exponent for the Semantic Prime MOVE*. Australian Journal of Linguistics 36:4 ► pp. 542 ff.
Nuti, Andrea
2016. A matter of perspective. In Embodiment in Latin Semantics [Studies in Language Companion Series, 174], ► pp. 15 ff.
Ju, Bo Hyun & Ki-Seong Park
2011. A Study on the Aspects of Markedness in English Motion Verbs Come and Go. Linguistic Research 28:2 ► pp. 355 ff.
Nakazawa, Tsuneko
2007. A Typology of the Ground of Deictic Motion Verbs As Path-Conflating Verbs: the Speaker, the Addressee, and Beyond. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 43:2
Essegbey, James
2004. Auxiliaries in serialising languages: on COME and GO verbs in Sranan and Ewe. Lingua 114:4 ► pp. 473 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.