Discourse on the Move
Using corpus analysis to describe discourse structure
| Northern Arizona University
| Indiana University - Indianapolis
| Indiana University - Indianapolis
Discourse on the Move is the first book-length exploration of how corpus-based methods can be used for discourse analysis, applied to the description of discourse organization. The primary goal is to bring these two analytical perspectives together: undertaking a detailed discourse analysis of each individual text, but doing so in terms that can be generalized across all texts of a corpus. The book explores two major approaches to this task: ‘top-down’ and ‘bottom-up’. In the ‘top-down’ approach, the functional components of a genre are determined first, and then all texts in a corpus are analyzed in terms of those components. In contrast, textual components emerge from the corpus analysis in the bottom-up approach, and the discourse organization of individual texts is then analyzed in terms of linguistically-defined textual categories. Both approaches are illustrated through case studies of discourse structure in particular genres: fund-raising letters, biology/biochemistry research articles, and university classroom teaching.
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 28] 2007. xii, 290 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
|
Preface
|
xi–xii
|
|
1. Discourse analysis and corpus linguistics
|
1–20
|
|
Part I. Top-down analysis of discourse organization
|
|
|
23–41
|
|
|
3. Identifying and analyzing rhetorical moves in philanthropic discourse
|
43–72
|
|
73–119
|
|
|
121–151
|
|
|
Part II. Bottom-up analyses of discourse organization
|
|
|
155–173
|
|
|
175–212
|
|
|
213–238
|
|
|
Conclusion: Comparing the analytical approaches
|
239–259
|
|
Appendix 1: A brief introduction to multi-dimensional analysis
|
261–266
|
|
Appendix 2: Grammatical and lexico-grammatical features included in the multi-dimensional analyses
|
267–271
|
|
References
|
273–285
|
|
Index
|
287–289
|
“The integration of corpus-based approaches with top-down discourse analysis in this volume is a significant achievement, and its clearly described procedures will be valuable to anybody attempting further work of this kind.”
John M. Swales, University of Michigan, in Language 85(3): 694-696
“
Discourse on the Move is interesting and inspiring. It is a valuable work of synthesis, where several previous approaches are combined to produce more extensive and comprehensive findings. The book is aimed at corpus linguists, but it can be informative also for those computational linguists, NLP researchrs and language engineers who are keen to incorporate language variation and genre specifics into computational models.”
Marina Santini, University of Glasgow, in Computational Linguistics Vol. 35(1), 2009
Cited by
Cited by 145 other publications
No author info given
2015.
In Linguistic Variation in Research Articles [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 71],
No author info given
2015.
In The Discourse of Nurse-Patient Interactions [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 72],
No author info given
2016.
In Discourse Topics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 269],
No author info given
2018.
In Compliments and Positive Assessments [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 289],
No author info given
2021.
In Discourse Studies in Public Communication [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 92],
Aarts, Jan
2011.
In Handbook of Pragmatics,
► pp. 1 ff.
Abdollahpour, Zeinab & Javad Gholami
2019. Embodiment of rhetorical moves in lexical bundles in abstracts of the medical sciences.
Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 37:4 ► pp. 339 ff.
Almujaiwel, Sultan
2017. Discursive patterns of anti-feminism and pro-feminism in Arabic newspapers of the KACST corpus.
Discourse & Communication 11:5 ► pp. 441 ff.
Anderson, Wendy & John Corbett
2009.
In Exploring English with Online Corpora,
► pp. 101 ff.
Anderson, Wendy & John Corbett
2017.
In Exploring English with Online Corpora,
► pp. 129 ff.
Andrus, Jennifer
2012.
In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
ASHOFTEH, Zahra, Majid ELAHİ SHİRVAN & Seyyed Ehsan GOLPARVAR
2020. The move structure of abstracts in applied linguistics research articles in light of the distribution and functions of metadiscourse markers.
Dil ve Dilbilimi Çalışmaları Dergisi 16:4 ► pp. 2077 ff.
Aull, Laura L. & David West Brown
2013. Fighting words: a corpus analysis of gender representations in sports reportage.
Corpora 8:1 ► pp. 27 ff.
Bajwa, Nida ul Habib, Cornelius J. König & Thiemo Kunze
2020. Evidence-based understanding of introductions of research articles.
Scientometrics 124:1 ► pp. 195 ff.
Belcher, Diane
2012.
In The Handbook of English for Specific Purposes,
► pp. 535 ff.
Berber Sardinha, Tony
2018. Dimensions of variation across Internet registers.
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 23:2 ► pp. 125 ff.
Berber Sardinha, Tony & Marcia Veirano Pinto
2019. Dimensions of variation across American television registers.
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 24:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Biber, Douglas
2014. Using multi-dimensional analysis to explore cross-linguistic universals of register variation.
Languages in Contrast 14:1 ► pp. 7 ff.
Biber, Douglas
2016.
In Genre- and Register-related Discourse Features in Contrast [Benjamins Current Topics, 87],
► pp. 7 ff.
Biber, Douglas & Susan Conrad
2019.
In Register, Genre, and Style,
Borderieux, Julien, F. Neveu, G. Bergounioux, M.-H. Côté, J.-M. Fournier, L. Hriba & S. Prévost
2016. L’approche contributionnelle.
SHS Web of Conferences 27 ► pp. 06002 ff.
Bordet, Geneviève
2013. The Rhetorical Role of ‘Collocational Chains’ and their Implications in the Building of Scientific Discourse Strategies.
European Journal of English Studies 17:3 ► pp. 235 ff.
Bruce, Ian
2010.
In Genres on the Web [Text, Speech and Language Technology, 42],
► pp. 323 ff.
Bączkowska, Anna
2019.
In Contacts and Contrasts in Cultures and Languages [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ],
► pp. 163 ff.
Cao, Yan & Richard Xiao
2013. A multi-dimensional contrastive study of English abstracts by native and non-native writers.
Corpora 8:2 ► pp. 209 ff.
Casañ-Pitarch, Ricardo & José Ramón Calvo-Ferrer
2015. Developing Writing Skills in The Classroom: A Corpus-based Analysis of Multi-Genre Structures.
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 198 ► pp. 74 ff.
Charles, Maggie
2012.
In The Handbook of English for Specific Purposes,
► pp. 137 ff.
Chiang, Emily
2020. ‘Send Me Some Pics’: Performing the Offender Identity in Online Undercover Child Abuse Investigations.
Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice
Chitez, Mădălina
2018.
In University Writing in Central and Eastern Europe: Tradition, Transition, and Innovation [Multilingual Education, 29],
► pp. 133 ff.
Conoscenti, Michelangelo
2013.
In Multimodal Communication in Political Speech. Shaping Minds and Social Action [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7688],
► pp. 258 ff.
Conrad, Susan
2019. Register in English for Academic Purposes and English for Specific Purposes.
Register Studies 1:1 ► pp. 168 ff.
Cortes, Viviana
2012.
In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
Cotos, Elena
2017.
In The Handbook of Technology and Second Language Teaching and Learning,
► pp. 248 ff.
Cotos, Elena
2018.
In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
► pp. 1 ff.
Cotos, Elena & Yoo‐Ree Chung
2018.
Domain Description: Validating the Interpretation of the
TOEFL iBT
® Speaking Scores for International Teaching Assistant Screening and Certification Purposes
.
ETS Research Report Series 2018:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Csomay, Eniko & Siew Mei Wu
2020. Language variation in university classrooms.
Register Studies 2:1 ► pp. 131 ff.
da Cunha, Iria & M Amor Montané
2020. A corpus-based analysis of textual genres in the administration domain.
Discourse Studies 22:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Danni, Yu
2020. A Genre Approach to the Translation of Political Speeches Based on a Chinese-Italian-English Trilingual Parallel Corpus.
SAGE Open 10:2 ► pp. 215824402093360 ff.
Dastjerdi, Zahra Shirian, Helen Tan & Ain Nadzimah Abdullah
2017. RHETORICAL STRUCTURE OF INTEGRATED RESULTS AND DISCUSSION CHAPTER IN MASTER’S DISSERTATIONS ACROSS DISCIPLINES.
Discourse and Interaction 10:2 ► pp. 61 ff.
Dayter, Daria & Sofia Rüdiger
2020.
In Corpus Approaches to Social Media [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 98],
► pp. 63 ff.
de la Fuente Garcia, Sofia, Craig W. Ritchie & Saturnino Luz
2020. Artificial Intelligence, Speech, and Language Processing Approaches to Monitoring Alzheimer’s Disease: A Systematic Review.
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 78:4 ► pp. 1547 ff.
Degraeuwe, Jasper & Patrick Goethals
2020. La selección temática del vocabulario para fines didácticos: evaluación de un acercamiento cuantitativo.
Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas 15:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Dontcheva-Navratilova, Olga
2012.
In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
Dontcheva-Navratilova, Olga
2016. RHETORICAL FUNCTIONS OF CITATIONS IN LINGUISTICS RESEARCH ARTICLES: A CONTRASTIVE (ENGLISH-CZECH) STUDY.
Discourse and Interaction 9:2 ► pp. 51 ff.
Dontcheva-Navrátilová, Olga
2017.
In Coherence in political speeches,
Egbert, Jesse & Michaela Mahlberg
2020. Fiction – one register or two?.
Register Studies 2:1 ► pp. 72 ff.
Eller, Monika
2018.
In The Discursive Construction of Identities On- and Offline [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 78],
► pp. 177 ff.
Evans, Rick, Gregory D. Fuchs & Traci Nathans-Kelly
2013.
In IEEE International Professonal Communication 2013 Conference,
► pp. 1 ff.
Fanego, Teresa & Paula Rodríguez-Puente
2019.
In Corpus-based Research on Variation in English Legal Discourse [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 91],
► pp. 1 ff.
Fontaine, Sam A. & Daniel M. Gomez
2020. Going Social: A Comparative Analysis of Presidents' Official and Social Media Messages.
Presidential Studies Quarterly 50:3 ► pp. 507 ff.
Gan, Zhengdong
2013. Understanding English speaking difficulties: an investigation of two Chinese populations.
Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 34:3 ► pp. 231 ff.
Gigante, Maria E
2018. Argumentation by Self-Model: Missing Methods and Opportunities in the Personal Narratives of Popular Health Coaches.
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 48:3 ► pp. 259 ff.
Giménez-Moreno, Rosa & Hanna Skorczynska
2013. Corpus Analysis and Register Variation: A Field in Need of an Update.
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 95 ► pp. 402 ff.
Gray, Bethany, Elena Cotos & Jordan Smith
2020.
In Advances in Corpus-based Research on Academic Writing [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 95],
► pp. 138 ff.
Groom, Nicholas
2019. Construction Grammar and the corpus-based analysis of discourses.
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 24:3 ► pp. 291 ff.
Groom, Nicholas & Jack Grieve
2019.
In Corpus-based Research on Variation in English Legal Discourse [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 91],
► pp. 201 ff.
Hasko, Victoria
2012.
In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
Haupt, Jaromír
2014.
In The Pragmatics of Discourse Coherence [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 254],
► pp. 53 ff.
Heron, Marion & Erika Corradini
2020. A genre-based study of professional reflective writing in higher education.
Teaching in Higher Education ► pp. 1 ff.
Ho, Victor
2017. Achieving service recovery through responding to negative online reviews.
Discourse & Communication 11:1 ► pp. 31 ff.
Ho, Victor
2019. Hotel management’s attempts at repairing customers’ trust.
Pragmatics and Society 10:4 ► pp. 493 ff.
Ibáñez, Romualdo, Fernando Moncada & Benjamín Cárcamo
2019. Coherence Relations in Primary School Textbooks: Variation across School Subjects.
Discourse Processes 56:8 ► pp. 764 ff.
Ibáñez O., Romualdo & Fernando Moncada N.
2017. El Resumen de artículos de investigación científica.
Spanish in Context 14:2 ► pp. 273 ff.
Jeaco, Stephen
2020. Calculating and displaying key labels: the texts, sections, authors and neighbourhoods where words and collocations are likely to be prominent.
Corpora 15:2 ► pp. 169 ff.
Joseph, Renu, Jason Miin-Hwa Lim & Nor Arifah Mohd. Nor
2014. Communicative Moves in Forestry Research Introductions: Implications for the Design of Learning Materials.
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 134 ► pp. 53 ff.
Jørgensen, Annette Myre & Inés Olza
2020. Phraseology in teenage language in Spanish, English and Norwegian.
Languages in Contrast 20:1 ► pp. 58 ff.
Khalili, Assef, Farahman Farrokhi & Majid Aslanabadi
2016. Application of Native Speaker Models for Identifying Deviations in Rhetorical Moves in Non-Native Speaker Manuscripts.
Research and Development in Medical Education 5:1 ► pp. 18 ff.
Khany, Reza & Bahareh Malmir
2020. A Move-marker List: A Study of Rhetorical Move-lexis Linguistic Realizations of Research Article Abstracts in Social and Behavioural Sciences.
RELC Journal 51:3 ► pp. 381 ff.
Klégr, Aleš
2014. PUBLISHER’S DESCRIPTIONS OF LINGUISTIC BOOKS: COMPARISON OF CZECH AND ENGLISH DISCOURSE STRATEGIES.
Discourse and Interaction 7:2 ► pp. 21 ff.
Kunioshi, Nílson, Judy Noguchi, Hiroko Hayashi & Kazuko Tojo
2012. An online support site for preparation of oral presentations in science and engineering.
European Journal of Engineering Education 37:6 ► pp. 600 ff.
Labrador, Belén & Noelia Ramón
2015. ‘Perfectly Smooth, Creamy and Full Flavoured’: Online Cheese Descriptions.
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 198 ► pp. 226 ff.
Lammers, Annelotte, Martin J. Goedhart & Lucy Avraamidou
2019. Reading and synthesising science texts using a scientific argumentation model by undergraduate biology students.
International Journal of Science Education 41:16 ► pp. 2323 ff.
Lee, Joseph J.
2018.
In The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching,
► pp. 1 ff.
Lehto, Anu
2012. Review of Biber & Conrad (2009): Register, Genre, and Style.
Journal of Historical Pragmatics 13:1 ► pp. 147 ff.
Lin, (Kathy) Ling
2020.
In Perspectives on the Introductory Phase of Empirical Research Articles [Corpora and Intercultural Studies, 5],
► pp. 101 ff.
Lin, Hui & Brendan Luyt
2012. The evolution of scientific journal articles in the periphery: a case study and analysis of the Raffles Bulletin of Zoology from 1928 to 2008.
Journal of Information Science 38:5 ► pp. 407 ff.
Lin, Ling
2014. Variability in the rhetorical structure of research article introductions.
Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 27:2 ► pp. 405 ff.
López Arroyo, Belén & Leticia Moreno Pérez
2019. Lexical chunks in English and Spanish sales contracts.
Terminology. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication 25:1 ► pp. 32 ff.
López Arroyo, Belén & Roda P. Roberts
2015. Unusual sentence structure in wine tasting notes.
Languages in Contrast 15:2 ► pp. 162 ff.
López Arroyo, Belén & Roda P. Roberts
2017. Genre and Register in Comparable Corpora: An English/Spanish Contrastive Analysis.
Meta 62:1 ► pp. 114 ff.
López Arroyo, Belén, Roda P. Roberts & Leticia Moreno Pérez
2019. The use of -ing and -ndo forms in sales contracts.
Languages in Contrast 19:2 ► pp. 256 ff.
Markowitz, David M.
2018. Academy Awards Speeches Reflect Social Status, Cinematic Roles, and Winning Expectations.
Journal of Language and Social Psychology 37:3 ► pp. 376 ff.
Markowitz, David M. & Darrin J. Griffin
2020. When context matters: how false, truthful, and genre-related communication styles are revealed in language.
Psychology, Crime & Law 26:3 ► pp. 287 ff.
Markowitz, David M. & Jeffrey T. Hancock
2016. Linguistic Obfuscation in Fraudulent Science.
Journal of Language and Social Psychology 35:4 ► pp. 435 ff.
Markowitz, David M. & Jeffrey T. Hancock
2019.
In The Palgrave Handbook of Deceptive Communication,
► pp. 193 ff.
Marín, María José
2014. Evaluation of five single-word term recognition methods on a legal English corpus.
Corpora 9:1 ► pp. 83 ff.
Mason, Marianne
2011. Examining the rhetorical structure and discursive features of letters of leniency as a genre.
Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 21:1 ► pp. 111 ff.
Mason, Marianne & Robert D. Mason
2012. Communicating a Green Corporate Perspective.
Journal of Business and Technical Communication 26:4 ► pp. 479 ff.
McGee, Iain
2019. The Textual Management of the Solicit Response Move in Newspaper Fundraising Advertisements.
Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing ► pp. 1 ff.
Mehrjooseresht, Maryam & Ummul K. Ahmad
2018.
In Intercultural Perspectives on Research Writing [AILA Applied Linguistics Series, 18],
► pp. 105 ff.
Michaelis, Laura A. & Hanbing Feng
2015. What is this, sarcastic syntax?.
Constructions and Frames 7:2 ► pp. 148 ff.
Mizumoto, Atsushi, Sawako Hamatani & Yasuhiro Imao
2017. Applying the Bundle-Move Connection Approach to the Development of an Online Writing Support Tool for Research Articles.
Language Learning 67:4 ► pp. 885 ff.
Moskowich, Isabel
2013. Eighteenth Century Female Authors: Women and Science in theCoruña Corpus of English Scientific Writing.
Australian Journal of Linguistics 33:4 ► pp. 467 ff.
Ngula, Richmond Sadick
2017. Epistemic modal verbs in research articles written by Ghanaian and international scholars: a corpus-based study of three disciplines.
Brno studies in English :2 ► pp. [5] ff.
Nikiforidou, Kiki
2015. Grammatical constructions and cross-text generalizations.
Constructions and Frames 7:2 ► pp. 181 ff.
Nikiforidou, Kiki
2018. Genre and constructional analysis.
Pragmatics & Cognition 25:3 ► pp. 543 ff.
Nordrum, Lene & Andreas Eriksson
2015.
In Learner Corpora in Language Testing and Assessment [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 70],
► pp. 59 ff.
O'Neill, Gary
2011. Book review: Maggie Charles, Diane Percorari and Susan Hunston (eds), Academic Writing: At the Interface of Corpus and Discourse. London: Continuum International Publishing Group, 2009. viii + 303 pp.
Discourse & Society 22:3 ► pp. 364 ff.
Pan, Mingwei & David D. Qian
2017. Embedding Corpora into the Content Validation of the Grammar Test of the National Matriculation English Test (NMET) in China.
Language Assessment Quarterly 14:2 ► pp. 120 ff.
Paolillo, John C., Jonathan Warren & Breanne Kunz
2010.
In Genres on the Web [Text, Speech and Language Technology, 42],
► pp. 277 ff.
Parkinson, Jean, James Mackay & Murielle Demecheleer
2018. Situated Learning in Acquisition of a Workplace Genre.
Vocations and Learning 11:2 ► pp. 289 ff.
Parodi, Giovanni
2014. Genre organization in specialized discourse: Disciplinary variation across university textbooks.
Discourse Studies 16:1 ► pp. 65 ff.
Parodi, Giovanni
2015. Variation across university genres in seven disciplines.
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 20:4 ► pp. 469 ff.
Parodi, Giovanni & Gina Burdiles
2019. Los pronombres neutros ‘esto’, ‘eso’ y ‘aquello’ como mecanismos encapsuladores en el discurso de la
economía.
Spanish in Context 16:1 ► pp. 104 ff.
Pecman, Mojca
2014. Variation as a cognitive device.
Terminology. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication 20:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Peters, Pam
2014. Review of Hundt & Gut (2012): Mapping Unity and Diversity World-Wide. Corpus-Based Studies of New Englishes.
English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 35:2 ► pp. 234 ff.
Petroni, Sandra
2019.
In Analyzing Digital Discourse,
► pp. 251 ff.
Pieterse, J. H., J. M. Ulijn & A. van Wagenberg
2012.
In 2012 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference,
► pp. 1 ff.
Pizarro Sánchez, Isabel
2017.
In Cross-linguistic Correspondences [Studies in Language Companion Series, 191],
► pp. 221 ff.
Pollak, Senja, Borut Lesjak, Janez Kranjc, Vid Podpecan, Martin nidaric & Nada Lavrac
2015.
In 2015 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence,
► pp. 1468 ff.
Povolná, Renata
2016. CROSS-CULTURAL ANALYSIS OF CONFERENCE ABSTRACTS.
Discourse and Interaction 9:1 ► pp. 29 ff.
Povolná, Renata
2018.
In Intercultural Perspectives on Research Writing [AILA Applied Linguistics Series, 18],
► pp. 151 ff.
Rabadán, Rosa
2016. Proposals in meeting minutes.
Languages in Contrast 16:2 ► pp. 213 ff.
Rabin, Eyal, Vered Silber-Varod, Yoram M. Kalman & Marco Kalz
2019.
In Transforming Learning with Meaningful Technologies [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 11722],
► pp. 224 ff.
Rachfał, Edyta
2016. Towards a linguistic model of crisis response (CRModel).
Journal of Language and Politics 15:2 ► pp. 215 ff.
Rau, Gerald
2019.
In Writing for Engineering and Science Students,
► pp. 206 ff.
Redeker, Gisela & Helmut Gruber
2014.
In The Pragmatics of Discourse Coherence [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 254],
► pp. 1 ff.
Renkema, Jan & Christoph Schubert
2018.
In Introduction to Discourse Studies,
Ricento, Thomas
2016.
In Research Methods in Language and Education,
► pp. 1 ff.
Ricento, Thomas
2017.
In Research Methods in Language and Education,
► pp. 67 ff.
Santini, Marina, Alexander Mehler & Serge Sharoff
2010.
In Genres on the Web [Text, Speech and Language Technology, 42],
► pp. 3 ff.
Sawaki, Tomoko
2016.
In Analysing Structure in Academic Writing,
► pp. 31 ff.
Sepehri, Amir, David M. Markowitz & Rod Duclos
2020. The Location of Maximum Emotion in Deceptive and Truthful Texts.
Social Psychological and Personality Science ► pp. 194855062094973 ff.
Shahriari Ahmadi, Hesamoddin, Behzad Ghonsooly & Azar Hosseini Fatemi
2012. Analyzing research article introductions by Iranian and native English-speaking authors of Applied Linguistics.
International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning 2:3
Shaw, Philip M.
2012.
In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
Siirtola, Harri, Tanja Säily, Terttu Nevalainen & Kari-Jouko Räihä
2014. Text Variation Explorer.
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 19:3 ► pp. 417 ff.
Slodzian, Monique
2008. Paradoxes du multilinguisme.
Syntaxe et sémantique 9:1 ► pp. 111 ff.
Staples, Shelley, Jesse Egbert, Douglas Biber & Susan Conrad
2015.
In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis,
► pp. 505 ff.
Stockinger, Peter
2013.
In Audiovisual Archives,
► pp. 301 ff.
Stoller, Fredricka L. & Marin S. Robinson
2014.
In Language, Literacy, and Learning in STEM Education [Language Studies, Science and Engineering, 1],
► pp. 11 ff.
Sánchez Upegui, Alexánder Arbey
2015. Análisis lingüístico de la citación en artículos de ciencias sociales y humanas.
Revista Lasallista de Investigación 12:1 ► pp. 99 ff.
Tardy, Christine M.
2012.
In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
Teo, Peter & Songsha Ren
2019. Marketization of universities in China: A critical discourse analysis of the university president’s message.
Discourse & Communication 13:5 ► pp. 539 ff.
Thominet, Luke
2020. We’ve Selected a Candidate Who More Closely Fits Our Current Needs: A Genre Analysis of Academic Job-Refusal Letters.
Journal of Business and Technical Communication 34:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Thumvichit, Athip, Chanika Gampper & Jeroen van de Weijer
2019. Composing responses to negative hotel reviews: A genre analysis.
Cogent Arts & Humanities 6:1 ► pp. 1629154 ff.
Tranter, Kate
2012.
In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
Tyrkkö, Jukka
2014.
In Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 243],
► pp. 157 ff.
van der Vliet, Nynke & Gisela Redeker
2014.
In The Pragmatics of Discourse Coherence [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 254],
► pp. 23 ff.
Walther-Hansen, Mads
2016.
In Music, Mind, and Embodiment [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 9617],
► pp. 228 ff.
Wang, Haiping, Yuanyuan Zheng & Yiyan Cai
2015.
In Corpus Linguistics in Chinese Contexts,
► pp. 158 ff.
Warren, Martin
2012.
In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
Wright, Heidi R.
2020.
In Advances in Corpus-based Research on Academic Writing [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 95],
► pp. 308 ff.
XIAO, RICHARD
2009. Multidimensional analysis and the study of world Englishes.
World Englishes 28:4 ► pp. 421 ff.
Yu, Danni & Marina Bondi
2019. A Genre-Based Analysis of Forward-Looking Statements in Corporate Social Responsibility Reports.
Written Communication 36:3 ► pp. 379 ff.
Ştefănescu, Ariadna
2019.
In Fuzzy Boundaries in Discourse Studies,
► pp. 287 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 08 february 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
BIC Subject: CFG – Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General