Corpus-based Analyses of the Problem–Solution Pattern
A phraseological approach
| Hong Kong University of Science & Technology
This book reports research on the Problem-Solution rhetorical pattern, which has to date received very little attention in corpus-based studies. Insights from genre analysis and systemic-functional grammar are also applied to the analysis of the Problem-Solution pattern, thus moving towards a more multi-faceted analysis of corpus data. The pattern is investigated in two specialized corpora of technically-oriented report writing, a professional corpus and a student corpus, using a key word and key-key word analysis. Phraseological analyses of key words in both corpora are presented. Data show that students’ writing lacks a range of lexico-grammatical patternings for expressing the Problem and Solution elements of the pattern. The book concludes with some pedagogic implications and applications of the findings. Suggested concordancing activities are discussed within the context of key issues in the field of data-driven learning.
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 29] 2008. xi, 179 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
|
Acknowledgments
|
xi
|
|
Chapter 1. Problem-Solution pattern: An overview and corpus analytic perspective
|
1–12
|
|
Chapter 2. Issues in corpus linguistics and discourse studies
|
13–20
|
|
Chapter 3. The two corpora: Context and compilation
|
21–32
|
|
Chapter 4. Frequency, key word and key-key word analysis of signals for the Problem-Solution pattern
|
33–51
|
|
Chapter 5. PROFCORP: Phraseological analysis of signals for the Problem element
|
53–74
|
|
Chapter 6. PROFCORP: Phraseological analysis of signals for the Solution element
|
75–95
|
|
Chapter 7. STUCORP: Phraseological analysis of signals for the Problem element
|
97–113
|
|
Chapter 8. STUCORP: Phraseological analysis of signals for the Solution element
|
115–128
|
|
Chapter 9. General conclusions and implications for pedagogy
|
129–139
|
|
Appendices
|
141–164
|
|
References
|
165–173
|
|
Author index
|
175
|
|
Subject index
|
177–179
|
Cited by
Cited by 11 other publications
Benitez-Castro, Miguel-Angel & Paul Thompson
2015. Shell-nounhood in academic discourse.
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 20:3 ► pp. 378 ff. 
Charles, Maggie
2012.
In The Handbook of English for Specific Purposes,
► pp. 137 ff.
Dontcheva-Navrátilová, Olga
2017.
In Coherence in political speeches,
Egbert, Jesse & Michaela Mahlberg
2020. Fiction – one register or two?.
Register Studies 2:1 ► pp. 72 ff.
GOLYNSKAİA, Anna & Fatma BÖLÜKBAŞ KAYA
2021. Öğrenen Derlemlerinin Dil Öğretiminde Kullanımı Üzerine Kuramsal Tartışmalar.
Ana Dili Eğitimi Dergisi
granger, Sylviane & Magali paquot
2012.
In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
Heffernan, Kevin & Simone Teufel
2018. Identifying problems and solutions in scientific text.
Scientometrics 116:2 ► pp. 1367 ff.
López Arroyo, Belén & Roda P. Roberts
2017. Genre and Register in Comparable Corpora: An English/Spanish Contrastive Analysis.
Meta 62:1 ► pp. 114 ff.
Nordrum, Lene & Andreas Eriksson
2015.
In Learner Corpora in Language Testing and Assessment [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 70],
► pp. 59 ff.
Parkinson, Jean
2012.
In The Handbook of English for Specific Purposes,
► pp. 155 ff.
Warren, Martin
2012.
In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 june 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
BIC Subject: CFG – Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General