A Dictionary of English Normative Grammar 1700–1800 (DENG)

HardboundAvailable
ISBN 9789027245502 (Eur) | EUR 130.00
ISBN 9781556193583 (USA) | USD 195.00
 
e-Book
ISBN 9789027277688 | EUR 130.00 | USD 195.00
 
Google Play logo
Eighteenth-century English grammarians plead eloquently for purity, precision and perspicuity, but their method of teaching largely amounts to citing examples of impurity, imprecision and lack of clarity from contemporary writings. This book is the first of its kind to provide a detailed systematic account of such 'errors'. Apart from source and page references, the Dictionary gives the context of the error (I have not wept this forty years), the correct or 'target' form ('these forty years'), the name of the authors quoted by the grammarians ('Addison', 'Swift'), and the labels which sum up their assessment of the error ('absurd', 'solecism'). It operates with error categories such as ambiguity, ellipsis and government (fourteen in all), which are subdivided into grammatically described main entries, subentries, and so on. The Introduction includes a guide to the use of the Dictionary, the grammatical code, and a discussion of grammatical concepts, error typologies, problems of identifying literary sources, attitudes to correctness, grammatical figures, and other topics. A Bibliography and an Index of lexical items and technical terms round off the volume. The way the Dictionary is organized should make it possible to find in it the answer to a wide variety of questions pertaining to grammar, style and linguistic historiography.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
Cited by

Cited by 55 other publications

John Algeo
2001. The Cambridge History of the English Language, DOI logo
ANDERWALD, LIESELOTTE
2014. Measuring the success of prescriptivism: quantitative grammaticography, corpus linguistics and the progressive passive. English Language and Linguistics 18:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Anderwald, Lieselotte
2017. “Vernacular universals” in nineteenth-century grammar writing. In Exploring Future Paths for Historical Sociolinguistics [Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics, 7],  pp. 275 ff. DOI logo
Auer, Anita
2014. Nineteenth-century English. In Norms and Usage in Language History, 1600–1900 [Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics, 3],  pp. 151 ff. DOI logo
Austin, Frances
2005. Points Of Modern English Usage LXXXI. English Studies 86:3  pp. 269 ff. DOI logo
Beal, Joan C.
2013. The place of pronunciation in eighteenth‐century grammars of English. Transactions of the Philological Society 111:2  pp. 165 ff. DOI logo
Brinton, Laurel J.
2015. Studying real-time change in the adverbial subjunctive. In Transatlantic Perspectives on Late Modern English [Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics, 4],  pp. 13 ff. DOI logo
Busse, Ulrich
2020. “Divided by a common language”?. In Late Modern English [Studies in Language Companion Series, 214],  pp. 186 ff. DOI logo
Conde-Silvestre, J. Camilo & Javier Calle-Martín
2015. Zero that-clauses in the history of English. A historical sociolinguistic approach (1424–1681). Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 1:1  pp. 57 ff. DOI logo
de Vos, Machteld
2022. In Between Description and Prescription: Analysing Metalanguage in Normative Works on Dutch 1550–1650. Languages 7:2  pp. 89 ff. DOI logo
Denison, David
1999. SYNTAX. In The Cambridge History of the English Language,  pp. 92 ff. DOI logo
Domínguez-Rodríguez, M. Victoria
2016. A Corpus-Based Study of Abbreviations in Eighteenth-Century English Grammars. English Studies 97:5  pp. 528 ff. DOI logo
Fanego, Teresa
2023.  Tomorrow I’ll go (a) shopping: on the history of the Expeditionary Go construction and its relation to the absentive. Folia Linguistica 57:s44-s1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Finegan, Edward
1999. ENGLISH GRAMMAR AND USAGE. In The Cambridge History of the English Language,  pp. 536 ff. DOI logo
Fitzmaurice, Susan M.
1998. The commerce of language in the pursuit of politeness in eighteenth‐century England. English Studies 79:4  pp. 309 ff. DOI logo
Godard, Thomas
2015. A New Grammar by Joseph Priestley (1733–1804). Language & History 58:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Görlach, Manfred
2000. REGIONAL AND SOCIAL VARIATION. In The Cambridge History of the English Language,  pp. 459 ff. DOI logo
Haugland, Kari E.
1995. Is't allow'd or ain't it? On contraction in early grammars and spelling books1. Studia Neophilologica 67:2  pp. 165 ff. DOI logo
Hodson, Jane
2016. Chapter 8. Jane Austen and the prescriptivists. In Linguistics and Literary History [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 25],  pp. 151 ff. DOI logo
Hyett, James & Carol Percy
Koerner, Konrad & Kofi K. Saah
1992. Publications received / Ouvrages reçus / Eingegangene schriften. Historiographia Linguistica 19:1  pp. 199 ff. DOI logo
Laker, Stephen
2008. The English negative comparative particle1. Transactions of the Philological Society 106:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Roger Lass
2000. The Cambridge History of the English Language, DOI logo
LUCAS, CHRISTOPHER & DAVID WILLIS
2012. Never again: the multiple grammaticalization ofneveras a marker of negation in English. English Language and Linguistics 16:3  pp. 459 ff. DOI logo
Lukač, Morana
2016. Linguistic prescriptivism in letters to the editor. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 37:3  pp. 321 ff. DOI logo
Malory, Beth
2023. Pinpointing prescriptive impact. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics DOI logo
Malory, Beth
2023. Locating the ‘Age of Prescriptivism’ in Late Modern periodical reviews: a corpus-assisted discourse analytic approach. Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 9:2  pp. 263 ff. DOI logo
McCafferty, Kevin
2011. Victories fastened in grammar: historical documentation of Irish English. English Today 27:2  pp. 17 ff. DOI logo
MCCAFFERTY, KEVIN
2017. Irish English in emigrant letters. World Englishes 36:2  pp. 176 ff. DOI logo
McCAFFERTY, KEVIN & CAROLINA P. AMADOR-MORENO
2014. ‘[The Irish] find much difficulty in these auxiliaries . . .puttingwillforshallwith the first person’: the decline of first-personshallin Ireland, 1760–1890. English Language and Linguistics 18:3  pp. 407 ff. DOI logo
Montgomery, Michael B.
2009. HISTORICAL AND COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVES ONA-PREFIXING IN THE ENGLISH OF APPALACHIA. American Speech 84:1  pp. 5 ff. DOI logo
Nevalainen, Terttu
2000. EARLY MODERN ENGLISH LEXIS AND SEMANTICS. In The Cambridge History of the English Language,  pp. 332 ff. DOI logo
NEVALAINEN, TERTTU
2008. Social variation in intensifier use: constraint on -ly adverbialization in the past?. English Language and Linguistics 12:2  pp. 289 ff. DOI logo
Nevalainen, Terttu
2014. Norms and usage in seventeenth-century English. In Norms and Usage in Language History, 1600–1900 [Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics, 3],  pp. 103 ff. DOI logo
Percy, Carol
2012. Robert Lowth and the Critics. Historiographia Linguistica 39:1  pp. 9 ff. DOI logo
Percy, Carol
2012. Attitudes, prescriptivism, and standardization. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English,  pp. 446 ff. DOI logo
Percy, Carol
2013. J. Matlock's Young ladies guide to the knowledge of the English tongue (1715): contextualising the first grammar of English for ladies. Transactions of the Philological Society 111:2  pp. 223 ff. DOI logo
Percy, Carol E.
1996. In the margins: Dr Hawkesworth's editorial emendations to the language of captain cook'svoyages*. English Studies 77:6  pp. 549 ff. DOI logo
Schlüter, Julia
2019. Tracing the (re-)emergence of /h/ and /j/ onsets through 350 years of books: Mergers and merger reversals at the interface of phonetics and phonology. Folia Linguistica 53:s40-s1  pp. 177 ff. DOI logo
Schneider, Edgar W.
2004. Investigating Variation and Change in Written Documents. In The Handbook of Language Variation and Change,  pp. 67 ff. DOI logo
Straaijer, Robin
2016. Codification of correctness: normative sources for Joseph Priestley’s grammar. Language & History 59:1  pp. 14 ff. DOI logo
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid
2014. Eighteenth-century English normative grammars and their readers. In Norms and Usage in Language History, 1600–1900 [Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics, 3],  pp. 129 ff. DOI logo
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid
2015. Five Hundred Mistakes Corrected. In Transatlantic Perspectives on Late Modern English [Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics, 4],  pp. 55 ff. DOI logo
van Ostade, Ingrid Tieken-Boon
2013. Studying attitudes to English usage. English Today 29:4  pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
VAN OSTADE, INGRID TIEKEN-BOON & VIKTORIJA KOSTADINOVA
2015. Have went– an American usage problem. English Language and Linguistics 19:2  pp. 293 ff. DOI logo
Vartiainen, Turo & Mikko Höglund
2020. How to Make New Use of Existing Resources:. American Speech 95:4  pp. 408 ff. DOI logo
Yáñez-Bouza, Nuria
2011. The ‘Glaring’ Place of Prepositions. Historiographia Linguistica 38:3  pp. 255 ff. DOI logo
Yáñez-Bouza, Nuria
2015. Senses of “Grammar” in the Eighteenth-Century English Tradition. English Studies 96:8  pp. 913 ff. DOI logo
Yáñez-Bouza, Nuria
2016. “May Depend on Me Sending It You”. Journal of English Linguistics 44:2  pp. 138 ff. DOI logo
Yáñez-Bouza, Nuria
2022. Methodological approaches to the study of codification, prescription, and prescriptivism. Studia Neophilologica 94:3  pp. 334 ff. DOI logo
Yáñez‐Bouza, Nuria
2012. Grammar Writing and Provincial Grammar Printing in the Eighteenth‐Century British Isles1. Transactions of the Philological Society 110:1  pp. 34 ff. DOI logo
Nuria Yáñez-Bouza, Emma Moore, Linda van Bergen & Willem B. Hollmann
2019. Categories, Constructions, and Change in English Syntax, DOI logo
Yáñez‐Bouza, Nuria & María E. Rodríguez‐Gil
2013. The ECEG database. Transactions of the Philological Society 111:2  pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2013. Reference Guide for Varieties of English. In A Dictionary of Varieties of English,  pp. 363 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 february 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects

Main BIC Subject

CF: Linguistics

Main BISAC Subject

LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
ONIX Metadata
ONIX 2.1
ONIX 3.0
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  91043663 | Marc record