Argumentation

• Contributors | p. v
• Preface | p. vii
• Part One: Re-Modelling Logic
• Introduction
  E.M. Barth | p. 3
• A Necessary Component of Logic: Empirical Argumentation Analysis
  Arne Naess | p. 9
• 1. Logic has empirical components and needs empirical research
• 2. ‘Argumentation analysis’
• 3. Options in a clarification and assessment game
• 4. Analysis of agreement and pseudo-agreement
• 5. Degree of definiteness of intention (discrimination acuity) as a factor in argumentation
• 6. The hermeneutical spiral as a factor in argumentation
• Die Dialogische Begründung Von Logikkalkülen
  P. Lorenzen | p. 23
• 1. Drei Typen von Logikkalkülen
• 2. Das Begründungsproblem
• 3. Empraktische Einführung der Verwendungsregeln
• 4. Materiale Dialoge: Semantik
• 5. Erweiterungen der strengen Dialoge: Liberalisierungen
• 6. Die effektive Dialogregel
• 7. Das Problem der Konsistenz: Schnittregel
• 8. Die klassische Dialogregel
• 9. Die Beziehung materialer Dialoge zu Logikkalkülen
• 10. Zur Frage der sog: Vollständigkeit
• 11. Vollständigkeit ohne Semantik
• Sherlock Holmes Confronts Modern Logic: Toward a Theory of Information-Seeking Through Questioning
  Jaakko Hintikka and Merrill B. Hintikka | p. 55
• 1. Sherlock Holmes vs. philosophers on deduction
• 2. Making tacit information explicit through questioning
• 3. The structure of question-inference complexes
• 4. On the principle of total evidence. Bayesianism
• 5. The role of observations
• 6. Question-answer sequences as games against Nature
• 7. Payoffs and strategies
• 8. Deductions sometimes replaceable by questions and answers
• Semantical Games and Transcendental Arguments
  Jaakko Hintikka | p. 77
• 1. Kant on the logic of existence
• 2. Seeking and finding, and game-theoretical semantics
• 3. A transcendental refutation of certain related views
• 4. A test-case: branching quantifiers
• 5. Material vs. logical truth, formal argumentation, and semantics
• 6. From semantical games to dialogical ones
• Towards a General Theory of Argumentation
  Leo Apostel | p. 93
• 1. Logic and rhetorics, heuristics, proof theory
• 2. Theory of discussion
• 3. What are discussions?
• 4. Reduction to the theory of (inter-)action
• 5. “Proponent”, “Opponent”, “defence” and “attack”
• 6. Systematic connections between the theory of games and some theories discussed at this conference
• 7. Hamblin's theory: What is an argument?
• 8. Decomposition of argumentative texts: Sub-games
• 9. Equivocation and use of metaphors
• Theory of Argumentation and the Dialectical Garb of Formal Logic
  Erik C.W. Krabbe | p. 123
• Ein Konstruktiver Weg Zur Semantik Der “Möglichen Welten”
  Rüdiger Inhetveen | p. 133
• 1. Dialogebenen: Spielregel
• 2. Beispiele
• 3. Beziehung zu den modallogischen Standardsystemen
• Part Two: Choosing the Rules
• Introduction
  E.M. Barth | p. 143
• On the Criteria for the Choice of Rules of Dialogic Logic
  Kuno Lorenz | p. 145
• 1. A game-theoretic pragmatic conception of truth
• 2. Specifying the game (“global” game rules)
• 3. Argument rules (“local” game rules)
• 4. Subjunction
• 5. Formal winning-strategy and formal truth
• 6. A theorem of formal dialogic logic
• A Normative-Pragmatical Foundation of the Rules of some Systems of Formal3 Dialectics
  E.M. Barth | p. 159
• 1. New foundations: Statemental dialogue attitudes
• 2. Two purposes — presentation of the dialectical systems, and the problem of fallacy
• 3. Basic norms and ends; implementations
• 4. Dialectics should be systematic and thorough going
• 5. Dialectics should be orderly and dynamic
• 6. Epilogue: The three elementary phases of a critical discussion
• Part Three: Describing Argumentative Dialogues
• Introduction
  E.M. Barth | p. 171
• A Set of Concepts for the Study of Dialogical Argumentation
  Arnold Gunther | p. 175
• 1. Introduction
• 2. Argumentation — informally described
• 3. Dialogue bases
• 4. Co-operative argumentative dialogues and argumentation
• Montague-Grammars for Argumentative Dialogues
  Carl H. Heidrich | p. 191
• 1. Introduction
• 2. Background and motivation
• 3. An example of a dialogue
• 4. A Montague-grammar
• Part Four: Analysing Philosophy
• Introduction
  E.M. Barth | p. 229
• Formal Dialectics as Immanent Criticism of Philosophical Systems
  Erik C.W. Krabbe | p. 233
• 1. Introduction
• 2. The provocative thesis
• 3. Critical interpretation of the logical constants
• 4. Information-seeking interpretation of the logical constants
• An Application of Empirical Argumentation Analysis to Spinoza's “Ethics”
  Arne Naess | p. 245
• 1. The propositions of the “Ethics” conceived of as arguments in a debate
• 2. Spinoza's theses of equivalence
• 3. Equivalences as arguments
• Finite Debates About “The Infinite”
  E.M. Barth | p. 257
• 1. Two philosophical paradigms
• 2. “Tongue-twisting for the sake of consistency” — a recent description of the Weierstrass method
• 3. Two-role logic and the notion of ‘limit’
• 4. Instantaneous velocities
• 5. Paradigmatically misleading expressions
• 6. Conclusion
• Part Five: Analysing Interaction
• Introduction
  E.M. Barth | p. 271
• A Decision-Theoretical Interpretation of Dialogues
  Ulrike Leopold-Wildburger | p. 273
• On the Philosophy of Argument and the Logic of Common Morality
  F. van Dun | p. 281
• 1. Dialectical argument and first principles
• 2. The fundamental principle of morality
• 3. A dialogical approach to the logic of common morality
• Theory of Argumentation: A Chronological Bibliography of some Important Works

Cited by six other publications

Moeschler, Jacques

2016. Argumentation and Connectives. In Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 4], ► pp. 653 ff.

Blair, J. Anthony

2012. The Limits of the Dialogue Model of Argument. In Groundwork in the Theory of Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 21], ► pp. 231 ff.

Finocchiaro, Maurice A.

2005. Arguments about Arguments,

Walton, Douglas

2001. Informal Logic,

Girle, Roderic A.

1991. Dialogue and the Teaching of Reasoning. Educational Philosophy and Theory 23:1 ► pp. 45 ff.

Hintikka, Jaakko

1989. The Paradox of Transcendental Knowledge. In An Intimate Relation [Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 116], ► pp. 243 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Main BIC Subject

Main BISAC Subject