Non-canonical Marking of Subjects and Objects
Editors
In some languages every subject is marked in the same way, and also every object. But there are languages in which a small set of verbs mark their subjects or their objects in an unusual way. For example, most verbs may mark their subject with nominative case, but one small set of verbs may have dative subjects, and another small set may have locative subjects. Verbs with noncanonically marked subjects and objects typically refer to physiological states or events, inner feelings, perception and cognition. The Introduction sets out the theoretical parameters and defines the properties in terms of which subjects and objects can be analysed. Following chapters discuss Icelandic, Bengali, Quechua, Finnish, Japanese, Amele (a Papuan language), and Tariana (an Amazonian language); there is also a general discussion of European languages. This is a pioneering study providing new and fascinating data, and dealing with a topic of prime theoretical importance to linguists of many persuasions.
[Typological Studies in Language, 46] 2001. xii, 364 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
Contributors | p. vii
-
Preface | p. ix
-
Introduction: Non-canonically marked subjects and objects: Parameters and PropertiesMasayuki Onishi | p. 1
-
Non-canonical marking of core arguments in European languagesMartin Haspelmath | p. 53
-
Non-canonical A/S marking in IcelandicAvery D. Andrews | p. 85
-
Non-canonically marked A/S in BengaliMasayuki Onishi | p. 113
-
Non-canonically marked A/S in Imbabura QuechuaGabriella Hermon | p. 149
-
Verb types, non-canonically marked arguments and grammatical relations: A Tariana perspectiveAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald | p. 177
-
Impersonal constructions in AmeleJohn R. Roberts | p. 201
-
Non-canonical subjects and objects in FinnishKristina Sands and Lyle Campbell | p. 251
-
Non-canonical constructions in JapaneseMasayoshi Shibatani | p. 307
-
Language index | p. 355
-
Author index | p. 357
-
Subject index | p. 360
“The volume contains a broad range of carefully described cross-linguistic data which pertain to the ‘core’ theoretical problems of linguistics, and I strongly believe that it must and will play a major role in any further discussions of these problems.”
Elena Maslova, Stanford University in Linguist List Vol-12-2658. Wed Oct 24 2001
“There is something for everyone in this volume. Differential case marking, split intransitivity, degrees of transitivity, control, impersonal constructions, dative subjects, and psychological verbs are just some of the many topics addressed. This book is another fine contribution to the study of language typology from John Benjamins and it is also another example of exciting collaborative work spear-headed by the Research Centre for Linguistic Typology, La Trobe University.”
Donna B. Gerdts, Simon Fraser University in Journal of Linguistics 40 (2004)
“Each article of the volume is valuable for its presentation of new data from individual languages as well as for its contribution to the study of subject and object properties from a cross-linguistic perspective. The clear presentation helps a lot in understanding the most complicated syntactic problems. This book is highly recommended for general linguists and typologists.”
Leonid Kulikov, University of Nijmegen, in Canadian Journal of Linguistics 49:1, 2004
“The value in this collection is two-fold. Individually, the articles provide lucid insights into a host of thorny case-marking problems that at best have received a less than adequate functional description in the past. Collectively, they point the way toward true insight into the cognitive underpinnings behind recurring patterns of exceptions to general morpho-syntactic regularities.”
Edward J. Vajda, Western Washington University, in Language 79(2), 2003
“I consider the book interesting reading matter for all typologists who are interested in the cross-linguistic study of actancy phenomena. I am convinced that this collections of articles marks the starting point for similarly-minded studies of the relation of canonical and non-canonical marking of syntactic relations.”
Thomas Stolz, University of Bremen, in STUF 58(4), 2005
Cited by (40)
Cited by 40 other publications
Rodríguez Guerra, Alexandre
Walker, Katherine & Pegah Faghiri
Guerrero, Lilián
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria
Pacchiarotti, Sara & Leonid Kulikov
van Lier, Eva & Maria Messerschmidt
Benedetti, Marina & Chiara Gianollo
2020. Criteria for subjecthood and non-canonical subjects in Classical Greek. In Historical Linguistics 2017 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 350], ► pp. 30 ff.
Romagno, Domenica
Romagno, Domenica
2020. Strategies for aligning syntactic roles and case marking with semantic properties. In Historical Linguistics 2017 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 350], ► pp. 10 ff.
Magnani, Marco
2019. Non-canonical case marking on subjects in Russian and Lithuanian. Evolutionary Linguistic Theory 1:2 ► pp. 175 ff.
Barðdal, Jóhanna
2018. Chapter 1. Introduction. In Non-Canonically Case-Marked Subjects [Studies in Language Companion Series, 200], ► pp. 1 ff.
Floyd, Simeon
2018. Chapter 9. Egophoricity and argument structure in Cha’palaa. In Egophoricity [Typological Studies in Language, 118], ► pp. 269 ff.
Li, Yanzhi & Yicheng Wu
2018. The constructionalization and constructional change of noncanonical V-NP expressions in Mandarin Chinese. Studies in Language 42:4 ► pp. 886 ff.
Malchukov, Andrej L.
2018. Chapter 10. Forty years in the search of a/the subject. In Non-Canonically Case-Marked Subjects [Studies in Language Companion Series, 200], ► pp. 241 ff.
Andrews, Avery D.
Lander, Yury & Alexander Letuchiy
2017. Valency-decreasing operations in a valency-increasing language?. In Verb Valency Changes [Typological Studies in Language, 120], ► pp. 286 ff.
Viti, Carlotta
2017. Semantic and cognitive factors of argument marking in ancient Indo-European languages. Diachronica 34:3 ► pp. 368 ff.
Viti, Carlotta
Halevy, Rivka
2016. Non-canonical ‘existential-like‘ constructions in colloquial Modern Hebrew. In Atypical predicate-argument relations [Lingvisticæ Investigationes Supplementa, 33], ► pp. 27 ff.
Halevy, Rivka
Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa & Tuomas Huumo
2015. Canonical and non-canonical subjects in constructions. In Subjects in Constructions – Canonical and Non-Canonical [Constructional Approaches to Language, 16], ► pp. 1 ff.
Lazard, Gilbert
Leino, Jaakko
2015. The syntactic and semantic history of the Finnish genitive subject. In Subjects in Constructions – Canonical and Non-Canonical [Constructional Approaches to Language, 16], ► pp. 231 ff.
Pustet, Regina
2015. The syntax of temperature predications. In The Linguistics of Temperature [Typological Studies in Language, 107], ► pp. 889 ff.
Seržant, Ilja A.
2015. Categorization and semantics of subject-like obliques. In Subjects in Constructions – Canonical and Non-Canonical [Constructional Approaches to Language, 16], ► pp. 175 ff.
Seržant, Ilja A.
2015. An approach to syntactic reconstruction. In Perspectives on Historical Syntax [Studies in Language Companion Series, 169], ► pp. 117 ff.
Holvoet, Axel & Marta Grzybowska
2014. Non-canonical grammatical relations in a modal construction: The Latvian debitive. In Grammatical Relations and their Non-Canonical Encoding in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic, 1], ► pp. 97 ff.
Holvoet, Axel & Nicole Nau
2014. Argument marking and grammatical relations in Baltic: An overview. In Grammatical Relations and their Non-Canonical Encoding in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic, 1], ► pp. 1 ff.
Siewierska, Anna
Richardson, Kylie
Battistella, Edwin, Vit Bubenik, Andrew Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrii Danylenko, Patrick J. Duffley, Peter Grund, Shin Ja J. Hwang, John E. Joseph, Johanna Laakso, Alan R. Libert, Kanavillil Rajagopalan, Kanavillil Rajagopalan, Kanavillil Rajagopalan, Kanavillil Rajagopalan, Solomon I. Sara, Delfina Sessa, Thomas Stolz, Graham Thurgood, Heli Tissari, Edward J. Vajda, Edward J. Vajda, Edward J. Vajda, Edward J. Vajda & Elly van Gelderen
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.