Aspects of Literary Comprehension

A cognitive approach

Rolf A. Zwaan | University of Utrecht
ISBN 9789027222176 (Eur) | EUR 105.00
ISBN 9781556194283 (USA) | USD 158.00
ISBN 9789027276841 | EUR 105.00 | USD 158.00
Google Play logo
Given the fact that there are widely different types of text, it is unlikely that every text is processed in the same way. It is assumed here that for each text type, proficient readers have developed a particular cognitive control system, which regulates the basic operations of text comprehension. The book focuses on the comprehension of literary texts, which involves specific cognitive strategies that enable the reader to respond flexibly to the indeterminacies of the literary reading situation. The study relies heavily on methods and theoretical conceptions from cognitive psychology and presents the results of experiments carried out with real readers. The results are not only relevant to research problems in literary theory, but also to the study of discourse comprehension in general.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
Cited by

Cited by 68 other publications

Banerjee, Konika, Omar S. Haque & Elizabeth S. Spelke
2013. Melting Lizards and Crying Mailboxes: Children's Preferential Recall of Minimally Counterintuitive Concepts. Cognitive Science 37:7  pp. 1251 ff. DOI logo
Bauer, Matthias, Judith Glaesser, Augustin Kelava, Leonie Kirchhoff & Angelika Zirker
2022. ‘When most I wink, then’ – what? Assessing the comprehension of literary texts in university students of English as a second language. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 31:3  pp. 345 ff. DOI logo
Blohm, Stefan, Stefano Versace, Sanja Methner, Valentin Wagner, Matthias Schlesewsky & Winfried Menninghaus
2022. Reading Poetry and Prose: Eye Movements and Acoustic Evidence. Discourse Processes 59:3  pp. 159 ff. DOI logo
Brown, Carol M.
1998. L2 Reading: An Update on Relevant L1 Research. Foreign Language Annals 31:2  pp. 191 ff. DOI logo
Bruhn, Mark J.
2018. Citation analysis. Scientific Study of Literature 8:1  pp. 77 ff. DOI logo
Carlsson, Maj Asplund, Márta Fülüp & Ference Marton
2001. Peeling the Onion: Student teachers' of literary understanding. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 45:1  pp. 5 ff. DOI logo
Caro, Marina Ramos
2016. Testing audio narration: the emotional impact of language in audio description. Perspectives 24:4  pp. 606 ff. DOI logo
Castiglione, Davide
2017. Difficult poetry processing: Reading times and the narrativity hypothesis. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 26:2  pp. 99 ff. DOI logo
Castiglione, Davide
2019. Organisms of Difficulty: The Data. In Difficulty in Poetry,  pp. 169 ff. DOI logo
Castiglione, Davide
2019. New Coordinates of Difficulty: An Interdisciplinary Framework. In Difficulty in Poetry,  pp. 65 ff. DOI logo
Castiglione, Davide
2019. Genes of Difficulty: The Indicators. In Difficulty in Poetry,  pp. 95 ff. DOI logo
de Kreij, Mark
2014. Review of Sanford & Emmott (2012): Mind, Brain and Narrative. English Text Construction 7:2  pp. 300 ff. DOI logo
Elfenbein, Andrew
2006. Cognitive Science and the History of Reading. PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 121:2  pp. 484 ff. DOI logo
Fokkema, Douwe
1993. A European canon of literature?. European Review 1:1  pp. 21 ff. DOI logo
Fokkema, Douwe
2008. Dialogue and Research: Cross-cultural Literary Studies. Journal of Multicultural Discourses 3:1  pp. 16 ff. DOI logo
Forceville, Charles
1999. Educating the eye? Kress and Van Leeuwen’s Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design (1996). Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 8:2  pp. 163 ff. DOI logo
Gambino, Renata & Grazia Pulvirenti
2019. Neurohermeneutics A Transdisciplinary Approach to Literature. Gestalt Theory 41:2  pp. 185 ff. DOI logo
Graesser, Arthur C., Shane S. Swamer & Xiangen Hu
1997. Quantitative discourse psychology. Discourse Processes 23:3  pp. 229 ff. DOI logo
Guy, Josephine M, Kathy Conklin & Jennifer Sanchez-Davies
2018. Literary stylistics, authorial intention and the scientific study of literature: A critical overview. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 27:3  pp. 196 ff. DOI logo
Hakala, Christopher M.
1999. Accessibility of spatial information in a situation model. Discourse Processes 27:3  pp. 261 ff. DOI logo
Hall, Geoff
2000. Book Review: The year’s work in stylistics: 1999. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 9:4  pp. 361 ff. DOI logo
Hall, Geoff
2007. Stylistics in Second Language Contexts: A Critical Perspective. In Literature and Stylistics for Language Learners,  pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Hall, Geoff
2009. Texts, readers — and real readers. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 18:3  pp. 331 ff. DOI logo
Hansen, Preben & Jussi Karlgren
2005. Effects of foreign language and task scenario on relevance assessment. Journal of Documentation 61:5  pp. 623 ff. DOI logo
Henschel, Sofie & Thorsten Roick
2013. Zusammenhang zwischen Empathie und dem Verstehen literarischer Texte. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie 45:2  pp. 103 ff. DOI logo
Henschel, Sofie, Thorsten Roick, Martin Brunner & Petra Stanat
2013. Leseselbstkonzept und Textart: Lassen sich literarisches und faktuales Leseselbstkonzept trennen?*. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie 27:3  pp. 181 ff. DOI logo
2022. The Relationship Between Lexical Coverage and Type of Reading Comprehension in Beginning L2 Spanish Learners. The Modern Language Journal 106:1  pp. 284 ff. DOI logo
Hersh, Reuben
2013. Mathematical Intuition: Poincaré, Pólya, Dewey. In The Courant–Friedrichs–Lewy (CFL) Condition,  pp. 9 ff. DOI logo
Heyne, Nora, Maximilian Pfost & Hanna Maria Heiler
2021. Affektive Perspektivenübernahme beim Verstehen literarischer Texte im Grundschulalter und ihre Bedeutung für Leseeinstellungen und Textverstehen. Diskurs Kindheits- und Jugendforschung / Discourse. Journal of Childhood and Adolescence Research 16:4-2021  pp. 496 ff. DOI logo
Horiba, Yukie
2000. Reader Control in Reading: Effects of Language Competence, Text Type, and Task. Discourse Processes 29:3  pp. 223 ff. DOI logo
Jacobs, Arthur M.
2015. Neurocognitive poetics: methods and models for investigating the neuronal and cognitive-affective bases of literature reception. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 9 DOI logo
Jacobs, Arthur M. & Roel M. Willems
2015. Towards a neurocognitive poetics model of literary reading. In Cognitive Neuroscience of Natural Language Use,  pp. 135 ff. DOI logo
Jiang, Qiuxia
2009. Aesthetic Progression in Literary Translation. Meta 53:4  pp. 860 ff. DOI logo
Kosch, Lukas, Günther Stocker, Annika Schwabe & Hajo G. Boomgaarden
2021. Reading fiction with an e-book or in print. Scientific Study of Literature 11:2  pp. 196 ff. DOI logo
Kosch, Lukas, Günther Stocker, Annika Schwabe & Hajo G. Boomgaarden
2023. Bücher am Bildschirm. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 53:3  pp. 761 ff. DOI logo
Kuijpers, Moniek M.
2021. Chapter 12. Postscript. In Style and Reader Response [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 36],  pp. 217 ff. DOI logo
Lin, Hui Wei & Mei Hua Hsu
2013. Exploring the Mystery of Literary Reading: A Psychophysiological Perspective. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity  pp. 459 ff. DOI logo
Mangen, Anne & Don Kuiken
2014. Lost in an iPad. Scientific Study of Literature 4:2  pp. 150 ff. DOI logo
McCarthy, Kathryn S.
2015. Reading beyond the lines. Scientific Study of Literature 5:1  pp. 99 ff. DOI logo
McCarthy, Philip M., Shinobu Watanabe & Travis A. Lamkin
2012. The Gramulator. In Applied Natural Language Processing,  pp. 312 ff. DOI logo
McCarthy, Philip M., Shinobu Watanabe & Travis A. Lamkin
2014. The Gramulator. In Cross-Cultural Interaction,  pp. 1673 ff. DOI logo
Meier, Christel, Thorsten Roick, Sofie Henschel, Jörn Brüggemann, Volker Frederking, Adelheid Rieder, Volker Gerner & Petra Stanat
2017. An Extended Model of Literary Literacy. In Competence Assessment in Education [Methodology of Educational Measurement and Assessment, ],  pp. 55 ff. DOI logo
Miall, David S.
2015. Temporal Aspects of Literary Reading. In Investigations Into the Phenomenology and the Ontology of the Work of Art [Contributions To Phenomenology, 81],  pp. 15 ff. DOI logo
Miall, David S. & Don Kuiken
1999. What is literariness? Three components of literary reading. Discourse Processes 28:2  pp. 121 ff. DOI logo
Milin, Petar, Filip Nenadić & Michael Ramscar
2020. Approaching text genre. Scientific Study of Literature 10:1  pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Nishihara, Takayuki
2015. Achievement Tests for Literary Reading in General EFL Reading Courses. In Literature and Language Learning in the EFL Classroom,  pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Persson, Per
2003. Understanding Cinema, DOI logo
Peskin, Joan
2010. The Development of Poetic Literacy During the School Years. Discourse Processes 47:2  pp. 77 ff. DOI logo
Pérez, Francisco Antonio & Carolina Vargas-Daza
2019. Shaping Narrative Writing Skills Through Creating Picture Books. GIST – Education and Learning Research Journal :19  pp. 148 ff. DOI logo
Rosa, Lotta-Sofia La & Aku-Ville Lehtimäki
2021. Absorbing narratives and Motivation to Read. Scientific Study of Literature 11:1  pp. 74 ff. DOI logo
Schilcher, Anita & Christel Meier
2021. Verwandtschaften, Wahlverwandtschaften und andere Beziehungskisten: Deutschdidaktik als transdisziplinäres Fach. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 51:1  pp. 63 ff. DOI logo
Schmitz, Anke, Cornelia Gräsel & Björn Rothstein
2017. Students’ genre expectations and the effects of text cohesion on reading comprehension. Reading and Writing 30:5  pp. 1115 ff. DOI logo
Schneider, Ralf
2005. Hypertext narrative and the reader: a view from cognitive theory. European Journal of English Studies 9:2  pp. 197 ff. DOI logo
Schwabe, Annika, Lukas Brandl, Hajo G. Boomgaarden & Günther Stocker
2021. Experiencing literature on the e‐reader: the effects of reading narrative texts on screen. Journal of Research in Reading 44:2  pp. 319 ff. DOI logo
Schwabe, Annika, Fabienne Lind, Lukas Kosch & Hajo G. Boomgaarden
2022. No Negative Effects of Reading on Screen on Comprehension of Narrative Texts Compared to Print: A Meta-analysis. Media Psychology 25:6  pp. 779 ff. DOI logo
Semino, Elena & Jonathan Culpeper
2022. Stylistics. In Handbook of Pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics, ],  pp. 1345 ff. DOI logo
Semino, Elena & Gerard Steen
2008. Metaphor in Literature. In The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought,  pp. 232 ff. DOI logo
Steen, Gerard
1999. Genres of discourse and the definition of literature. Discourse Processes 28:2  pp. 109 ff. DOI logo
Sternberg, Meir
2003. Universals of Narrative and Their Cognitivist Fortunes (II). Poetics Today 24:3  pp. 517 ff. DOI logo
Sternberg, Meir
2003. Universals of Narrative and Their Cognitivist Fortunes (I). Poetics Today 24:2  pp. 297 ff. DOI logo
Van Peer, W.
1997. “High”/“Low” Cultural Products and Their Social Functions. Empirical Studies of the Arts 15:1  pp. 29 ff. DOI logo
van Peer, Willie
2007. Review Article: Towards a new narratology. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 16:2  pp. 214 ff. DOI logo
Vassallo, Odette
2016. Chapter 5. Enhancing responses to literary texts with L2 learners. In Scientific Approaches to Literature in Learning Environments [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 24],  pp. 83 ff. DOI logo
Worthmann, Friederike
1998. Literarische Kanones als Lektüremacht. Systematische Überlegungen zum Verhältnis von Kanon(isierung) und Wert(ung). In Kanon Macht Kultur,  pp. 9 ff. DOI logo
Zwaan, Rolf A. & Herre van Oostendorp
1993. Do readers construct spatial representations in naturalistic story comprehension?. Discourse Processes 16:1-2  pp. 125 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.


Literature & Literary Studies

Theoretical literature & literary studies

Main BIC Subject

DSB: Literary studies: general

Main BISAC Subject

ONIX Metadata
ONIX 2.1
ONIX 3.0
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  92042079 | Marc record