Right Node Raising and Gapping
Interface conditions on prosodic deletion
This book investigates two elliptical coordinations in German, Right Node Raising and Gapping. Ellipsis in both constructions is claimed to be the result of a phonological process which is conditioned by prosodic and focus semantic constraints. It is convincingly argued that Right Node Raising cannot involve raising to the right periphery: The alleged movement freely violates any of the well-known restrictions on syntactic movement and it does not alter the scope relations within the coordination. Gapping in contrast is more sensitive to syntactic conditions in that its remnants must be major syntactic constituents. The author carefully examines the close connection between focus and ellipsis in the two constructions. A considered discussion of focus structure demonstrates that the conjuncts are informationally dependent on each other. This co-dependence is also reflected in their particular intonational contour which is argued to be responsible for ellipsis in coordination.
[Not in series, 106] 2000. xiv, 190 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Published online on 21 October 2008
Published online on 21 October 2008
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
Preface | p. vii
-
General overview | p. ix
-
Acknowledgements | p. xiii
-
1. Basic assumptions | p. 1
-
2. Coordinated structures | p. 21
-
3. Right Node Raising | p. 53
-
4. Gapping | p. 143
-
Conclusion | p. 175
-
-
Name index | p. 185
-
Subject index | p. 189
“Katharina Hartmann is addressing the core questions of ellipsis in coordination. Her account is richly textured, integrating many different perspectives with lucidity and insight. Her analyses are empirically and theoretically outstanding and make the current state of knowledge in an increasinlgy significant discipline accessible.”
Günther Grewendorf, University of Frankfurt
“
Right Node Raising and Gapping is a very impressive book, engagingly connecting the major achievements of focus theory to account for ellipsis phenomena. Its comprehensive presentation as well as its clear analytical structure make it a pleasure to read. This investigation of Right Node Raising and Gapping is the best existing analysis for German and it is paradigmatic for other languages as well.”
Wolfgang Klein, Max Planck Institute, Nijmegen
Cited by (22)
Cited by 22 other publications
Driemel, Imke
Kim, Jeong-Seok, Duk-Ho Jung & Jin Hyung Lee
Wang, Yuyun
Alqarni, Muteb & Mohammad Alanazi
Ma, Baopeng & Di Zhang
Bonke, Max & Sophie Repp
Bîlbîie, Gabriela & Pegah Faghiri
Bîlbîie, Gabriela & Israel De La Fuente
2021. An experimental approach to parallelism in ellipsis. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2017 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 355], ► pp. 49 ff.
Ott, Dennis & Raymond Therrien
Petzell, Erik M.
Ott, Dennis & Mark de Vries
Truckenbrodt, Hubert
2016. Some distinctions in the right periphery of the German clause. In Inner-sentential Propositional Proforms [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 232], ► pp. 105 ff.
Leiken, Kimberly, Brian McElree & Liina Pylkkänen
Ott, Dennis
Fuß, Eric
2014. Complementizer agreement (in Bavarian). In Bavarian Syntax [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 220], ► pp. 51 ff.
Toosarvandani, Maziar
Toosarvandani, Maziar
Wagner, Michael
te Velde, John R.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Main BIC Subject
CF: Linguistics
Main BISAC Subject
LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General