Organic Creativity and the Physics Within

Editor
| Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
e-Book Open Access
ISBN 9789027212030
 

A group of international top scientists from a diversity of disciplines sat together for five days with artists, designers, and entrepreneurs to develop a trans-disciplinary theory of creativity. Organic Creativity and the Physics Within assumes that creativity is a quality of nature visible in physics as well as in psychology, its basis being combinatorics, coincidence, complementarity, and fractal emergence. The authors prompt a mechanism cutting through particle physics, perception, psychology, and culminating into playfulness. Organic Creativity and the Physics Within connects us to the universality of nature's creativeness.

[Not in series, 179]  2013.  x, 59 pp.
Publishing status: Available

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Table of Contents
Preface
ix–x
1. Introduction
1–2
2. History
3–6
3. Physical creativity
7–20
4. Perception as a limiter, perception as a fuser
21–30
5. 
Human creativity
31–34
6. Implications
35–46
7. Conclusions
47–50
8. Coda: Futurist perspectives
51–52
References
53–56
Contributors
57–58
Appendix 1
59
“This book is fascinating. Its format is in line with its true democratic posture, it is brilliant in the exposition of the ideas and quite original in its philosophical argumentation of the mathematics and physics of creativity. I also see strong pedagogical implications in the section on playfulness. As an educator, I would definitely subscribe that play does not imply "silly" - rather, "pleasure" and "enjoyment" and "exploratory" and "discovery." It is an unspecific search. Creating new problems is almost as enjoyable as creating solutions." These considerations should definitely see their way into learning environments.”
Cited by

Cited by other publications

No author info given
2014.  In Creative Confluence [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 16], Crossref logo
Hoorn, Johan F.
2015.  In The Handbook of the Psychology of Communication Technology,  pp. 176 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 september 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References
Albert, R. S., & Runco, M. A.
(1999) A history of research on creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 16–31). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.Google Scholar
Ambrose, D.
(1996) Unifying theories of creativity: Metaphorical thought and the unification process. New Ideas in Psychology, 14(3), 257–267. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arieti, S.
(1976) Creativity: the magic synthesis. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Arnheim, R.
(1954) Art and visual perception: A psychology of the creative eye. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Attridge, D.
(2004) The singularity of literature. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Avital, M., & Te'eni, D.
(2009) From generative fit to generative capacity: Exploring an emerging dimension of information systems design and task performance. Information Systems Journal, 4(19), 345–367. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barron, F.
(1988) Putting creativity to work. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 76–98). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boden, M.
(1990) The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms. London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson.Google Scholar
Bois, J. S.
(1972) Epistemics: The science-art of innovating. San Francisco, CA: International Society for General Semantics.Google Scholar
Brown, T.
(2008) Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 84–92.Google Scholar
Carter, B., & Knight, D.
Carter, R.
(2004) Language and creativity. The art of common talk. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Casti, J. L.
(1994) Complexification: Explaining a paradoxical world through the science of surprise. New York, NY: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.
(1966) Cartesian linguistics. A chapter in the history of rationalist thought. New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Clark, A.
(2003) Natural-born cyborgs: Minds, technologies, and the future of human intelligence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Csíkszentmihályi, M.
(1988) Society, culture, and person: a systems view of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 325–339). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1996) Creativity: flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R.
(1976/1989) The selfish gene. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
De Beaugrande, R.
(1978) Linguistics and Creativity. Paper presented at the Interdisciplinary Conference on Linguistics (Louisville, Kentucky, April 1978).
Dewey, J.
(1916) Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Elsom-Cook, M.
(2001) Principles of interactive multimedia. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Fairbanks, M. S., & Taylor, R. P.
(2011) Measuring the scaling properties of temporal and spatial patterns: From the human eye to the foraging albatross. In S. Guastello & R. Gregson (Eds.), Nonlinear dynamical analysis for the behavioral sciences using real data. New York, NY: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Freud, S.
(1986) On creativity and the unconscious. The psychology of art, literature, love, and religion. New York, NY: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Gardner, H.
(1988) Creative lives and creative works: A synthetic scientific approach. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 288–321). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J.
(1966) The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Giedion, S.
(1941) Space, time and architecture: The growth of a new tradition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(1948) Mechanization takes command, a contribution to anonymous history. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gladwell, M.
(2002) The tipping point: How little things can make a big difference. Boston, MA: Little, Brown, and Company.Google Scholar
Goswami, A.
(1996) Creativity and the quantum: A unified theory of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 9(1), 47–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Greene, R. T.
(2001) A model of 42 models of creativity, plus a new model derived from selecting 7 of them. Available at: http://​independent​.academia​.edu​/RichardTaborGreene​/Papers​/9086​/A​_Model​_of​_42​_Models​_of​_Creativity
(2004) A model of 60 models of creativity for studying how particular repertoires of such models in creators affect their creativity. Available at: http://​www​.scribd​.com​/doc​/2162318​/A​-Model​-of​-60​-Models​-of​-Creativity
Gruber, H. E., & Davis, S. N.
(1988) Inching our way up Mount Olympus: The evolving-systems approach to creative thinking. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 243–270). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hahn, R.
(1971) Anatomy of a scientific institution: The Paris Academy of Sciences, 1666-1803. Berkeley, CA: University of California.Google Scholar
Heilman, K. M., Nadeau, S. E., & Beversdorf, D. O.
(2003) Creative innovation: Possible brain mechanisms. Neurocase, 9 (5), 369–379. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, B.
(1997) Cognitive foundations of grammar. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heisenberg, W.
(1952) Die Physik der Atomkerne [The physics of atomic nuclei]. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Helmholtz, H. L. F.
(1969) Treatise on physiological optics. New York, NY: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Hennessey, B. A. & Amabile, T. M.
(1988) The conditions of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 1–38). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hoorn, J. F.
(2012) Epistemics of the virtual. Linguistic approaches to literature 12. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnson-Laird, P. N.
(1988) Freedom and constraint in creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 202–219). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A.
(1984) Choices, values and frames. American Psychologist, 39(4), 341–350. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kirkham, R. L.
(1984) Does the Gettier problem rest on a mistake? Mind, 93(372), 501–513. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, K.
(2010) What technology wants. New York, NY: Viking.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T.
(1962) The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Landy, M. S., Maloney, L. T., Johnston, E. B., & Young, M.
(1995) Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: In defense of weak fusion. Vision Research, 35, 389–412. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langlotz, A.
(2006) Idiomatic creativity. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Latour, B.
(2007) Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lowcre, M. M. M.
(2011) Creativity: Meaning, Mechanisms, Models. Lorentz Workshop in collaboration with KNAW and NIAS (Sept. 12-16, 2011). Leiden, NL: Lorentz Center. Available at: http://​www​.lorentzcenter​.nl​/lc​/web​/2011​/470​/info​.php3​?wsid​=470
Mandelbrot, B. B.
(1982) The fractal geometry of nature. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.Google Scholar
Marr, D.
(1982) Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. New York, NY: Freeman.Google Scholar
McKim, R. H.
(1972) Experiences in visual thinking. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Miller, A. I.
(2000) Insights of genius. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Molella, A. P.
(2002) Classics revisited: science moderne, Sigfried Giedion. Technology and Culture, 43, 374–379. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moran, S.
(2010) The roles of creativity in society. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 74–90). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mumford, L.
(1934) Technics and civilization. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace and Company.Google Scholar
Nickerson, R. S.
(1999) Enhancing creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 392–430). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.Google Scholar
Paffen, C. L. E., Verstraten, F. A. J., & Vidnyanszky, Z.
(2008) Attention-based perceptual learning increases binocular rivalry suppression of irrelevant visual features. Journal of Vision, 8(4):25, 1–11. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Park, G., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P.
(2007) Contrasting intellectual patterns predict creativity in the arts and sciences: Tracking intellectually precocious youth over 25 years. Psychological Science, 18, 948–952. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perkins, D. N.
(1988) The possibility of invention. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 362–385). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Piaget, J.
(1952) The child’s conception of number. Trans. C. Gattegno & F. M. Hodgson. London: Routledge and Paul.Google Scholar
Poelman, W.
(2005) Design for living. International Conference on Doing, Thinking, Feeling Home: The Mental Geography of Residential Environments (Oct. 14-15, 2005, Technical University Delft). Available at: http://​otb​.tudelft​.nl
Pope, R.
(2005) Creativity: Theory, history, practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pope, R., & Swann, J.
(2011) Introduction: creativity, language, literature. In Swann, J., Pope, R., & Carter, R. (Eds.), Creativity in language and literature: The state of the art (pp. 1–22). Basingstoke, Hants: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ryland, S.
(2011) Resisting metaphors: A metonymic approach to the study of creativity and cognition in art analysis and practice. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, University of Brighton / University for the Creative Arts.Google Scholar
Schank, R. C.
(1988) Creativity as a mechanical process. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 220–238). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schaub, A., Herst, D., Surya, T., & Agrivina, I.
(2011) Intercontinental collaboration on prosthetic design. In B. van Abel, R. Klaassen, L. Evers, & P. Troxler (Eds.), Open design now. Amsterdam: BIS Publishers.Google Scholar
Schrödinger, E.
(1944/2010) What is life? Mind and matter. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K.
(1988) Creativity, leadership, and chance. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 386–426). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sennet, R.
(2008) The craftsman. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
St. Clair, R. N.
(2002) Metaphor and linguistic creativity. Keynote Address: Trinity University. Available at: http://​epistemic​-forms​.com​/R​-creativity​.html
Sternberg, R. J.
(Ed.) (1988) The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives. New York NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. & O’Hara, L. A.
(1999) Creativity and intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 251–272). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. W.
(1988) Approaches to and definitions of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 118–119). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Torrance, E. P.
(1988) The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 43–75). New York NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Abel, B., Klaassen, R., Evers, L., & Troxler, P.
(Eds.) (2011) Open design now. Amsterdam: BIS Publishers.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, D., Kresin, F., Reitenbach, M., & Rennen, E.
(2011) Users as designers. Amsterdam: Waag Society.Google Scholar
Van Osch, W., & Avital, M.
(2010) Generative collectives. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), Saint Louis, Missouri.Google Scholar
Von Bertalanffy, L.
(1968) General systems theory: Foundations, development, applications. New York, NY: George Braziller.Google Scholar
Von Graevenitz, A.
(2009) Joseph Beuys’ letzte Leitern Scala Libera und Scala Napolitana (1985). In M. Vahler, M. Vöhler, & D. Linck (Eds.), Grenzen der Katharsis in den modernen Künsten: Transformationen des aristotelischen Modells seit Bernays, Nietzsche und Freud (pp. 255–292) [Boundaries of catharsis in the modern arts: Transformations of the Aristotelian model since Bernays, Nietzsche and Freud]. Berlin, GE: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wenger, W., & Poe, R.
(1996) The Einstein factor: A proven new method for increasing your intelligence. New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
Ward, T. B., Smith, S. M., & Finke, R. A.
(1999) Creative cognition. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 189–212). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wolpert, D. M., Ghahramani, Z., & Jordan, M. I.
(1995) An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science, 269, 1880–1882. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zawada, B.
(2006) Linguistic creativity from a cognitive perspective. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 24(2), 235–254. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Subjects

Consciousness Research

Consciousness research

Philosophy

Philosophy
BIC Subject: JMJ – Occupational & industrial psychology
BISAC Subject: PSY034000 – PSYCHOLOGY / Creative Ability