Concise Lexicon for Sign Linguistics

| HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht
| HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht
Hardbound – Available
ISBN 9789027212337 | EUR 95.00 | USD 143.00
 
Paperback – Available
ISBN 9789027212344 | EUR 33.00 | USD 49.95
 
e-Book –
ISBN 9789027266880 | EUR 95.00/33.00*
| USD 143.00/49.95*
 
This extensive, well-researched and clearly formatted lexicon of a wide variety of linguistic terms is a long overdue. It is an extremely welcome addition to the bookshelves of sign language teachers, interpreters, linguists, learners and other sign language users, and of course of the Deaf themselves.

Unique to this lexicon is not only the inclusion of many terms that are used especially for sign languages, but also the fact that for the terms, there are not only examples from spoken languages but there are also glossed and translated examples from several different sign languages.

There are many interesting features to this lexicon. There is an immediate temptation to find examples of terms in the sign language one is studying as well as determining how many of the most used concepts would be signed in the local language. As there are to date still almost no reference grammars of sign languages, the definitions of many of these concepts would be extremely helpful for those linguists planning to make a reference grammar of their sign language.
[Not in series, 201]  2016.  xi, 230 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.201
Table of Contents
Foreword
vii–viii
Introduction and acknowledgments
ix–xii
Lexicon
1–220
References
221–230
References

References

Aarts, J. & M. Haak
(2002) Onderzoek naar slips of the hands van horende tweede-taalverwervers van de Nederlandse Gebarentaal. Doctoraalscriptie Universiteit van Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Ackema, P.. et al.
(eds.) (2006) Arguments and agreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
①
Ahlgren, I., B. Bergman & M. Brennan
(eds.) (1994) Perspectives on sign language structure. Papers from the fifth international symposium on sign language research. Durham: ISLA.Google Scholar
①
Arends, J., P. Muysken & N. Smith
(eds.) (1995) Pidgins and Creoles, an introduction. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aronoff, M., I. Meir & W. Sandler
(2005) The paradox of sign language morphology. Language 81, 301–344. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, A.D. & R.H. Logie
(1999) Working memory: the multiple-component model. In: A. Miyake & P. Shah (eds.), Models of working memory. Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control, 28–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baker, A. & B. van den Bogaerde
(2012) Communicative interaction. In: R. Pfau, M. Steinbach & B. Woll (eds.), Sign Language, 489–512. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) Ch. 4: Interaction and discourse. In: Baker et al. (eds.), The Linguistics of Sign Languages: An Introduction, 73–91. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baker, A., B. van den Bogaerde & O. Crasborn
(eds.) (2003) Cross-linguistic perspectives in sign language research. Selected papers from TISLR 2000. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
①
Baker, A., B. van den Bogaerde & S. Jansma
(2016) Ch. 3: Aquisition. In: Baker, A. et al. (eds.), The Linguistics of Sign Languages: An Introduction, 51–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baker, A., B. van den Bogaerde, R. Pfau & T. Schermer
(2016) The Linguistics of Sign Languages: An Introduction. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
① ② ③ ④ ⑤ ⑥ ⑦ ⑧ ⑨ ⑩ ⑪ ⑫ ⑬
Baker, A. & K. Hengeveld
(eds.) (2012) Linguistics. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Baker, A. & R. Pfau
(2016) Ch. 5: Constituents and word classes. In: Baker et al. (eds.), The Linguistics of Sign Languages: An Introduction, 93–115. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bank, R.
(2015) The ubiquity of mouthings in NGT. A corpus study. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Bateman, L. & C. Ussery
(eds.) 2005) Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS 35), Vol. 2. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
①
Battison, R.
(1974) Phonological deletion in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 5, 1–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bayley, R., R. Cameron, & C. Lucas
(eds.) (2013) The Oxford handbook of sociolinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
①
Bhatia, T.K., & W.C. Richie
(eds.) (2006) The handbook of bilingualism. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bird, S. & Liberman, M.
(2000) A Formal Framework for Linguistic Annotation (revised version). CoRR, cs.CL/0010033:pp 23/60. http://​arxiv​.org​/abs​/cs​/0010033.Google Scholar
Bishop, M. & S.L. Hicks
(eds.) (2009) Hearing, Mother-Father Deaf: Hearing People in Deaf Families. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
①
Bos, H.
(1990) Person and location marking in Sign Language of the Netherlands: Some implications of a spatially expressed syntactic system. In: S. Prillwitz & T. Vollhaber (eds.) (1990b), Proceedings of the third European congress on sign language research, 231–246.Google Scholar
(1993) Agreement and prodrop in Sign Language of the Netherlands. In: K. Hengeveld & F. Drijkoningen (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 1993, 37–47.Google Scholar
(1994) An auxiliary verb in Sign Language of the Netherlands. In: I. Ahlgren, B. Bergman & M. Brennan (eds.), Perspectives on sign language structure. Papers from the fifth international symposium on sign language research, 37–53.Google Scholar
(1995) Pronoun copy in Sign Language of the Netherlands. In: H. Bos & G.M. Schermer (eds.), 121–147.Google Scholar
(1996) Serial verb constructions in Sign Language of the Netherlands. Paper presented at the Fifth International Conference on Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research . Université du Québec à Montreal & McGill University, 19–22 September 1996. Unpublished paper.
Bosman, I.
(ed.) (2006) Over doofblindheid. Utrecht: Agiel.Google Scholar
Botma, B. & J. van Kampen
(eds.) (2009) Linguistics in the Netherlands 2009. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
①
Boyes Braem, P.
(2012) Evolving methods for written representations of signed languages of the Deaf. In: A. Ender, A. Leemann & B. Wälchli (eds.), Methods in Contemporary Linguistics, 411– 438. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boyes-Braem, P. & R. Sutton-Spence
(2001) The hands are the head of the mouth: the mouth as articulator in sign languages. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Branchini, C. & C. Donati
(2009) Relatively different. Italian Sign Language relative clauses in a typological perspective. In: A. Lipták (ed.), Correlatives Cross-Linguistically, 157–191. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, M.
(2005) Conjoining Word and Image in British Sign Language (BSL): An Exploration of Metaphorical Signs in BSL. Sign Language Studies, 5, 360–382. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, M. & G.H. Turner
(eds.) (1994) Word-order issues in sign language. Durham: ISLA.Google Scholar
①
Brentari, D.
(1998) A prosodic model of sign language phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
①
(2012) Phonology. In: R. Pfau, M. Steinbach & B. Woll (eds.), Sign Language, 21–54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, C.
(2001) The application of Speech Act Theory to American Sign Language. PhD Dissertation, University at Albany, State University of New York.Google Scholar
Campbell, R., M. MacSweeney & D. Waters
(2008) Sign language and the brain: A review. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 13, 3–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, D.W.
(2004) Psychology of language. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Chambers, J.K., P. Trudgill & N. Schilling-Estes
(2002) The handbook of language variation and language change. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.
(1957) Syntactic structures. Den Haag: Mouton.Google Scholar
(1981) Regels en representaties. De grammatica als mentaal orgaan. Utrecht: Bohn, Scheltema & Holkema.Google Scholar
(1986) Knowledge of language. Its nature, origin, and use. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Clark, E.
(2009) First Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coerts, J.
(1994) Constituent order in Sign Language of the Netherlands. In: M. Brennan & G.H. Turner (eds.), Word-order issues in sign language, 47–70.Google Scholar
Cohen, J., K. McAlister, K. Rolstad, & J. MacSwan
(eds.) (2005) Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Bilingualism. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
①
Cokart, R.
(2010) Kajana Gebarentaal, een homesign of een gebarentaal in ontwikkeling? Bachelor thesis, Dept. of Linguistics, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Cole, P. & Morgan, J.
(eds.) Studies in Syntax and Semantics III: Speech Acts New York Academic Press
①
Coppola, M., O. Crasborn & U. Zeshan
(eds.) (2011) Sign Language Typology. Berlin, Boston and Nijmegen: De Gruyter/Mouton & Ishara Press.Google Scholar
Corina, D.P.
(1999) On the nature of left hemisphere specialization for signed language. Brain and Language 69, 230–240. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Costello, B.
(2015) Language and modality. Effects of the use of space in the agreement system of Lengua de Signos Española (Spanish Sign Language). Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Crasborn, O.
(2012) Phonetics, Phonology, and Prosody. In: R. Pfau, M. Steinbach & B. Woll (eds.), Sign Language, 4–20.Google Scholar
Crasborn, O., R. Bank, A. de Meijer, E. van der Kooij, A. Sáfár & I. Zwitserlood
(2015) Annotation Conventions for the Corpus NGT. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crasborn, O. & E. van der Kooij
(2016) Ch. 10: Phonetics. In: A. Baker et al. (eds.), The Linguistics of Sign Languages: An Introduction, 229–249. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crasborn, O. & E. van der Kooij, D. Waters, B. Woll & J. Mesch
(2008) Frequency distribution and spreading behaviour of different types of mouth actions in three sign languages. Sign Language and Linguistics 11, 45–67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crystal, D.
(2008) A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics. Malden, etc.: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cuxac, C., A. Braffort, A. Choisier, C. Collet, P. Dalle, I. Fusellier, G. Jirou, F. Lejeune, B. Lenseigne, N. Monteillard, A. Risler, & M-A. Sallandre
(2002) Corpus LS-COLIN, http://​cocoon​.tgeadonis​.fr​/exist​/crdo​/meta​/crdo​-FSL​-CUC021​_SOUND.Google Scholar
Cuxac, C. & M.A. Sallandre
(2007) Iconicity and Abritrariness in French Sign Language: highly iconic structures, degenerated iconicity and diagrammatic iconity. In: E. Pizzuto, P. Pietandrea & R. Simone (eds.), Verbal and signed Languages: comparing structures, constructs and methodologies, 13–33.Google Scholar
Dachkovsky, S. & W. Sandler
(2009) Visual intonation in the prosody of a sign language. Language and Speech, 52 (2/3), 287–314. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Daly, R. & A. Riehl
(eds.) (1999) ESCOL’99. Storrs: Cornell University.Google Scholar
①
De Vos, C.
(2012) Sign-Spatiality in Kata Kolok: how a village sign language of Bali inscribes its signing space. Dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Don, J. & T. Sanders
(eds.) (1999) OTS Yearbook 1998–1999. Utrecht: OTS.Google Scholar
①
Doughty C.J. & M.H. Long
(2005) The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Edmondson, W.H. & F. Karlsson
(eds.) (1990) Papers from the fourth international symposium on sign language research. Hamburg: Signum Press.Google Scholar
①
Emmorey, K.
(2000) The confluence of of space and language. In: C. Valli, & C. Lucas (eds.), Linguistics of American Sign Language: an introduction, 171–209. Washington DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
(2001) Language, cognition, and the brain. Insights from sign language research. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2002) Language, cognition and the brain. Insights from sign language research. Mahwah, N.J: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Emmorey, K., H.B. Borinstein & R. Thompson
(2005) Bimodel bilingualism: codeblending between spoken English and American Sign Language. In: J. Cohen et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Bilingualism, 663–673.Google Scholar
Emmorey, K., H.B. Borinstein, R. Thompson & T.H. Gollan
(2008) Bimodal Bilingualism. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 11, 43–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ender, A., Leemann, A. & Wälchli, B.
(eds.) Methods in Contemporary Linguistics Berlin/Boston Walter de Gruyter Crossref
①
Evans, L.
(1982) Total Communication: Structure and Strategy. Gallaudet: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Féry, C. & S. Ishihara
(eds.) (2014) The Oxford Handbook of Information Structure. Online publication. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, S. & W. Janis
(1990) Verb Sandwiches in American Sign Language. In: S. Prillwitz & T. Vollhaber (eds.) (1990a), Currrent trends in European sign language research, 279–293.Google Scholar
Fontana, S., S. Corazza, P. Boyes Braem & V. Volterra
(2015) Language research and language community change: Italian Sign Language 1981–2013. International Journal of Sociolinguistics (2015, singles issue).Google Scholar
Frisberg, N.
(1975) Arbitraryness and iconicity: historical change in American Sign Language. Language 51, 676–710.Google Scholar
(1985) Dominance relations and discourse structures. In: W.C. Stokoe, & V. Volterra (eds.), , 79–90.Google Scholar
Fromkin, V.
(ed.) (1980) Errors in linguistic perfomance: slips of the tongue, ear, pen and hand. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
①
Gabarró-López, S. & L. Meurant
(n.d.). The use of buoys across genres in French Belgian Sign Language (LSFB). https://​www​.unamur​.be​/lettres​/romanes​/lsfb​-lab​/theuseofbuoys
Gillis, S. & A. Schaerlaekens
(eds.) (2000) Kindertaalverwerving. Een handboek voor het Nederlands. Groningen: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Glück, S. & R. Pfau
(1997) Eine Klasse für sich: Klassifizierende Verben in Deutscher Gebärdensprache. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 16, 181–208. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1998) On classifiying classification as a class of inflection in German Sign Language. In: T. Cambier-Langeveld, A. Lipták & M. Redford (eds.), 59–74.Google Scholar
Goldin Meadow, S.
(2003) The Resilience of Language: What Gesture Creation in Deaf Children Can Tell Us About How All Children Learn Language. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Grauls, M.
(2001) Mijn naam is Haas. Hoe historische figuren in het woordenboek belandden. Leuven: Van Halewyck/Balans.Google Scholar
Grice, H.P.
(1975) Logic and conversation. In: P. Cole & J. Morgan (eds), Studies in Syntax and Semantics III: Speech Acts, 183–98.Google Scholar
Grosjean, F.
(2010) Bilingual, life and reality. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hamaker, C. & V. Busato
(2000) Het geheugen. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harley, T.A.
(2008) The psychology of language. From data to theory. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. & U. Tadmor
(eds.) (2009) Loanwords in the world’s languages. A comparative handbook. Berlin: De Gruyter/Mouton.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hendriks, B.
(2004) An introduction to the grammar of Jordanian Sign Language. Salt (Jordan): Al-Balqa Applied University.Google Scholar
(2008) Jordanian Sign Language: Aspects of grammar from a cross-linguistic perspective. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, K. & F. Drijkoningen
(eds.) (1993), Linguistics in the Netherlands 1993. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
①
Hickok, G., U. Bellugi & E.S. Klima
(2001) Sign language in the brain. Scientific American 284, 58–65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hinskens, F. & J. Taeldeman
(eds.) (2013) Language and Space. An international handbook of linguistic variation. Vol. 3: Dutch. Berlijn: De Gruyter/Mouton.Google Scholar
Hohenberger, A.,D. Happ & H. Leuninger
(2002) Modality-dependent aspects of sign language production: Evidence from slips of the hand and their repairs in German Sign Language. In: R. Meier et al. (eds.), Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages, 112–142. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoza, J.
(2007) It’s not what you sign, it’s how you sign it. Politeness in American Sign Language. Washington DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Huenerfauth, M. & H. Kacorri
(2015) Augmenting EMBR Virtual Human Animation System with MPEG-4 Controls for Producing ASL Facial Expressions. The Fifth International Workshop on Sign Language Translation and Avatar Technology (SLTAT’15). Paris, April 9–10. Link: http://​huenerfauth​.ist​.rit​.edu​/pubs​/huenerfauth​-kacorri​-2015​-sltat​.pdf
Jansen, M.J. & I. Rødbroe
(2007) Contact and social interaction: communication and congenital deafblindness. Aalborg: Danish Resourch Centre on Congenital Deafblindness (VCDBF/ Sint-Michielsgestel: Viataal).Google Scholar
Janzen, T.
(2012) Lexicalization and Grammaticalisation. In: R. Pfau, M. Steinbach & B. Woll (eds.), Sign Language, 816–840. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Janzen, T., B. O’Dea & B. Shaffer
(2001) The construal of events: Passives in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 1, 281–310. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, T., & A. Schembri
(1999) On defining lexeme in a signed language. Sign Language and Linguistics, 2, 115–185. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, T. & A. Schembri
(2007) Australian Sign Language. An introduction to sign language linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, T.A.
(2003) Language Standardization and Signed Language Dictionaries, Sign Language Studies, 3, 431–468. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kager, R., J. Grijzenhout & K. Sebregts
(eds.) (2014) Where the principles fail. A Festschrift for Wim Zonneveld on the occasion of his 64th birthday. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
①
Keller, J., A. Hohenberger & H. Leuninger
(2003) Sign language production: slips of the hand and their repairs in German Sign Language. In: A. Baker, B. van den Bogaerde & O. Crasborn (eds.), Cross-linguistic perspectives in sign language research. Selected papers from TISLR 2000, 307–333.Google Scholar
Kendon, A.
(2004) Gesture. Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kerstens, J.. et al.
(1997) Plato’s probleem. Bussum: Coutinho.Google Scholar
Kimmelman, V.
(2014) Information structure in Russian Sign Language and Sign Language of the Netherlands. Dissertation, University of Amsterdam. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kimmelman, V. & R. Pfau
(2014) Information Structure in Sign Languages. In: C. Féry & S. Ishihara (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Information Structure. Online publication. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kisch, S.
(2004) Negotiating (genetic) deafness in a Bedouin community. In: J.B. Van Cleve (eds.) (2004), Genetics, disability, and deafness, 148–173.Google Scholar
Knoors, H. & M.P.J. Vervloed
(2011) Educational programming for deaf children with multiple disabilities: accommodating special needs. In: M. Marchark & P.E. Spencer (eds.), 82–96.Google Scholar
Ladd, P.
(2003) Understanding Deaf Culture: in search of Deafhood. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Laudanna, A. & V. Volterra
(1991) Order of words, signs, and gestures: A first comparison. Applied Psycholinguistics 12, 135–150. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leeson, L.
(2001) Aspects of verbal valency in Irish Sign Language. Dissertation, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.Google Scholar
Leuninger, H.
(2001) Das Projekt RELEX: Ein ökumenisches Lexikon religiöser Gebärden. In: H. Leuninger & K. Wempe (eds.), Gebardensprachlinguistik 2000: Theorie und Anwendung, 171–192.Google Scholar
Leuninger, H. & D. Happ
(2005) Gebärdensprachen : Struktur, Erwerb, Verwendung. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Leuninger, H., A. Happ, E. Waleschkowski, E. Menges & D. Happ
(2004) The impact of modality on language production: Evidence from slips of the tongue and hand. In: T. Pechmann & C. Habel (eds.), Trends in linguistics, 219–278.Google Scholar
H. Leuninger & K. Wempe
(eds.) (2000) Gebardensprachlinguistik 2000: Theorie und Anwendung. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
①
Liddell, S.K.
(1978) Nonmanual signals and relative clauses in American Sign Language. In: P. Siple (ed.), Understanding language through sign language research, 59–90.Google Scholar
(1980) American Sign Language syntax. Den Haag: Mouton.Google Scholar
(2003) Grammar Gesture and meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liddell, S., M. Vogt-Svendsen & B. Bergman
(2007) A crosslinguistic comparison of buoys: Evidence f rom American, Norwegian, and Swedish Sign Language. In: M. Vermeerbergen, L. Leeson & O. Crasborn (eds.), Simultaneity in Signed Languages: Form and Function, 187–215. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lipták, A.
(ed.) (2009) Correlatives Cross-Linguistically. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
①
Marschark, M. & P.E. Spencer
(eds.) (2011) The Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language, and education. Volume 1. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marsaja, G.
(2008) Desa Kolok – A deaf village and its sign language in Bali, Indonesia. Nijmegen: Ishara Press.Google Scholar
Massone, M.I., & M. Curiel
(2004) Sign Order in Argentine Sign Language. In: Sign Language Studies 5(1), 63293. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mathur, G. & D.J. Napoli
(eds.) (2010) Deaf around the world: the impact of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
①
Matsuoka, K.
(1999) The Lexical Verb Sandwich in American Sign Language and the Hybrid Feature. In: R. Daly & A. Riehl (eds.), ESCOL’99, 142–148.Google Scholar
McCaskill, C., C. Lucas, R. Bayley, & J. Hill
(2011) The hidden treasure of Black ASL. Its history and structure. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Meir, I., C. Padden, M. Aronoff & W. Sandler
(2007) Re-thinking Sign Language verb classes: The body as subject. On-line proceedings of TISLR 9 conference, Florianopolis, Brazil .
Meier, R., K. Cormier & D. Quinto-Pozos
(eds.) (2002) Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
①
Mesch, J.
(2001) International studies on sign language and communication of the deaf.Volume 38. Seedorf/Hamburg: Signum-Verlag.Google Scholar
Metzger, M.
(1995) Constructed dialogue and constructed action in American Sign Language. In: A. Schembri & C. Lucas (eds.), Sociolinguistics and Deaf Communities. Cambridge UK: CUP, 255–271.Google Scholar
Miyake, A. & P. Shah
(eds.) (1999) Models of working memory. Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
①
Morford, J., J. Staley & B. Burns
(2010) Seeing Signs: Language Experience and Handshape Perception. http://​dsdj​.gallaudet​.edu​/assets​/section​/section2​/entry94​/DSDJ​_entry94​.pdf. Retrieved August 2013.Google Scholar
Muysken, P.
(2008) Functional categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Napoli, D.J., N. Sanders & R. Wright
Some aspects of articulatory ease in American Sign Language. Retrieved from the internet on July 31, 2013.http://​sanders​.phonologist​.org​/Papers​/sanders​-sb​-handout​.pdf
Narrog, H & B. Heine
(eds.) (2011) The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
①
Neidle, C.
(n.d.) Signstream. See http://​www​.bu​.edu​/asllrp​/SignStream/
Newkirk, D.. et al.
(1980) Linguistic evidence from slips of the hand. In: V. Fromkin (ed.), Errors in linguistic perfomance: slips of the tongue, ear, pen and hand, 165–197.Google Scholar
Nijen Twilhaar, J.
(2014) How to indicate gender in Sign Language of the Netherlands. In R. Kager, J. Grijzenhout & K. Sebregts (eds.), Where the principles fail. A Festschrift for Wim Zonneveld on the occasion of his 64th birthday, 161–172.Google Scholar
Nonaka, A.M.
(2004) The forgotten endangered languages: lessons on the importance of remembering from Thailand’s Ban Khor Sign Language. Language in Society 33, 737–767. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nyst, V.
(2007) A descriptive analysis of Adamorobe Sign Language (Ghana). Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Oller, D.K.
(2000) The emergence of speech capacity. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Orgassa, A.
(2003) Afatisch of niet – a pilot study: Inventarisatie van het co-speech gesture gedrag in gezonde en anomische taalproductie. Doctoraalscriptie Radboud Universiteit van Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Padden, C.
(1988) Interaction of morphology and syntax in American Sign Language. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Padden, C.A. & T.L. Humphries
(2005) Inside Deaf Culture. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pahz, J.A., C.S. Pahz & G.T. Lloyd
(1978) Total Communication: the meaning behind the movement to expand educational opportunities for deaf children. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
Pechmann, T. & C. Habel
(eds.) (2004) Trends in linguistics. Berlin: De Gruyer/Mouton.Google Scholar
①
Petitto, L.A.
(1991) Babbling in the manual mode: evidence for the ontology of language. Science, April 1991, 251 (5000), 1493–1496. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pfau, R.
(2016a) Ch. 7: Syntax: Complex sentences. In: Baker et al. (eds.), The Linguistics of Sign Languages: An Introduction, 149–172. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016b) Ch. 9: Morphology. In: Baker et al. (eds.), The Linguistics of Sign Languages: An Introduction, 197–228. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pfau, R. & H. Bos
(2016) Ch. 6: Syntax: Simple sentences. In: Baker et al. (eds.), The Linguistics of Sign Languages: An Introduction, 117–147. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pfau, R. & M. Steinbach
(2005) Relative clauses in German Sign Language: Extraposition and reconstruction. In: L. Bateman & C. Ussery (eds.), Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS 35), 507–521.Google Scholar
(2011) Grammaticalisation in sign languages. In: H. Narrog, & B. Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 683–695.Google Scholar
Pfau, R., M. Steinbach & B. Woll
(eds.) (2012) Sign Language. An international handbook. Berlin: De Gruyter/Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
① ② ③ ④ ⑤ ⑥ ⑦ ⑧
Pinker, S.
(1994) The language instinct: the new science of language and mind. New York: Morrow. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pizzuto, E., P. Pietandrea & R. Simone
(eds.) (2007) Verbal and signed Languages: comparing structures, constructs and methodologies. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
①
Poizner, H. & J. Kegl
(1992) Neural basis of language and motor behaviour: Perspectives from America Sign Language. Aphasiology 6, 219–256. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Poizner, H., E.S. Klima & U. Bellugi
(1987) What the hands reveal about the brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Prillwitz, S. & T. Vollhaber
(eds.) (1990a) Currrent trends in European sign language research. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
①
(eds.) (1990b) Proceedings of the third European congress on sign language research. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
①
Quinto-Pozos, D.
(2007) Why does constructed action seem obligatory? An analysis of classifiers and the lack of articulator-referent correspondence. Sign Language Studies 7, 458–506. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Robert, E. & P. Mariën
(eds.) (2006) Afasie (z)onder woorden. Diagnostische en therapeutische ontwikkelingen. Antwerpen/Apeldoorn: Garant 2006.Google Scholar
Sacks, O.
(1986) The man who mistook his wife for a hat. London: Gerard Duckworth & Co.Google Scholar
Sandler, W. & D. Lillo-Martin
(2006) Sign language and linguistic universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sandler, W., I. Meir, C. Padden, and M. Aronoff
(2005) The emergence of grammar in a new sign language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 102, No. 7, 2661–2665. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sapountzaki, G.
(2012) Agreement auxiliaries. In: R. Pfau, M. Steinbach & B. Woll (eds.), Sign Language, 204–227. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schembri, A.
. & T. Johnston (2012) Sociolinguistic aspects of variation and change. In: R. Pfau, M. Steinbach & B. Woll (eds.), Sign Language, 788–815. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schembri, A. & T. Johnston
(2013) Sociolinguistic variation and changes in sign languages. In: R. Bayley, R. Cameron & C. Lucas (eds).The Oxford handbook of sociolinguistics, CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schembri, A. & C. Lucas
(eds.) (1995) Sociolinguistics and Deaf Communities. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schermer, G.M.
(2012) Language Planning. In: R. Pfau, M. Steinbach & B. Woll (eds.), Sign Language, 889–908. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016a) Ch. 12: Language variation and standardization. In: A. Baker, et al. (eds.), The Linguistics of Sign Languages: An Introduction, 279–298. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016b) Ch. 8: Lexicon. In: A. Baker et al. (eds.), The Linguistics of Sign Languages: An Introduction, 173–195. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schermer, G.M. & R. Pfau
(2016a) Ch. 2: Psycholinguistics. In: A. Baker et al. (eds.), The Linguistics of Sign Languages: An Introduction, 25–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008b) Ch. 13: Language contact and change. In: A. Baker et al. (eds.), The Linguistics of Sign Languages: An Introduction, 299–324.Google Scholar
Senghas, A.
(1995) Children’s contribution to the birth of Nicaraguan Sign Language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Senghas, A., S. Kita, & A. Ozyurek
(2004) Children creating core properties of language: Evidence from an emerging sign language in Nicaragua. Science 305 (5697), 1779–1782. Crossref DOI: CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Siple, P.
(ed.) (1978) Understanding language through sign language research. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
①
Skinner, B.
(1957) Verbal behaviour. New York: Appleton Century-Crofts. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, D.
(2004) The layering of syntactical non-manual markers in Sign Language of the Netherlands: Possibilities and constraints. MA-sciptie Universiteit van Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Spencer, P.E. & M. Marschark, M
(2010) Evidence-based practice in educating deaf and hard-of-hearing students. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stokoe, W.C. & V. Volterra
(eds.) (1985)  SLR ’83. Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Sign Language Research . CNR, Rome.
①
Streeck, J.
(2009) Gesturecraft. The manu-facture of meaning. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sutton-Spence, R. & Boyes Braem, P.
(2013) Comparing the products and the processes of creating sign language poetry and pantomimic improvisations. Journal of nonverbal behavior 37, 245–280. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sutton-Spence, R. & B. Woll
(1998) The linguistics of British Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambrige University Press.Google Scholar
Sze, F.Y.B.
(2008) Topic constructions in Hong Kong Sign Language. Ph. Dissertation University of Bristol.Google Scholar
UNESCO
(1994)  The Salamanca Statement . Retrieved August 2013.Google Scholar
Valli, C. & C. Lucas
(1992/1995) Linguistics of American Sign Language: an introduction. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
①
Van Boxtel, S.
(2005) Can the late bird catch the worm? Ultimate attainment in L2 syntax. Utrecht: LOT. Proefschrift Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Van Bree, C.
(1996) Historische taalkunde. Leuven/Amersfoort: Acco.Google Scholar
Van Cleve, J.B.
(ed.) (2004) Genetics, disability, and deafness. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
①
Van de Sande, J. & O. Crasborn
(2009) Lexically bound mouth action in Sign Language of the Netherlands. A comparison between different registers and age groups. In: B. Botma & J. van Kampen (eds.)  Linguistics in the Netherlands 2009, Google Scholar
Van den Bogaerde, B.
(2000) Input and interaction in deaf families. Utrecht: LOT. Proefschrift Universiteit van Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Van den Bogaerde, & A. Baker
(2009) Bi-modal language acquisition in KODA’s. In: M. Bishop & S.L. Hicks (eds.), Hearing, Mother-Father Deaf: Hearing People in Deaf Families, 99–131.Google Scholar
Van den Bogaerde, B., M. Buré & C. Fortgens
(2016) Ch. 14: Bilingualism and Deaf education. In: A. Baker et al. (eds.), The Linguistics of Sign Languages: An Introduction, 325–336. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van den Bogaerde, B. & J. Nortier
(2006) Bimodaal codewisselen: simultaan spreken en gebaren. Anéla 2006, 79–88.Google Scholar
Van der Kooij, E. & O. Crasborn
(2016) Ch. 11: Phonology. In: A. Baker, et al. (eds.), The Linguistics of Sign Languages: An Introduction, 251–278. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van der Kooij, E., O. Crasborn, & J. Ros
(2006) Manual prosodic cues: palm-up and pointing signs. Poster presented at TISLR9 , Florianápolis, Brazil, December 2006.
Van der Lem, G.J. & C. Fortgens
(eds.) (1996) Totale Communicatie en lezen. Deventer: Van Tricht uitgeverij.Google Scholar
Van der Sijs, N.
(2010) Nederlandse woorden wereldwijd. Den Haag: Sdu.Google Scholar
Van Gijn, I.
(2004) The quest for syntactic dependency. Sentential complementation in Sign Language of the Netherlands. Utrecht: LOT. Proefschrift Universiteit van Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Van Oostendorp, M.
(2004) Een wereldtaal. De geschiedenis van het Esperanto. Amsterdam: Athenaeum/Polak & Van Gennep.Google Scholar
Vermeerbergen, M.
(1997) Grammaticale aspecten van de Vlaams-Belgische Gebarentaal. Gent: Cultuur voor Doven.Google Scholar
(2006) Past and current trends in sign language research. Language & Communication 26, 168–192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vermeerbergen, M., L. Leeson & O. Crasborn
(eds.) (2007) Simultaneity in Signed Languages: Form and Function. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
① ②
Vermeerbergen, M., J. Nijen Twilhaar & M. Van Herreweghe
(2013) Variation between and within Sign Language of the Netherlands and Flemish Sign Language. In: F. Hinskens and J. Taeldeman (eds.), 680–699.Google Scholar
Vogt-Svendsen, M. & B. Bergman
(2007) Point Buyos: the weak hand as a point of reference for time and space. In: M. Vermeerbergen, L. Leeson & O. Crasborn (eds.), Simultaneity in Signed Languages: Form and Function, 217–235. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L.
(1962) Thought and language. Cambridge: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1978) Mind in society. London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wilber, R.B.
(1987) American Sign Language: linguistic and applied dimensions. Boston: College-Hill.Google Scholar
(1990) Metaphors in American Sign Language and English. In: W.H. Edmondson & F. Karlsson (eds.), Papers from the fourth international symposium on sign language research, 163–170.Google Scholar
Wilcox, P.P.
(2000) Metaphor in ASL. Washington: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
(ed.) (2005) Metaphor in signed languages. Special issue of Sign Language Studies 5 (3).Google Scholar
Wilcox, S., P. Rossini & E. Antinoro Pizzuto
(2010) Grammaticalisation in sign languages. In: D. Brentari (ed.), A prosodic model of sign language phonology, 332–354. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wittmann, H.
(1991) Classification linguistique des langues signées non vocalement. Revue québécoise de linguistique théorique et appliquée 10, 215–88.Google Scholar
Zeshan, Ulrike
(2010) Response: Village Sign Languages: a commentary. In: G. Mathur & D.J. Napoli (eds.), Deaf around the world: the impact of language, 221–230. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zwitserlood, I.
(2003) Classifiying hand configurations in Nederlandse Gebarentaal. Utrecht: LOT. Proefschrift Universiteit Utrecht.Google Scholar
(2012) Classifiers. In: R. Pfau, M. Steinbach & B. Woll (eds.), Sign Language, 158–186. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zwitserlood, I. & I. van Gijn
(2006) Agreement phenomena in Sign Language of the Netherlands. In: P. Ackema et al. (eds.), Arguments and agreement, 195–229.Google Scholar
Zwitserlood, I. & S. Nijhof
(1999) Pluralization in Sign Language of the Netherlands (NGT). In: J. Don & T. Sanders (eds.), OTS Yearbook 1998–1999, 58–78.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Wienholz, Anne, Derya Nuhbalaoglu, Markus Steinbach, Annika Herrmann & Nivedita Mani
2021. Phonological priming in German Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics 24:1 ► pp. 4 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 december 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects & Metadata

Linguistics

Dictionaries
Signed languages
Theoretical linguistics
BIC Subject: CFZ – Sign languages, Braille & other linguistic communication
BISAC Subject: LAN017000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Sign Language
ONIX Metadata
ONIX 2.1
ONIX 3.0
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2016016218 | Marc record