Wh-Movement and the Theory of Feature-Checking
Wh-movement and the theory of feature-checking argues that cross-linguistic variation in wh-constructions reduces to the availability of different lexical instantiations of a +wh C0 both across languages and within a single language, and the way in which such lexical elements are syntactically identified, either via movement or base-generation. Evidence from a wide range of patterns including wh-expletive questions leads to the conclusion that wh-feature checking may sometimes be effected non-locally and at a distance (long-distance wh-agreement), and that movement in general takes place for two related but discrete reasons: both to identify and activate an underspecified licensing head and in order for an element to occur in the checking domain projected by its relevant licensing head. Developing and generalizing the proposals beyond wh-phenomena, the study also goes on to argue for a Minimalist model of syntax in which feature-dependencies are in fact all licensed in the overt syntax and where there is no need for any further level of LF.
[Not in series, 98] 2000. xii, 244 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Published online on 21 October 2008
Published online on 21 October 2008
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
Foreword and Acknowledgments | p. ix
-
1. Wh in situ and the LF Movement Hypothesis | p. 1
-
2. Wh-movement and feature-checking | p. 69
-
3. Partial Movement and wh-expletive questions | p. 147
-
-
Index | p. 240
“In a real tour de force, Andrew Simpson offers a novel theory of wh-agreement which unifies the diverse behavior of wh-elements in situ in languages such as Iraqi Arabic or Hindi, partial wh-movement in German and multiple fronting in Romanian. His far reaching results must be taken into account by anyone interested in this central topic which has shaped debate within contemporary linguistic theory.”
Joseph Aoun, Professor of Linguistics, USC
“[...] presents an in-depth analysis of wh-constructions from a diverse variety of languages, and draws forceful and innovative conclusions regarding the licensing of wh-phrases.”
Edward Garrett, Department of Religious Studies, University of Virginia
Cited by (20)
Cited by 20 other publications
Ahmed, Abdulgaleel A.
Gong, Zhiyu Mia
Issa, Hassan Mohammad Bani, Jong Hui Ying & Yasir Bin Azam
Li, Wenshan & Jiang Liu
Li, Wenshan & Jiang Liu
Bayer, Josef & Lisa Lai‐Shen Cheng
Fanselow, Gisbert
Kotek, Hadas & Michael Yoshitaka Erlewine
Fakih, Abdul-Hafeed Ali
MIZUGUCHI, MANABU
Manetta, Emily
THOMAS, ROSE
Cheng, Lisa Lai‐Shen
Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan
NISHIMURA, MEGUMI
Mathieu, Eric
TOMIZAWA, NAOTO
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Main BIC Subject
CF: Linguistics
Main BISAC Subject
LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General