Argumentation in Political Deliberation

| Universidade Nova de Lisboa
| Universidade Nova de Lisboa
ISBN 9789027242648 | EUR 85.00 | USD 128.00
ISBN 9789027268273 | EUR 85.00 | USD 128.00
The goal of this volume is to further the examination of the role, shape, and quality of argumentation in political deliberation. The chapters collected in the volume employ the concepts and methods developed within argumentation theory to investigate the specifics of political discourse across various deliberative arenas: from debates in the European Parliament, consensus conferences and public hearings in France, discussions in Dutch online forums, to exchanges of comments in online versions of British newspapers. In this way, the studies reveal the inner workings of argumentative interactions that constitute deliberative discourse – and thus importantly contribute to the study of public deliberation. This should be of interest to the students of argumentation, deliberation, and political discourse. In addition, the volume problematizes and theorizes some vital issues related to the study of situated argumentation, thus advancing the study of argumentation in context.

Originally published in Journal of Argumentation in Context, Vol. 2:1 (2013).
[Benjamins Current Topics, 76]  2015.  v, 178 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse in political deliberation
Frans H. van Eemeren
Strategic maneuvering in European Parliamentary Debate
Bart Garssen
Pursuing multiple goals in European Parliamentary Debates: EU immigration policies as a case in point
Dima Mohammed
The place of counter discourse in two methods of public deliberation: The conférence de citoyens and the débat public on nanotechnologies in France
Marianne Doury and Assimakis Tseronis
Deliberation digitized: Designing disagreement space through communication-information services
Mark Aakhus
(How) do participants in online discussion forums create ‘echo chambers’? The inclusion and exclusion of dissenting voices in an online forum about climate change
Arthur Edwards
Debating multiple positions in multi-party online deliberation: Sides, positions, and cases
Marcin Lewiński
Subject index
“This book applies the perspective of argumentation theory to elucidating the ‘role, shape and quality of argumentation in political deliberation’. We strongly recommend it as a substantial contribution to the growing literature on the study of argumentation in specific contexts, and especially in politics.”
“How to improve the rational deliberative quality of political communication is an issue of growing public concern in liberal democracies and one that calls upon the insights of academic scholars in political theory, argumentation, rhetoric, communication studies, and other fields. While using the resources of argumentation analysis to illuminate problems of political deliberation, this volume extends argumentation theory in new directions to account for the influence of multiple goals and participants, complex positioning, and institutional design on political discourse in contexts ranging from parliamentary debates to online forums.”
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Jacquin, Jérôme
2017.  In Multimodal Argumentation and Rhetoric in Media Genres [Argumentation in Context, 14],  pp. 240 ff. Crossref logo
Lewiński, Marcin & Dima Mohammed
2016.  In The International Encyclopedia of Communication Theory and Philosophy,  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 october 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects & Metadata

Communication Studies

Communication Studies


BIC Subject: CFG – Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
ONIX Metadata
ONIX 2.1
ONIX 3.0
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2015014504 | Marc record