Cognitive Aphasiology – A Usage-Based Approach to Language in Aphasia

| Manchester Metropolitan University
ISBN 9789027209177 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
ISBN 9789027259691 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
Aphasia is the most common acquired language disorder in adults, resulting from brain damage, usually stroke. This book firstly explains how aphasia research and clinical practice remain heavily influenced by rule-based, generative theory, and summarizes key shortcomings with this approach. Crucially, it demonstrates how an alternative — the constructivist, usage-based approach — can provide a more plausible theoretical perspective for characterizing language in aphasia. After detailing rigorous transcription and segmentation methods, it presents constructivist, usage-based analyses of spontaneous speech from people with various aphasia ‘types’, challenging a clear-cut distinction between lexis and grammar, emphasizing the need to consider whole-form storage and frequency effects beyond single words, and indicating that individuals fall along a continuum of spoken language capability rather than differing categorically by aphasia ‘type’. It provides original insight into aphasia — with wide-reaching implications for clinical practice —, while equally highlighting how the study of aphasia is important for the development of Cognitive Linguistics.
[Constructional Approaches to Language, 31]  2021.  xx, 311 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
List of tables
List of figures
List of common abbreviations
Chapter 1. Introduction
Part I. Aphasia and linguistic theory
Chapter 2. Aphasia and the rule-based approach
Chapter 3. The constructivist, usage-based approach and its potential in aphasiology
Part II. Methods for research in Cognitive Aphasiology
Chapter 4. Method of data collection
Chapter 5. Developing a reliable transcription method
Chapter 6. Speech segmentation (extraction of strings for analysis)
Part III. Case study analyses of six speakers with aphasia
Chapter 7. Quantitative and qualitative analyses of verbs
Chapter 8. Quantitative analyses of strings
Chapter 9. Qualitative analyses of strings
Chapter 10. Overall discussion of findings, implications and limitations
Part IV. Looking forward
Chapter 11. What next for Cognitive Aphasiology?
Appendix I. Language profiles of case study participants
Appendix II. Protocol for counting words in a speech sample
Appendix III. Transcription protocol
Appendix IV. First segmentation protocol
Appendix V. Second segmentation protocol (string extraction)
Appendix VI. Protocol for extraction and classification of verbs
Appendix VII. All verb tokens produced by HB
Appendix VIII. All verb tokens produced by MH
Appendix IX. All strings and subordinate clauses produced by HB
Appendix X. All strings and subordinate clauses produced by HB


Aarts, B.
(2007) Syntactic gradience: The nature of grammatical indeterminacy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aarts, B., Chalker, S., & Weiner, E.
(2014) Oxford dictionary of English grammar (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alajouanine, T.
(1956) Verbal realization in aphasia. Brain, 79(1), 1–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, L. G.
(1988) Longman English grammar. Longman.Google Scholar
Allan, K.
(2006) Clause-type, primary illocution, and mood-like operators in English. Language Sciences, 28(1), 1–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Allwood, J.
(2000) An activity-based approach to pragmatics. In H. Bunt, & W. Black (Eds.), Abduction, belief and context in dialogue: Studies in computational pragmatics (pp. 47–80). John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ambridge, B.
(2017) Syntactic categories in child language acquisition: Innate, induced, or illusory? In H. Cohen, & C. Lefebvre (Eds.), Handbook of categorization in cognitive science (2nd ed.) (pp. 567–580). Elsevier. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ambridge, B., Kidd, E., Rowland, C. F., & Theakston, A. L.
(2015) The ubiquity of frequency effects in first language acquisition. Journal of Child Language, 42(2), 239–273. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ambridge, B., & Lieven, E. V. M.
(2011) Child language acquisition: Contrasting theoretical approaches. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) A Constructivist account of child language acquisition. In B. MacWhinney, & W. O'Grady (Eds.), Handbook of language emergence (pp. 478–510). Wiley Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
(n.d.-c) Glossary. Retrieved January 30, 2021, from https://​www​.asha​.org​/practice​-portal​/glossary/
Anderson, A.
(2014) Speech Therapy Aphasia Rehabilitation STAR workbook. Createspace Independent Publishing Platform.Google Scholar
Andreetta, S., & Marini, A.
(2015) The effect of lexical deficits on narrative disturbances in fluent aphasia. Aphasiology, 29(6), 705–723. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anjarningsih, H. Y., Haryadi-Soebadi, R. D., Gofir, A., & Bastiaanse, R.
(2012) Characterising agrammatism in Standard Indonesian. Aphasiology, 26(6), 757–784. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aphasia Now
(n.d.) Living with aphasia. Retrieved December 27, 2019, from http://​www​.aphasianow​.org​/About​_Us​/Living​_with​_Aphasia/
Arnon, I., & Snider, N.
(2010) More than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases. Journal of Memory and Language, 62, 67–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Auclair-Ouellet, N., Pythoud, P., Koenig-Bruhin, M., & Fossard, M. (2018) Inflectional morphology in fluent aphasia: A case study in a highly inflected language. Language and Speech, 62(2), 250–259. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Audacity Team
(2013–2014) Audacity(R): Free audio editor and recorder (Version 2.0.5) [Computer App]. https://​audacityteam​.org/
Australian Aphasia Rehabilitation Pathway
(n.d.) Types of aphasia therapy: Best practice statements. Retrieved January 30, 2021, from http://​www​.aphasiapathway​.com​.au​/?name​=Types​-of​-aphasia​-therapy
Babiak, M. C., Gorno-Tempini, M. L., & Henry, M. L.
(2014) Language disorders, overview. In M. J. Aminoff, & R. B. Daroff (Eds.), Encyclopedia of neurological sciences (2nd ed.) (pp. 837–839). Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baker, M.
(2011) In other words: A coursebook on translation (2nd ed.). Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bannard, C., & Matthews, D.
(2008) Stored word sequences in language learning: The effect of familiarity on children's repetition of four-word combinations. Psychological Science, 19(3), 241–248. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bastiaanse, R.
(2011) The retrieval and inflection of verbs in the spontaneous speech of fluent aphasic speakers. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 24(2), 163–172. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bastiaanse, R., Bouma, G., & Post, W.
(2009) Linguistic complexity and frequency in agrammatic speech production. Brain and Language, 109(1), 18–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bastiaanse, R., & Grodzinsky, Y.
(Eds.) (2000) Grammatical disorders in aphasia. Whurr Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
Bastiaanse, R., Rispens, J. E., & van Zonneveld, R.
(2000) Verb retrieval, verb inflection and negation. In R. Bastiaanse, & Y. Grodzinsky (Eds.), Grammatical disorders in aphasia (pp. 171–190). Whurr Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
Bastiaanse, R., & van Zonneveld, R.
(2004) Broca’s aphasia, verbs and the mental lexicon. Brain and Language, 90(1–3), 198–202. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bates, E. A., Friederici, A. D., Wulfeck, B. B., & Juarez, L. A.
(1988) On the preservation of word order in aphasia: Cross-linguistic evidence. Brain and Language, 33(2), 323–364. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bates, E., & Goodman, J. C.
(1997) On the inseparability of grammar and the lexicon: Evidence from acquisition, aphasia and real-time processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12(5–6), 507–584. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bates, E., Wulfeck, B., & MacWhinney, B.
(1991) Crosslinguistic research in aphasia: An overview. Brain and Language, 41(2), 123–148. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beeke, S., Beckley, F., Johnson, F., Heilemann, C., Edwards, S., Maxim, J., & Best, W.
(2015) Conversation focused aphasia therapy: Investigating the adoption of strategies by people with agrammatism. Aphasiology, 29(3), 355–377. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beeke, S., Johnson, F., Beckley, F., Heilemann, C., Edwards, S., Maxim, J., & Best, W.
(2014) Enabling better conversations between a man with aphasia and his conversation partner: Incorporating writing into turn taking. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 47(3), 292–305. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beeson, P. M., & Bayles, K. A.
(1997) Aphasia. In P. D. Nussbaum (Ed.), Handbook of neuropsychology and aging (pp. 298–314). Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Benton, A. L., & Joynt, R. J. (1960) Early descriptions of aphasia. Archives of Neurology, 3, 205–222. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berndt, R. S.
(2001) Sentence production. In B. Rapp (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive neuropsychology: What deficits reveal about the human mind (pp. 375–396). Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Berndt, R. S., Mitchum, C. C., Haendiges, A. N., & Sandson, J.
(1997) Verb retrieval in aphasia. 1. Characterizing single word impairments. Brain and Language, 56(1), 68–106. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berndt, R., & Zingeser, L.
(1991) Grammatical class effects in word production: Finding the locus of the deficit. Brain and Language, 41(4), 597–600. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Best, W., Maxim, J., Heilemann, C., Beckley, F., Johnson, F., Edwards, S. I., Howard, D., & Beeke, S.
(2016) Conversation therapy with people with aphasia and conversation partners using video feedback: A group and case series investigation of changes in interaction. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 562. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Leech, G.
(2002) Longman student grammar of spoken and written English. Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
Biran, M., & Friedmann, N.
(2007) From phonological paraphasias to the structure of the phonological output lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20(4), 589–616. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, D., & Byng, S.
(1984) Assessing semantic comprehension: Methodological considerations, and a new clinical test. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 1(3), 233–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blanken, G., & Marini, V.
(1997) Where do lexical speech automatisms come from? Journal of Neurolinguistics, 10(1), 19–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boye, K., Bastiaanse, R., & Harder, P.
(2017, July 10–14). Agrammatic aphasia in a usage-based theory of grammar [Paper presentation]. 14th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Tartu, Estonia.
Boye, K., Bastiaanse, R., Harder, P., & Martínez-Ferreiro, S.
(2018) Agrammatic aphasia in a usage-based theory of grammar [Manuscript submitted for publication]. Department of Nordic Studies and Linguistics, University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Boye, K., & Harder, P.
(2012) A usage-based theory of grammatical status and grammaticalization. Language, 88(1), 1–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, M.
(2014) Test-retest stability of word retrieval in aphasic discourse. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57(3), 966–978. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Braine, M. D. S., & Bowerman, M.
(1976) Children's first word combinations. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 41(1), 1–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Broca, P.
(1861a) Nouvelle observation d’aphémie produite par une lésion de la troisième circonvolution frontale. Bulletins de la Société d’anatomie (Paris), 2nd series, 6, 398–407.Google Scholar
(1861b) Perte de la parole: Ramollissement chronique et destruction partielle du lobe anterieur gauche du cerveau. Bulletins de la Societe d’anthropologie, 1st series, 2, 235–8.Google Scholar
(1861c) Remarques sur le siège de la faculté du langage articulé, suivies d’une observation d’aphémie (perte de la parole). Bulletins de la Société d’anatomie (Paris), 2nd series, 6, 330–57.Google Scholar
Brown, R.
(1973) A first language: The early stages. George Allen & Unwin. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brumfitt, S.
(1993) Losing your sense of self: What aphasia can do. Aphasiology, 7(6), 569–575. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bryant, L., Ferguson, A., & Spencer, E. (2016) Linguistic analysis of discourse in aphasia: A review of the literature. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 30(7), 489–518. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bunt, H., & Petukhova, V.
(2010) On the many benefits of a multidimensional approach to the analysis of spoken dialogue. In P. J. Henrichsen (Ed.), Linguistic theory and raw sound: Copenhagen Studies in Language 40. Samfundslitteratur.Google Scholar
Butterworth, B., & Howard, D.
(1987) Paragrammatisms. Cognition, 26(1), 1–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J.
(1995) Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10(5), 425–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Usage-based theory and grammaticalization. In H. Narrog, & B. Heine (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization (pp. 69–78). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. L.
(2013) Usage-based theory and exemplar representations of constructions. In T. Hoffmann, & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 49–69). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. L., & Beckner, C.
(2010) Usage-based theory. In B. Heine, & H. Narrog (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis (pp. 827–856). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, J., & Scheibmann, J.
(1999) The effect of usage on degrees of constituency: The reduction of don’t in English. Linguistics, 37(4), 575–596. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cambridge University Press
(n.d.-a) Cambridge dictionary. http://​dictionary​.cambridge​.org/
(n.d.-b) Pay. In Cambridge Dictionary. Retrieved May 20, 2014, from http://​dictionary​.cambridge​.org​/dictionary​/british​/pay​_1​?q​=pay
(n.d.-c) Pay for sth. In Cambridge Dictionary. Retrieved May 20, 2014, from http://​dictionary​.cambridge​.org​/dictionary​/british​/pay​-for​-sth​?q​=pay+for
(n.d.-d) Phrasal verb. In Cambridge Dictionary. Retrieved May 20, 2014, from http://​dictionary​.cambridge​.org​/dictionary​/british​/phrasal​-verb​?q​=phrasal+verb
(n.d.-e) Sneeze. In Cambridge Dictionary. Retrieved January 30, 2021, from https://​dictionary​.cambridge​.org​/dictionary​/english​/sneeze
Caplan, D.
(1987) Neurolinguistics and linguistic aphasiology: An introduction. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caplan, D., DeDe, G., & Michaud, J.
(2006) Task-independent and task-specific syntactic deficits in aphasic comprehension. Aphasiology, 20(9), 893–920. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cappa, S. F., Moro, A., Perani, D., & Piattelli-Palmarini, M.
(2000) Broca’s aphasia, Broca’s area, and syntax: A complex relationship. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 23(1), 27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carragher, M., Sage, K., & Conroy, P.
(2013) The effects of verb retrieval therapy for people with non-fluent aphasia: Evidence from assessment tasks and conversation. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 23(6), 846–887. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carter, R., & McCarthy, M.
(2006) Cambridge grammar of English: A comprehensive guide. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chafe, W. L.
(1968) Idiomaticity as an anomaly in the Chomskyan paradigm. Foundations of Language, 4(2), 109–127.Google Scholar
Chen, S., & Bates, E.
(1998) The dissociation between nouns and verbs in Broca’s and Wernicke’s aphasia: Findings from Chinese. Aphasiology, 12(1), 5–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1957) Syntactic structures. Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1965) Aspects of the theory of syntax. MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1980) Discussion of Putnam’s comments. In M. Piattelli-Palmarini (Ed.), Language and learning: The debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky (pp. 35–52). Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
(1981) Lectures on government and binding: The Pisa lectures. Foris.Google Scholar
(1986) Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin and use. Praeger.Google Scholar
Clausner, T. C., & Croft, W.
(1997) Productivity and schematicity in metaphors. Cognitive Science, 21(3), 247–282. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Code, C.
(1982) Neurolinguistic analysis of recurrent utterance in aphasia. Cortex, 18(1), 141–152. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1989) Speech automatisms and recurring utterances. In C. Code (Ed.), The characteristics of aphasia (pp. 155–177). Taylor Francis. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1994) Speech automatism production in aphasia. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 8(2), 135–148. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Code, C., Müller, N., Tree, J., & Ball, M.
(2006) Syntactic impairments can emerge later: Progressive agrammatic agraphia and syntactic comprehension impairment. Aphasiology, 20(9), 1035–1058. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J.
(1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Conroy, P., Sage, K., & Lambon Ralph, M. A.
(2009) Errorless and errorful therapy for verb and noun naming in aphasia. Aphasiology, 23(11), 1311–1337. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cowper, S.
(2002) Finiteness. University of Toronto. Retrieved December 4, 2018, from http://​homes​.chass​.utoronto​.ca​/~cowper​/Cowper​.finiteness​.pdf Google Scholar
Crawford, J. R.
(n.d.) Single-case methodology in neuropsychology. University of Aberdeen. Retrieved May 30, 2014, from https://​homepages​.abdn​.ac​.uk​/j​.crawford​/pages​/dept​/SingleCaseMethodology​.htm Google Scholar
Crawford, J. R., & Garthwaite, P. H.
(2002) Investigation of the single case in neuropsychology: Confidence limits on the abnormality of test scores and test score differences. Neuropsychologia, 40, 1196–1208. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cristofaro, S.
(2003) Subordination. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Croft, W.
(2001) Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Logical and typological arguments for Radical Construction Grammar. In M. Fried, & J. Östman (Eds.), Construction grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions (Constructional Approaches to Language, 3) (pp. 273–314). John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Construction grammar. In D. Geeraerts, & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 463–508). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A.
(2004) Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crookes, G.
(1990) The utterance, and other basic units for second language discourse analysis. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 183–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crystal, D.
(1981) Clinical linguistics. Springer Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1988) Linguistic levels in aphasia. In F. C. Rose, R. Whurr, & M. A. Wyke (Eds.), Aphasia (pp. 23–45). Whurr Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. (2003) The Cambridge encyclopedia of the English language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2008) Dictionary of linguistics and phonetics (6th ed.). Blackwell Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cummings, L.
(2008) Clinical linguistics. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
(2014) Communication disorders. Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dąbrowska, E.
(2004) Language, mind and brain: Some psychological and neurological constraints on theories of grammar. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
(2012) Different speakers, different grammars: Individual differences in native language attainment. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 2(3), 219–253. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) Recycling utterances: A speaker’s guide to sentence processing. Cognitive Linguistics, 25(4), 617–653. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dąbrowska, E., & Lieven, E.
(2005) Towards a lexically specific grammar of children’s question constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 16(3), 437–474. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dalman, A. J. E., & Eling, P.
(2000) In P. J. Koehler, G. W. Bruyn, & J. M. S. Pearce (Eds.), Neurological eponyms (pp. 244–249). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Damasio, A. R.
(1998) Signs of aphasia. In M. Taylor Sarno (Ed.), Acquired aphasia (3rd ed.) (pp. 25–41). Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, B.
(2017a) Introduction. In B. Dancygier (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 1–10). Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(Ed.) (2017b) The Cambridge handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davies, M.
(2004–) BYU-BNC (Based on the British National Corpus from Oxford University Press) [Data set]. Brigham Young University. http://​corpus​.byu​.edu​/bnc/ Google Scholar
DeDe, G., & Caplan, D.
(2006) Factor analysis of aphasic syntactic comprehension disorders. Aphasiology, 20(2–4), 123–135. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dell, G. S., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Saffran, E. M., & Gagnon, D. A.
(1997) Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. Psychological Review, 104(4), 801–838. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dick, F., & Bates, E.
(2000) Grodzinsky’s latest stand - or, just how specific are “lesion-specific” deficits? Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 23(1), 29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diessel, H.
(2015) Usage-based construction grammar. In E. Dąbrowska, & D. Divjak (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 295–321). Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2017) Usage-based linguistics. In M. Aronoff (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of linguistics. Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(n.d.) Clause patterns. Friedrich Schiller University Jena. https://​holgerdiessel​.uni​-jena​.de​/INTRO​_Clause​_patterns​.pdf Google Scholar
Dorgeloh, H.
(1997) Inversion in Modern English: Form and function. John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Druks, J.
(2002) Verbs and nouns: A review of the literature. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 15(3–5), 289–315. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Druks, J., & Marshall, J. C. (1995) When passives are easier than actives: Two case studies of aphasic comprehension. Cognition, 55(3), 311–331. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Duffield, N.
(2018) Reflections on psycholinguistic theories: Raiding the inarticulate. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eddington, D.
(2008) 2008 Presidential address: Linguistics and the scientific method. Southwest Journal of Linguistics, 27(2), 1–16.Google Scholar
Edwards, S., & Tucker, K.
(2006) Verb retrieval in fluent aphasia: A clinical study. Aphasiology, 20(7), 644–675. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Efstratiadou, E. A., Papathanasiou, I., Holland, R., Archonti, A., & Hilari, K.
(2018) A systematic review of semantic feature analysis therapy studies for aphasia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 61(5), 1261–1278. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & Wulff, S.
(2014) Usage-based approaches to SLA. In B. VanPatten, & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 75–93). Routledge.Google Scholar
Eppler, E. D., & Ozón, G.
(2013) English words and sentences: An introduction. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, N., & Levinson, S. C.
(2009) The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(5), 429–448. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Faroqi-Shah, Y., & Thompson, C. K.
(2004) Semantic, lexical, and phonological influences on the production of verb inflections in agrammatic aphasia. Brain and Language, 89(3), 484–498. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fay, D.
(1982) Substitutions and splices: A study of sentence blends. In A. Cutler (Ed.), Slips of the tongue and language production (pp. 163–195). Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Feenaughty, L., Basilakos, A., Bonilha, L., den Ouden, D. B., Rorden, C., Stark, B., & Fridriksson, J.
(2017) Non-fluent speech following stroke is caused by impaired efference copy. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 34(6), 333–346. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, A., & Armstrong, E.
(2009) Researching communication disorders. Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C. J., Kay, P., & O’Connor, M. C.
(1988) Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language, 64(3), 501–538. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fink, R., Brecher, A., Sobel, P., & Schwartz, M.
(2005) Computer-assisted treatment of word retrieval deficits in aphasia. Aphasiology, 19(10–11), 943–954. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foygel, D., & Dell, G. S.
(2000) Models of impaired lexical access in speech production. Journal of Memory and Language, 43(2), 182–216. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fridriksson, J., Fillmore, P., Guo, D., & Rorden, C.
(2015) Chronic Broca’s aphasia is caused by damage to Broca’s and Wernicke’s areas. Cerebral Cortex, 25(12), 4689–4696. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, N.
(2002) Question production in agrammatism: The Tree Pruning Hypothesis. Brain and Language, 80(2), 160–187. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Degrees of severity and recovery in agrammatism: Climbing up the syntactic tree. Aphasiology, 19(10–11), 1037–1051. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, N., & Grodzinsky, Y.
(1997) Tense and agreement in agrammatic production: Pruning the syntactic tree. Brain and Language, 56(3), 397–425. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gahl, S.
(2002) Lexical biases in aphasic sentence comprehension: An experimental and corpus linguistic study. Aphasiology, 16(12), 1173–1198. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gahl, S., & Menn, L. (2016) Usage-based approaches to aphasia. Aphasiology, 30(11), 1361–1377. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gahl, S., Menn, L., Ramsberger, G., Jurafsky, D. S., Elder, E., Rewega, M., & Holland Audrey, L.
(2003) Syntactic frame and verb bias in aphasia: Plausibility judgments of undergoer-subject sentences. Brain and Cognition, 53(2), 223–228. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geeraerts, D., & Cuyckens, H.
(2007) Introducing Cognitive Linguistics. In D. Geeraerts, & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 1–21). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Geertzen, J., Petukhova, V., & Bunt, H.
(2007) A multidimensional approach to utterance segmentation and dialogue act classification. In S. Keizer, H. Bunt, & T. Paek (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue (pp. 140–149). https://​let​.uvt​.nl​/general​/people​/bunt​/docs​/SIGdial​_07​_Geertzen​_Petukhova​_Bunt​.pdf
Gentner, D.
(1982) Why nouns are learned before verbs: Linguistic relativity versus natural partitioning. In S. A. KuczajII (Ed.), Language development: Vol. 2. Language, thought and culture (pp. 301–334). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(2006) Why verbs are hard to learn. In K. Hirsh-Pasek, & R. Golinkoff (Eds.), Action meets word: How children learn verbs (pp. 544–564). Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Glucksberg, S.
(1993/2014) Idiom meanings and allusional content. In C. Cacciari, & P. Tabossi (Eds.), Idioms: Processing, structure, and interpretation (pp. 3–26). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E.
(1995) Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(2003) Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 7(5), 219–224. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2013) Argument structure constructions versus lexical rules or derivational verb templates. Mind & Language, 28(4), 435–465. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A. E., & Casenhiser, D.
(2006) English constructions. In B. Aarts, & A. McMahon (Eds.), The handbook of English linguistics (pp. 343–356). Blackwell Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A., & Suttle, L.
(2010) Construction grammar. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 1(4), 468–477. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grodzinsky, Y.
(2000) The neurology of syntax: Language use without Broca’s area. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 23(1), 1–71. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Groenewold, R., Bastiaanse, R., & Huiskes, M.
(2013) Direct speech constructions in aphasic Dutch narratives. Aphasiology, 27(5), 546–567. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Groenewold, R., Bastiaanse, R., Nickels, L., & Huiskes, M.
(2014) Perceived liveliness and speech comprehensibility in aphasia: The effects of direct speech in auditory narratives. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 49(4), 486–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gwet, K. L. (2012) Handbook of inter-rater reliability: The definitive guide to measuring the extent of agreement among multiple raters (3rd ed.). Advanced Analytics LLC.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R.
(1976) Cohesion in English. Longman.Google Scholar
Hameister, I., Nickels, L., Abel, S., & Croot, K.
(2017) “Do you have mowing the lawn?” – improvements in word retrieval and grammar following constraint-induced language therapy in primary progressive aphasia. Aphasiology, 31(3), 308–331. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hatchard, R.
(2015a) A construction-based approach to spoken language in aphasia [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Sheffield]. White Rose eTheses Online. http://​etheses​.whiterose​.ac​.uk​/10385/
(2015b, July 20–25). Constructivist theory and methods in aphasia: A usage-based examination of verbs [Paper presentation]. 13th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Northumbria, UK.
(2016, July 19–22). Retrieval not rules: A construction-based analysis of spoken errors in aphasia [Paper presentation]. 6th UK Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Bangor, UK.
(2017, July 10–14). Common constructions in aphasia? A usage-based examination of it’s [Paper presentation]. 14th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Tartu, Estonia.
(2019) Usage-based approach to language acquisition. In J. S. Damico, & M. J. Ball (Eds.), The SAGE encyclopedia of human communication sciences and disorders (pp. 2020–2023). Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Hatchard, R., & Lieven, E.
(2019) Inflection of nouns for grammatical number in spoken narratives by people with aphasia: How glass slippers challenge the rule-based approach. Language and Cognition, 11(3), 341–372. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hatchard, R., Lieven, E., & Herbert, R.
(2015, September 9–11). Retrieval not rules: A new approach to connected speech in aphasia [Paper presentation]. British Aphasiology Society International Biennial Conference, London, UK.
Hatchard, R., Wilkinson, R., & Herbert, R.
(2013a, June 23–28). The application of Construction Grammar to language in aphasia [Paper presentation]. 12th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Edmonton, Canada.
(2013b, September 9–11). The application of Construction Grammar to language in aphasia [Paper presentation]. British Aphasiology Society Biennial Conference, Manchester, UK.
Harvey, D. Y., & Schnur, T. T.
(2015) Distinct loci of lexical and semantic access deficits in aphasia: Evidence from voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping and diffusion tensor imaging. Cortex, 67, 37–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heeschen, C.
(1985) Agrammatism versus paragrammatism: A fictitious opposition. In M. L. Kean (Ed.), Agrammatism (pp. 207–248). Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hier, D. B., Gorelick, P. B., & Gellin Shindler, A.
(1987) Topics in behavioural neurology and neuropsychology: With key references. Butterworth Publishers.Google Scholar
Hilpert, M.
(2014) Construction Grammar and its application to English. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Hughlings-Jackson, J.
(1874) On the nature of the duality of the brain. In J. Taylor (Ed.), Selected writings of John Hughlings Jackson: Vol. 2 (pp. 129–145). Staples Press.Google Scholar
Hughlings-Jackson, J. (1879) On affections of speech from disease of the brain. Brain, 2, 203–222. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hung, P. F., & Ostergren, J.
(2019) A comparison of drawing and writing on facilitating word retrieval in individuals with aphasia. Aphasiology, 33(12), 1462–1481. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, J.
(2016) Cuespeak [Mobile App]. http://​www​.cuespeak​.com
Hunt, K. W.
(1966) Recent measures in syntactic development. Elementary English, 43(7), 732–39.Google Scholar
Jefferson, G.
(2004) Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ibanescu, G., & Pescariu, S.
(Eds.) (2010) Aphasia: Symptoms, diagnosis and treatment. Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
International Phonetic Association
Ishkhanyan, B.
(2015, July 20–25). Agrammatism, working memory and lexicon-grammar distinction [Paper presentation]. 13th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Northumbria, UK.
Ishkhanyan, B., Sahraoui, H., Harder, P., Mogensen, J., & Boye, K.
(2017) Grammatical and lexical pronoun dissociation in French speakers with agrammatic aphasia: A usage-based account and REF-based hypothesis. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 44, 1–16. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
John, A. A., Javali, M., Mahale, R., Mehta, A., Acharya, P. T., & Srinivasa, R.
(2017) Clinical impression and Western Aphasia Battery classification of aphasia in acute ischemic stroke: Is there a discrepancy? Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice, 8, 74–8. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kasselimis, D., Potagas, C., Kourtidou, E., & Evdokimidis, I.
(2012) Classification of the aphasias: Maybe it’s time for a change. Academy of Aphasia 2012, Procedia - Social and Behavioural Sciences, 61, 161–162. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kasselimis, D. S., Simos, P. G., Peppas, C., Evdokimidis, I., & Potagas, C.
(2017) The unbridged gap between clinical diagnosis and contemporary research on aphasia: A short discussion on the validity and clinical utility of taxonomic categories. Brain and Language, 164, 63–67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kay, P.
(2000) Comprehension deficits of Broca’s aphasics provide no evidence for traces. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(1), 37–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kay, J., Lesser, R., & Coltheart, M.
(1992) Psycholinguistic Assessments of Language Processing in Aphasia. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(1996) Psycholinguistic assessments of language processing in aphasia (PALPA): An introduction. Aphasiology, 10(2), 159–180. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kent, R. D.
(2010) Communication disorders. In I. B. Weiner, & W. E. Craighead (Eds.), The Corsini encyclopedia of psychology: Volume 1 (4th ed.) (pp. 358–360). NJ: John Wiley & Sons. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kertesz, A.
(1982) Western Aphasia Battery. Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
(2006) Western Aphasia Battery - Revised. Harcourt Assessments.Google Scholar
Kim, M., & Thompson, C. K.
(2000) Patterns of comprehension and production of nouns and verbs in agrammatism: Implications for lexical organization. Brain and Language, 74(1), 1–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kinney, J., Wallace, S. E., & Schreiber, J. B. (2020) The relationship between word retrieval, drawing, and semantics in people with aphasia. Aphasiology, 34(2), 254–274. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koukoulioti, V., & Stavrakaki, S.
(2014) Producing and inflecting verbs with different argument structure: Evidence from Greek aphasic speakers. Aphasiology, 28(11), 1320–1349. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krámský, J.
(1969) Verb-form frequency in English. Brno Studies in English, 8, 111–120.Google Scholar
Kroll, B.
(1977) Combining ideas in written and spoken English: A look at subordination and coordination. In E. Ochs Keenan, & T. L. Bennett (Eds.), Discourse across time and space. Southern California Occasional Papers in Linguistics 5 (pp. 69–108). University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Labov, W.
(1972) Sociolinguistic patterns. University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, K.
(1994) Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
(1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar, volume I: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(2008) Cognitive Grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Le, D., Licata, K., & Mower Provost, E.
(2018) Automatic quantitative analysis of spontaneous aphasic speech. Speech Communication, 100, 1–12. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J., & Thompson, C. K.
(2015) Phonological facilitation effects on naming latencies and viewing times during noun and verb naming in agrammatic and anomic aphasia. Aphasiology, 29(10), 1164–1188. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leech, G., & Svartvik, J.
(2002) A communicative grammar of English (3rd ed.). Routledge.Google Scholar
Lesser, R., & Perkins, L.
(1999) Cognitive neuropsychology and conversation analysis in aphasia: An introductory casebook. Whurr Publishers, Ltd.Google Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S.
(1999) A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(1), 1–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(n.d.-a) By and large. In Lexico dictionary. Retrieved January 30, 2021, from https://​www​.lexico​.com​/definition​/by​_and​_large
(n.d.-b) Sneeze. In Lexico dictionary. Retrieved January 30, 2021, from https://​www​.lexico​.com​/definition​/sneeze
Lieven, E.
(2008) Learning the English auxiliary: A usage-based approach. In H. Behrens (Ed.), Corpora in language acquisition research: History, methods, perspectives (Trends in Acquisition Research, 6) (pp. 61–98). John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) Usage-based approaches to language development: Where do we go from here? Language and Cognition, 8(3), 346–368. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lieven, E., Salomo, D., & Tomasello, M.
(2009) Two-year-old children’s productions of multiword utterances: A usage-based analysis. Cognitive Linguistics, 20(3), 481–507. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Linebaugh, C. W., Shisler, R. J., & Lehner, L.
(2005) CAC classics. Aphasiology, 19(1), 77–92. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Links, P., Hurkmans, J., & Bastiaanse, R.
(2010) Training verb and sentence production in agrammatic Broca’s aphasia. Aphasiology, 24(11), 1303–1325. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lum, C., Cox, R., & Kilgour, J. (2012) PATSy: A database of clinical cases for teaching and research [Data set]. Universities of Sussex and Edinburgh. Retrieved January, 2012 – May, 2015, from http://​www​.patsy​.ac​.uk Google Scholar
Luzzatti, C., Raggi, R., Zonca, G., Pistarini, C., Contardi, A., & Pinna, G.
(2002) Verb–noun double dissociation in aphasic lexical impairments: The role of word frequency and imageability. Brain and Language, 81(1), 432–444. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lyalka, O., Howard, D., Morris, J., & Nickels, L.
(2020) Does producing semantically related words aid word retrieval in people with aphasia? Aphasiology, 34(2), 158–194. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marcus, G. F.
(1995) Children’s overregularization of English plurals: A quantitative analysis. Journal of Child Language, 22(2), 447–459. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marini, A., Andreetta, S., del Tin, S., & Carlomagno, S.
(2011) A multi-level approach to the analysis of narrative language in aphasia. Aphasiology, 25(11), 1372–1392. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, J.
(2010) Classification of aphasia: Are there benefits for practice? Aphasiology, 24(3), 408–412. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, J., Devane, N., Edmonds, L., Talbot, R., Wilson, S., Woolf, C., & Zwart, N.
(2018) Delivering word retrieval therapies for people with aphasia in a virtual communication environment. Aphasiology, 32(9), 1054–1074. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martínez Insua, A. E.
(1998) Existential there-constructions in present day English: A corpus-based study. Atlantis, 20(2), 107–131.Google Scholar
Matthews, D., Lieven, E., Theakston, A., & Tomasello, M.
(2005) The role of frequency in the acquisition of English word order. Cognitive Development, 20(1), 121–136. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research
McCann, C., & Doleman, J.
(2011) Verb retrieval in nonfluent aphasia: A replication of Edwards & Tucker, 2006. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 24(2), 237–248. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McNeil, M. R., Sung, J. E., Yang, D., Pratt, S. R., Fossett, T. R. D., Doyle, P. J., & Pavelko, S.
(2007) Comparing connected language elicitation procedures in persons with aphasia: Concurrent validation of the Story Retell Procedure. Aphasiology, 21(6–8), 775–790. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Menn, L.
(1990) Agrammatism in English: Two case studies. In L. Menn, & L. K. Obler (Eds.), Agrammatic aphasia (pp. 117–178). John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) The art and science of transcribing aphasic (and other) speech. In L. Scliar-Cabral (Ed.), Psycholinguistics: Scientific and technological challenges (pp. 24–43). EDIPUCRS.Google Scholar
Menn, L., & Duffield, C. J.
(2013) Aphasias and theories of linguistic representation: Representing frequency, hierarchy, constructions, and sequential structure. WIREs: Cognitive Science, 4(6), 651–663. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Menn, L., Ramsberger, G., & Helm-Estabrooks, N.
(1994) A linguistic communication measure for aphasic narratives. Aphasiology, 8(4), 343–359. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Middleton, E. L., Schwartz, M. F., Rawson, K. A., Traut, H., & Verkuilen, J. (2016) Towards a theory of learning for naming rehabilitation: Retrieval practice and spacing effects. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 59(5), 1111–1122. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moses, M. S., Nickels, L. A., & Sheard, C.
(2004) Disentangling the web: Neologistic perseverative errors in jargon aphasia. Neurocase, 10(6), 452–461. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Murdoch, B. E.
(2010) Acquired speech and language disorders: A neuroanatomical and functional neurological approach (2nd ed.). Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Murphy, R.
(2019) English grammar in use (5th ed.). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Musser, B., Wilkinson, J., Gilbert, T., & Bokhour, B. G.
(2015) Changes in identity after aphasic stroke: Implications for primary care. International Journal of Family Medicine, 2015, Article ID: 970345. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
National Aphasia Association
(n.d.) Aphasia FAQs. Retrieved January 30, 2021, from https://​www​.aphasia​.org​/aphasia​-faqs/
Nelson, G., & Greenbaum, S.
(2016) An introduction to English grammar (4th ed.). Routledge.Google Scholar
Ochs, E.
(1979) Transcription as theory. In E. Ochs, & B. Schieffelin (Eds.), Developmental pragmatics (pp. 43–72). Academic Press.Google Scholar
O’Halloran, R., Carragher, M., & Foster, A.
(2017) The consequences of the consequences: The impact of the environment on people with aphasia over time. Topics in Language Disorders, 37(1), 85–100. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Olness, G. S., Matteson, S. E., & Stewart, C. T.
(2010) “Let me tell you the point”: How speakers with aphasia assign prominence to information in narratives. Aphasiology, 24(6–8), 697–708. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, K. E., & Shewell, C.
(1987) Speak and spell: Dissociations and word-class effects. In M. Coltheart, R. Job, & G. Sartori (Eds.), The cognitive neuropsychology of language. Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Perek, F.
(2015) Argument structure in usage-based construction grammar: Experimental and corpus-based perspectives. John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) Using distributional semantics to study syntactic productivity in diachrony: A case study. Linguistics, 54(1), 149–188. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S., & Bloom, P.
(1990) Natural language and natural selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13(4), 707–726. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pullum, G. K., & Scholz, B. C.
(2002) Empirical assessment of stimulus poverty arguments. The Linguistic Review, 19(1–2), 9–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, J. T. E.
(2000) Clinical and neuropsychological aspects of closed head injury (2nd ed.). Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Riches, N. G.
(2013) Treating the passive in children with specific language impairment: A usage-based approach. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 29(2), 155–169. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rispoli, M., Hadley, P. A., & Holt, J. K.
(2009) The growth of tense productivity. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52(4), 930–944. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rochon, E., Saffran, E. M., Berndt, R. S., & Schwartz, M. F. (2000) Quantitative analysis of aphasic sentence production: Further development and new data. Brain and Language, 72(3), 193–218. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Routhier, S., Bier, N., & Macoir, J.
(2015) The contrast between cueing and/or observation in therapy for verb retrieval in post-stroke aphasia. Journal of Communication Disorders, 54, 43–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G.
(1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Saffran, E. M., Berndt, R. S., & Schwartz, M. F.
(1989) The quantitative analysis of agrammatic production: Procedure and data. Brain and Language, 37(3), 440–479. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Saffran, E. M., Schwartz, M. F., & Marin, O. S. M.
(1980) The word order problem in agrammatism. II. Production. Brain and Language, 10(2), 263–280. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, H-J.
(2015) A blueprint of the Entrenchment-and-Conventionalization Model. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association, 3, 1–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schuchard, J., & Middleton, E. L.
(2018) The roles of retrieval practice versus errorless learning in strengthening lexical access in aphasia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 61(7), 1700–1717. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Siemund, P.
(2018) Speech acts and clause types: English in a cross-linguistic context. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J.
(Ed.) (1990) Collins Cobuild English grammar. Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Siyambalapitiya, S., Chenery, H. J., & Copland, D. A.
(2013) Lexical-semantic representation in bilingual aphasia: Findings from semantic priming and cognate repetition priming. Aphasiology, 27(11), 1302–1321. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I.
(1991) Aphasia in Turkish: Speech production in Broca’s and Wernicke’s patients. Brain and Language, 41(2), 149–164. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M. C.
(2015) Word categories. In J. R. Taylor (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the word (pp. 175–195). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sotiropoulou, C., Conroy, P., & Lambon-Ralph, M.
(2015) The impact of accuracy-focused and speed-focused therapy on word retrieval in picture naming and composite picture descriptions in post-stroke aphasia. International Journal of Stroke, 10(5), 65–65.Google Scholar
Street, J., & Dąbrowska, E.
(2014) Lexically specific knowledge and individual differences in adult native speakers’ processing of the English passive. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35(1), 97–118. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stroke Association
(n.d.) Rebuilding lives: Alisha's story. Retrieved January 28, 2021, from https://​www​.stroke​.org​.uk​/rebuilding​-lives​/alisha
Swan, M.
(1995) Practical English usage (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Swinburn, K., Porter, G., & Howard, D.
(2004) Comprehensive Aphasia Test. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Svorou, S.
(2010) Relational constructions in Cognitive Linguistics. In D. Geeraerts, & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 726–752). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tactus Therapy Solutions Ltd (n.d.-a) How to: Verb Network Strengthening Treatment (VNeST). Tactus Therapy. Retrieved January 22, 2021, from https://​tactustherapy​.com​/vnest​-verb​-network​-strengthening​-app/ Google Scholar
(n.d.-b) What is Broca’s aphasia? Tactus Therapy. Retrieved January 17, 2021, from https://​tactustherapy​.com​/brocas​-aphasia​-nonfluent​-video/ Google Scholar
(n.d.-c) What is fluent aphasia? Tactus Therapy. Retrieved January 17, 2021, from https://​tactustherapy​.com​/what​-is​-fluent​-aphasia​-video/ Google Scholar
Taylor, J. R.
(2012) The mental corpus: How language is represented in the mind. Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Theakston, A., & Lieven, E.
(2017) Multiunit sequences in first language acquisition. Topics in Cognitive Science, 9(2), 588–603. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, C. K., Lange, K. L., Schneider, S. L., & Shapiro, L. P.
(1997) Agrammatic and non-brain-damaged subjects' verb and verb argument structure production. Aphasiology, 11(4–5), 473–490. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, C. K., Riley, E. A., den Ouden, D., Meltzer-Asscher, A., & Lukic, S.
(2013) Training verb argument structure production in agrammatic aphasia: Behavioural and neural recovery patterns. Cortex 49(9), 2358–2376. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, J., & McKeever, M.
(2014) The impact of stroke aphasia on health and well-being, and appropriate nursing interventions: An exploration using the Theory of Human Scale Development. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 23(3–4), 410–420. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, S. A., & Hopper, P.
(2001) Transitivity, clause structure, and argument structure: Evidence from conversation. In J. Bybee, & P. Hopper (Eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure (pp. 26–60). John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M.
(1992) First verbs: A case study of early grammatical development. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1995) Language is not an instinct. Cognitive Development, 10(1), 131–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(2015) The usage-based theory of language acquisition. In E. Bavin (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of child language (2nd ed.) (pp. 89–106). Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Turkstra, L. S., Coelho, C., & Ylvisaker, M.
(2005) The use of standardized tests for individuals with cognitive-communication disorders. Seminars in Speech and Language, 26(4), 215–222. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Turkstra, L., & Thompson, C. K.
(2011) Agrammatism. In J. S. Kreutzer, J. DeLuca, & B. Caplan (Eds.), Encyclopedia of clinical neuropsychology. Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Ewijk, L., & Avrutin, S.
(2016) Lexical access in nonfluent aphasia: A bit more on reduced processing. Aphasiology, 30(11), 1264–1282. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Lancker Sidtis, D.
(2004) When novel sentences spoken or heard for the first time in the history of the universe are not enough: Toward a dual-process of language production. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 39(1), 1–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Lancker Sidtis, D., & Postman, W. A. (2006) Formulaic expressions in spontaneous speech of left- and right-hemisphere-damaged subjects. Aphasiology, 20(5), 411–426. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verspoor, M., & Sauter, K.
(2000) English sentence analysis: An introductory course. John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wallesch, C-W., & Blanken, G.
(2000) Recurring utterances: How, where, and why are they generated? Brain and Language, 71(1), 255–257. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wang, H., & Thompson, C. K.
(2016) Assessing syntactic deficits in Chinese Broca’s aphasia using the Northwestern Assessment of Verbs and Sentences-Chinese (NAVS-C). Aphasiology, 30(7), 815–840. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Webelhuth, G.
(2011) Motivating non-canonicality in Construction Grammar: The case of locative inversion. Cognitive Linguistics, 22(1), 81–105. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Webster, J., Franklin, S., & Howard, D.
(2001) An investigation of the interaction between thematic and phrasal structure in nonfluent agrammatic subjects. Brain and Language, 78(2), 197–211. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) An analysis of thematic and phrasal structure in people with aphasia: What more can we learn from the story of Cinderella? Journal of Neurolinguistics, 20(5), 363–394. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Webster, J., & Whitworth, A.
(2012) Treating verbs in aphasia: Exploring the impact of therapy at the single word and sentence levels. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 47(6), 619–636. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wells, B., & Whiteside, S.
(2008) Prosodic impairments. In M. J. Ball, M. R. Perkins, N. Müller, & S. Howard (Eds.), The handbook of clinical linguistics (pp. 549–567). Blackwell Publishing Ltd. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wernicke, C.
(1874) Der aphasische Symptomencomplex: Eine psychologische Studie auf anatomischer Basis. Cohn and Weigert.Google Scholar
Whitworth, A., Webster, J., & Howard, D.
(2014) A cognitive neuropsychological approach to assessment and intervention in aphasia: A clinician's guide (2nd ed.). Psychology Press Ltd. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Argument structure deficit in aphasia: It’s not all about verbs. Aphasiology, 29(12), 1426–1447. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wieling, M.
(2012) A quantitative approach to social and geographical dialect variation [Doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen]. University of Groningen Research Database. https://​www​.rug​.nl​/research​/portal​/publications​/a​-quantitative​-approach​-to​-social​-and​-geographical​-dialect​-variation(cd637817​-572f​-4826​-98c1​-08272775fb64)​.html
Wilkinson, R., Lock, S., Bryan, K., & Sage, K.
(2011) Interaction-focused intervention for acquired language disorders: Facilitating mutual adaptation in couples where one partner has aphasia. International Journal of Speech and Language Pathology, 13(1), 74–87. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, S. M., Eriksson, D. K., Schneck, S. M., & Lucanie, J. M.
(2018) A quick aphasia battery for efficient, reliable, and multidimensional assessment of language function. PLOS ONE 13(2), e0192773. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Winkler, S.
(2012) The information structure of English. In M. Krifka, & R. Musan (Eds.), The expression of information structure (pp. 71–94). Mouton De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wood, J. M. (2007) Understanding and computing Cohen’s Kappa: A tutorial. WebPsychEmpiricist. http://​mywpe​.info​/vault​/wood07​/Wood07​.pdf
Wray, A.
(2002) Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wulff, S., & Ellis, N. C.
(2018) Usage-based approaches to second language acquisition. In D. Miller, F. Bayram, J. Rothman, & L. Serratrice (Eds.), Bilingual cognition and language: The state of the science across its subfields (pp. 37–56). John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerer, V., Dąbrowska, E., Romanowski, C. A. J., Blank, C., & Varley, R. A.
(2014) Preservation of passive constructions in a patient with primary progressive aphasia. Cortex, 50, 7–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerer, V. C., Newman, L., Thomson, R., Coleman, M., & Varley, R. A.
(2018) Automated analysis of language production in aphasia and right-hemisphere damage: Frequency and collocation strength. Aphasiology, 32(11), 1267–1283. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Subjects & Metadata
BIC Subject: CFD – Psycholinguistics
BISAC Subject: LAN009040 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / Psycholinguistics
ONIX Metadata
ONIX 2.1
ONIX 3.0
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2021019198 | Marc record