Evidence for Linguistic Relativity
Editors
This volume has arisen from the 26th International LAUD Symposium on “Humboldt and Whorf Revisited. Universal and Culture-Specific Conceptualizations in Grammar and Lexis”. While contrasting two or more languages, the papers in this volume either provide empirical evidence confirming hypotheses related to linguistic relativity, or deal with methodological issues of empirical research.These new approaches to Whorf’s hypotheses do not focus on mere theorizing but provide more and more empirical evidence gathered over the last years. They prove in a very sophisticated way that Whorf’s ideas were very lucid ones, even if Whorf’s insights were framed in a terminology which lacked the flexibility of linguistic categories developed over the last quarter of this century, especially in cognitive linguistics. To date, there is sufficient proof to claim that linguistic relativity is indeed a vital issue, and the current volume confirms a more general trend for rehabilitating Whorf’s theory complex and also offers evidence for it. It contains articles written by scholars from various fields of linguistics including phonology, psycholinguistics, language acquisition, historical linguistics, anthropological linguistics and (cross-)cultural semantics, which all contribute to a re-evaluation and partial reformulation of Whorf’s thinking.
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 198] 2000. xxii, 240 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
PrefaceSusanne Niemeier and René Dirven | p. vii
-
Introductory commentsJohn A. Lucy | p. ix
-
Part 1. Evidence from Language: Production, Interpretation, and Change
-
Linguistic relativity in speech perception: An overview of the influence of language experience on the perception of speech sounds from infancy to adulthoodOcke-Schwen Bohn | p. 1
-
Equivalence and mismatch of semantic features: Collocations in English, Spanish and DutchJan Schroten | p. 29
-
Can grammar make you feel different?Michael Maratsos, Demetra Katis and Annalisa Margheri | p. 53
-
Semantic change as linguistic interpretation of the worldGábor Győri | p. 71
-
(Micro-)categorization, semantic change, and the Sapir-Whorf hypothesisRichard A. Rhodes | p. 91
-
Part 2. Evidence beyond Language: Cognition, Discourse, and Culture
-
Verbalized events: A dynamic approach to linguistic relativity and determinismDan I. Slobin | p. 107
-
Universal ontological knowledge and a bias toward language-specific categories in the construal of individuationMutsumi Imai | p. 139
-
Grammar and social practice: On the role of ‘culture’ in linguistic relativityBalthasar Bickel | p. 161
-
“S’engager” vs. “to show restraint”: Linguistic and cultural relativity in discourse managementBert Peeters | p. 193
-
Grammar and the cult of the virgin: A case study of Polish religious discourseElżbieta Tabakowska | p. 223
-
Subject Index | p. 235
-
Language Index | p. 241
“Papers in this volume will prove to be of interest because they suggest new ways of approaching the issue of linguistic relativity.”
Zdenek Salzmann, Northern Arizona University
Cited by
Cited by 17 other publications
Aixelà, Yolanda
Boers, Frank
Fernández Casas, María José
2002. El relativismo lingüístico a la entrada del siglo XXI.. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 137-138 ► pp. 271 ff. 
Jepson, Doris
Kemmerer, David
Kleiner, Luna Filipovic
Montemayor, Carlos
Musolff, Andreas
2014. Metaphors: Sources for intercultural misunderstanding?. International Journal of Language and Culture 1:1 ► pp. 42 ff. 
Musolff, Andreas
Pavlenko, Aneta
Piccardo, Enrica & Brian North
Renkema, Jan & Christoph Schubert
Schedlitzki, Doris
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Main BIC Subject
CF: Linguistics
Main BISAC Subject
LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General