A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis
Theory, methodology and interdisciplinarity
Editors
| Lancaster University
| University of East Anglia
Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) has established itself over the past two decades as an area of academic activity in which scholars and students from many different disciplines are involved. It is a field that draws on social theory and aspects of linguistics in order to understand and challenge the discourses of our day. It is time for A New Agenda in the field. The present book is essential for anyone working broadly in the field of discourse analysis in the social sciences. The book includes often critical re-assessments of CDA's assumptions and methods, while proposing new route-maps for innovation. Practical analyses of major issues in discourse analysis are part of this agenda-setting volume.
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 13] 2005. xviii, 320 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
|
Acknowledgements
|
ix
|
|
xi–xii
|
|
|
PART I. Interdisciplinarity and (C)DA
|
|
|
3–18
|
|
|
19–51
|
|
|
53–70
|
|
|
71–100
|
|
|
101–117
|
|
|
PART II. Implementing interdisciplinarity
|
|
|
121–135
|
|
|
137–163
|
|
|
165–187
|
|
|
189–211
|
|
|
213–239
|
|
|
PART III. Inside and Outside traditional disciplines
|
|
|
243–267
|
|
|
269–281
|
|
|
283–309
|
|
|
Biographical Notes
|
311–314
|
|
Name index
|
317–318
|
|
Subject index
|
319–321
|
“The present book is essential for anyone working broadly in the field of discourse analysis in the social sciences. The book includes often critical re-assessments of CDA's assumptions and methods, while proposing new route-maps for innovation.”
Folia Linguistica, Vol. 39:3/4 (2005)
“A precious resource for students and scholars interested in (critical) discourse analysis. This thought-provoking book is a must for anyone interested in discourse studies.”
Aleksander Carapic, Department of General Linguistics, University of Belgrade, Serbia
“Individually, the chapters of this collection present firmly grounded conceptual and operational perspectives about CDA. Its innovative approach is some of its great assets. It is a welcome addition to the growing base of literature devoted to the field of social sciences, and CDA in particular.”
Li Songqing, in SKASE, Journal of Theoretical Linguistics Vol. 3:1 (2006)
Cited by
Cited by 78 other publications
No author info given
2007.
In Diskursforschung,
► pp. 117 ff. 
No author info given
2020.
In Language Policy in Business [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 89],
Angouri, Jo
2015.
In The International Encyclopedia of Human Sexuality,
► pp. 1115 ff.
Barbe, Katharina
2007. Victor Klemperer: The accidental sociolinguist.
Journal of Sociolinguistics 11:4 ► pp. 505 ff.
Barbe, Katharina
2008. Propaganda in the trivial: puzzles in the women's section of the Völkischer Beobachter.
Discourse & Communication 2:2 ► pp. 115 ff.
Bartley, Leanne Victoria
2016. Girl A: The Truth about the Rochdale Sex Ring by the Individual Who Stopped Them: A CDA of a Rape Victim’s Testimony.
Applied Linguistics ► pp. amw013 ff.
Bell, Allan
2011. Re-constructing Babel: Discourse analysis, hermeneutics and the Interpretive Arc.
Discourse Studies 13:5 ► pp. 519 ff.
Bolívar, Adriana
2020. Análisis del discurso y hermenéutica como métodos en la interpretación de textos.
Interpretatio. Revista de Hermenéutica 5:1 ► pp. 17 ff.
Boukala, Salomi
2019.
In European Identity and the Representation of Islam in the Mainstream Press,
► pp. 19 ff.
Boukala, Salomi
2019.
In European Identity and the Representation of Islam in the Mainstream Press,
► pp. 257 ff.
Boyd, Michael S.
2019.
In Migration and Media [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 81],
► pp. 291 ff.
Cap, Piotr
2015. CROSSING SYMBOLIC DISTANCES IN POLITICAL DISCOURSE SPACE.
Critical Discourse Studies 12:3 ► pp. 313 ff.
Carvalho, Anabela
2008. MEDIA(TED) DISCOURSE AND SOCIETY.
Journalism Studies 9:2 ► pp. 161 ff.
Catalano, Theresa & Linda R. Waugh
2020.
In Critical Discourse Analysis, Critical Discourse Studies and Beyond [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 26],
► pp. 13 ff.
Catalano, Theresa & Linda R. Waugh
2020.
In Critical Discourse Analysis, Critical Discourse Studies and Beyond [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 26],
► pp. 71 ff.
Chivaura, Runyararo Sihle
2020.
In Blackness as a Defining Identity,
► pp. 25 ff.
Cotter, Colleen
2015.
In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis,
► pp. 795 ff.
Cozzolino, Adriano
2020. The Discursive Construction of Europe in Italy in the Age of Permanent Austerity.
JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 58:3 ► pp. 580 ff.
Dontcheva-Navrátilová, Olga
2017.
In Analysing Genre: The Colony Text of UNESCO Resolutions,
Dontcheva-Navrátilová, Olga
2017.
In Coherence in political speeches,
Dunmire, Patricia L.
2012. Political Discourse Analysis: Exploring the Language of Politics and the Politics of Language.
Language and Linguistics Compass 6:11 ► pp. 735 ff.
Eder, Franz X. & Oliver Kühschelm
2014.
In Bilder in historischen Diskursen,
► pp. 3 ff.
El Shazly, Reham Farouk
2021. The synergy of topoi and socio-cognition in ideology construction and identity reformation: war on terror discourse.
Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression 13:1 ► pp. 62 ff.
Eriksson, Madeleine
2008. (re)producing a “peripheral” region – northern sweden in the news.
Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 90:4 ► pp. 369 ff.
Felgenhauer, Tilo
2010. Regional identity as celebration and routine: ‘Mitteldeutschland’s’ glorification and its taken-for-granted meaning in media content.
European Journal of Cultural Studies 13:1 ► pp. 63 ff.
Filardo-Llamas, Laura
2013. ‘Committed to the ideals of 1916’. The language of paramilitary groups: the case of the Irish Republican Army.
Critical Discourse Studies 10:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Fløttum, Kjersti & Dag Stenvoll
2009. Blair speeches in a polyphonic perspective.
Journal of Language and Politics 8:2 ► pp. 269 ff.
Gavriely-Nuri, Dalia
2010. If both opponents “extend hands in peace” — Why don’t they meet?.
Journal of Language and Politics 9:3 ► pp. 449 ff.
Gergen, Kenneth J. & Mary M. Gergen
2010. Scanning the Landscape of Narrative Inquiry.
Social and Personality Psychology Compass 4:9 ► pp. 728 ff.
Ghachem, Inès
2014. A Critical Discourse Analysis of Self-presentation through the Use of Cognitive Processes Associated with We.
Journal of Language Teaching and Research 5:3
Grue, Jan
2010. Is there something wrong with society, or is it just me? Social and medical knowledge in a Norwegian anti-discrimination law.
Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 12:3 ► pp. 165 ff.
Holland, Martin & Natalia Chaban
2011. The EU as an Agent for Democracy: Images of the EU in the Pacific Media ‘Mirror’.
Journal of European Integration 33:3 ► pp. 285 ff.
Horsbøl, Anders
2010. Experts in political communication.
Journal of Language and Politics 9:1 ► pp. 29 ff.
Howarth, David
2010. Power, discourse, and policy: articulating a hegemony approach to critical policy studies.
Critical Policy Studies 3:3-4 ► pp. 309 ff.
Huang, Mimi
2020.
In The Language of Crisis [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 87],
► pp. 1 ff.
Janning, Frank, Philip Leifeld, Thomas Malang & Volker Schneider
2009.
In Politiknetzwerke,
► pp. 59 ff.
Jenks, Christopher J.
2020. Applying critical discourse analysis to classrooms.
Classroom Discourse 11:2 ► pp. 99 ff.
Kratochvíl, Petr & Lukáš Tichý
2013. EU and Russian discourse on energy relations.
Energy Policy 56 ► pp. 391 ff.
Kutter, Amelie
2020.
In Legitimation in the European Union,
► pp. 35 ff.
Lahusen, Christian & Johannes Kiess
2020. The Diverging Presence of Youth in Public Discourse: A Comparative Analysis of Youth-Related Debates Across Countries and Issue Fields.
American Behavioral Scientist 64:5 ► pp. 574 ff.
Lewis, J. P.
2010. Commissioned Citizenship: The Evolution of Pedagogical Citizen Construction in Canada, 1947–1994.
American Review of Canadian Studies 40:4 ► pp. 478 ff.
Li, Jian & Xue Eryong
2020. Criticality in world-class universities research: a critical discourse analysis of international education publications.
Educational Philosophy and Theory ► pp. 1 ff.
Lippert, Florian
2019. Public self-reflection in the context of the European migrant crisis: Towards a new transdisciplinary model of discourse analysis in politics, media and the arts.
Journal of European Studies 49:3-4 ► pp. 336 ff.
Lukin, Annabelle
2019.
In War and Its Ideologies [The M.A.K. Halliday Library Functional Linguistics Series, ],
► pp. 1 ff.
Löbel, Katarina
2010. The sociolinguistics of development in Africa.
Journal of Multicultural Discourses 5:1 ► pp. 75 ff.
Martínez Guillem, Susana
2011. European Identity: Across Which Lines? Defining Europe Through Public Discourses on the Roma.
Journal of International and Intercultural Communication 4:1 ► pp. 23 ff.
Molek-Kozakowska, Katarzyna
2013.
In Language in Cognition and Affect [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ],
► pp. 95 ff.
Molek-Kozakowska, Katarzyna & Jan Chovanec
2017.
In Representing the Other in European Media Discourses [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 74],
► pp. 1 ff.
Musolff, Andreas
2012. The study of metaphor as part of critical discourse analysis.
Critical Discourse Studies 9:3 ► pp. 301 ff.
Musolff, Andreas
2017. Truths, lies and figurative scenarios.
Journal of Language and Politics 16:5 ► pp. 641 ff.
Nazariadli, Shahab, Duarte B. Morais, Kyle Bunds, Perver Baran & Stacy Supak
2019. Rural tourism microentrepreneurs’ self-representation through photography: a counter-hegemonic approach.
Rural Society 28:1 ► pp. 29 ff.
O'Regan, John P. & Anne Betzel
2015.
In Research Methods in Intercultural Communication,
► pp. 281 ff.
Okulska, Urszula
2018.
In Dialogic Ethics [Dialogue Studies, 30],
► pp. 77 ff.
Parker, Ian
2013. Discourse Analysis: Dimensions of Critique in Psychology.
Qualitative Research in Psychology 10:3 ► pp. 223 ff.
Pavlidou, Theodossia-Soula
2011. Open forum: The challenge of interdisciplinarity: From theoretical claims to interdisciplinary practices in Gender Studies.
European Journal of Women's Studies 18:3 ► pp. 310 ff.
Pujante, David
2017.
In Developing New Identities in Social Conflicts [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 71],
► pp. 42 ff.
Pérez-Milans, Miguel
2012.
In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
Pühringer, Stephan & Katrin Hirte
2015. The financial crisis as a heart attack.
Journal of Language and Politics 14:4 ► pp. 599 ff.
Ryazanova-Clarke, Lara
2017. From commodification to weaponization: the Russian language as ‘pride’ and ‘profit’ in Russia's transnational discourses.
International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 20:4 ► pp. 443 ff.
Schäffner, Christina
2012. Unknown agents in translated political discourse.
Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 24:1 ► pp. 103 ff.
Serrano-Velarde, Kathia
2015. Words into deeds: the use of framing strategy in EU higher education policy.
Critical Policy Studies 9:1 ► pp. 41 ff.
Shenk, Elaine M.
2013. H.R. 2499 Puerto Rico Democracy Act of 2010.
Journal of Language and Politics 12:4 ► pp. 583 ff.
Shi-xu
2012. Why do cultural discourse studies? Towards a culturally conscious and critical approach to human discourses.
Critical Arts 26:4 ► pp. 484 ff.
Siltaoja, Marjo, Katariina Juusola & Marke Kivijärvi
2019. ‘World-class’ fantasies: A neocolonial analysis of international branch campuses.
Organization 26:1 ► pp. 75 ff.
Smirnova, Anastasia
2015. Aligning language to ideology.
Journal of Language and Politics 14:2 ► pp. 205 ff.
Souleymanov, Rusty, David J. Brennan, Carmen H. Logie, Dan Allman, Shelley L. Craig & Perry N. Halkitis
2020. Party-n-Play and online information and communication technologies: A socio-linguistic perspective.
Sexualities ► pp. 136346072093237 ff.
Sánchez Ruiz, Raquel
2019. Analyzing and comparing de Blasio’s and Quinn’s speech in their
democratic election programs for 2013 New York Mayoral Elections.
Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 32:1 ► pp. 304 ff.
Temmerman, Martina & Maaike Van de Voorde
2015. Absent husbands and whispering voices: a critical analysis of the representation of men in two popular Flemish women's magazines.
Journal of Gender Studies 24:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Teti, Andrea
2012. The EU's First Response to the ‘Arab Spring’: A Critical Discourse Analysis of thePartnership for Democracy and Shared Prosperity.
Mediterranean Politics 17:3 ► pp. 266 ff.
Valli, Chiara & Feras Hammami
2020. Introducing Business Improvement Districts (BIDs) in Sweden: A social justice appraisal.
European Urban and Regional Studies ► pp. 096977642092552 ff.
Van Dijk, Teun A.
2015.
In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis,
► pp. 466 ff.
Vincent Marrelli, Jocelyne
2006.
In Handbook of Pragmatics,
► pp. 1 ff.
Watson, Danielle, Francis D. Boateng, Nathan Pino & Paula Morgan
2018. The interface between exercise of state power and personal powerlessness: a study of police perceptions of factors impacting professional practices.
Police Practice and Research 19:5 ► pp. 458 ff.
Wilson, John
2015.
In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis,
► pp. 775 ff.
Wodak, Ruth
2005. Inter/trans/post-disciplinarity and the study of language and/in politics.
Journal of Language and Politics 4:2 ► pp. 169 ff.
Wodak, Ruth
2014.
In The Discourse Studies Reader,
► pp. 401 ff.
Xu, Janice Hua
2016.
In Handbook of Research on Human Social Interaction in the Age of Mobile Devices [Advances in Human and Social Aspects of Technology, ],
► pp. 452 ff.
Xu, Janice Hua
2021.
In Research Anthology on Developing Critical Thinking Skills in Students,
► pp. 667 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 07 february 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Communication Studies
BIC Subject: CF – Linguistics
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General