Parentheticals

Editors
Nicole Dehé | Freie Universität Berlin
Yordanka Kavalova | University College London
HardboundAvailable
ISBN 9789027233707 | EUR 115.00 | USD 173.00
 
e-Book
ISBN 9789027291998 | EUR 115.00 | USD 173.00
 
Google Play logo
This volume offers a unique collection of articles investigating the often neglected phenomenon of parentheticals, which are commonly seen as expressions interrupting the linear structure of a host utterance, but lacking a structural relation to it. The book provides an up-to-date introduction to the subject, as well as a range of research articles addressing questions including the syntactic link between parenthetical and frame utterance, the relation between syntactic and prosodic form, the usage and interpretation of parentheticals, and many more. It embraces research findings from different European languages (English, German, Dutch, Romance) and covers an array of forms of syntactic interpolations (from one-word parentheticals to clausal) and a range of methodologies, including empirical research, corpus research, and theoretical analyses. The collection underlines the importance of an interdisciplinary approach to a multi-faceted phenomenon such as parentheticals.
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 106] 2007.  xii, 314 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
“The contributions made here go a long way not just in sharpening our understanding of PTs, but also in asking crucial (though admittedly, by no means new) questions of linguistics theory, such as, what does it mean for a construction to be syntactically integrated inside another; what precisely should we understand by “constituency” and what does it apply to; what are/should be the boundaries of a clause complex/ sentence, and others. To my mind, the success of the book lies not so much in being able to answer these questions, as it does in being able to raise them, and in doing so within the context of rigorous linguistic analysis. In asking these questions, the book provides the opportunity to move away from a limited, narrow-minded prescriptive view of language, where grammaticality is the yardstick which measures every phenomenon, to a more realistic view, where language is understood as an evolving cultural trait and as a tool developed for achieving specific communicative goals. In my view, this is a far more productive and useful endeavour.”
“Parentheticals have so far been largely ingnored in linguistic theory; I am not aware of any model of linguistic analysis that would be able to offer a principled account for the main syntactic, pragmatic, and prosodic characteristics of at least a larger portion of them. Parentheticals provide a challenge to any kind of linguistic theorizing - the problem is that most linguists do not seem to be aware of this. It is hoped that the present volume will be of help in creating an awareness of what linguistic analysis has so far missed by reducing parentheticals to a marginal phenomenon that is elusive to the taxonomic paradigms of linguistic modelling.”
Cited by

Cited by 85 other publications

Ariel, Mira
2014. Orconstructions: Monosemy vs. polysemy. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 333 ff. DOI logo
Barabadi, Elyas, Seyyed Ehsan Golparvar & Amanollah Arghavan
2021. To Put It Differently: A Cross-Disciplinary Investigation of Reformulation Markers in Student Essays. Discourse Processes 58:9  pp. 787 ff. DOI logo
Biberauer, Theresa & Michelle Sheehan
2012. Disharmony, Antisymmetry, and the Final‐over‐Final Constraint. In Ways of Structure Building,  pp. 206 ff. DOI logo
Bornkessel‐Schlesewsky, Ina & Matthias Schlesewsky
2014. Competition in argument interpretation: Evidence from the neurobiology of language. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 107 ff. DOI logo
Bošković, Željko
2012. Don't Feed Your Movements When You Shift Your Objects. In Ways of Structure Building,  pp. 245 ff. DOI logo
Bury, Dirk & Hiroyuki Uchida
2012. Constituent Structure Sets II. In Ways of Structure Building,  pp. 19 ff. DOI logo
Citko, Barbara
2012. A Parallel Merge Solution to the Merchant/Johnson Paradox. In Ways of Structure Building,  pp. 44 ff. DOI logo
Coons, Caitie
2022. Nominal Word Order Typology in Signed Languages. Frontiers in Communication 6 DOI logo
Cristofaro, Sonia
2014. Competing motivation models and diachrony: What evidence for what motivations?. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 282 ff. DOI logo
Cui, Yaxiao
2014. Parentheticals and the presentation of multipersonal consciousness: A stylistic analysis ofMrs Dalloway. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 23:2  pp. 175 ff. DOI logo
Danckaert, Lieven
2015. Spelling out the obvious. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 16:1  pp. 109 ff. DOI logo
DEHÉ, NICOLE
2009. Clausal parentheticals, intonational phrasing, and prosodic theory. Journal of Linguistics 45:3  pp. 569 ff. DOI logo
Dendale, Patrick, Anne Vanderheyden & Melissa Schuring
2022. Visiblement , adverbe de phrase évidentiel ou visiblement , adverbe de constituant exprimant la manière. La prosodie comme nouveau critère. Langages N° 227:3  pp. 57 ff. DOI logo
Deppermann, Arnulf & Jürgen Streeck
2018. The body in interaction. In Time in Embodied Interaction [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 293],  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
DOBASHI, YOSHIHITO
2018. <i>Parentheticals in Spoken English: The Syntax-Prosody</i><i> Relation </i>. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 35:1  pp. 173 ff. DOI logo
Dobrovoljc, Kaja
2017. Multi-word discourse markers and their corpus-driven identification. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 22:4  pp. 551 ff. DOI logo
Dressler, Wolfgang U., Gary Libben & Katharina Korecky‐Kröll
2014. Conflicting vs. convergent vs. interdependent motivations in morphology. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 180 ff. DOI logo
Du Bois, John W.
2014. Motivating competitions. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 262 ff. DOI logo
Epstein, Samuel David, Hisatsugu Kitahara & T. Daniel Seely
2012. Structure Building That Can't Be. In Ways of Structure Building,  pp. 253 ff. DOI logo
Francis, Elaine J. & Laura A. Michaelis
2014. Why move? How weight and discourse factors combine to predict relative clause extraposition in English. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 70 ff. DOI logo
Frazier, Lyn & Charles Clifton
2022. Interpreting Adjuncts: Processing EnglishAs-Clauses. Language and Speech 65:1  pp. 193 ff. DOI logo
Fábregas, Antonio
2012. Evidence for Multidominance in Spanish Agentive Nominalizations. In Ways of Structure Building,  pp. 66 ff. DOI logo
Giorgi, Alessandra
2015. Discourse and the syntax of the left periphery. In Discourse-oriented Syntax [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 226],  pp. 229 ff. DOI logo
Giorgi, Alessandra
Griffiths, James & Mark de Vries
2013. The Syntactic Integration of Appositives: Evidence from Fragments and Ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 44:2  pp. 332 ff. DOI logo
Griffiths, James & Mark de Vries
2019. Parenthesis: Syntactic Integration or Orphanage? A Rejoinder to. Linguistic Inquiry 50:3  pp. 609 ff. DOI logo
Haiman, John
2014. Six competing motives for repetition. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 246 ff. DOI logo
Hannay, Mike & María De los Ángeles Gómez-González
2012. Thematic Parentheticals in Dutch and English. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 6:1-3  pp. 99 ff. DOI logo
Haspelmath, Martin
2014. On system pressure competing with economic motivation. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 197 ff. DOI logo
Hawkins, John A.
2014. Patterns in competing motivations and the interaction of principles. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 54 ff. DOI logo
Heine, Bernd
2018. Are there two different ways of approaching grammaticalization?. In New Trends in Grammaticalization and Language Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 202],  pp. 23 ff. DOI logo
Heine, Bernd, Tania Kuteva & Haiping Long
Helmbrecht, Johannes
2014. Politeness distinctions in personal pronouns: A case study on competing motivations. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 315 ff. DOI logo
Hughes, Mary E. & Shanley E. M. Allen
2014. Competing motivations in children's omission of subjects? The interaction between verb finiteness and referent accessibility. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 144 ff. DOI logo
Ioanesyan, E. R.
2023. Appellative Constructions with Epistemic Modality Predicates. Nauchnyi dialog 12:5  pp. 55 ff. DOI logo
Kaltenböck, Gunther & Bernd Heine
2014. Sentence grammar vs. thetical grammar: Two competing domains?. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 348 ff. DOI logo
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Evelien Keizer & Arne Lohmann
2016. Extra-clausal constituents. In Outside the Clause [Studies in Language Companion Series, 178],  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Krajewski, Grzegorz & Elena Lieven
2014. Competing cues in early syntactic development. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 163 ff. DOI logo
Lahne, Antje
2012. Specificity‐driven Syntactic Derivation. In Ways of Structure Building,  pp. 271 ff. DOI logo
Lamers, Monique J. A. & Helen de Hoop
2014. Animate object fronting in Dutch: A production study. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 42 ff. DOI logo
Lechner, Winfried
2012. Structure Building From Below: More on Survive and Covert Movement. In Ways of Structure Building,  pp. 297 ff. DOI logo
Leclercq, Benoît
2022. From modals to modal constructions. Constructions and Frames 14:2  pp. 226 ff. DOI logo
LEKAKOU, MARIKA & KRISZTA SZENDRŐI
2012. Polydefinites in Greek: Ellipsis, close apposition and expletive determiners. Journal of Linguistics 48:1  pp. 107 ff. DOI logo
Levis, John M. & Anne Wichmann
2015. English Intonation – Form and Meaning. In The Handbook of English Pronunciation,  pp. 139 ff. DOI logo
López-Couso, María José & Belén Méndez-Naya
López-Couso, María José & Belén Méndez-Naya
2016. From clause to adverb. In Outside the Clause [Studies in Language Companion Series, 178],  pp. 157 ff. DOI logo
MacWhinney, Brian
2014. Conclusions: Competition across time. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 364 ff. DOI logo
Brian MacWhinney, Andrej Malchukov & Edith Moravcsik
2014. Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, DOI logo
Malchukov, Andrej
2014. Resolving alignment conflicts: A competing motivations approach. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 16 ff. DOI logo
Matsui, Tomoko
2014. Children’s understanding of linguistic expressions of certainty and evidentiality. In Pragmatic Development in First Language Acquisition [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 10],  pp. 295 ff. DOI logo
Miller, Jim & Andreea S. Calude
2020. Speaking and Writing English. In The Handbook of English Linguistics,  pp. 547 ff. DOI logo
Miyamoto, Yoichi
2012. On Transparent Adjuncts in Japanese. In Ways of Structure Building,  pp. 330 ff. DOI logo
Mondorf, Britta
2014. Apparently competing motivations in morphosyntactic variation. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 209 ff. DOI logo
Moneglia, Massimo
2022. Le unità di informazione Parentetiche alla periferia destra del Comment nella Teoria della Lingua in Atto. DILEF. Rivista digitale del Dipartimento di Lettere e Filosofia :1  pp. 88 ff. DOI logo
Monforte, Sergio
2022. Modalitate-markatzaileak: partikula modalak ote dira euskarazko partikula modalak? [Marcadores de modalidad: ¿son realmente las partículas modales del vasco partículas modales?]. Fontes Linguae Vasconum :132  pp. 515 ff. DOI logo
Moravcsik, Edith
2014. Introduction. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
2014. Where do motivations compete?. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 299 ff. DOI logo
Ott, Dennis
2016. Fragment Anchors Do Not Support the Syntactic Integration of Appositive Relative Clauses: Reply to Griffiths and De Vries 2013. Linguistic Inquiry 47:3  pp. 580 ff. DOI logo
Peng, Xinjia
2018. The emergence of a discourse construction in the internet. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 9:2  pp. 209 ff. DOI logo
Pfeiffer, Martin
2014. Formal vs. functional motivations for the structure of self‐repair in German. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 229 ff. DOI logo
Rhee, Seongha
2013. “I Know I’m Shameless to Say this”: Grammaticalization of the Mitigating Discourse Marker Makilay in Korean. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 97  pp. 480 ff. DOI logo
Rodríguez, Catalina Fuentes
2021. Discursive functions and constructionalization of independent "subordinate" sentences in Spanish. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 87  pp. 173 ff. DOI logo
Rowland, Caroline F., Claire Noble & Angel Chan
2014. Competition all the way down: How children learn word order cues to sentence meaning. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 127 ff. DOI logo
Sabet, Peyman G.P. & Grace Q. Zhang
2018. The Pragmatic Functions of ‘I Don't Think’ and ‘I Think + Not’. Australian Journal of Linguistics 38:3  pp. 421 ff. DOI logo
Saccone, Valentina & Chiara Trombetta
2021. Parenthetical Units and Structures in Italian and German spoken language: Prosodic and textual analysis. CHIMERA: Revista de Corpus de Lenguas Romances y Estudios Lingüísticos 8  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Serrano-Losada, Mario
2017. On Englishturn outand Spanishresultarmirative constructions. Journal of Historical Linguistics 7:1-2  pp. 160 ff. DOI logo
SHIBASAKI, REIJIROU
2014. ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF <i>THE POINT IS </i>AND RELATED ISSUES IN THE HISTORY OF AMERICAN ENGLISH. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 31:1  pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
Soltic, Jorie
2015. Parenthetical “I say (you)” in Late Medieval Greek vernacular. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 16:2  pp. 187 ff. DOI logo
Strunk, Jan
2014. A statistical model of competing motivations affecting relative clause extraposition in German. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. 88 ff. DOI logo
VAN BOGAERT, JULIE
2010. A constructional taxonomy ofI thinkand related expressions: accounting for the variability of complement-taking mental predicates. English Language and Linguistics 14:3  pp. 399 ff. DOI logo
Nuria Yáñez-Bouza, Emma Moore, Linda van Bergen & Willem B. Hollmann
2019. Categories, Constructions, and Change in English Syntax, DOI logo
Кустова, Г.И., Kustova, G.I., Н.Б. Швелидзе & N.B. Shvelidze
2020. Системные свойства апеллятивных вводных конструкций (по данным Национального корпуса русского языка). Научно-техническая информация. Серия 2: Информационные процессы и системы :9  pp. 27 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2009. Publications received. Lingua 119:9  pp. 1366 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2012. Ways of Structure Building,  pp. 424 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2012. Copyright Page. In Ways of Structure Building,  pp. vi ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2012. Abbreviations. In Ways of Structure Building,  pp. xvii ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2012. Notes on Contributors. In Ways of Structure Building,  pp. xiii ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2012. General Preface. In Ways of Structure Building,  pp. xi ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. List of figures and tables. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. xiv ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. Notes on contributors. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. viii ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. Copyright Page. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. iv ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. Preface. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. vii ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. List of abbreviations. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,  pp. xviii ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 february 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects

Main BIC Subject

CFK: Grammar, syntax

Main BISAC Subject

LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
ONIX Metadata
ONIX 2.1
ONIX 3.0
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2007009986 | Marc record