Bare Nominals in Brazilian Portuguese

An integral approach

| University of Zurich
Hardbound – Available
ISBN 9789027257284 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
 
e-Book –
ISBN 9789027264657 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
 
Over the last three decades, Brazilian Portuguese bare nominals have turned into a hot topic in the cross-linguistic study of nominal syntax and semantics. This contribution is the first comprehensive, book-length treatment of the issue, covering both the long-standing discussion about the adequate analysis of these forms as well as the establishment of a solid empirical basis for future research. The book goes further than previous accounts in also taking into consideration the phonetic-phonological dimension, showing the advantages of a more comprehensive account. The empirical section outlines an innovative approach in which different methods and data types are combined and focuses on the underresearched definite / specific / referential uses and interpretations of bare singulars. The book also addresses the traditional topics in the study of bare nominals – genericity, the mass/count distinction, NP-internal plural agreement, the NP/DP distinction, and syntax-semantics-phonology interface questions – in the light of the new findings.
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 245]  2017.  xv, 322 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.245
Table of Contents
Index of tables
ix–x
Index of figures
xi
List of abbreviations and remarks on glosses
xiii–xiv
Acknowledgments
xv
Chapter 1. Introduction
2–51
Chapter 2. The literature on Brazilian Portuguese bare nominals
54–104
Chapter 3. Article assimilation and bare nominals
106–160
Chapter 4. Definite/specific (and some generic) BSs in corpora
162–201
Chapter 5. Acceptability Judgment Tasks on generic and specific bare singulars
204–247
Chapter 6. Towards an integral approach
250–299
Bibliography
301–314
Author index
315
Subject index
References

Bibliography

Corpora and other linguistic data sources and tools

de Andrade, Mário
1978 Macunaíma: O herói sem nenhum caráter. Rio de Janeiro: LTC Editora.Google Scholar
BDI
Roncarati, Cláudia. Banco de dados interacionais. Programa de estudos sobre o uso da língua. Rio de Janeiro: UFRJ.
Centro Virtual Camões
Mapa VI: Localização das Amostras – Gravações do Grupo de Variação do Centro de Linguística da Universidade de Lisboa. http://​cvc​.instituto​-camoes​.pt​/hlp​/geografia​/mapa06​.html (11 June 2017).
Davies, Mark & Ferreira, Michael
2006– Corpus do Português: 45 million words, 1300s–1900s. http://​www​.corpusdoportugues​.org (11 June 2017).
E-Prime 2
. Psychology Software Tools, Inc.2012 <http://​www​.pstnet​.com 11 August 2017.
IBORUNA. Gonçalves, Sebastião Carlos Leite (org)
Banco de dados Iboruna: amostras eletrônicas do português falado no interior paulista. http://​www​.iboruna​.ibilce​.unesp​.br​/index​.php (11 June 2017).
Linguateca
http://​www​.linguateca​.pt/ (11 June 2017).
Mayer, Mercer
2003 A boy, a Dog, and a Frog. New York NY: Dial Books for Young Readers.Google Scholar
2003 Frog Goes to Dinner. New York NY: Dial Books for Young Readers.Google Scholar
2003 Frog on his own. New York NY: Dial Books for Young Readers.Google Scholar
2003 Frog, where are you? New York NY: Dial Books for Young Readers.Google Scholar
MOBRAL
Movimento Brasileiro de Alfabetização. Rio de Janeiro: UFRJ. http://​www​.letras​.ufrj​.br​/peul​/mobral​.html (11 June 2017).
NURC-RJ
Projeto norma linguística urbana culta. Rio de Janeiro: UFRJ. http://​www​.letras​.ufrj​.br​/nurc​-rj (11 June 11 2017).
PEUL-RJ
Programa de estudos sobre o uso da língua. Rio de Janeiro: UFRJ. http://​www​.letras​.ufrj​.br​/peul (11 June 2017).
TdE2
. Padilha, José & Prado, Marcos producers Padilha, José (director) 2010 Tropa de Elite 2. O Inimigo Agora É Outro [Motion Picture]. Brazil: Feijão Filmes; Riofilme; Globo Filmes.Google Scholar
WebExp2
School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh. http://​groups​.inf​.ed​.ac​.uk​/webexp/ (11 June 2017).

References

Abaurre, Maria B. M.
1994 Acento frasal e processos fonológicos segmentais. Letras de Hoje 10(4): 41–50.Google Scholar
Abney, Steven P.
1987 The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Aguilar Guevara, Ana
2014 Weak Definites: Semantics, Lexicon and Pragmatics [International Series 360]. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, Haegeman, Liliane M. V. & Stavrou, Melita
2007 Noun Phrase in the Generative Perspective [Studies in Generative Grammar 71]. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alonso, Amado
1967 Estudios lingüísticos: Temas hispanoamericanos. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Álvarez, Rosario & Xove, Xosé
2002 Gramática da lingua galega [Manuais 5]. Vigo: Editorial Galaxia.Google Scholar
Amaral, Amadeu
1920 O dialeto caipira: Gramática – vocabulario. São Paulo: Huitec.Google Scholar
de Andrade, Mário
1984 Macunaíma. Translated from Brazilian Portuguese by E. A. Goodland. New York NY: Random House.Google Scholar
Autelli, Erica
In preparation. Il Genovese poetico attraverso i secoli. PhD dissertation, Universität Innsbruck.
Bader, Markus & Häussler, Jana
2010 Toward a model of grammaticality judgments. Journal of Linguistics 46(2): 273–330. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bagno, Marcos
2014 Gramática pedagógica do português brasileiro [Referenda 1]. São Paulo: Parábola.Google Scholar
Bale, Alan C. & Barner, David
2009 The interpretation of functional heads: Using comparatives to explore the mass/count distinction. Journal of Semantics 26(3): 217–252. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barton, Ellen L.
1998 The grammar of telegraphic structures: Sentential and nonsentential derivation. Journal of English Linguistics 26(2): 37–67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barwise, Jon & Perry, John
1983 Situations and Attitudes. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bechara, Evanildo
1999 Moderna gramática portuguesa. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Lucerna.Google Scholar
Berezowski, Leszek
2009 The Myth of the Zero Article. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Beviláqua, Kayron, Lima, Suzi & Pires de Oliveira, Roberta
2016 Bare nouns in Brazilian Portuguese: An experimental study on grinding. In Number: Cognitive, Semantic and Crosslinguistic Approaches, Susan Rothstein & Jurģis Šķilters, (eds), Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 11: 1–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beviláqua, Kayron & Pires de Oliveira, Roberta
2014 Brazilian bare phrases and referentiality: Evidences from an experiment. Revista Letras 90: 253–275. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bird, Alexander & Tobin, Emma
2017 Natural kinds. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring 2017 edn, Edward N. Zalta (ed.), https://​plato​.stanford​.edu​/archives​/spr2017​/entries​/natural​-kinds/ (11 June 2017).
Bisol, Leda
1996a Sândi externo: O processo e a variação. In Grámatica do português falado: Convergências [ Série Pesquisas 5], Mary A. Kato & Ataliba T. de Castilho (eds), 55–96. Campinas: Editora da Unicamp.Google Scholar
1996b Sândi vocálico externo. In Gramática do português falado, Vol.2: Níveis de análise lingüística, Rodolfo Ilari (ed.), 21–38. Campinas: Editora da Unicamp.Google Scholar
2000 A Elisão, uma regra variável. Letras de Hoje 35(1): 319–330.Google Scholar
2002 A degeminação e a elisão no VARSUL. In Fonologia e variação: Recortes do português brasileiro, Leda Bisol & Cláudia Brescancini (eds), 231–250. Porto Alegre: EDIPUCRS.Google Scholar
2003 Sandhi in Brazilian Portuguese. Probus 15(2): 177–200. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bizzocchi, Aldo
2002 Vocalicidade e consonantalidade nas línguas européias: Estudo das terminações de palavras com vistas ao estabelecimento de uma tipologia. Unifieo 4(1).Google Scholar
Blache, Philippe
2000 Constraints, linguistic theories, and natural language processing. In Natural Language Processing – NLP 2000 [Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1835], Dimitris N. Christodoulakis (ed.), 221–232. Heidelberg: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blache, Philippe
2005 Property grammars: A fully constraint-based theory. In Constraint Solving and Language Processing [Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 3438], Henning Christiansen, Peter R. Skadhauge & Jørgen Villadsen (eds), 1–16. Berlin: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blache, Philippe
2007 Model theoretic syntax is not generative enumerative syntax with constraints: Under what condition? In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Constraints and Language Processing, Henning Christiansen & Jørgen Villadsen (eds), 29–39. Roskilde.Google Scholar
2016 Representing syntax by means of properties: A formal framework for descriptive approaches. Journal of Language Modelling 4(2): 183–224. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blache, Philippe, Christiansen, Henning, Dahl, Verónica, Duchier, Denis & Villadsen, Jørgen
2014 Constraints and Language. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Blache, Philippe & Prost, Jean-Philippe
2014 Model-theoretic syntax: Property grammars, status and directions. In Constraints and Language, Philippe Blache, Henning Christiansen, Verónica Dahl, Denis Duchier & Jørgen Villadsen (eds), 37–59. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan
1995 Morphosyntax: The Syntax of Verbal Inflection. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul
1998 Functional Phonology: Formalizing the Interactions between Articulatory and Perceptual Drives. The Hague: HAG.Google Scholar
1999 On the need for a separate perception grammar [Rutgers Optimality Archive 358]. Ms, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit
2005 Structuring Sense, Vol. I: In Name Only. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Borsley, Robert D. & Börjars, Kersti
2011 Non-transformational Syntax: Formal and Explicit Models of Grammar. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bošković, Željko
2007 What will you have, DP or NP? In Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 37, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Emily Elfner & Martin Walkow (eds), 101–114. Amherst MA: University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Bosque, Ignacio & Demonte, Violeta
1999 Gramática descriptiva de la lengua espanola [Coleccion Nebrija y Bello]. Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar
Braga, João Vinícius de Almeida, de Sena, Laiza, Mariano, Ruan & Pires de Oliveira, Roberta
2010 Bare singular and bare mass nouns in Brazilian Portuguese: First results of an empirical survey. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 9(1): 75–94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brandão, Silvia F. & Vieira, Silvia R.
2012 A concordância nominal e verbal no português do Brasil e no português de São Tomé: Uma abordagem sociolinguística. PAPIA 22(1): 7–39.Google Scholar
Britto, Helena
1998 Deslocamento à esquerda, resumptivo-sujeito, ordem SV e a codificação sintática de juízos categórico e tético no português do Brasil. PhD dissertation, UNICAMP, Campinas.Google Scholar
2000 Syntactic codification of categorical and thetic judgments in Brazilian Portuguese. In Brazilian Portuguese and the Null Subject Parameter [Ediciones de Iberoamericana, Serie B, Lingüistica 4], Mary A. Kato & Esmeralda V. Negrão (eds), 183–208. Madrid & Frankfurt: Iberoamericana & Vervuert.Google Scholar
Büring, Daniel
1996 A weak theory of strong readings. In Proceedings of SALT VI, Teresa Galloway & Justin Spence (eds), 17–34. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Linguistic Publications.Google Scholar
Butler, Brian
2012 A Semantic Map Approach to English Articles (a, the and Ø). PhD dissertation, University of Oregon.Google Scholar
Callou, Dinah, Moraes, João & Leite, Yonne
2013 Consoantes em coda silábica: /s, r, l/. In A construção fonológica da palavra [Gramática do português culto falado no Brasil 7], Maria Bernadete Marques Abaurre Gnerre (ed.), 167–194. São Paulo: Editora Contexto.Google Scholar
Câmara, Joaquim M.
1970 Estrutura da línuga portuguêsa. Petrópolis: Editora Vozes.Google Scholar
Cardona, George
1997 Pāṇini: His Work and Tradition. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Carlson, Gregory Norman
1977 A unified analysis of the English bare plural. Linguistics and Philosophy 1: 413–457. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003 No lack of determination. In The Second Glot International State-of-the-article Book: The Latest in Linguistics, Lisa L. S. Cheng & Rint P. E. Sybesma (eds), 149–178. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
2006 The meaningful bounds of incorporation. In Non-definiteness and Plurality [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 95], Svetlana Vogeleer & Liliane Tasmowski (eds), 35–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 Generics and concepts. In Kinds, Things and Stuff, Francis Jeffry Pelletier (ed.), 16–35. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
de Castilho, Ataliba T.
1989 O artigo no português culto falado em São Paulo. In Português culto falado no Brasil, Ataliba T. de Castilho (ed.), 67–87. Campinas: Editora da Unicamp.Google Scholar
2010 Nova gramática do português brasileiro. São Paulo: Contexto.Google Scholar
Chesterman, Andrew
1991 On Definiteness: A Study with Special Reference to English and Finnish [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 56]. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro
1998 Reference to kinds across languages. Linguistic Inquiry 6(4): 339–405.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1981 Lectures on Government and Binding [Studies in Generative Grammar 9]. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
1982 On the representation of form and function. The Linguistic Review 1(1): 3–40.Google Scholar
1986 Barriers [Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 13]. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1995 Bare phrase structure. In Government and Binding Theory and the Minimalist Program: Principles and Parameters in Syntactic Theory [Generative Syntax 1], Gert Webelhuth (ed.), 365–439. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2001 Derivation by Phase. Ken Hale: A Life in Language [Current Studies in Linguistics 36], Michael J. Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–52. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2007 Approaching UG from below. In Interfaces + Recursion = Language? Chomsky’s Minimalism and the View from Syntax-Semantics [Studies in Generative Grammar 89], Uli Sauerland & Hans-Martin Gärtner (eds), 1–29. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Cohen, Ariel
2004 Existential generics. Linguistics and Philosophy 27(2): 137–168. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, Robin
1982 Binding in wholewheat* syntax (*unenriched with inaudibilia). In The Nature of Syntactic Representation [Synthese Language Library, Texts and Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 15], Pauline Jacobson & Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds), 59–78. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coseriu, Eugenio
1952 Sistema, norma y habla. Montevideo: Universidad de Montevideo.Google Scholar
1955 Determinación y entorno. Dos problemas de una lingüística del hablar. Romanistisches Jahrbuch 7: 29–54.Google Scholar
1985 Linguistic competence: What is it really? The Modern Language Review 80(4): xxv–xxxv. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Costa, Francisco & Branco, António
2014 A Computational Grammar for Deep Linguistic Processing of Portuguese: LXGram, version 5. [Technical Report]. Lisbon: University of Lisbon, Department of Informatics.Google Scholar
Copestake, Ann, Flickinger, Dan, Pollard, Carl & Sag, Ivan A.
2005 Minimal recursion semantics: An introduction. Research on Language and Computation 3: 281–322. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Culicover, Peter W. & Jackendoff, Ray
2005 Simpler Syntax [Oxford Linguistics]. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cunha, Celso & Cintra, Luís Filipe Lindley
2001 Nova gramática do português contemporâneo. Rio de Janeiro: Ed. Nova Fronteira.Google Scholar
Cyrino, Sonia & Espinal, M. Teresa
2015 Bare nominals in Brazilian Portuguese: More on the DP/NP analysis. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 33(2): 471–521. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
D’Alessandro, Roberta & Scheer, Tobias
2015 Modular PIC. Linguistic Inquiry 46(4): 593–624. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dardano, Maurizio & Trifone, Pietro
1997 La nuova grammatica della lingua italiana. Bologna: Zanichelli.Google Scholar
Dayal, Veneeta
2011 Bare noun phrases. In Maienborn, von Heusinger & Portner (eds), 1088–1109. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen
2010 Number neutral amounts and pluralities in Brazilian Portuguese. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 9(1): 53–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen & Laca, Brenda
2003 Les noms sans déterminant dans les langues romanes. In Les langues romanes: Problèmes de la phrase simple, Danièle Godard & Anne Abeillé (eds), 235–281. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen & Pires de Oliveira, Roberta
2008 Reference to kinds in Brazilian Portuguese: Definite singulars vs. bare singulars. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 12, Atle Grønn (ed.), 107–121. Oslo: University of Oslo.Google Scholar
2010 Generic bare singulars in Brazilian Portuguese. In Romance Linguistics 2008: Interactions in Romance: Selected Papers from the 38th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Urbana-Champaign, April 2008 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 313], Karlos Arregi, Zsuzsanna Fagyal, Silvina Montrul & Annie Tremblay (eds), 203–216. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Duchier, Denys, Dao, Thi-Bich-Hanh, Parmentier, Yannick & Lesaint, Willy
2012 Property grammar parsing seen as a constraint optimization problem. In Formal Grammar [Lecture Notes in Computer Science 7395], Philippe de Groote & Mark-Jan Nederhof (eds), 82–96. Heidelberg: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Emonds, Joseph
2012 Which is the extended projection above N? In Functional Heads [The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 7], Laura Brugé, Anna Cardinaletti, Giuliana Giusti, Nicola Munaro & Cecilia Poletto (eds), 325–337. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Farkas, Donka F. & de Swart, Henriëtte
2003 The Semantics of Incorporation: From Argument Structure to Discourse Transparency [Stanford Monographs in Linguistics]. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Featherston, Sam
2008 Thermometer judgements as linguistic evidence. In Was ist linguistische Evidenz? Kolloquium des Zentrums Sprachenvielfalt und Mehrsprachigkeit, November 2006 [ZSM-Studien 2], Claudia M. Riehl & Astrid Rothe (eds), 69–89. Aachen: Shaker.Google Scholar
Ferreira, Marcelo
2010 The morpho-semantics of number in Brazilian Portuguese bare singulars. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 9(1): 95–116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, Maristela
2009 A construção de ação rotineira no português do Brasil – Buscar menino no colégio, pular carnaval na Bahia e jogar lenha na fogueira. In Construções do português do Brasil: Da gramática ao discurso, Neusa S. Miranda & Maria Margarida Martins Salomão (eds). Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG.Google Scholar
Féry, Caroline, Kaiser, Elsi, Hörnig, Robin, Weskott, Thomas & Kliegl, Reinhold
2009 Perception of intonational contours on given and new referents: A completion study and an eye-movement experiment. In Phonology in Perception [Phonology and Phonetics 15], Paul Boersma & Silke Hamann (eds), 235–266. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Fischer, Susann & Gabriel, Christoph
2016 Manual of Grammatical Interfaces in Romance [Manuals of Romance Linguistics 10]. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fleischer, Wolfgang
1967 Zur Funktion des Artikels in der deuschen Sprache der Gegenwart. Acta Universitatis Wratislaviensis 60: 131–160.Google Scholar
Fortuna, Antonella
2002 Grammatica siciliana: Principali regole grammaticali, fonetiche e grafiche (comparate tra i vari dialetti siciliani). Caltanissetta: Terzo millennio.Google Scholar
Frota, Sonia
2000 Prosody and Focus in European Portuguese: Phonological Phrasing and Intonation [Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics]. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Gerstner-Link, Claudia
1995 Über Generizität. Generische Nominalausdrücke in singulären und generellen Aussagen [Studien zur Theoretischen Linguistik 13]. München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H.
1978 How does a language acquire gender markers? In Universals of Human Language: Word Structure [Universals of Human Language 3], Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), 47–82. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Guidi, Luiz G.
2011 Are Brazilian Portuguese bare singulars incorporated? Vernaculum 2(1).Google Scholar
Guillemin, Diana
2011 The Syntax and Semantics of a Determiner System: A Case Study of Mauritian Creole [Creole Language Library 38]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Martin
1977 ‘Demonstratives’, ‘articles’ and ‘third person pronouns’ in French: Change in progress. Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie 93(3–4): 249–261.Google Scholar
Hawkins, John A.
2004 Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars [Oxford Linguistics]. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heim, Irene
1982 The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Narrog, Heiko
2010 The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis [Oxford Handbooks in Linguistics]. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Herbelot, Aurelie & Copestake, Ann
2009 Annotating genericity: How do humans decide? (A case study in ontology extraction). In The Fruits of Empirical Linguistics, Vol. 1: Processes [Studies in Generative Grammar 101], Sam Featherston & Susanne Winkler (eds), 103–121. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
von Heusinger, Klaus
2002 Specificity and definiteness in sentence and discourse structure. Journal of Semantics 19(3): 245–274. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 Definiteness [Oxford Bibliographies Online]. http://​www​.oxfordbibliographies​.com​/view​/document​/obo​-9780199772810​/obo​-9780199772810​-0063​.xml (11 June 2017). Crossref
da Hora, Dermeval
2006 Vocalização da lateral /l/: Correlação entre restrições sociais e estruturais. Scripta 9(18): 29–44.Google Scholar
Ilari, Rodolfo & Basso, Renato M.
In prep. On the history of semantics studies in Brazil. Manual of Brazilian Portuguese Linguistics [Manuals of Romance Linguistics 21], Johannes Kabatek, José Simões da Silva & Albert Wall eds Berlin De Gruyter Mouton
Ilari, Rodolfo & Neves, Maria Helena de Moura
(eds) 2008 Gramática do Português culto falado no Brasil. Campinas: Unicamp.Google Scholar
Ionin, Tania
2006  This is definitely specific: Specificity and definiteness in article systems. Natural Language Semantics 14(2): 175–234. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ionin, Tania, Grolla, Elaine, Montrul, Silvana & Santos, Hélade
2014 When Articles Have Different Meanings. Acquiring the Expression of Genericity in English and Brazilian Portuguese. In Crosslinguistic Studies on Noun Phrase Structure and Reference, Patricia Cabredo Hofherr & Anne Zribi-Hertz (eds), 367–397. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ionin, Tania, Montrul, Silvina & Santos, Hélade
2011 An experimental investigantion of the expression of genericity in English, Spanish and Brazilian Portuguese. Lingua 121(5): 963–985. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1997 The Architecture of the Language Faculty [Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 28]. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
1971a Das Nullzeichen. In Selected Writings, 2: Word and Language, Roman Jakobson (ed.), 220–222. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
1971b Signe Zéro. In Selected Writings, 2: Word and Language, Roman Jakobson (ed.), 211–219. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Joosten, Frank
2003 Accounts of the count-mass distinction: A critical survey. Nordlyd 31(1): 216–229.Google Scholar
Kabatek, Johannes
2002 Gibt es einen Grammatikalisierungszyklus des Artikels in der Romania? Romanistisches Jahrbuch 53: 56–80.Google Scholar
2005a Die Bolognesische Renaissance und der Ausbau romanischer Sprachen: Juristische Diskurstraditionen und Sprachentwicklung in Südfrankreich und Spanien im 12. und 13. Jahrhundert [Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 321]. Tübingen: Ni-emeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005b Existe-t-il un cycle de grammaticalisation de l’article dans les langues romanes? In La variabilité en langue, Vol II: Les quatre variations, Rika van Deyck, Rosanna Sornicola & Johannes Kabatek (eds), 139–172. Gand: Communication & Cognition.Google Scholar
2007 Existe um ciclo de gramaticalização do artigo na România? In Para a história do Português Brasileiro, Vol. 5: Estudos sobre mudança lingüística e história social, Jânia M. Ramos (ed.), 13–51. Belo Horizonte: Faculdade de Letras da UFMG.Google Scholar
Kabatek, Johannes, Obrist, Philipp & Vincis, Valentina
2010 Clause linkage techniques as a symptom of discourse traditions: Methodological issues and evidence from Romance languages. In Syntactic Variation and Genre, Heidrun Dorgeloh & Anja Wanner (eds), 247–275. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kabatek, Johannes & Wall, Albert
(eds) 2013 New Perspectives on Bare Noun Phrases in Romance and Beyond [Studies in Language Companion Series 141]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kamp, Hans & Reyle, Uwe
1993 From Discourse to Logic: Introduction to Model Theoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic, and Discourse Representation Theory [Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 42]. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kirsling, Ross
2012 Probabilities without Paradigm-Shifting: Recognizing Gradience in Natural Language Syntax. http://​rkirsling​.github​.io​/papers​/gradience​-squib​.pdf (11 June 2017).
Koch, Peter
1988 Norm und Sprache. In Das sprachtheoretische Denken Eugenio Coserius in der Diskussion (1). Energeia und Ergon. Sprachliche Variation – Sprachgeschichte – Sprachtypologie, Harald Thun (ed.), 327–354. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
1997 Diskurstraditionen. Zu ihrem sprachtheoretischen Status und ihrer Dynamik. In Gattungen mittelalterlicher Schriftlichkeit [Script Oralia 99], Barbara Frank, Thomas Haye & Doris Tophinke (eds), 43–79. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Koch, Peter & Oesterreicher, Wulf
1985 Sprache der Nähe – Sprache der Distanz. Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit im Spannungsfeld von Sprachtheorie und Sprachgeschichte. Romanistische Forschungen 36: 15–43.Google Scholar
Komatsu, Mariana & Santos, Raquel S.
2007 A variação na aquisição de regras de sândi externo em português brasileiro. DELTA 23(2): 223–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kosta, Peter
1995/1996 Empty categories, null-subjects and null-objects and how to treat them in the Minimalist Program. Linguistics in Potsdam 2–3: 7–38.Google Scholar
Kracht, Marcus
2007 Compositionality: The very idea. Research on Language and Computation 5(3): 287–308. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
2004 Bare NPs: Kind-referring, indefinites, both, or neither? In Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) XIII, Robert B. Young & Yuping Zhou (eds), 180–203. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred, Pelletier, Francis J., Carlson, Gregory Norman, ter Meulen, Alice G. B., Link, Godehard & Chierchia, Gennaro
1995 Genericity: An introduction. In The Generic Book Gregory Norman Carlson & Francis J. Pelletier (eds), 1–124. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Krivochen, Diego G. & Kosta, Peter
2013 Eliminating Empty Categories: A Radically Minimalist View on Their Ontology and Justification [Potsdam Linguistic Investigations 11]. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuroda, Sige-Yuki
1972 The categorical and the thetic judgment: Evidence from Japanese syntax. Foundations of Language 9(2): 153–185.Google Scholar
Laca, Brenda
2013 Spanish bare plurals and topicalizations. In Kabatek & Wall (eds), 95–119. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Landman, Fred
1989 Groups, I. Linguistics and Philosophy 12(5): 559–605. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Lange, Joke, Vasic, Nada & Avrutin, Sergey
2009 Reading between the (head)lines: A processing account of article omissions in newspaper headlines and child speech. Lingua 119(10): 1523–1540. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lieb, Hans-Heinrich
1983 Integrational Linguistics, Vol. I: General Outline [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 17]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Lima, Suzi & Quadro Gomes, Ana P.
2016 The interpretation of Brazilian Portuguese bare singulars in neutral contexts. Revista Letras 93: 193–209. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Link, Godehard
1983 The logical analysis of plurals and mass terms: A lattice theoretical approach. In Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language [Foundations of Communication and Cognition], Rainer Bäuerle, Christoph Schwarze & Arnim von Stechow (eds), 302–323. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Löbner, Sebastian
1985 Definites. Journal of Semantics 4(4): 279–326. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1990 Wahr neben falsch: Duale Operatoren als die Quantoren natürlicher Sprache [Linguistische Arbeiten 244]. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Löbner, Sebastian
2000 Polarity in natural language: Predication, quantification and negation in particular and characterizing sentences. Linguistics and Philosophy 23(3): 213–308. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Löbner, Sebastian
2011 Concept types and determination. Journal of Semantics 28(3): 279–333. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 Understanding Semantics [Understanding Language Series]. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
2016 The semantics of nominals. The Routledge Handbook of Semantics [Routledge Handbooks in Linguistics], Nick Riemer (ed.), 293–302. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Longobardi, Giuseppe
1994 Reference and proper names: A theory of N-movement in syntax and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry 25(4): 609–665.Google Scholar
2001 The structure of DPs: Some principles, parameters and problems. In The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory [Blackwell Handbooks in Linguistics], Mark R. Baltin & Chris Collins (eds), 562–603. Malden MA: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lopes, Ruth E. Vasconcellos
2006 Bare nouns and DP number agreement in the acquisition of Brazilian Portuguese. In Selected Proceedings of the 9th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, Nuria Sagarra & Almeida J. Toribio (eds), 252–262. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Macdonell, Arthur A.
1927 A Sanskrit Grammar for Students. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Maienborn, Claudia, von Heusinger, Klaus & Portner, Paul
(eds) 2011 Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, Vol. 2 [Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science (HSK) 33.2]. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manning, Christopher
2003 Probabilistic syntax. In Probabilistic Linguistics, Rens Bod, Jennifer Hay & Stefanie Jannedy (eds), 289–341. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mariano, Ruan
2013 Nominais nus, tópico e foco: Testando a aceitabilidade em sentenças episódicas. MA thesis, UFSC, Florianópolis.Google Scholar
Märzhäuser, Christina
2013 Coordinated bare nouns in French, Spanish and European Portuguese. In Kabatek & Wall (eds), 283–300. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Massini-Cagliari, Gladis
2008 Sandhi: A comparative study between Archaic and Brazilian Portuguese. In Contemporary Phonology in Brazil, Leda Bisol & Cláudia Brescancini (eds), 84–109. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Mateus, Maria Helena M. & d’Andrade, Ernesto
2000 The Phonology of Portuguese. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John
1986 Gemination and antigemination. Linguistic Inquiry 17(2): 207–263.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John & Prince, Alan
1994 The emergence of the unmarked: Optimality in prosodic morphology. In Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 24, Mercedes Gonzàlez (ed.), 333–379. Amherst MA: GSLA.Google Scholar
Meisterfeld, Reinhard
1998 Numerus und Nominalaspekt: Eine Studie zur romanischen Apprehension [Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 293]. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
2000 Die unbestimmte Bestimmung: Zur Entstehung des unbestimmten Artikels in den romanischen Sprachen. In Linguistica romanica et indiana: Festschrift für Wolf Dietrich zum 60. Geburtstag, Bruno Staib (ed.), 303–332. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Mendoza, Imke
2004 Nominaldetermination im Polnischen: Die primären Ausdrucksmittel. Habilitationsschrift, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München.Google Scholar
Menuzzi, Sérigo d. M., Silva, Maria Cristina F. & Doetjes, Jenny
2015 Subject bare singulars in Brazilian Portuguese and information structure. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 14(1): 7–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miller, George A.
1975 Some comments on competence and performance. In Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences [Developmental Psycholinguistics and Communication Disorders 263], 201–204. New York NY: New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Milsark, Gary
1977 Toward an explanation of certain peculiarities of the existential construction in English. Linguistic Analysis 3: 1–29.Google Scholar
Müller, Ana L.
2002 Genericity and the denotation of common nouns in Brazilian Portuguese. DELTA 18(2): 287–308. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Ana L. & Oliveira, Fátima
2004 Bare nominals and number in Brazilian and European Portuguese. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 3(1): 9–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Ana L. & Paraguassu-Martins, Nize
2007 A distinção contável-massivo nas línguas naturais. Letras 73: 169–183.Google Scholar
Müller, Stefan
2016 Grammatical Theory: From Transformational Grammar to Constraint-based Approaches. Berlin: Language Science Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Munn, Alan & Schmitt, Cristina
2002 Bare nouns and the morphosyntax of number. In Current Issues in Romance Languages [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 220], Teresa Satterfield, Christina Tortora & Diana Cresti (eds), 225–239. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005 Number and indefinites. Lingua 115: 821–855. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nagore Laín, Francho
1979 Gramática de la lengua aragonesa. Zaragoza: Librería General.Google Scholar
Neves, Maria Helena de Moura
2000 Gramática de usos do português. São Paulo: Editora UNESP.Google Scholar
Nogueira, Milca V.
2007a Por uma nova regra de elisão. In Interface da Ciência Lingüística com as demais áreas do conhecimento: domínios e fronteiras. Seleção de textos proferidos durante o VIII Encontro dos Alunos de Pós-Graduação em Lingüística da Universidade de São Paulo, Cristiane B. Santos, Cristiane C. Silva, Leandro O. de Neris, Lidia L. da Silva, Renata T. Leung & Sueli M. R. da Silva (eds). São Paulo: Paulistana Editora.Google Scholar
2007b Aspectos segmentais dos processos de sândi vocálico externo no falar de São Paulo. MA thesis, USP, São Paulo. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Noll, Volker
1999 Das brasilianische Portugiesisch: Herausbildung und Kontraste. Heidelberg: C. Winter.Google Scholar
Noteboom, Sieb G.
1969 The tongue slips into patterns. In Nomen: Leyden Studies in Linguistics and Phonetics, A. G. Sciarone, A. J. van Essen & A. A. van Raad (eds), 114–132. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Nueva gramática de la Lengua Española: Morfología y Sintaxis I
2009 Madrid: Espasa Libros.Google Scholar
Oesterreicher, Wulf
1997 Zur Fundierung von Diskurstraditionen. In Gattungen mittelalterlicher Schriftlichkeit [ScriptOralia 99], Barbara Frank, Thomas Haye & Doris Tophinke (eds), 19–41. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Palácio, Adair, Martins de Oliveira, Eneida, Lins de Araújo, Gilda Maria & Wanderley da Silva, Ítala Maria
1989 O artigo: Normas e usos. In Português culto falado no Brasil, Ataliba T. de Castilho (ed.), 57–65. Campinas: Editora da Unicamp.Google Scholar
Paraguassu-Martins, Nize
2010 A contabilidade dos nomes nus no português brasileiro. PhD dissertation, USP, São Paulo.Google Scholar
Pereltsvaig, Asya
2006 Small nominals. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 24(2): 433–500. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perini, Mário A.
2010 Gramática do português brasileiro [Educac̦ão Linguística 4]. São Paulo: Parábola.Google Scholar
Pires de Oliveira, Roberta
2012 Brazilian bare nouns in subject position of episodic predicates. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 16, Ana Aguilar Guevara, Anna Chernilovskaya & Rick Nouwen (eds), 501–511. Cambridge MA: MITWPL.Google Scholar
Pires de Oliveira, Roberta, Coelho, Josa da Silva & Bressane, Mariana Rublescki Silveira
2010 O singular nu denota espécie: Uma investigação empírica. DELTA 26(1): 115–139. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pires de Oliveira, Roberta & Mariano, Ruan
2011 MulherF discutiu futebol na festa ontem! Estrutura infomacional e os nomes nus no PB. Anais do VII Congresso Internacional da Abralin, Curitiba, Maria J. Foltran et al. (eds), 3744–3756.Google Scholar
Pires de Oliveira, Roberta & Rothstein, Susan
2011 Bare singular noun phrases are mass in Brazilian Portuguese. Lingua 121(15): 2153–2175. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 Bare singular arguments in Brazilian Portuguese: Perfectivity, telicity, and kinds. In Kabatek & Wall (eds), 189–222. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pires de Oliveira, Roberta & de Swart, Henriëtte
2015 Brazilian Portuguese noun phrases: An optimality theoretic perspective. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 13(1): 63–93. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Poesio, Massimo, Ponzetto, Simone P. & Versley, Yannick
2010 Computational Models of Anaphora Resolution: A survey. Ms.Google Scholar
Pollard, Carl J. & Sag, Ivan A.
1994 Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar [Studies in Contemporary Linguistics]. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pomino, Natascha
2011 Number mismatches within the Italo-Romance DP. In Proceedings of the V NEREUS International Workshop: Mismatches in Romance [Arbeitspapiere / Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft 125], Natascha Pomino & Elisabeth Stark (eds), 75–94. Konstanz: Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Konstanz.Google Scholar
2014 On the clitic status of the Romance plural marker. Paper presented at NEREUS 2014, Hamburg.
Prost, Jean-Philippe
2008 Modelling Syntactic Gradience with Loose Constraint-based Parsing. PhD dissertation, Macquarie University & Université de Provence, Aix-en-Provence.Google Scholar
Pullum, Geoffrey K. & Scholz, Barbara C.
2001 On the distinction between model-theoretic and generative-enumerative syntactic frameworks. In Logical Aspects of Computational Linguistics [Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 2099], Philippe de Groote, Glyn V. Morrill & Christian Retoré (eds), 17–43. Berlin: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Radatz, Hans-Ingo & Torrent-Lenzen, Aina
(eds) 2006 Iberia polyglotta: Zeitgenössische Gedichte und Kurzprosa in den Sprachen der Iberischen Halbinsel: Zeitgenössische Texte auf Aragonesisch, Asturianisch, Baskisch, Englisch, Extremeño, Fala de Xálima, Galicisch, Katalanisch, Mirandesisch, Murcianisch, Okzitanisch, Olivenza-Portugiesisch, Portugiesisch und Spanisch: Mit deutscher Übersetzung. Titz: Lenzen.Google Scholar
Regueira, Xosé L.
(ed.) 1998 Os sons da lingua. Vigo: Xerais.Google Scholar
Reimer, Marga
2010 Reference. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring 2010 edn, Edward N. Zalta (ed.). http://​plato​.stanford​.edu​/archives​/spr2010​/entries​/reference/ (11 June 2017).
Rijkhoff, Jan
2002 The Noun Phrase. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 On flexible and rigid nouns. Studies in Language 32(3): 727–752. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Craig
1996 Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. In Papers in Semantics [OSU Working Papers in Linguistics 49], Jae-Hak Yoon & Andreas Kathold (eds), 91–136. Columbus OH: Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Rohlfs, Gerhard
1949 Historische Grammatik der italienischen Sprache und ihrer Mundarten, Band II: Formenlehre und Syntax. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
Rospantini, Lígia M. Gonçalves
2016 A omissão do artigo em português. Um estudo contrastivo com base em jornais portugueses e brasileiros dos séculos XX e XXI. PhD dissertation, University of Tübingen.Google Scholar
Rothstein, Susan
2010a Counting and the mass-count distinction. Journal of Semantics 27(3): 343–397. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010b Bare nouns semantics, kind interpretations and the universal grinder. Paper at the Bare Nominals and Genericity Conference, Paris.
2013 Some cross-linguistic aspects of bare NP distribution: Modern Hebrew and Brazilian Portuguese. In Kabatek & Wall (eds), 35–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sakel, Jeanette & Everett, Daniel L.
2012 Linguistic Fieldwork: A Student Guide. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sampson, Geoffrey R.
2007 Grammar without grammaticality. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 3(1): 1–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Santos, Raquel S.
2001 A aquisição do acento primário no Português Brasileiro. PhD dissertation, UNICAMP, Campinas, SP.Google Scholar
Saraiva, Maria Elisabeth Fonseca
1997 “Buscar menino no colégio”: A questão do objeto incorporado em português. Campinas: Pontes.Google Scholar
Sato, Kiyoaki
1986 Der Artikel bei T. Sekiguchi: Die Bedeutungsform-Grammatik als Grammatik des Sprechens [Tübinger Beiträge zur Linguistik 307] Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Scheer, Tobias
2011 A Guide to Morphosyntax-phonology Interface Theories: How Extra-phonological Information is Treated in Phonology since Trubetzkoy’s Grenzsignale. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Scherre, Marta Maria Pereira
2001 Major linguistic patterns in noun phrase agreement in Brazilian Portuguese. In Cinquant’anni di ricerche linguistiche: Problemi, risultati e prospettive per il terzo millennio: Atti del 9. Convegno Internazionale di Linguisti, Milano, 8-9-10 ottobre 1998, Rosa B. Finazzi & Tornaghi, Paola (eds), 461–473. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Cristina & Munn, Alan
1999 Against the nominal mapping parameter: Bare nouns in Brazilian Portuguese. In Proceedings of NELS 29, Pius N. Tamanji, Masako Hirotani & Nancy Hall (eds), 339–353. Amherst MA: GSLA.Google Scholar
2003 The syntax and semantics of bare arguments in Brazilian Portuguese. In Linguistic Variation Yearbook 2002, Pierre Pica (ed.), 185–216. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Schneider, Gerold & Schreier, Daniel
2013 Automatically detecting mass nouns in English. Paper presented at the Workshop on Mass and Count in Romance and Germanic Languages. Zurich.
Schütze, Carson T.
1996 The Empirical Base of Linguistics: Grammaticality Judgments and Linguistic Methodology. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
de Sena, Laiza
2012  Vinho e o vinho: O sintagma massivo nu e o massivo definido diferem? MA thesis, UFSC, Florianópolis.Google Scholar
Silva, Thais C.
2011/1999 Fonética e fonologia do português: Roteiro de estudos e guia de exercícios. São Paulo: Editora Contexto.Google Scholar
Stark, Elisabeth
2006 Indefinitheit und Textkohärenz: Entstehung und semantische Strukturierung indefiniter Nominaldetermination im Altitalienischen [Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 336]. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stemberger, Joseph P.
1984 Structural errors in normal and agrammatical speech. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1(4): 281–313. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stvan, Laurel S.
2009 Semantic incorporation as an account for some bare singular count noun uses in English. Lingua 119(2): 314–333. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taveira da Cruz, Ronald
2008 O singular nu e a (pseudo) incorporação no PB. PhD dissertation, UFSC, Florianópolis.Google Scholar
Tenani, Luciani E.
2002 Domínios prosódicos no português do Brasil: Implicações para a prosódia e para a aplicação de processos fonológicos. PhD dissertation, UNICAMP, Campinas.Google Scholar
Thomas, Earl W.
1969 The Syntax of Spoken Brazilian Portuguese. Nashville TN: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
Toso, Fiorenzo
1997 Grammatica del genovese: Varietà urbana e di koinè. Recco, Genova: Le mani.Google Scholar
Uriagereka, Juan
2012 Spell-out and the Minimalist Program [Oxford Linguistics]. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Vater, Heinz
1963 Das System der Artikelformen im gegenwärtigen Deutsch. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Veloso, Brenda S.
2003 O sândi vocálico externo e os monomorfemas em três variedades do português. MA thesis, UNICAMP, Campinas.Google Scholar
Vincent, Nigel
1995 Exaptation and grammaticalization. In Historical Linguistics 1993: Selected Papers from the 11th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Los Angeles, 16 – 20 Aug. 1993 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 124], Henning Andersen (ed.), 433–445. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wall, Albert
2017 ‘Porém jacaré acreditou?’ Eine kritische Macunaíma-Ausgabe als Glücksfall für die Beschreibung der brasilianischen Nominalphrase. In Philologie und Grammatik [Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie 415], Georg Kaiser & Harald Völker (eds), 149–167. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
2013 The distribution of specific and definite bare nominals in Brazilian Portuguese. In Kabatek & Wall (eds), 223–253. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 The role of grammaticality judgments within an integral approach to Brazilian Portuguese bare nominals. In Psycholinguistic Approaches to Meaning and Understanding across Languages [Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics 44], Barbara Hemforth, Barbara Mertins & Cathrine Fabricius-Hansen (eds), 143–173. Cham: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wall, Albert & Kabatek, Johannes
2013 Laying bare nominal determination. An introduction to the present volume. In Kabatek & Wall (eds), 1–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wall, Albert & Octavio de Toledo y Huerta, Álvaro
2016 Exploring and recycling: Topichood and the evolution of Iberorromance articles. In Exaptation and Language Change [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 336], Muriel Norde & Freek van de Velde (eds), 341–375. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wall, Albert, Ott, Niels, Ziai, Ramon & Rudzewitz, Björn
2014 Macunaíma as a Data Source for the Distribution and Interpretation of Bare NPs in Brazilian Portuguese: Corpus Preparation and First Annotation Agreement Results. Poster at CODILI III. Zurich.Google Scholar
Wasow, Thomas & Arnold, Jennifer
2005 Intuitions in linguistic argumentation. Lingua 115(11): 1481–1496. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weinberg, Amy
1999 A minimalist theory of human sentence processing. In Working Minimalism, Samuel D. Epstein & Norbert Hornstein (eds), 283–316. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Weir, Andrew
2012 Article drop in headlines: Failure of CP-level Agree. Ms, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Weir, Andrew
2013 Article drop in headlines and truncation of CP. Poster presented at the LSA Annual Meeting, Boston MA.
Wetzels, Willem Leo
1997 The lexical representation of nasality in Brazilian Portuguese. Probus 9: 203–232. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wiltschko, Martina
2012 Decomposing the mass/count distinction: Evidence from languages that lack it. In Count and Mass Across Languages [Oxford Linguistics 42], Diane Massam (ed.), 120–146. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Woll, Dieter
1982 Die Eigenentwicklung des brasilianischen Portugiesisch: Der Artikelgebrauch. Romanistische Forschungen 94: 67–83.Google Scholar
Yvia-Croce, Hyacinthe
1979 Grammaire corse. Ajaccio: Editions Cyrnos et Méditerranée.Google Scholar
Zelinsky-Wibbelt, Cornelia
2000 Discourse and the Continuity of Reference: Representing Mental Categorization. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Niina N.
2013 Classifier Structures in Mandarin Chinese [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 263]. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Subjects & Metadata

Linguistics

Generative linguistics
Romance linguistics
Semantics
Syntax
Theoretical linguistics
BIC Subject: CFK – Grammar, syntax
BISAC Subject: LAN009060 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / Syntax
ONIX Metadata
ONIX 2.1
ONIX 3.0
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2017035847 | Marc record