Mixing Metaphor
Editor
| University of California, Santa Cruz
Mixing metaphors in speech, writing, and even gesture, is traditionally viewed as a sign of inconsistency in thought and language. Despite the prominence of mixed metaphors, there have been surprisingly few attempts to comprehensively explain why people mix their metaphors so frequently and in the particular ways they do. This volume brings together a distinguished group of linguists, psychologists and computer scientists, who tackle the issue of how and why mixed metaphors arise and what communicative purposes they may serve. These scholars, almost unanimously, argue that mixing metaphors is a natural consequence of common metaphorical thought processes, highlighting important complexities of the metaphorical mind. Mixing Metaphor, for the first time, offers new, critical empirical and theoretical insights on a topic that has long been ignored within interdisciplinary metaphor studies.
[Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 6] 2016. xiv, 269 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins
Table of Contents
|
Introduction
|
|
|
vii–xiv
|
|
|
Part I. Is Mixed Metaphor a Problem?
|
|
|
1–16
|
|
|
17–30
|
|
|
31–56
|
|
|
57–72
|
|
|
Part II. Reasons for Mixing Metaphor
|
|
|
73–112
|
|
|
113–132
|
|
|
133–154
|
|
|
155–176
|
|
|
Part III. Effects of Mixing Metaphor
|
|
|
177–202
|
|
|
203–222
|
|
|
223–240
|
|
|
241–266
|
|
|
Index
|
267–270
|
“Mixing Metaphor is a compilation of 12 chapters by prominent researchers, introduced by Raymond Gibbs, one of the main actors in the field of metaphor studies. It is a highly timely contribution that fills a gap between the pre-theoretical notion of ‘mixed metaphors’, largely known to the (English-speaking) public as something to be avoided as it reflects poor style or even sloppy thinking, and scholarly research on metaphor, where the topic has received little attention.”
Jordan Zlatev and Georgios Stampoulidis, Lund University, in Metaphor and the Social World Vol. 8:2 (2018)
“Overall, we found the engaging and thought-provoking book has provided a plethora of fertile starting points for future research in this emergent interdisciplinary area of metaphor studies. It has remarkably input food for thought to prompt and facilitate new tasks and discussions on mixed metaphors that otherwise would have remained blurred and indistinct and opened an inviting and intriguing pathway for dominant but often bombarded CMT as an outlet.”
Yi Sun and Yang Bai, Xi’an International Studies University, in Review of Cognitive Linguistics 16:1 (2018)
Cited by
Cited by other publications
No author info given
2017.
In Multimodal Metaphor and Metonymy in Advertising [Figurative Thought and Language, 2],
No author info given
2019.
In Representing Wine – Sensory Perceptions, Communication and Cultures [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 21],
Barnden, John A.
2017. Communicating flexibly with metaphor.
Review of Cognitive Linguistics 14:2 ► pp. 442 ff.
Beger, Anke & Thomas H. Smith
2020.
In How Metaphors Guide, Teach and Popularize Science [Figurative Thought and Language, 6],
► pp. 1 ff.
Kövecses, Zoltán
2020.
In Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory,
Littlemore, Jeannette & Sarah Turner
2019. What Can Metaphor Tell Us About Experiences of Pregnancy Loss and How Are These Experiences Reflected in Midwife Practice?.
Frontiers in Communication 4
Magaña, Dalia & Teenie Matlock
2018. How Spanish speakers use metaphor to describe their experiences with cancer.
Discourse & Communication 12:6 ► pp. 627 ff.
Suárez-Toste, Ernesto
2017. Babel of the senses.
Terminology 23:1 ► pp. 89 ff.
Tay, Dennis
2017. Time series analysis of discourse: A case study of metaphor in psychotherapy sessions.
Discourse Studies 19:6 ► pp. 694 ff.
Zawisławska, Magdalena
2019. Narrative metaphors in Polish perfumery discourse.
Cognitive Linguistic Studies 6:2 ► pp. 221 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 02 may 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
BIC Subject: CFK – Grammar, syntax
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number: 2015043290