Politeness in compliment responses
A perspective from naturally occurring exchanges in Turkish
This paper analyses a corpus of compliment responses in Turkish according to the conversational maxim approach (Leech 1983, 2003) and the face-management approach (Brown and Levinson 1987) with a view to extending the conceptualisation of self-presentation in theorising on politeness. It observes that the two theories ground politeness on consideration for alter and give precedence to politeness in the sense of displaying deference and solidarity at the expense of self-politeness, described in the present study as speaker need for display of competence, self-confidence, and individuality in interaction, besides the need for non-imposition. Regarding the maxim approach, the paper argues that conversational implicatures triggered by a variety of responses ultimately tie to the Tact Maxim and more specifically to the Sympathy Maxim in the Turkish context. The analysis reveals that compliment responses may override the Politeness Principle, that self-presentational concerns are crucial motivating factors, and that face concerns need to be incorporated into the model. From the perspective of the face-management approach, the study supports the claim in O’Driscoll (1996) and Spencer-Oatey (2000) that the notions of positive and negative face as need for community and autonomy need to be disentangled from the theory’s conceptualisation of face as public self-image. With the incorporation of a number of self-politeness strategies, the face-theoretic analysis builds on this distinction and integrates it with the concept of interactional imbalance by extending an analytic framework adapted from Bayraktaroğlu (1991). The paper concludes with suggestions on how the two theories may complement each other.
Keywords: Face, Self-politeness, (Im)politeness, Turkish compliment responses
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 01 March 2006
(1996) A study of interlanguage pragmatics: Compliment responses by learners of Japanese and English as a second language. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas at Austin, UMI No.: 9719290.
Bach, Kent, and Robert M. Harnish
(1979) Linguistic communication and speech acts. Cambridge, Massachusetts/London: MIT Press. BoP
Barnlund, Dean C., and Shoko Araki
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
(1993) Responding to compliments: A contrastive study of politeness strategies between American English and Chinese speakers. Journal of Pragmatics 20: 49-75. BoP
(2001) Self-politeness: A proposal. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 87-106. BoP
(1996) Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics 25: 349-67. BoP
(2001) A critique of politeness theories. Manchester: St. Jerome's Press. BoP
Ensari, Nurcan, and Norman Miller
(1990) Perspectives on politeness. Journal of Pragmatics 14: 219-236. BoP
(1982) Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. New York: Pantheon Books. BoP
Haugh, Michael, and Carl Hinze
(2003) A metalinguistic approach to deconstructing the concepts of ‘face’ and ‘politeness’ in Chinese, English and Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 35: 1581-1611. BoP
(1996) Compliments, compliment responses, and politeness in an African-American community. In J. Arnold, R. Blake, B. Davidson, S. Schwenter, and J. Solomon (eds.), Sociolinguistic variation: Data, theory and analysis, selected papers from NWAV 23 at Stanford.Stanford, CA: Center for Language and Information, pp. 195-208.
Herbert, Robert K.
(1990) Sex-based differences in compliment behaviour. Language in Society 19: 201-224. BoP
Hess, Jon A.
(1986) Compliments and compliment responses in New Zealand English. Anthropological Linguistics 28.4: 485-508. BoP
(1995) Women, men and politeness. London, New York: Longman. BoP
(1983) Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman. BoP
Manes, Joan, and Nessa Wolfson
Mao, LuMing Robert
Rogers, Priscilla S, and Song Mei Lee-Wong
Ruhi, Şükriye, and Gürkan Doğan
Ruhi, Şükriye, and Hale Işık
(2005) Face and facework in Turkish: Revelations from politeness lexemes and idioms in Turkish. Paper presented at the 9th International Conference on Pragmatics, 10-15 July, 2005, Riva del Garda.
Schwartz, Shalom, Gila Melech, Arielle Lehmann, Steven Burgess, Mari Harris, and Vicki Owens
(1969) Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
(1976) A classification of illocutionary acts. Language and Society 5: 1-23. BoP
(2001) “Oh, how appropriate” compliments and politeness. In A. Bayraktaroğlu and M. Sifianou (eds.), Linguistic politeness across Boundaries: The case of Greek and Turkish.Amsterdam/New York: John Benjamins, pp. 391-430. BoP
(2000) Rapport management: A framework for analysis. In H. Spencer-Oatey (ed.), Culturally speaking: Managing rapport through talk across cultures.London: Continuum, pp. 11–46. BoP
(2002) Managing rapport in talk: Using rapport sensitive incidents to explore the motivational concerns underlying the management of relations. Journal of Pragmatics 34: 529-545. BoP
(2005) (Im)Politeness, face and perceptions of rapport: Unpackaging their bases and interrelationships. Journal of Politeness Research 1: 95-119. BoP
Spencer-Oatey, Helen, Patrick Ng, and Li Dong
(2000) Responding to compliments: British and Chinese evaluative judgements. In H. Spencer-Oatey (ed.), Culturally speaking: Managing rapport through talk across cultures.London: Continuum, pp. 53-65. BoP
Spencer-Oatey, Helen, and Wenying Jiang
(2003) Explaining cross-cultural pragmatic findings: Moving from politeness maxims to sociopragmatic interactional principles (SIPs). Journal of Pragmatics 35: 1633-1650. BoP
(1995) Meaning in interaction: An introduction to pragmatics. London: Longman. BoP
Ting-Toomey, Stella, and A. Kurogi
(1998) Facework competence in intercultural conflict: An updated face-negotiation theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 22.2: 187-225. BoP
(2003) Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
(1991) Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: The Semantics of Human Interaction. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. BoP
(1983) An empirically based analysis of complimenting in American English. In N. Wolfson, E. Judd (eds.), Sociolinguistics and language acquisition. Newbury House Publishers, Rowley/London/Tokyo: Newbury House Publishers, pp. 82-95. BoP
Cited by 20 other publications
No author info given
Aksan, Mustafa & Yeşim Aksan
Chen, Rong & Dafu Yang
Culpeper, Jonathan & Kevin Pat
DİLEK, Tuba Karagöz
Hernández Toribio, María Isabel & Luis Deltell Escolar
Ruhi, Şükriye & Hale Işık-Güler
Salam El-Dakhs, Dina Abdel
Sarkhosh, Mehdi & Ali Alizadeh
Stoian, Claudia E.
Xia, Dengshan, Caiyan Yin & Chun Lan
Şakırgil, Can & Hatice Çubukçu
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 january 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.