Article published In:
PragmaticsVol. 19:2 (2009) ► pp.179–196
Address strategies in a British academic setting
The English system of address constitutes an exception among the European languages, in that it does not have a grammatical distinction between a formal pronoun of address and an informal one. Rather, English speakers exploit lexical strategies (i.e. nominal vocatives). This study aims to shed light on the address strategies used by students and members of the teaching staff in academic interactions, with reference to the University of Reading (UK). Data from semi-structured interviews and video-recordings outline an unmarked pattern of asymmetry between the parties, in which students mainly employ formal vocatives towards lecturers (title+surname, honorifics), while lecturers frequently use first names and other informal expressions. Reciprocal informal vocatives, by contrast, emerges as a marked practice, which is resisted or delayed in time. This asymmetrical distribution of forms questions classical models and previous research on address and calls for the necessity of new components for the understanding of the phenomenon.
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
References
Axelson, Elizabeth
(2007) Vocatives: A double-edged strategy in intercultural discourse among graduate students. Pragmatics 17.1: 95-122. BoP 
Bargiela, Francesca, Corinne Boz, Lily Gokzadze, Abdurrahman Hamza, Sara Mills, and Nino Rukhadze
(2002) Ethnocentrism, politeness and naming strategies.
Working papers on the web 3
. [URL]. (Accessed 16th February 2008).
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan
(1999) The Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
Braun, Friederike
(1988) Terms of address: Problems of patterns and usage in various languages and cultures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. BoP
Brown, Roger, and Albert Gilman
(1960) The pronoun of power and solidarity. In Thomas A. Sebeok (ed.), Style in language. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Technology Press of Massachusetts Institute of Technology, pp. 253-276. Reprinted in Pier Paolo Giglioli (ed.) (1972) Language and social context. Harmondsworth, U.K.: Penguin, pp. 252-82.
Brown, Roger, and Marguerite Ford
(1961) Address in American English. Journal of abnormal and social psychology 621: 375-385. Reprinted in Dell Hymes (ed.) (1964) Language in culture and society. New York: Harper and Row, pp. 234-244. BoP
BoPClyne, Michael, Catrin Norrby, and Jane Warren
(2009) Language and human relations. Styles of address in contemporary language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clyne, Michael, Heinz L. Kretzenbacher, Catrin Norrby, and Jane Warren
(2004) Address in some western European languages. In Christo Moskovsky (ed.), Proceedings of the 2003 conference of the Australian Linguistic Society. [URL] (Accessed on 16th February 2008).
Clyne, Michael, Heinz-Leo Kretzenbacher, Catrin Norrby, and Doris Schüpbach
(2006) Perceptions of variation and change in German and Swedish address. Journal of sociolinguistics 10.3: 287-319.
Dickey, Eleanor
Dunkling, Leslie
(1990) A dictionary of epithets and terms of address. London: Routledge.
Duranti, Alessandro
Ervin-Tripp, Susan
(1986) On sociolinguistic rules: Alternation and co-occurrences. In John J. Gumperz and Dell Hymes (eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication. (Reissued with corrections and additions). Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell, pp. 213-250.
Formentelli, Maicol
(2007) The vocative mate in contemporary English: A corpus based study. In Andrea Sansò (ed.), Language resources and linguistic theory. Milano: Franco Angeli, pp. 180-199.
Gilman, Albert, and Roger Brown
(1958) Who says ‘Tu’ to whom? ETC: A review of general semantics 15.3: 169-174.
Goldthorpe, John Harry
(2000) Social class and the differentiation of employment contracts. In John Harry Goldthorpe (ed.), On sociology: Numbers, narratives, and the integration of research and theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 206-229.
Gumperz, John J., and Dell Hymes
(eds.) (1972) Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. BoP
Helmbrecht, Johannes
(2003) Politeness distinctions in second person pronouns. In Friedrich Lenz (ed.), Deictic conceptualization of space, time and person. (Pragmatics and beyond). Amsterdam: Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 185-203.
(2005) Politeness distinctions in personal pronouns. In Martin Haspelmath, Bernard Comrie, Matthew S. Dryer and David Gil (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 186-190.
(2006) On the development of Standard Average European (SAE) – The case of polite pronouns. Paper presented at the 28th annual meeting of the DGfS, University of Bielefeld, Germany. 22-24 February 2006.
Hickey, Leo, and Miranda Stewart
Hickey, Raymond
(2002) Rectifying a standard deficiency. Second-person pronominal distinctions in varieties of English. In Irma Taavitsainen and Andreas H. Jucker (eds.), Diachronic perspectives on address term systems. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 343-374.
Jaworski, Adam, and Dariusz Galasiński
(2000) Vocative address forms and ideological legitimization in political debates. Discourse studies 2.1: 35-53. BoP
BoPLeech, Geoffrey
(1999) The distribution and function of vocatives in American and British English conversation. In Hilde Hasselgård and Signe Oksefjell (eds.), Out of Corpora. Studies in Honour of Stig Johansson. Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 107-118.
McConnell-Ginet, Sally
(2003) “What’s in a Name?” Social labelling and gender practices”. In Janet Holmes and Miriam Meyerhoff (eds.), The handbook of language and gender. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 69-97.
Mühlhäusler, Peter, and Rom Harré
(1990) Pronouns and people: The linguistic construction of social and personal identity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Murray, Thomas E
(2002) A new look at address in American English: The rules have changed. Names 50.1: 43-61.
Philipsen, Gerry, and Michael Huspek
(1985) A bibliography of sociolinguistic studies of personal address. Anthropological linguistics 271: 94-101. BoP
Pieper, Ursula
(1990) Homologie, Homöologie und Heterologie im Anredeverhalten: Anrede im Deutschen, Dänischen und Polnischen. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 18.1: 1-12.
Saville-Troike, Muriel
(2003) The ethnography of communication: An introduction. 3ed. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sutton, Laurel A
(1995) Bitches and skankly hobags: The place of women in contemporary slang. In Kira Hall and Mary Bucholtz (eds.), Gender articulated. Language and the socially constructed self. London: Routledge, pp. 279-96.
Wales, Katie
Warren, Jane, Michael Clyne, Heinz L. Kretzenbacher, and Catrin Norrby
(2007) The underlying pragmatics of address usage: Comparing and contrasting English with French, German and Swedish. Paper presented at the 10th International Pragmatics Conference, Göteborg, Sweden. 8-13 July 2007.
Wierzbicka, Anna
(1991) Cross-cultural pragmatics. The semantics of human interaction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. BoP.
Zwicky, Arnold M
(1974) Hey, Whatsyourname!. In Michael W. La Galy, Robert A. Fox, Anthony Bruck (eds.), Papers from the tenth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 787-801.
Cited by
Cited by 23 other publications
Bodis, Agnes
2021. ‘Double deficit’ and exclusion: Mediated language ideologies and international students’ multilingualism. Multilingua 40:3 ► pp. 367 ff. 
Burt, Susan Meredith
2015. “There’s not a lot of negotiation”. In Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Im/politeness [AILA Applied Linguistics Series, 14], ► pp. 71 ff.
Economidou-Kogetsidis, Maria
2011. “Please answer me as soon as possible”: Pragmatic failure in non-native speakers’ e-mail requests to faculty. Journal of Pragmatics 43:13 ► pp. 3193 ff.
Economidou-Kogetsidis, Maria
2016. Variation in evaluations of the (im)politeness of emails from L2 learners and perceptions of the personality of their senders. Journal of Pragmatics 106 ► pp. 1 ff.
Economidou-Kogetsidis, Maria
2022. “Mr Paul, please inform me accordingly”. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 489 ff.
Formentelli, Maicol
Formentelli, Maicol & John Hajek
2022. Address practices in academic interactions in a pluricentric language. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 631 ff.
Hildenbrand, Grace, Evan Perrault & Taylor Devine
2020. You May Call Me Professor: Professor Form of Address in Email Communication and College Student Reactions to Not Knowing What to Call Their Professors. Journal of Communication Pedagogy 3 ► pp. 82 ff.
Lenchuk, Iryna & Amer Ahmed
2019. Are the Speech Acts of EFL Learners Really Direct? The Case of Requests in the Omani EFL Context. SAGE Open 9:1 ► pp. 215824401882501 ff.
Mehrabi Boshrabadi, Abbas & Sepideh Bataghva Sarabi
2016. Cyber-communic
tion etiquette. Interactive Technology and Smart Education 13:2 ► pp. 86 ff.
tion etiquette. Interactive Technology and Smart Education 13:2 ► pp. 86 ff. Mensah, Eyo O.
2021. A sociolinguistic study of address terms in a Nigerian university’s staff club. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 57:4 ► pp. 677 ff.
Merrison, Andrew John, Jack J. Wilson, Bethan L. Davies & Michael Haugh
2012. Getting stuff done: Comparing e-mail requests from students in higher education in Britain and Australia. Journal of Pragmatics 44:9 ► pp. 1077 ff.
Miner, Annette & Brenda Nicodemus
2021. Situated Community Engagement. In Situated Learning in Interpreter Education, ► pp. 69 ff.
Nguyen, Thi Thuy Minh
2022. Pragmatic development in the instructed context. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 217 ff.
Norrby, Catrin, Doris Schüpbach, John Hajek & Heinz L. Kretzenbacher
2019. Introductions at international academic conferences. In It’s not all about you
[Topics in Address Research, 1], ► pp. 376 ff.
Parkinson, Jean
2020. On the use of the address terms guys and mate in an educational context. Journal of Pragmatics 161 ► pp. 81 ff.
Rau, Der-Hwa Victoria & Gerald Rau
2016. Negotiating Personal Relationship Through Email Terms of Address. In Email Discourse Among Chinese Using English as a Lingua Franca, ► pp. 11 ff.
Sifianou, Maria
2013. The impact of globalisation on politeness and impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics 55 ► pp. 86 ff.
Urban, Anna
2012. Die kleine House-Apotheke: Reception of the American, German and Polish Gregory House and Varied Translations of the Pronoun you. Research in Language 10:3 ► pp. 313 ff.
Zago, Raffaele
2015. “That’s none of your business, Sy”. In Participation in Public and Social Media Interactions [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 256], ► pp. 183 ff.
Zilberman Friedmann, Yael & Hadar Netz
2023. ‘You son of a perverse rebellious woman’: Mobilizing the storytelling event for self-empowerment. Language in Society 52:3 ► pp. 433 ff.
张, 艳
2023. A Study of Wang Xifeng’s Speech in A Dream of Red Mansions from the Perspective of the Adaptation Theory. Modern Linguistics 11:07 ► pp. 3193 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.