Article published in:
Pragmatics
Vol. 19:2 (2009) ► pp. 179–196

Address strategies in a British academic setting

The English system of address constitutes an exception among the European languages, in that it does not have a grammatical distinction between a formal pronoun of address and an informal one. Rather, English speakers exploit lexical strategies (i.e. nominal vocatives). This study aims to shed light on the address strategies used by students and members of the teaching staff in academic interactions, with reference to the University of Reading (UK). Data from semi-structured interviews and video-recordings outline an unmarked pattern of asymmetry between the parties, in which students mainly employ formal vocatives towards lecturers (title+surname, honorifics), while lecturers frequently use first names and other informal expressions. Reciprocal informal vocatives, by contrast, emerges as a marked practice, which is resisted or delayed in time. This asymmetrical distribution of forms questions classical models and previous research on address and calls for the necessity of new components for the understanding of the phenomenon.

Keywords: Academic setting, Terms of address, British English, Classroom interactions
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 01 June 2009
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.19.2.02for
References
Axelson, Elizabeth
(2007) Vocatives: A double-edged strategy in intercultural discourse among graduate students. Pragmatics 17.1: 95-122.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bargiela, Francesca, Corinne Boz, Lily Gokzadze, Abdurrahman Hamza, Sara Mills, and Nino Rukhadze
(2002) Ethnocentrism, politeness and naming strategies. Working papers on the web 3 . http://​extra​.shu​.ac​.uk​/wpw​/politeness​/bargiela​.htm. (Accessed 16th February 2008).
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan
(1999) The Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Braun, Friederike
(1988) Terms of address: Problems of patterns and usage in various languages and cultures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Roger, and Albert Gilman
(1960) The pronoun of power and solidarity. In Thomas A. Sebeok (ed.), Style in language. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Technology Press of Massachusetts Institute of Technology, pp. 253-276. Reprinted in Pier Paolo Giglioli (ed.) (1972) Language and social context. Harmondsworth, U.K.: Penguin, pp. 252-82.Google Scholar
Brown, Roger, and Marguerite Ford
(1961) Address in American English. Journal of abnormal and social psychology 621: 375-385. Reprinted in Dell Hymes (ed.) (1964) Language in culture and society. New York: Harper and Row, pp. 234-244. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Clyne, Michael, Catrin Norrby, and Jane Warren
(2009) Language and human relations. Styles of address in contemporary language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clyne, Michael, Heinz L. Kretzenbacher, Catrin Norrby, and Jane Warren
(2004) Address in some western European languages. In Christo Moskovsky (ed.), Proceedings of the 2003 conference of the Australian Linguistic Society. http://​au​.geocities​.com​/austlingsoc​/proceedings​/als2003​/clyne​.pdf (Accessed on 16th February 2008).
Clyne, Michael, Heinz-Leo Kretzenbacher, Catrin Norrby, and Doris Schüpbach
(2006) Perceptions of variation and change in German and Swedish address. Journal of sociolinguistics 10.3: 287-319. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dickey, Eleanor
(1997) Forms of address and terms of reference. Journal of linguistics 33.2: 255-274. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Dunkling, Leslie
(1990) A dictionary of epithets and terms of address. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro
(1997) Linguistic anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, Susan
(1986) On sociolinguistic rules: Alternation and co-occurrences. In John J. Gumperz and Dell Hymes (eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication. (Reissued with corrections and additions). Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell, pp. 213-250.Google Scholar
Formentelli, Maicol
(2007) The vocative mate in contemporary English: A corpus based study. In Andrea Sansò (ed.), Language resources and linguistic theory. Milano: Franco Angeli, pp. 180-199.Google Scholar
Gilman, Albert, and Roger Brown
(1958) Who says ‘Tu’ to whom? ETC: A review of general semantics 15.3: 169-174.Google Scholar
Goldthorpe, John Harry
(2000) Social class and the differentiation of employment contracts. In John Harry Goldthorpe (ed.), On sociology: Numbers, narratives, and the integration of research and theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 206-229.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J., and Dell Hymes
(eds.) (1972) Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Helmbrecht, Johannes
(2003) Politeness distinctions in second person pronouns. In Friedrich Lenz (ed.), Deictic conceptualization of space, time and person. (Pragmatics and beyond). Amsterdam: Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 185-203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005) Politeness distinctions in personal pronouns. In Martin Haspelmath, Bernard Comrie, Matthew S. Dryer and David Gil (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 186-190.Google Scholar
(2006) On the development of Standard Average European (SAE) – The case of polite pronouns. Paper presented at the 28th annual meeting of the DGfS, University of Bielefeld, Germany. 22-24 February 2006.
Hickey, Leo, and Miranda Stewart
(eds.) (2004) Politeness in Europe. Clevedon, U.K.: Multilingual Matters.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Hickey, Raymond
(2002) Rectifying a standard deficiency. Second-person pronominal distinctions in varieties of English. In Irma Taavitsainen and Andreas H. Jucker (eds.), Diachronic perspectives on address term systems. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 343-374. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaworski, Adam, and Dariusz Galasiński
(2000) Vocative address forms and ideological legitimization in political debates. Discourse studies 2.1: 35-53. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
(1999) The distribution and function of vocatives in American and British English conversation. In Hilde Hasselgård and Signe Oksefjell (eds.), Out of Corpora. Studies in Honour of Stig Johansson. Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 107-118.Google Scholar
McConnell-Ginet, Sally
(2003) “What’s in a Name?” Social labelling and gender practices”. In Janet Holmes and Miriam Meyerhoff (eds.), The handbook of language and gender. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 69-97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mühlhäusler, Peter, and Rom Harré
(1990) Pronouns and people: The linguistic construction of social and personal identity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Murray, Thomas E
(2002) A new look at address in American English: The rules have changed. Names 50.1: 43-61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Philipsen, Gerry, and Michael Huspek
(1985) A bibliography of sociolinguistic studies of personal address. Anthropological linguistics 271: 94-101.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Pieper, Ursula
(1990) Homologie, Homöologie und Heterologie im Anredeverhalten: Anrede im Deutschen, Dänischen und Polnischen. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 18.1: 1-12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saville-Troike, Muriel
(2003) The ethnography of communication: An introduction. 3ed. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sutton, Laurel A
(1995) Bitches and skankly hobags: The place of women in contemporary slang. In Kira Hall and Mary Bucholtz (eds.), Gender articulated. Language and the socially constructed self. London: Routledge, pp. 279-96.Google Scholar
Wales, Katie
(1996) Personal pronouns in present-day English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Warren, Jane, Michael Clyne, Heinz L. Kretzenbacher, and Catrin Norrby
(2007) The underlying pragmatics of address usage: Comparing and contrasting English with French, German and Swedish. Paper presented at the 10th International Pragmatics Conference, Göteborg, Sweden. 8-13 July 2007.
Wierzbicka, Anna
(1991) Cross-cultural pragmatics. The semantics of human interaction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.  BoP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M
(1974) Hey, Whatsyourname!. In Michael W. La Galy, Robert A. Fox, Anthony Bruck (eds.), Papers from the tenth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 787-801.Google Scholar

Full-text

Address strategies in a British academic setting
Cited by

Cited by 23 other publications

No author info given
2021. . In Nominal and Pronominal Address in Jamaica and Trinidad [Topics in Address Research, 3], DOI logo
Bodis, Agnes
2021. ‘Double deficit’ and exclusion: Mediated language ideologies and international students’ multilingualism. Multilingua 40:3 ► pp. 367 ff. DOI logo
Burt, Susan Meredith
2015. “There’s not a lot of negotiation”. In Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Im/politeness [AILA Applied Linguistics Series, 14], ► pp. 71 ff. DOI logo
Economidou-Kogetsidis, Maria
2011. “Please answer me as soon as possible”: Pragmatic failure in non-native speakers’ e-mail requests to faculty. Journal of Pragmatics 43:13 ► pp. 3193 ff. DOI logo
Economidou-Kogetsidis, Maria
2016. Variation in evaluations of the (im)politeness of emails from L2 learners and perceptions of the personality of their senders. Journal of Pragmatics 106 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Economidou-Kogetsidis, Maria
2022. “Mr Paul, please inform me accordingly”. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 489 ff. DOI logo
Formentelli, Maicol
2014. Vocatives galore in audiovisual dialogue. English Text Construction 7:1 ► pp. 53 ff. DOI logo
Formentelli, Maicol & John Hajek
2022. Address practices in academic interactions in a pluricentric language. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 631 ff. DOI logo
Hildenbrand, Grace, Evan Perrault & Taylor Devine
2020. You May Call Me Professor: Professor Form of Address in Email Communication and College Student Reactions to Not Knowing What to Call Their Professors. Journal of Communication Pedagogy 3 ► pp. 82 ff. DOI logo
Lenchuk, Iryna & Amer Ahmed
2019. Are the Speech Acts of EFL Learners Really Direct? The Case of Requests in the Omani EFL Context. SAGE Open 9:1 ► pp. 215824401882501 ff. DOI logo
Mehrabi Boshrabadi, Abbas & Sepideh Bataghva Sarabi
2016. Cyber-communic at tion etiquette. Interactive Technology and Smart Education 13:2 ► pp. 86 ff. DOI logo
Mensah, Eyo O.
2021. A sociolinguistic study of address terms in a Nigerian university’s staff club. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 57:4 ► pp. 677 ff. DOI logo
Merrison, Andrew John, Jack J. Wilson, Bethan L. Davies & Michael Haugh
2012. Getting stuff done: Comparing e-mail requests from students in higher education in Britain and Australia. Journal of Pragmatics 44:9 ► pp. 1077 ff. DOI logo
Miner, Annette & Brenda Nicodemus
2021. Situated Community Engagement. In Situated Learning in Interpreter Education, ► pp. 69 ff. DOI logo
Nguyen, Thi Thuy Minh
2022. Pragmatic development in the instructed context. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 217 ff. DOI logo
Nicodemus, Brenda, Maicol Formentelli, Keith M. Cagle & Jay Pittman
2021. Address practices of Deaf undergraduate students and faculty: A study of language, identity, and community. Journal of Pragmatics 176 ► pp. 110 ff. DOI logo
Norrby, Catrin, Doris Schüpbach, John Hajek & Heinz L. Kretzenbacher
2019. Introductions at international academic conferences. In It’s not all about you [Topics in Address Research, 1], ► pp. 376 ff. DOI logo
Parkinson, Jean
2020. On the use of the address terms guys and mate in an educational context. Journal of Pragmatics 161 ► pp. 81 ff. DOI logo
Rau, Der-Hwa Victoria & Gerald Rau
2016. Negotiating Personal Relationship Through Email Terms of Address. In Email Discourse Among Chinese Using English as a Lingua Franca, ► pp. 11 ff. DOI logo
Sifianou, Maria
2013. The impact of globalisation on politeness and impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics 55 ► pp. 86 ff. DOI logo
Urban, Anna
2012. Die kleine House-Apotheke: Reception of the American, German and Polish Gregory House and Varied Translations of the Pronoun you. Research in Language 10:3 ► pp. 313 ff. DOI logo
Zago, Raffaele
2015. “That’s none of your business, Sy”. In Participation in Public and Social Media Interactions [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 256], ► pp. 183 ff. DOI logo
Zilberman Friedmann, Yael & Hadar Netz
2022. ‘You son of a perverse rebellious woman’: Mobilizing the storytelling event for self-empowerment. Language in Society ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 january 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.