Article published in:

Pragmatics
Vol. 19:2 (2009) ► pp. 179–196

Address strategies in a British academic setting

Maicol Formentelli

The English system of address constitutes an exception among the European languages, in that it does not have a grammatical distinction between a formal pronoun of address and an informal one. Rather, English speakers exploit lexical strategies (i.e. nominal vocatives). This study aims to shed light on the address strategies used by students and members of the teaching staff in academic interactions, with reference to the University of Reading (UK). Data from semi-structured interviews and video-recordings outline an unmarked pattern of asymmetry between the parties, in which students mainly employ formal vocatives towards lecturers (title+surname, honorifics), while lecturers frequently use first names and other informal expressions. Reciprocal informal vocatives, by contrast, emerges as a marked practice, which is resisted or delayed in time. This asymmetrical distribution of forms questions classical models and previous research on address and calls for the necessity of new components for the understanding of the phenomenon.

Keywords: Academic setting, Terms of address, British English, Classroom interactions

Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

Published online: 01 June 2009
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.19.2.02for

Full-text

Address strategies in a British academic setting

References

Axelson, Elizabeth

(2007) Vocatives: A double-edged strategy in intercultural discourse among graduate students. Pragmatics 17.1: 95-122. BoP

Bargiela, Francesca, Corinne Boz, Lily Gokzadze, Abdurrahman Hamza, Sara Mills, and Nino Rukhadze

(2002) Ethnocentrism, politeness and naming strategies. Working papers on the web 3 . http://extra.shu.ac.uk/wpw/politeness/bargiela.htm. (Accessed 16th February 2008).

Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan

(1999) The Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.

Braun, Friederike

(1988) Terms of address: Problems of patterns and usage in various languages and cultures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. BoP

Brown, Roger, and Albert Gilman

(1960) The pronoun of power and solidarity. In Thomas A. Sebeok (ed.), Style in language. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Technology Press of Massachusetts Institute of Technology, pp. 253-276. Reprinted in Pier Paolo Giglioli (ed.) (1972) Language and social context. Harmondsworth, U.K.: Penguin, pp. 252-82.

Brown, Roger, and Marguerite Ford

(1961) Address in American English. Journal of abnormal and social psychology 62: 375-385. Reprinted in Dell Hymes (ed.) (1964) Language in culture and society. New York: Harper and Row, pp. 234-244.

BoP

Clyne, Michael, Catrin Norrby, and Jane Warren

(2009) Language and human relations. Styles of address in contemporary language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Clyne, Michael, Heinz L. Kretzenbacher, Catrin Norrby, and Jane Warren

(2004) Address in some western European languages. In Christo Moskovsky (ed.), Proceedings of the 2003 conference of the Australian Linguistic Society. http://au.geocities.com/austlingsoc/proceedings/als2003/clyne.pdf (Accessed on 16th February 2008).

Clyne, Michael, Heinz-Leo Kretzenbacher, Catrin Norrby, and Doris Schüpbach

(2006) Perceptions of variation and change in German and Swedish address. Journal of sociolinguistics 10.3: 287-319.

Dickey, Eleanor

(1997) Forms of address and terms of reference. Journal of linguistics 33.2: 255-274.

BoP

Dunkling, Leslie

(1990) A dictionary of epithets and terms of address. London: Routledge.

Duranti, Alessandro

(1997) Linguistic anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

BoP

Ervin-Tripp, Susan

(1986) On sociolinguistic rules: Alternation and co-occurrences. In John J. Gumperz and Dell Hymes (eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication. (Reissued with corrections and additions). Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell, pp. 213-250.

Formentelli, Maicol

(2007) The vocative mate in contemporary English: A corpus based study. In Andrea Sansò (ed.), Language resources and linguistic theory. Milano: Franco Angeli, pp. 180-199.

Gilman, Albert, and Roger Brown

(1958) Who says ‘Tu’ to whom? ETC: A review of general semantics 15.3: 169-174.

Goldthorpe, John Harry

(2000) Social class and the differentiation of employment contracts. In John Harry Goldthorpe (ed.), On sociology: Numbers, narratives, and the integration of research and theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 206-229.

Gumperz, John J., and Dell Hymes

(eds.) (1972) Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. BoP

Helmbrecht, Johannes

(2003) Politeness distinctions in second person pronouns. In Friedrich Lenz (ed.), Deictic conceptualization of space, time and person. (Pragmatics and beyond). Amsterdam: Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 185-203.

(2005) Politeness distinctions in personal pronouns. In Martin Haspelmath, Bernard Comrie, Matthew S. Dryer and David Gil (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 186-190.

(2006) On the development of Standard Average European (SAE) – The case of polite pronouns. Paper presented at the 28th annual meeting of the DGfS, University of Bielefeld, Germany. 22-24 February 2006.

Hickey, Leo, and Miranda Stewart

(eds.) (2004) Politeness in Europe. Clevedon, U.K.: Multilingual Matters. BoP

Hickey, Raymond

(2002) Rectifying a standard deficiency. Second-person pronominal distinctions in varieties of English. In Irma Taavitsainen and Andreas H. Jucker (eds.), Diachronic perspectives on address term systems. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 343-374.

Jaworski, Adam, and Dariusz Galasiński

(2000) Vocative address forms and ideological legitimization in political debates. Discourse studies 2.1: 35-53.

BoP

Leech, Geoffrey

(1999) The distribution and function of vocatives in American and British English conversation. In Hilde Hasselgård and Signe Oksefjell (eds.), Out of Corpora. Studies in Honour of Stig Johansson. Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 107-118.

McConnell-Ginet, Sally

(2003) “What’s in a Name?” Social labelling and gender practices”. In Janet Holmes and Miriam Meyerhoff (eds.), The handbook of language and gender. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 69-97.

Mühlhäusler, Peter, and Rom Harré

(1990) Pronouns and people: The linguistic construction of social and personal identity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Murray, Thomas E.

(2002) A new look at address in American English: The rules have changed. Names 50.1: 43-61.

Philipsen, Gerry, and Michael Huspek

(1985) A bibliography of sociolinguistic studies of personal address. Anthropological linguistics 27: 94-101. BoP

Pieper, Ursula

(1990) Homologie, Homöologie und Heterologie im Anredeverhalten: Anrede im Deutschen, Dänischen und Polnischen. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 18.1: 1-12.

Saville-Troike, Muriel

(2003) The ethnography of communication: An introduction. 3ed. Oxford: Blackwell.

Sutton, Laurel A.

(1995) Bitches and skankly hobags: The place of women in contemporary slang. In Kira Hall and Mary Bucholtz (eds.), Gender articulated. Language and the socially constructed self. London: Routledge, pp. 279-96.

Wales, Katie

(1996) Personal pronouns in present-day English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP

Warren, Jane, Michael Clyne, Heinz L. Kretzenbacher, and Catrin Norrby

(2007) The underlying pragmatics of address usage: Comparing and contrasting English with French, German and Swedish. Paper presented at the 10th International Pragmatics Conference, Göteborg, Sweden. 8-13 July 2007.

Wierzbicka, Anna

(1991) Cross-cultural pragmatics. The semantics of human interaction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. BoP

Zwicky, Arnold M.

(1974) Hey, Whatsyourname!. In Michael W. La Galy, Robert A. Fox, Anthony Bruck (eds.), Papers from the tenth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 787-801.

Cited by

Cited by 20 other publications

No author info given

2021. In Nominal and Pronominal Address in Jamaica and Trinidad [Topics in Address Research, 3],

Bodis, Agnes

2021. ‘Double deficit’ and exclusion: Mediated language ideologies and international students’ multilingualism. Multilingua 40:3 ► pp. 367 ff.

Burt, Susan Meredith

2015. In Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Im/politeness [AILA Applied Linguistics Series, 14], ► pp. 71 ff.

Economidou-Kogetsidis, Maria

2011. “Please answer me as soon as possible”: Pragmatic failure in non-native speakers’ e-mail requests to faculty. Journal of Pragmatics 43:13 ► pp. 3193 ff.

Economidou-Kogetsidis, Maria

2016. Variation in evaluations of the (im)politeness of emails from L2 learners and perceptions of the personality of their senders. Journal of Pragmatics 106 ► pp. 1 ff.

Economidou-Kogetsidis, Maria

2018. “Mr Paul, please inform me accordingly”. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 28:4 ► pp. 489 ff.

Formentelli, Maicol

2014. Vocatives galore in audiovisual dialogue. English Text Construction 7:1 ► pp. 53 ff.

Formentelli, Maicol & John Hajek

2016. Address practices in academic interactions in a pluricentric language. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 26:4 ► pp. 631 ff.

Hildenbrand, Grace, Evan Perrault & Taylor Devine

2020. You May Call Me Professor: Professor Form of Address in Email Communication and College Student Reactions to Not Knowing What to Call Their Professors. Journal of Communication Pedagogy 3 ► pp. 82 ff.

Lenchuk, Iryna & Amer Ahmed

2019. Are the Speech Acts of EFL Learners Really Direct? The Case of Requests in the Omani EFL Context. SAGE Open 9:1 ► pp. 215824401882501 ff.

Mehrabi Boshrabadi, Abbas & Sepideh Bataghva Sarabi

2016. Cyber-communic

tion etiquette. Interactive Technology and Smart Education 13:2 ► pp. 86 ff.

Merrison, Andrew John, Jack J. Wilson, Bethan L. Davies & Michael Haugh

2012. Getting stuff done: Comparing e-mail requests from students in higher education in Britain and Australia. Journal of Pragmatics 44:9 ► pp. 1077 ff.

Miner, Annette & Brenda Nicodemus

2021. In Situated Learning in Interpreter Education, ► pp. 69 ff.

Nguyen, Thi Thuy Minh

2018. Pragmatic development in the instructed context. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 28:2 ► pp. 217 ff.

Nicodemus, Brenda, Maicol Formentelli, Keith M. Cagle & Jay Pittman

2021. Address practices of Deaf undergraduate students and faculty: A study of language, identity, and community. Journal of Pragmatics 176 ► pp. 110 ff.

Norrby, Catrin, Doris Schüpbach, John Hajek & Heinz L. Kretzenbacher

2019. In It’s not all about you [Topics in Address Research, 1], ► pp. 376 ff.

Parkinson, Jean

2020. On the use of the address terms guys and mate in an educational context. Journal of Pragmatics 161 ► pp. 81 ff.

Rau, Der-Hwa Victoria & Gerald Rau

2016. In Email Discourse Among Chinese Using English as a Lingua Franca, ► pp. 11 ff.

Sifianou, Maria

2013. The impact of globalisation on politeness and impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics 55 ► pp. 86 ff.

Zago, Raffaele

2015. In Participation in Public and Social Media Interactions [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 256], ► pp. 183 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 05 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.