Imperatives and commitments in Romanian academic meeting interactions
Romanian imperatives may include different constructions that do not necessarily entail an imperative verb, such as the subjunctive and the indicative mood, interjections or elliptical formats. This study focuses on the ‘bare’ imperative turns-at-talk by applying the methodology of conversation analysis on a corpus consisting of naturally occurring academic meeting interactions. It shows how the imperative expresses actions that display no contingency or difficulty in managing them due to the existence of mainly prior explicit commitments (suggestions, proposals, agreements, previous allocated tasks) that entitle the speakers to use the imperative form in order to direct their recipients. Moreover, it shows how the turn including an imperative verb may also represent a simultaneous commitment, more explicitly an offer that accounts for the lack of contingencies and makes relevant the use of the imperative form within the context of Romanian academic meeting interactions.
References (41)
Aikhenvald, Alexandra
(
2010)
Imperatives and Commands. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Antaki, Charles, and Alexandra Kent
(
2012)
Telling people what to do (and, sometimes, why): Contingency, entitlement and explanation in staff requests to adults with intellectual impairments.
Journal of Pragmatics 44.6–7: 876-889.
BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Asmuß, Birte, and Sae Oshima
(
2012)
Negotiation of entitlement in proposal sequences.
Discourse Studies 14.1: 67-86.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Asmuß, Birte, and Jan Svennevig
(
2009)
Meeting talk – an introduction.
Journal of Business Communication 461: 3-22.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bax, Ingrid Pufahl
(
1986)
How to assign work in an office: A comparison of spoken and written directives in American english.
Journal of Pragmatics 10.6: 673-692.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boden, Deirdre
(
1994)
The Business of Talk: Organizations in Action. Cambridge: Polity Press.
BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Craven, Alexandra, and Jonathan Potter
(
2010)
Directives: Entitlement and contingency in action.
Discourse Studies 12.4: 419-442.
BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Curl, Traci
(
2006)
Offers of assistance: Constraints on syntactic design.
Journal of Pragmatics 38.8: 1257-1280.
BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Curl, Traci, and Paul Drew
(
2008)
Contingency and action: A comparison of two forms of requesting.
Research on language and social interaction 41.2: 129-153.
BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Curl, Traci, John Local, and Gareth Walker
(
2006)
Repetition and the prosody–pragmatics interface.
Journal of Pragmatics 38.10: 1721-1751.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Djordjilovic, Olga
(
2012)
Displaying and developing team identity in workplace meetings - a multimodal perspective.
Discourse Studies 14.1: 111-127.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Drew, Paul
(
2005)
Conversation analysis. In
K. Fitch, and
R. Sanders (eds.),
Handbook of language and social interaction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 71-102.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Drew, Paul, and John Heritage
(
1992)
Talk at work. Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ervin-Tripp, Susan
(
1976)
Is Sybil there? The structure of some American English directives.
Language in Society 5.11: 25-66.
BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gheorghe, Mihaela, and Adina Velea
(
2012)
Control Acts In Romanian. In
Stanca Măda, and
Răzvan Săftoiu (eds.),
Professional Communication across Languages and Cultures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 135-167.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goodwin, Marjorie Harness
(
2006)
Participation, affect, and trajectory in family directive/response sequences.
Text and Talk 26.4-5: 513-541.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Guţu-Romalo, Valeria
(
2008)
The Grammar of Romanian Language (in Romanian). Bucureşti: Editura Academiei Române.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heinemann, Trine
(
2006)
'Will you or can't you?': Displaying entitlement in interrogative requests.
Journal of Pragmatics 38.7: 1081-1104.
BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heritage, John, and Steven Clayman
(
2010)
Talk in Action: Interactions, Identities, and Institutions. Oxford: Blackwell.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Keisanen, Tiina, and Rauniomaa, Mirka
(
2012)
The organization of participation and contingency in prebeginnings of request sequences.
Research on Language & Social Interaction 45.4: 323-351.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kent, Alexandra
(
2012)
Responding to parental directives - What can children do when a parent tells them what to do? In
M. Theobold, and
S. Danby (eds.),
Disputes in Everyday Life: Social and Moral Orders of Children and Young People. New York: American Sociological Association’s Studies of Children and Youth and Emerald Books.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lee, S.-H
(
2011)
Managing non-granting of customers’ requests in commercial service encounters.
Research on Language & Social Interaction 441: 109-134.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Maiden, Martin
(
2006)
On Romanian imperatives.
Philologica Jassyensia II.1: 47-59.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Măda, Stanca
(
2009)
Communication in Romanian professional environment (in Romanian). Braşov: Editura Universităţii Transilvania din Braşov.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ogiermann, Eva, and Joerg Zinken
(
2011)
How to propose an action as objectively necessary: The case of polish trzeba x (''one needs to x'').
Research on Language & Social Interaction 44.3: 263-287.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pană Dindelegan, Gabriela
Forthcoming)
Romanian Grammar: A linguistic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pearson, Bethyl
(
1989)
‘Role-ing out control’ at church business meetings: Directing and disagreeing.
Language Sciences 111: 289–304.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pîrvulescu, Mihaela, and Yves Roberge
(
2000)
The syntax and morphology of Romanian imperatives. In
V. Motapanyane (ed.),
Comparative studies in Romanian syntax. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 295-313.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schegloff, Emanuel A
(
2007)
Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. (Vol. 11). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sidnell, Jack
(
2010)
Conversation Analysis. An introduction. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stevanovic, Melisa, and Anssi Peräkylä
(
2012)
Deontic authority in interaction: The right to announce, propose, and decide.
Research on Language & Social Interaction 45.3: 297-321.
BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stivers, Tanya
(
2004)
''No no no'' and other types of multiple sayings in social interaction.
Human Communication Research 30.2: 260-293.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Svennevig, Jan
(
2012a)
The agenda as resource for topic introduction in workplace meetings.
Discourse Studies 14.1: 53-66.
BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Svennevig, Jan
(
2012b)
Interaction in workplace meetings.
Discourse Studies 14.11: 3-10.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vasilescu, Andra
Forthcoming)
Clause types. In
Gabriela Pană Dindelegan (ed.)
Romanian Grammar: A linguistic introduction Oxford Oxford University Press
Vine, Bernadette
(
2009)
Directives at work: Exploring the contextual complexity of workplace directives.
Journal of Pragmatics 41.7: 1395-1405.
BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Xrakovskij, Viktor S
(
2001)
Typology of imperative constructions. München: Lincom Europa.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zafiu, Rodica
Forthcoming)
Mood, tense and aspect. In
Gabriela Pană Dindelegan (ed.)
Romanian Grammar: A linguistic introduction Oxford Oxford University Press
Cited by (2)
Cited by 2 other publications
Van Olmen, Daniël & Simone Heinold
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.