Article published in:
The interaction between context and grammar in Functional Discourse Grammar
Edited by Nuria Alturo, Evelien Keizer and Lluís Payrató
[Pragmatics 24:2] 2014
► pp. 185–201

The interaction between context and grammar in functional discourse grammar

Introduction

Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 01 June 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.24.2.01alt
References
Auer, Peter
(1996) From context to contextualization. Links & Letters 31: 11-28.Google Scholar
(2009) Context and contextualization. In J. Verschueren, and J.O. Östman (eds.), Key Notions for Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 86-101. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas
(1988) Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Colin Fraser
(1979) Speech as a marker of situation. In K. Scherer, and H. Giles (eds.), Social Markers in Speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 33-62.Google Scholar
Butler, Christopher S
(2003) Structure and Function: A Guide to Three Major Structural-Functional Theories. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
(2008) Interpersonal meaning in the noun phrase. In D. García Velasco, and J. Rijkhoff (eds.), The Noun Phrase in Functional Discourse Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 221-261.Google Scholar
Connolly, John H
(2004) The question of discourse representation in Functional Discourse Grammar. In J.L. Mackenzie, and M.A. Gómez-González (eds.), A New Architecture for Functional Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 89-116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Context in Functional Discourse Grammar. Alfa: Revista de Lingüística 51/21: 11-33.Google Scholar
(2008) Freestanding noun phrases within documents: A pragmatic approach based on Functional Discourse Grammar. In D. García Velasco, and J. Rijkhoff (eds.), The Noun Phrase in Functional Discourse Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 263-285.Google Scholar
(2010) Accommodating multimodality in Functional Discourse Grammar. In G. Wanders, and E. Keizer (eds.), Web Papers in Functional Discourse Grammar 831: 1-18. Available at http://​home​.hum​.uva​.nl​/fdg​/working​_papers​/WP​-FDG​-83​_Connolly​.pdfGoogle Scholar
Cook, Guy
(1992) The Discourse of Advertising. London: Routledge.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Cornish, Francis
(2009) Text and discourse as context: Discourse anaphora and the FDG Contextual Component. In E. Keizer, and G. Wanders (eds.), Special Issue: The London papers I. Web Papers in Functional Discourse Grammar, pp. 97-115.Google Scholar
Cruse, Alan
(2006) A Glossary of Semantics and Pragmatics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Devlin, Keith
(1991) Logic and Information. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dik, Simon C
(1997a) The Theory of Functional Grammar. Part 1: The Structure of the Clause. Edited by K. Hengeveld. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(1997b) The Theory of Functional Grammar. Part 2: Complex and Derived Constructions. Edited by K. Hengeveld. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro, and Charles Goodwin
(1992) (eds.) Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita
(2004) Recontextualizing Context: Grammaticality Meets Appropiateness. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Firth, John R
(1957) Papers in Linguistics 1934–1951. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy
(2005) Context as Other Minds. The Pragmatics of Sociality, Cognition and Communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Ervin
(1981) Forms of Talk. Oxford: Blackwell.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1986) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organisation of Experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles, and Alessandro Duranti
(1992) Rethinking context: An introduction. In A. Duranti, and C. Goodwin (eds.), Rethinking Context: Grammaticality Meets Appropriateness. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 1-43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, John J
(1982) Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1992a) Contextualization revisited. In P. Auer, and A. Di Luzio (eds.), The contextualization of language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 39-54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1992b) Contextualization and understanding. In A. Duranti, and C. Goodwin (eds.), Rethinking Context: Grammaticality Meets Appropriateness. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 229-252.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K
(1985) An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K., and Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen
(2004) An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd revised edition on Halliday 1985). London: Hodder Arnold.Google Scholar
Harris, Wendell V
(1988) Interpretive Acts: In Search of Meaning. Oxford: Clarendon.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees, and John L. Mackenzie
(2008) Functional Discourse Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul
(1987) Emergent grammar. Berkeley Linguistics Society 131: 139-157. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hymes, Dell
(1972a) Models of the interaction of language and social life. In J.J. Gumperz, and D. Hymes (eds.), Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston, pp. 35-71.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1972b) On communicative competence. In J.B. Pride, and J. Holmes (eds.), Sociolinguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin, pp. 269-283.Google Scholar
Levelt, Willem J.M
(1989) Speaking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C
(1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Linell, Per
(1998) Approaching Dialogue: Talk, Interaction and Contexts in Dialogical Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Martin, J.R., and David Rose
(2007) Working with Discourse (2nd edition). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
(2008) Genre Relations: Mapping Culture. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Matthews, Peter H
(2007) The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press (1st edition, 1997).Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor
(1979) Introduction: What child language can contribute to pragmatics. In E. Ochs, and B.B. Schieffelin (eds.), Developmental Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, pp. 1-17.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Rijkhoff, Jan
(2008) Layers, levels and contexts in Functional Discourse Grammar. In D. García Velasco, and J. Rijkhoff (eds.), The Noun Phrase in Functional Discourse Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 63-115.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
(1986) Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A
(2008) Discourse and Context: A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, Jr, Robert D
(2005) Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, Jr, Robert D., and Randy La Polla
(1997) Syntax: Structure, Meaning and Function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber
(2004) Relevance theory. In L.R. Horn, and G. Ward (eds.), The Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 607-632.Google Scholar

Full-text

The interaction between context and grammar in functional discourse grammar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Keizer, Evelien
2020. Modelling stance adverbs in grammatical theory: tackling heterogeneity with Functional Discourse Grammar. Language Sciences 82 ► pp. 101273 ff. Crossref logo
Keizer, Evelien & Hella Olbertz
2018.  In Recent Developments in Functional Discourse Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series, 205], ► pp. 2 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.