Article published in:The interaction between context and grammar in Functional Discourse Grammar
Edited by Nuria Alturo, Evelien Keizer and Lluís Payrató
[Pragmatics 24:2] 2014
► pp. 229–248
The Contextual Component within a dynamic implementation of the FDG model
Structure and interaction
The central issue addressed in this paper concerns the design of an appropriate contextual framework to support a dynamic implementation of FDG. The first part of the paper is concerned with the internal structure of the contextual framework. A particular hierarchical structure for the analysis and description of context, articulated in Connolly (2007a) and termed the Extended Model of Context (EMC), is presented as the starting-point. Alternative frameworks are considered, but all are found to have shortcomings. However, the original version of the EMC has also received some criticism. Consequently, a revised model of the EMC is proposed, in which the treatment of context is enhanced, and which is appropriate to a dynamic implementation of FDG. The application of the revised EMC not only to the grammatical model, but also to a broader discourse model, is also discussed. The next part of the paper is concerned with the interaction between the EMC and the FDG Grammatical and Conceptual Components. It is contended that all of the main types of context recognised within the EMC have a significant effect upon grammar. However, the only way in which contextual factors may directly influence the production and interpretation of discourse is through their presence in the minds of the discourse-participants. Consequently, the Conceptual Component plays a vital, mediating role in the handling of interactions between the EMC and the Grammatical Component. This point is particularly salient when considering a dynamic implementation, in which the flow of information around the model is of crucial importance. It is contended that this flow is essentially cyclic in nature.
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 01 June 2015
(1988) Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
Brown, P., and C. Fraser
Clark, H.H., and T.B. Carlson
(2010) Accommodating multimodality in Functional Discourse Grammar. In G. Wanders, and E. Keizer (eds.), Web Papers in Functional Discourse Grammar WP-FDF-83, Special Issue: The London Papers II1: 1-18. Available at: http://www.functionaldiscoursegrammar.info/.
(1992) The Discourse of Advertising. London: Routledge. BoP
(2009) Text and discourse as context: Discourse anaphora and the FDG Contextual Component. In E. Keizer, and G. Wanders (eds.), Web Papers in Functional Grammar WP-FDG-82, Special Issue: the London Papers I1: 97-115. Available at http://www.functionaldiscoursegrammar.info/.
García Velasco, D., and J. Rijkhoff
(2000) Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 321: 1489-1522. BoP
Goodwin, C., and A. Duranti
(1992) Rethinking context: An introduction. In A. Duranti, and C. Goodwin (eds.), Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-42. BoP
Hengeveld, K., and J.L. Mackenzie
(1972) Models of the interaction of language and social life. In J.J. Gumperz, and D. Hymes (eds.), Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston, pp. 35-71. BoP
Jacoby, S., and E. Ochs
(1995) Co-construction: An introduction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 281: 171-183. BoP
(1998) Approaching Dialogue: Talk, Interaction and Contexts in Dialogical Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. BoP
(1992) English Text: System and Structure. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company. BoP
(2004) Text, Context, Pretext: Critical Issues in Discourse Analysis. Malden, MA: Blackwell. BoP
Cited by 13 other publications
García Velasco, Daniel
García Velasco, Daniel
Hengeveld, Kees & J. Lachlan Mackenzie
Keizer, Evelien & Hella Olbertz
Mackenzie, J. Lachlan
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.