Article published In:
The interaction between context and grammar in Functional Discourse GrammarEdited by Nuria Alturo, Evelien Keizer and Lluís Payrató
[Pragmatics 24:2] 2014
► pp. 229–248
Edited by Nuria Alturo, Evelien Keizer and Lluís Payrató
[Pragmatics 24:2] 2014
► pp. 229–248
The Contextual Component within a dynamic implementation of the FDG model
Structure and interaction
The central issue addressed in this paper concerns the design of an appropriate contextual framework to support a dynamic implementation of FDG. The first part of the paper is concerned with the internal structure of the contextual framework. A particular hierarchical structure for the analysis and description of context, articulated in Connolly (2007a) and termed the Extended Model of Context (EMC), is presented as the starting-point. Alternative frameworks are considered, but all are found to have shortcomings. However, the original version of the EMC has also received some criticism. Consequently, a revised model of the EMC is proposed, in which the treatment of context is enhanced, and which is appropriate to a dynamic implementation of FDG. The application of the revised EMC not only to the grammatical model, but also to a broader discourse model, is also discussed. The next part of the paper is concerned with the interaction between the EMC and the FDG Grammatical and Conceptual Components. It is contended that all of the main types of context recognised within the EMC have a significant effect upon grammar. However, the only way in which contextual factors may directly influence the production and interpretation of discourse is through their presence in the minds of the discourse-participants. Consequently, the Conceptual Component plays a vital, mediating role in the handling of interactions between the EMC and the Grammatical Component. This point is particularly salient when considering a dynamic implementation, in which the flow of information around the model is of crucial importance. It is contended that this flow is essentially cyclic in nature.
Keywords: Component, Functional Discourse Grammar, Dynamic, Context
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
References
Auer, P
(2009) Context and contextualisation. In J. Verschueren, and J.-O. Östman (eds.), Key Notions for Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 86-101. 
Biber, D
Brown, P., and C. Fraser
(1979) Speech as a marker of situation. In K. Scherer, and H. Giles (eds.), Social Markers in Speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 33-62.
Butler, C.S
(2008) Interpersonal meaning in the noun phrase. In D. García Velasco, and J. Rijkhoff (eds.), The Noun Phrase in Functional Discourse Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 221-261.
(2013) A reappraisal of the functional enterprise, with particular reference to Functional Discourse Grammar. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 671: 13-42.
Clark, H.H., and T.B. Carlson
(1992) Context for comprehension. In H.H. Clark (ed.), Arenas of language use. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 60-77.
Connolly, J.H
(2004) The question of discourse representation in Functional Discourse Grammar. In J.L. Mackenzie, and M. de los Ángeles Gómez-González (eds.), A New Architecture for Functional Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 89-116.
(2007a) Context in Functional Discourse Grammar. Alfa 51/21: 11-33.
(2007b) Mental context and the expression of terms within the English clause: An approach based on Functional Discourse Grammar. In M. Hannay, and G.J. Steen (eds.), Structural-functional Studies in English Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 193-208.
(2010) Accommodating multimodality in Functional Discourse Grammar. In G. Wanders, and E. Keizer (eds.), Web Papers in Functional Discourse Grammar WP-FDF-83, Special Issue: The London Papers II1: 1-18. Available at: [URL].
Cook, G
Cornish, F
(2009) Text and discourse as context: Discourse anaphora and the FDG Contextual Component. In E. Keizer, and G. Wanders (eds.), Web Papers in Functional Grammar WP-FDG-82, Special Issue: the London Papers I1: 97-115. Available at [URL].
Devlin, K
(1991) Logic and Information. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fetzer, A
(2004) Recontextualising Context: Grammaticality Meets Appropriateness. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Firth, J.R
(1957) Papers in Linguistics 1934–1951. London: Oxford University Press.
García Velasco, D., and J. Rijkhoff
(eds.) (2008) The Noun Phrase in Functional Discourse Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Giomi, R
this volume) Grammar, context and the hearer: Preliminary proposal for a hearer-based model of FDG. Pragmatics 24.2: 275-296.
Givón, T
(2005) Context as Other Minds: The Pragmatics of Sociability, Cognition and Communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Goodwin, C
(2000) Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 321: 1489-1522. BoP
BoPGoodwin, C., and A. Duranti
(1992) Rethinking context: An introduction. In A. Duranti, and C. Goodwin (eds.), Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-42. BoP
Harris, W.V
(1988) Interpretive Acts: In Search of Meaning. Oxford: Clarendon.
Hengeveld, K., and J.L. Mackenzie
(2008) Functional Discourse Grammar: A Typologically-based Theory of Language Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hymes, D
(1972) Models of the interaction of language and social life. In J.J. Gumperz, and D. Hymes (eds.), Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston, pp. 35-71. BoP
Jacoby, S., and E. Ochs
(1995) Co-construction: An introduction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 281: 171-183. BoP
BoPKeizer, E
(2008) Reference and ascription in Functional Discourse Grammar: an inventory of problems and some possible solutions. In D. García Velasco, and J. Rijkhoff (eds.), The Noun Phrase in Functional Discourse Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 43-62.
Linell, P
(1998) Approaching Dialogue: Talk, Interaction and Contexts in Dialogical Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. BoP
BoPLukin, A
(2013) What do texts do? The context-construing work of news. Text and Talk 31: 523-551.
Mackenzie, J.L
Martin, J.R
Martinec, R
(2000) Types of process in action. Semiotica 1301: 243-268.
Okada, M
(2007) Whose common ground? A misunderstanding caused by incorrect interpretations of the lexical markers of common ground. In A. Fetzer, and K. Fischer (eds.), Lexical Markers of Common Ground. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 183-194.
Rijkhoff, J
(2008) Layers, levels and contexts in Functional Discourse Grammar. In D. García Velasco, and J. Rijkhoff (eds.), The Noun Phrase in Functional Discourse Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 63-115.
Shailor, J.G
(1997) The meaning and use of “context’”in the theory of the Coordinated Management of Meaning. In J.L. Owen (ed.), Context and Communication Behaviour. Reno, NV: Context Press, pp. 97-110.
van Dijk, T.A
(2006) Discourse, context and cognition. Discourse Studies 81: 159-177.
(2008) Discourse and Context: A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Widdowson, H.G
Cited by
Cited by 15 other publications
Cenerini, Chantale
2018. External possessor constructions and Cree relational inflection compared. In Recent Developments in Functional Discourse Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series, 205], ► pp. 90 ff. 
Cornish, Francis
2014. "Agreement" as a perspectivizing device in discourse. In Theory and Practice in Functional-Cognitive Space [Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics, 68], ► pp. 177 ff.
García Velasco, Daniel
2015. Activation and the relation between context and grammar. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 297 ff.
García Velasco, Daniel
2015. Activation and the relation between context and grammar. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 297 ff.
Velasco, Daniel García
2022. Modification and context. Open Linguistics 8:1 ► pp. 524 ff.
Giomi, Riccardo
2015. Grammar, context and the hearer. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 275 ff.
Hengeveld, Kees & J. Lachlan Mackenzie
2015. Grammar and context in Functional Discourse Grammar. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 203 ff.
Keizer, Evelien
2020. Modelling stance adverbs in grammatical theory: tackling heterogeneity with Functional Discourse Grammar. Language Sciences 82 ► pp. 101273 ff.
Keizer, Evelien
2020. Chapter 6. The semantics, syntax and prosody of adverbs in English. In Grammar and Cognition [Human Cognitive Processing, 70], ► pp. 191 ff.
Keizer, Evelien & Hella Olbertz
2018. Functional Discourse Grammar. In Recent Developments in Functional Discourse Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series, 205], ► pp. 2 ff.
Keizer, Evelien, Thomas Schwaiger & Elnora ten Wolde
2022. Modification in Functional Discourse Grammar: State of the art and issues addressed. Open Linguistics 8:1 ► pp. 512 ff.
Kok, Kasper
Mackenzie, J. Lachlan
2015. The contextual component in a dialogic FDG. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 249 ff.
Mackenzie, J. Lachlan
O’Neill, Gareth
2015. Humming, whistling, singing, and yelling in Pirahã context and channels of communication in FDG. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 349 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.