Article published in:Approaches to grammar for interactional linguistics
Edited by Ritva Laury, Marja Etelämäki and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
[Pragmatics 24:3] 2014
► pp. 477–506
Why blend conversation analysis with cognitive grammar?
This article proposes that combining Conversation Analysis (CA) with Cognitive Grammar (CG) provides a fruitful framework for studying language as a socio-cognitive phenomenon. The authors first discuss two indexical phenomena, the Finnish demonstratives and the Finnish free-standing infinitives; these are first analyzed using the methods of CA, then rediscussed in the framework of CG. The description of both phenomena relies on the CG notion of grounding elements, i.e., the elements that conceptualize some facet of the ground (speech situation) as part of their meaning. The authors argue that such meaning associated with grammar includes knowledge about the schematic organization of the ground, and that the grammatical means for conceptualizing the ground make dynamic co-construction of the speech situation possible. Whereas the authors rely on the terminology of CG when describing the con-strual of the ground, they strongly underline the fact that the ways in which the ground is construed can only be found out using the methods of CA. In this way, combining CA with CG can offer us an approach where language is analyzed as the interface of the human mind and the social world.
Keywords: Construal, Interaction, Infinitives, Demonstratives, Ground, Conversation analysis, Cognitive grammar
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 01 September 2015
(2005) Projection in interaction and projection in grammar. Text 25.1: 7-36. BoP
Bybee, Joan, and Paul Hopper
(eds.) (2001) Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Units. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. BoP
(1999) Anaphora, Discourse and Understanding: Evidence from English and French. Oxford: Clarendon Press. BoP
this volume) What does grammar tell us about action? Pragmatics 24.3: 623-647.
Etelämäki, Marja, and Minna Jaakola
Etelämäki, Marja, Minna Jaakola, Ilona Herlin, and Laura Visapää
Evans, Nicholas, and Stephen C. Levinson
Fillmore, Charles J
Ford, Cecilia, and Barbara Fox
Ford, Cecilia, Barbara Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson
Glynn, Dylan, and Kerstin Fischer
Goodwin, Charles, and Marjorie Harness Goodwin
Gries, Stefan Th., and Anatol Stefanowitsch
(eds.) (2006) Corpora in Cognitive Linguistics: Corpus-based Approaches to Syntax And Lexis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. MetBib
Hakulinen, Auli, and Eeva-Leena Seppänen
(1992) Finnish kato: from verb to particle. Journal of Pragmatics 181: 527-549. BoP
Hanks, William F
(1990) Referential Practice. Language and Lived Space among the Maya. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. BoP
Hasson, Uri, Asif A. Ghanzafar, Bruno Galantucci, Simon Garrod, and Christian Keysers
(2011) Functions in the individual and in the community. Paper presented at the Symposium on Functions, Functionalism and Linguistics. LSA Winter Meeting, Pittsburgh, January 2011.
Langacker, Ronald W
(1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar. Volume 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University press. BoP
(1997) Demonstratives in Interaction. The emergence of a definite article in Finnish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. BoP
Levinson, Stephen C
(1998) Approaching dialogue: Talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. BoP
Mazeland, Harrie, and Mike Huiskes
Noordzij, Matthijas, Sarah E. Newman-Norlund, Jan Peter de Ruiter, Peter Hagoort, Stephen C. Levinson, and Ivan Toni
Ono, Tsuyoshi, and Sandra A. Thompson
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
Schegloff, Emanuel A
(1996) Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In E. Ochs, E.A. Schegloff, and S.A. Thompson (eds.), Interaction and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 52-133. BoP
(2007) Sequence Organization in Interaction. A Primer in Conversation Analysis I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
Schegloff, Emanuel A., and Harvey Sacks
(1973) Opening up closings. Semiotica VIII, 4: 289-327. BoP
(2010) Affectivity in conversational storytelling: An analysis of displays of anger or indignation in complaint stories. Pragmatics 201: 229-277. BoP
Setälä, Emil Nestor
(2001) Responding in Conversation. A Study of Response Particles in Finnish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. BoP
forthcoming) Infinitives revisited: An interactional and cognitive approach. Manuscript under revision.
Zlatev, Jordan A
(2008) The co-evolution of intersubjectivity and bodily mimesis. In J. Zlatev, T. Racine, C. Sinha, and E. Itkonen (eds.), The shared mind: Perspectives on intersubjectivity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 215-244 BoP
Cited by 8 other publications
Herlin, Ilona & Laura Visapää
Li, Yinmei & Yi’na Wang
ZIMA, ELISABETH & GEERT BRÔNE
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.