This article proposes that combining Conversation Analysis (CA) with Cognitive Grammar (CG) provides a fruitful framework for studying language as a socio-cognitive phenomenon. The authors first discuss two indexical phenomena, the Finnish demonstratives and the Finnish free-standing infinitives; these are first analyzed using the methods of CA, then rediscussed in the framework of CG. The description of both phenomena relies on the CG notion of grounding elements, i.e., the elements that conceptualize some facet of the ground (speech situation) as part of their meaning. The authors argue that such meaning associated with grammar includes knowledge about the schematic organization of the ground, and that the grammatical means for conceptualizing the ground make dynamic co-construction of the speech situation possible. Whereas the authors rely on the terminology of CG when describing the con-strual of the ground, they strongly underline the fact that the ways in which the ground is construed can only be found out using the methods of CA. In this way, combining CA with CG can offer us an approach where language is analyzed as the interface of the human mind and the social world.
Cornish, Francis (1999) Anaphora, Discourse and Understanding: Evidence from English and French. Oxford: Clarendon Press. BoP
Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth (this volume) What does grammar tell us about action?Pragmatics 24.3: 623-647.
Croft, William (2009) Towards a social cognitive linguistics. In V. Evans, and S. Pourcel (eds.), New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 395-420.
Diessel, Holger (2006) Demonstratives, joint attention, and the emergence of grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 171: 463-489.
Enfield, N.J. (2003) Demonstratives in space and interaction. Data from Lao speakers and implications for semantic analysis. Language 791: 82-117.
Etelämäki, Marja (2006) Toiminta ja tarkoite.Tutkimus suomen pronominista “tämä” [Activity and referent. A study on the Finnish pronoun tämä
]. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.
Etelämäki, Marja (2009) The Finnish demonstrative pronouns in light of interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 411: 21-46.
Etelämäki, Marja, and Minna Jaakola (2009) Tota ja puhetilanteen todellisuus [The particle tota and the reality of speech situation]. Virittäjä 21: 188-212.
Etelämäki, Marja, Minna Jaakola, Ilona Herlin, and Laura Visapää (2009) Kielioppi käsitteistyksenä ja toimintana. Kognitiivista kielioppia ja keskustelunanalyysia yhdistämässä. [Grammar as conceptualization and as action. Combining Cognitive Grammar and Conversation Analysis]. Virittäjä 21: 162-187.
Evans, Nicholas, and Stephen C. Levinson (2009) The myth of language universals. Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 321: 429-448. doi:
Fillmore, Charles J. (1988) The mechanisms of “construction grammar”. In Proceedings of the Annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society 141: 35-55.
Ford, Cecilia, Barbara Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson (2002) Constituency and turn increments. In C. Ford, B. Fox, and S. Thompson (eds.), The Language of Turns and Sequences. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 14-38.
Ford, Cecilia, Barbara Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson (2003) Social interaction and grammar. In M. To-masello (ed.), The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure, Vol. 2. London: Erlbaum, pp. 119-144.
Glynn, Dylan, and Kerstin Fischer (eds.) (2010) Quantitative Methods in Cognitive Semantics: Corpus-driven Approaches. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Goffman, Erwing (1981) Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Goodwin, Charles (1979) The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In G. Psathas (ed.), Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington Publishers, pp. 97-121.
Goodwin, Charles (2003) Pointing as Situated Practice. In S. Kita (ed.), Pointing: Where Language, Culture and Cognition Meet. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 217-241.
Goodwin, Charles, and Marjorie Harness Goodwin (1987) Concurrent operations on talk: Notes on the interactive organization of assessments. Pragmatics 1.1: 1-55.
Gries, Stefan Th., and Anatol Stefanowitsch (eds.) (2006) Corpora in Cognitive Linguistics: Corpus-based Approaches to Syntax And Lexis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. MetBib
Günthner, Suzanne (2000) Vorwurfsaktivitäten in der Alltagsinteraktion. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Hakulinen, Auli (ed.) (1989) Suomalaisen keskustelun keinoja I. [Characteristics of Finnish Conversation I]. Kieli 4. Department of Finnish, University of Helsinki.
Hakulinen, Auli, and Eeva-Leena Seppänen (1992) Finnish kato: from verb to particle. Journal of Pragmatics 181: 527-549. BoP
Hanks, William F. (1990) Referential Practice. Language and Lived Space among the Maya. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. BoP
Hanks, William F. (1992) The indexical ground of deictic reference. In A. Duranti, and C. Goodwin (eds.), Rethinking context. Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 43-76.
Hanks, William F. (2005) Explorations in the deictic field. Current Anthropology 46.2: 191-220.
Heritage, John (1996 [1984]) Harold Garfinkel ja etnometodologia. [Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology]. Transl. I. Arminen, O. Paloposki, A. Peräkylä, S. Vehviläinen, and S. Veijola. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.
Heritage, John (2011) Territories of knowledge, territories of experience: Empathic moments in interaction. T. Stivers, L. Mondada, and J. Steensig (eds.), The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 159-183.
Hasson, Uri, Asif A. Ghanzafar, Bruno Galantucci, Simon Garrod, and Christian Keysers (2012) Brain-to-brain coupling: A mechanism for creating and sharing a social world. Trends in Cognitive Science 161: 114-121. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.12.007
Itkonen, Terho (1966) Tutkimus suomen asyndetonista. [A study on Finnish asyndeton]. Virittäjä 701: 402-423.
Itkonen, Terho (1979) Zur Sematik und Pragmatik der Finnischen Demonstrativa. In C. Gläser, and J. Pustzay (eds.), Festschrift für Wolfgang Schalchter zum 70. Geburtstag. Veröf fentlichungen der Societas Uralo-Altaica 12. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, pp. 113-127.
Jaakola, Minna (2004) Suomen genetiivi [Finnish genitive]. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.
Jefferson, Gail (1988) On the sequential organization of troubles talk in ordinary conversation. Social Problems 35.4: 418-442.
Keevallik, Leelo (2003) From Interaction to Grammar. Estonian Finite Verb Forms in Conversation. Uppsala, Sweden: Studia Uralica Upsaliensia 34.
Kemmer, Suzanne (2011) Functions in the individual and in the community. Paper presented at the Symposium on Functions, Functionalism and Linguistics. LSA Winter Meeting, Pittsburgh, January 2011.
Koivisto, Aino (2012) Discouse patterns for turn-final conjunctions. Journal of Pragmatics 44: 1254– 1272.
Lambrecht, Kund (1994) Information Structure and Sentence Form. Topic, Focus and the Mental Repre-sentatins of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Langacker, Ronald W. (1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar. Volume 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University press. BoP
Langacker, Ronald W. (1990) Subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics 11: 5-38.
Langacker, Ronald W. (1991) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume II: Descriptive Application. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, Ronald W. (1999) Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Langacker, Ronald W. (2001) Discourse in Cognitive Grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 121: 143-188.
Langacker, Ronald W. (2002) Deixis and subjectivity. In F. Brisard (ed.), Grounding. The Epistemic Footing of Deixis and Reference. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 1-28.
Langacker, Ronald W. (2008) Cognitive grammar. A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Langacker, Ronald W. (2014) Subordination in a dynamic account of grammar. In J. Kalliokoski, H. Sorva, and L. Visapää (eds.), Contexts of Subordination. Cognitive, typological and discourse perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 17-72.
Larjavaara, Matti (2007) Pragmasemantiikka [Pragma-semantics]. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.
Laury, Ritva (2002) Interaction, grounding and third-person reference forms. In F. Brisard (ed.), Grounding. The Epistemic Footing of Deixis and Reference. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 83-111.
Leino, Jaakko (2003) Antaa se muuttua. Suomen kielen permissiivirakenne ja sen kehitys. [Let it change. The Finnish permissive construction and its history]. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.
Levinson, Stephen C. (2006) On the human “interaction engine”. In S.C. Levinson, and N.J. Enfield (eds.), Roots of human sociality. Oxford: Berg, pp. 39-69.
Linell, Per (2004) On some principles of a dialogical grammar. In K. Aijmer (ed.), Dialogue Analysis VIII: Understanding and misunderstanding in dialogue. Tübingen: Niemeyer, pp. 7-23.
Linell, Per (2009) Rethinking language, mind, and world dialogically. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Mazeland, Harrie, and Mike Huiskes (2001) Dutch but as a sequential conjuction. In M. Selting, and E. Couper-Kuhlen (eds.), Studies in Interactional Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 141-169.
Mielikäinen, Aila (1991) Murteiden murros: Levikkikarttoja nykypuhekielen piirteistä. [Circulation maps of features of present-day spoken language]. Jyväskylän yliopiston suomen kielen laitoksen julkaisuja 36. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.
Noordzij, Matthijas, Sarah E. Newman-Norlund, Jan Peter de Ruiter, Peter Hagoort, Stephen C. Levinson, and Ivan Toni (2009) Brain mechanisms underlying human communication. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 3: 14. doi: 10.3389/neuro.09.014.2009
Onikki-Rantajääskö, Tiina (2001) Sarjoja. Nykysuomen paikallissijaiset olotilanilmaukset kielen analogisuuden ilmentäjinä. Helsinki: Finnish Literatre Society.
Ono, Tsuyoshi, and Sandra A. Thompson (1995) What can conversation tell us about syntax? In P.W. Davis (ed.), Alternative linguistics. Descriptive and theoretical modes. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 213-271.
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson (1974) A simplest systemactics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 501: 696-735.
Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1992) Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersub-jectivity in conversatin. American Journal of Sociology 971: 1295-1345.
Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1996) Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In E. Ochs, E.A. Schegloff, and S.A. Thompson (eds.), Interaction and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 52-133. BoP
Schegloff, Emanuel A. (2007) Sequence Organization in Interaction. A Primer in Conversation Analysis I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
Schegloff, Emanuel A. (2010) Some other “uh(m)”s. Discourse Processes 471: 130-174.
Schegloff, Emanuel A., and Harvey Sacks (1973) Opening up closings. Semiotica VIII, 4: 289-327. BoP
Setälä, Emil Nestor (1880) Suomen kielen lauseoppi. Oppikirjan koe. [Finnish syntax. A textbook]. Helsinki: K.E. Holm.
Silverstein, Michael (1976) Shifters, verbal categories, and cultural description. In K.H. Basso, and H.A. Selby (eds.), Meaning in Anthropology. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, pp. 11-55.
Visapää, Laura (2008) Infinitiivi ja sen infiniittisyys. Tutkimus suomen kielen itsenäisistä A-infinitiivikonstruktioista. [Infinitive and its infinity. A study of the independent A-infinitive constructions]. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.
Visapää, Laura (forthcoming) Infinitives revisited: An interactional and cognitive approach. Manuscript under revision.
Zlatev, Jordan A. (2008) The co-evolution of intersubjectivity and bodily mimesis. In J. Zlatev, T. Racine, C. Sinha, and E. Itkonen (eds.), The shared mind: Perspectives on intersubjectivity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 215-244 BoP
Zlatev, Jordan A. (2010) Phenomenology and cognitive linguistics. In S. Callagher (ed.), Handbook on Phenomenology and Cognitive Science. Berlin: Springer, pp. 415-446.
Cited by (8)
Cited by eight other publications
Visapää, Laura
2022. Infinitives of affect and intersubjectivity: on the indexical interpretation of the Finnish independent infinitives. Cognitive Linguistics 33:3 ► pp. 521 ff.
2015. Cognitive Linguistics and interactional discourse: time to enter into dialogue. Language and Cognition 7:4 ► pp. 485 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.