Cover not available
Article published In:
Relational work in Facebook and discussion boards/fora
Edited by Miriam A. Locher, Brook Bolander and Nicole Höhn
[Pragmatics 25:1] 2015
► pp. 73–98

“Doing deference”

Identities and relational practices in Chinese online discussion boards

In this paper we examine a key relational practice found in interactions in online discussion boards in Mainland China and Taiwan: ‘doing deference’. In drawing attention to a relational practice that has received attention in quite different research traditions, namely, linguistic pragmatics and conversation analysis (CA), we mean to highlight the possible advantages of an approach to analysis that draws from both in analysing relational work in CMC. We claim in the course of our analysis that the participants are orienting not only to relationships but also to identities through this practice. In this way, we suggest that online discussion boards afford both meaningful interaction and relational work. We further claim that this analysis provides support for the theoretical position that while relational practices may intersect with the emergence of identities, they remain distinct analytical concerns.
Keywords: Deference, Computer-mediated communication, Impoliteness, Politeness, Face, Fora, Chinese, Conversation analysis
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 1 March 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.25.1.04hau
References (108)
Androutsopoulos, Jannis (2006) Introduction: Sociolinguistics and computer-mediated communication. Journal of Sociolinguistics 101: 419–438. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Antaki, Charles, and S. Widdicombe (1998) Identity as an achievement and as a tool. In C. Antaki, and S. Widdicombe (eds.), Identities in Talk. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 1–14.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Arundale, Robert (2005) Pragmatics, conversational implicature, and conversation. In K. Fitch, and R. Sanders (eds.), Handbook of Language and Social Interaction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 41-63.Google Scholar
Arundale, Robert B. (2006) Face as relational and interactional: A communication framework for research on face, facework, and politeness. Journal of Politeness Research 2.2: 193–216.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2009) Face as emergent in interpersonal communication: An alternative to Goffman. In F. Bargiela-Chiappini, and M. Haugh (eds.), Face, Communication and Social Interaction. London: Equinox, pp. 33–54.Google Scholar
. (2010a) Constituting face in conversation: Face, facework and interactional achievement. Journal of Pragmatics 42.8: 2078–2105. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
. (2010b) Relating. In M.A. Locher, and S.L. Graham (eds.), Interpersonal Pragmatics. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 137–167.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Steven C. Levinson (1978) Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In E.N. Goody (ed.), Questions and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 56–289.Google Scholar
(1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bunz, Ulla, and Scott W. Campbell (2004) Politeness accommodation in electronic mail. Communication Research Reports 21.1: 11–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chang, Wei-Lin M., and Michael Haugh (2011) Strategic embarrassment and face threatening in business interactions. Journal of Pragmatics 43.12: 2948–2963. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(2013) Face in Taiwanese business interactions: From emic concepts to emic practices. In Y. Pan, and D.Z. Kádár (eds.), Chinese Discourse and Interaction: Theory and Practice. London: Equinox, pp. 127–151.Google Scholar
Chun, Lan, and Yun Zhao (2010) Apology strategies between social unequals in The Dream of the Red Chamber. Chinese Language and Discourse 1.2: 264–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cook, Haruko (2006) Japanese politeness as an interactional achievement: Academic consultation sessions in Japanese universities. Multilingua 25.3: 269–291. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Daft, Richard L., and Robert H. Lengel (1984) Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organizational design. In L.L. Cummings, and B.M. Staw (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior. Homewood, IL: JAI Press, pp. 191–233.Google Scholar
Daft, R.L., and R.H. Lengel (1986) Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science 32.5: 554–571. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Danet, Brenda, and Susan C. Herring (eds.) (2003) The multilingual Internet: Language, culture, and communication in instant messaging, email and chat. Special issue of Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 9(1): Retrieved June 23, 2013, from [URL]Google Scholar
(eds.) (2007) The Multilingual Internet: Language, Culture and Communication Online. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Davies, Bethan L., Andrew J. Merrison, and Angela Goddard (2007) Institutional apologies in UK higher education: Getting back into the black before going into the red. Journal of Politeness Research 3.1: 39–63.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Oliveira, Sandi M. (2003) Breaking conversational norms on a Portuguese users network: Mean as adjudicators of politeness? Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 9.1 Retrieved June 23, 2013, from [URL]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dongman tieba [animation notice bar]. Baidu Teiba. (n.d.) Retrieved 13 July, 2011, from [URL]
Dresner, Eli, and Susan C. Herring (2010) Functions of the nonverbal in CMC: Emoticons and illocutionary force. Communication Theory 201: 249–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul (1995) Conversation analysis. In J. Smith, R. Harre, and L. van Langenhove (eds.), Rethinking Methods in Psychology. London: Sage, pp. 64–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1998) Complaints about transgressions and misconduct. Research on Language and Social Interaction 311: 295–325. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Eelen, Gino (2001) A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St. Jerome.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Ess, Charles and the AoIR Ethics Working Committee (2001) Ethical Decision-Making and Internet Research. Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee . Retrieved June 23, 2013, from, [URL]
Eysenbach, Gunther, and James E. Till (2001) Ethical issues in qualitative research on internet communities. BMJ 3231: 1103–1105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1972) The Archaeology of Knowledge. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Georgakopoulou, Alexandra (2006) Postscript: Computer-mediated communication in sociolinguistics. Journal of Sociolinguistics 10.4: 548–557. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graham, Sage L. (2007) Disagreeing to agree: Conflict, (im)politeness and identity in a computer - mediated community. Journal of Pragmatics 391: 742–759. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
. (2008) A manual for (im)politeness? The impact of the FAQ in an electronic community of practice. In D. Bousfield, and M.A. Locher (eds.), Impoliteness in Language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 281–304.Google Scholar
Gu, Yuego (1990) Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics 14.2: 237–257. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Harrison, Sandra (2000) Maintaining the virtual community: Use of politeness strategies in an e-mail discussion group. In L. Pemberton, and S. Shurville (eds.), Words on the Web: Computer Mediated Communication. Exeter, England: Intellect, pp. 69–78.Google Scholar
(2007) Transgressions, miscommunication and flames: Problematic incidents in email discussions. In M. Consalvo, and C. Haythornthwaite (eds.), Internet Research Annual. Berlin: Peter Lang, pp. 105–117.Google Scholar
Hatipoğlu, Ciler (2007) (Im)politeness, national and professional identities and context: Some evidence from e-mailed 'Call for papers'. Journal of Pragmatics 39.4: 760–773. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haugh, Michael (2007a) Emic conceptulisations of (im)politeness and face in Japanese: Implications for the discursive negotiation of second language learner identities. Journal of Pragmatics 39.4: 657–680. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007b) The discursive challenge to politeness theory: An interactional alternative. Journal of Politeness Research 3.2: 295–317.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) The discursive negotiation of international student identities. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 29.2: 207–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009) Face and interaction. In F. Bargiela-Chiappini, and M. Haugh (eds.), Face, Communication and Social Interaction. London: Equinox, pp. 1–30.Google Scholar
(2010a) When is an email really offensive? Argumentativity and variability in evaluations of impoliteness. Journal of Politeness Research 6.1: 7–31.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010b) Jocular mockery, (dis)affiliation, and face. Journal of Pragmatics 42.8: 2107–2119. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(2010c) Respect and deference. In M.A. Locher, and S.L. Graham (eds.), Interpersonal Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 271–288.Google Scholar
(2011) Humour, face and im/politeness in getting acquainted. In B. Davies, M. Haugh, and A. Merrison (eds.), Situated Politeness. London: Continuum, pp. 165–184.Google Scholar
(2012) Conversational interaction. In K. Allan, and K.M. Jaszczolt (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 251–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014) (Im)politeness Implicatures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael, and Wei-Lin Melody Chang (2015) Troubles talk, (dis)affiliation and the participation order in Taiwanese-Chinese online discussion boards. In M. Dynel, and J. Chovanec (eds.), Participation in Public and Social Media Interactions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 99-133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herring, Susan C. (1993) Gender and democracy in computer-mediated communication. The Electronic Journal of Communication 3(2): Retrieved June 23, 2013, from [URL]Google Scholar
. (1994) Politeness in computer culture: Why women thank and men flame. In M. Bucholtz, A. Liang, L. Sutton, and C. Hines (eds.), Cultural Performances: Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Women and Language Conference. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Women and Language Group, pp. 278–294.Google Scholar
. (1999) The rhetorical dynamics of gender harassment on-line. The Information Society, 15 (3): 151-167. Retrieved June 23, 2013, from [URL] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2000) Gender differences in CMC: Findings and implications. Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility Journal 18(1): Retrieved June 23, 2013, from [URL]Google Scholar
. (2003) Gender and power in on-line communication. In J. Holmes, and M. Meyerhoff (eds.), The Handbook of Language and Gender. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 202–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2004a) Computer-mediated analysis. An approach to researching online behaviour. In S. Barab, R. Kling, and J.H. Gray (eds.), Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 338–376. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2004b) Computer-mediated communication and woman's place. In M. Bucholtz (ed.), Language and Woman's Place. Text and Commentaries. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 216–222.Google Scholar
. (2007) A faceted classification scheme for computer-mediated discourse. Language@Internet 41: article 1. Retrieved September 08, 2010, from [URL].Google Scholar
. (2010) Computer-mediated conversation: Introduction and overview. Language@internet 71: article 2. Retrieved June 23, 2013, from [URL]Google Scholar
Herring, Susan C., and John C. Paolillo (2006) Gender and genre variation in weblogs. Journal of Sociolinguistics 10.4: 439–459. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet, and Stephanie Schnurr (2005) Politeness, humour and gender in the workplace: Negotiating norms and identifying contestation. Journal of Politeness Research 1.1: 121–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hongladarom, Krisadawan, and Soraj Hongladarom (2005) Politeness in Thai computer-mediated communication. In R.T. Lakoff, S. Ide, and J.L. Mey (eds.), Broadening the Horizon of Linguistic Politeness. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 145–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail (1988) On the sequential organization of troubles talk in ordinary conversation. Social Problems 35.4: 418–441. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, Steven G. (ed.) (1997) Virtual Culture. Identity and Communication in Cyberspace. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Kádár, Daniel Z. (2007) Terms of (Im)politeness. A Study of the Communicational Properties of Traditional Chinese (Im)polite Terms of Address. Budapest: Eötvös Loránd University Press.Google Scholar
. (2010) Exploring the historical Chinese polite denigration/elevation phenomenon. In J. Culpeper, and D.Z. Kádár (eds.), Historical (Im)politeness. Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 117–145.Google Scholar
Kádár, Daniel Z., and Michael Haugh (2013) Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Daniel Z., and Sara Mills (2011) Introduction. In D.Z. Kádár, and S. Mills (eds.), Politeness in East Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiesler, Sara, Jane Siegel, and Timothy McGuire (1984) Social psychological aspects of computer- mediated communication. American Psychologist 39.10: 1123–1134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, Robin T. (1973) The logic of politeness; or minding your p's and q's. Chicago Linguistics Society 91: 292–305.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Lamerichs, Joyce, and Hedwig Te Molder (2003) Computer-mediated communication: From a cognitive to a discursive model. New Media & Society 5.4: 451–473. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey (1983) Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Lindström, Anna, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen (2012) Affiliation in conversation. In Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers (eds.), Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, pp.350–369. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Locher, Miriam A. (2006) Advice online. Advice-giving in an American internet health column. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
. (2008) Relational work, politeness, and identity construction. In G. Antos, and E. Ventola (eds.), Handbook of Interpersonal Communication. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 509–540.Google Scholar
. (2010) Introduction: Politeness and impoliteness in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Politeness Research 6.1: 1–5. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2011) Situated impoliteness: The interface between identity work and relational construction. In B. Davies, M. Haugh, and A. Merrison (eds.), Situated Politeness. London: Continuum, pp. 187–208.Google Scholar
Locher, Miriam A., and Richard J. Watts (2005) Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research 1.1: 9–33.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Merrison, Andrew, Bethan Davies, Jack J. Wilson, and Michael Haugh (2012). Getting stuff done: Comparing e-mail requests from students in higher education in Britain and Australia. Journal of Pragmatics 44.9: 1077–1098. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Mills, Sara (2009) Impoliteness in a cultural context. Journal of Pragmatics 41.5: 1047–1060. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Mills, Sara, and Daniel Z. Kádár (2011) Politeness and culture. In D.Z. Kádár, and S. Mills (eds.), Politeness in East Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 21–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mullany, Louise (2010) Gender and interpersonal pragmatics. In M.A. Locher, and S.L. Graham (eds.), Interpersonal Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 225–250.Google Scholar
Nishimura, Yukiko (2008) Japanese BBS websites as online communities: (Im)politeness perspectives. Language@Internet 51: article 3. Retrieved December 5, 2011, from [URL].Google Scholar
(2010) Impoliteness in Japanese BBS interactions: Observations from message exchanges in two online communities. Journal of Politeness Research 6.1: 33–55.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
OED Online (2008) Oxford English Dictionary (2nd edn). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved January 20, 2010, from [URL]Google Scholar
Owen, Marion (1983) Apologies and Remedial Interchanges: A Study of Language Use in Social Interaction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.  BoP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pan, Yuling, and Daniel Z. Kádár (2011) Politeness in Historical and Contemporary Chinese. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Piirainen-Marsh, Arja (2005) Managing adversarial questioning in broadcast interviews. Journal of Politeness Research 1.2: 193–217.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Planchenault, Gaëlle (2010) Virtual community and politeness: The use of female markers of identity and solidarity in a transvestites' website. Journal of Politeness Research 6.1: 83–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita (1984) Pursuing a response. In J.M. Atkinson, and J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action. Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 152–163.Google Scholar
Pudlinski, Christopher (2005) Doing empathy and sympathy: Caring responses to troubles tellings on a peer support line. Discourse Studies 7.3: 267–288. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Radcliffe-Brown, Alfred R. (1952) Structure and Function in Primitive Society. London: Cohen & West.Google Scholar
Robinson, Jeffrey D. (2004) The sequential organisation of "explicit" apologies in naturally occurring English. Research on Language and Social Interaction 37.3: 291–330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. (2005) On complainability. Social Problems 52.4: 449–476. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2007) A tutorial on membership categorization. Journal of Pragmatics 391: 462–482. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Shils, Edward (1982) The Constitution of Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen (2007) Theories of identity and the analysis of face. Journal of Pragmatics 39.4: 639–656. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(2009) Face, identity and interactional goals. In F. Bargiela-Chiappini, and M. Haugh (eds.), Face, Communication and Social Interaction. London: Equinox, pp. 137–154.Google Scholar
Stommel, Wyke (2008) Conversation analysis and community of practice as approaches to studying online community. Language@Internet 51: article 5. Retrieved June 23, 2013, from [URL].Google Scholar
Stubbe, Maria, Chris Lane, Jo Hilder, Elaine Vine, Bernadette Vine, Meredith Marra., Janet Holmes, and A. Weatherall (2003) Multiple discourse analyses of a workplace interaction. Discourse Studies 5.3: 351–388. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Su, His-Yao (2003) The multilingual and multi-orthographic Taiwan-based Internet: Creative uses of writing systems on college-affiliated BBSs. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 9(1): Retrieved June 23, 2013, from [URL]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007) The multilingual and multi-orthographic Taiwan-based Internet: Creative uses of writing systems on college-affiliated BBSs. In B. Danet, and S.C. Herring (eds.), Multilingual Internet: Language, Culture, and Communication Online. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 64–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009) Reconstructing Taiwanese and Taiwan guoyu on the Taiwan-based internet. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 19.2: 313–335. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thimm, Caja (2008) Technically-mediated interpersonal communication. In G. Antos, and E. Ventola (eds.), Handbook of Interpersonal Communication. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 331–354.Google Scholar
Tsai, I.-Ting (2007) Studying Apologies. A Comparison of DCT and Role-play Data. Unpublished MA thesis, National Sun Yat-sen University.Google Scholar
Vandergriff, Ilona (2013) Emotive communication online: A contextual analysis of computer-mediated communicative (CMC) cues. Journal of Pragmatics 511: 1–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vinagre, Margarita (2008) Politeness strategies in collaborative e-mail exchanges. Computers and Education, 50.3: 1022–1036. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Yin-han (2009) 'Posing into being': An exploratory study of Taiwanese girls self-portraiture online. In N. Carpentier, P. Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt, R. Kilborn, T. Olsson, H. Nieminen, E. Sundin, and K. Nordenstreng (eds.), Communicative Approaches to Politics and Ethics in Europe. Tartu, Estonia: Tartu University Press, pp. 179–191.Google Scholar
Watts, Richard J. (2003) Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Weber, H.L. (2011) Missed cues: How disputes can socialize virtual newcomers. Language@Internet 81: article 5: Retrieved June 23, 2013, from [URL]Google Scholar
Wu, Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2004) Stance in Talk: A Conversation Analysis of Mandarin Final Particles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Cited by (19)

Cited by 19 other publications

Huang, Xu & Yongping Ran
2024.  Nǐ kànzhe bàn ba: negotiating complaint solutions in e-shopping service encounters. Text & Talk 44:5 ► pp. 597 ff. DOI logo
Brown, Lucien, Soung-U Kim & Hyunji Kim
2023. The embodied enactment of politeness metapragmatics. Journal of Politeness Research 19:1 ► pp. 149 ff. DOI logo
Tsoumou, Jean Mathieu
2023. Impoliteness among multilingual Facebook users in Congo Brazzaville. Journal of Politeness Research 19:2 ► pp. 521 ff. DOI logo
Blitvich, Pilar Garcés-Conejos & Alex Georgakopoulou
2021. Analysing Identity. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 293 ff. DOI logo
Brown, Lucien & Pilar Prieto
2021. Gesture and Prosody in Multimodal Communication. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 430 ff. DOI logo
Kung, Fan-Wei
2021. The renegotiation and redefinition of Taiwanese students’ language and cultural identities in Mainland China. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 24:3 ► pp. 309 ff. DOI logo
Xie, Chaoqun & Francisco Yus
2021. Digitally Mediated Communication. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 454 ff. DOI logo
Xie, Chaoqun, Francisco Yus & Hartmut Haberland
2021. Introduction. In Approaches to Internet Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 318], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Ferenčík, Milan
2020. Politeness and social change: The metapragmatics of Slovakia's 2018 ʽdecent revolutionʼ. Journal of Pragmatics 169 ► pp. 165 ff. DOI logo
Xia, Jie
2020. “Loving you”: Use of metadiscourse for relational acts in WeChat public account advertisements. Discourse, Context & Media 37 ► pp. 100416 ff. DOI logo
Idemaru, Kaori, Bodo Winter & Lucien Brown
2019. Cross-cultural multimodal politeness: The phonetics of Japanese deferential speech in comparison to Korean. Intercultural Pragmatics 16:5 ► pp. 517 ff. DOI logo
Sandel, Todd L., Chuyue Ou, Dorji Wangchuk, Bei Ju & Miguel Duque
2019. Unpacking and describing interaction on Chinese WeChat: A methodological approach. Journal of Pragmatics 143 ► pp. 228 ff. DOI logo
Jucker, Andreas H., Heiko Hausendorf, Christa Dürscheid, Karina Frick, Christoph Hottiger, Wolfgang Kesselheim, Angelika Linke, Nathalie Meyer & Antonia Steger
2018. Doing space in face-to-face interaction and on interactive multimodal platforms. Journal of Pragmatics 134 ► pp. 85 ff. DOI logo
Kienpointner, Manfred
2018. Impoliteness online. Internet Pragmatics 1:2 ► pp. 329 ff. DOI logo
Kienpointner, Manfred
2020. Impoliteness online. In (Im)politeness and Moral Order in Online Interactions [Benjamins Current Topics, 107], ► pp. 125 ff. DOI logo
Matley, David
2018. “Let's see how many of you mother fuckers unfollow me for this”: The pragmatic function of the hashtag #sorrynotsorry in non-apologetic Instagram posts. Journal of Pragmatics 133 ► pp. 66 ff. DOI logo
Graham, Sage L. & Claire Hardaker
2017. (Im)politeness in Digital Communication. In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, ► pp. 785 ff. DOI logo
Ohashi, Jun & Wei-Lin Melody Chang
2017. (Im)politeness and Relationality. In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, ► pp. 257 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Topics and Settings in Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 247 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.